Abstract
In this paper we present a case study about a community of practice’s foundation and development among Italian teachers, researchers and university students who participated in a European project aimed at developing and testing innovative pedagogical models and technologies for collaborative knowledge building. Forty-five people (34 teachers, five researchers and six university students) participated in the community of adults that interacted for a school year both face to face and online. We analyzed interactions in order to study the roles, forms and distribution of participation in that community, and the content of teachers’ reflections about the activity. The analysis focuses particularly on different modalities of participation between expert teachers (involved in the project from the beginning) and novices, novice and expert being treated as relevant dimensions according to Wenger’s model. Conversations were transcribed and a qualitative analysis of face-to-face and online discussion performed. The diversity of roles and different modalities of participation between social factors involved in the community, in particular between novice and expert teachers, emerged from the analysis. In final focus groups, teachers underlined innovative potentialities as well as difficulties related to computer-supported collaborative learning, both in classroom activities and in teacher training. In these final focus groups, novice teachers participated in the community, becoming more competent and conscious partners in shared planning with the expert teachers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Data was collected 8 years ago, in schools were the use of computers was not well established. However in Italian primary schools today there are still similar problems in technological equipment, especially for Internet connection
References
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–70). Cambridge: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. Cambridge-London: Belknap.
European Commission (2000). A memorandum on lifelong learning. Commission staff working paper. Available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc/policy/memo_en.pdf
Fasulo, A. (1998). La ricerca etnografica [ethnographic research]. In L. Mannetti (Ed.), Strategie di ricerca in psicologia sociale (pp. 183–225). Rome: Carocci.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.
Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6, 199–220.
Kirschner, P., & Lai, K. W. (2007). Online communities of practice in education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(2), 127–31.
Kranzberg, M. (1985). The information age: Evolution or revolution? In B. R. Guile (Ed.), Information technologies and social transformation (pp. 35–54). Washington: National Academy of Engineering.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.
Ligorio, M. B., & Caravita, S. (2003). Apprendimento collaborativo: Dal gruppo alla rete [collaborative learning, from the group to the net]. Rome: ICA.
Ligorio, M. B., Cesareni, D., Mancini, I., Talamo, A. (2001). Collaboration, constructivism, community: The three “C” for the CSCL in Italy. In M. Lakkala, M. Rahikainen, K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), Perspectives of CSCL in Europe: A review. Report D1 of ITCOLE European project (pp. 59–70). Available online at: http://www.euro-cscl.org/site/itcole/ITCOLE_Final_Report.pdf
Ligorio, M. B., Cacciamani, S., & Cesareni, D. (2006). Blended learning. Dalla scuola dell’obbligo alla formazione adulta [blended learning, from school to adult training]. Rome: Carocci.
Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 72–81). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Muukkonen, H., Hakkarainen, K., & Lakkala, M. (1999). Collaborative technology for facilitating progressive inquiry: The future learning environments tools. In C. Hoadley & J. Roscelle (Eds.), Computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 406–15). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Piaget, J. (1937). La naissance de l’intelligence chez l’enfant [the birth of the child’s intelligence]. Neuchatel: Delaxhaux et Niestlé.
Pontecorvo, C. (1999). Manuale di psicologia dell’educazione [manual of educational psychology]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–83.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stewart, T. (1997). Intellectual capital. New York: Currency/Doubleday.
Veermans, M., & Cesareni, D. (2005). The nature of the discourse in web-based collaborative learning environments: Case studies from four different countries. Computers in Education, 45, 316–36.
Vygotskij, L. S. (1934). Mislenie i rec’, Gosudartsvennoe Social’no-Ekonomiceskoe Izdatel’stvo, Moska- Leningrad [thought and language]. Chicago: MIT. 1962.
Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models, representation and the scientific understanding. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zucchermaglio, C. (2003). Contesti di vita quotidiana, interazione e discorso [everyday life context, interaction and discourse]. In G. Mantovani & A. Spagnolli (Eds.), Metodi qualitativi in psicologia [qualitative methods in psychology] (pp. 47–72). Bologna: Il Mulino.
Zucchermaglio, C., & Alby, F. (2005). Gruppi e tecnologie al lavoro [groups and technologies at work]. Rome: Carocci.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cesareni, D., Martini, F. & Mancini, I. Building a community among teachers, researchers and university students. A blended approach to training. Computer Supported Learning 6, 625–646 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9126-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9126-8