Skip to main content
Log in

Sharing and cultivating tacit knowledge in an online learning environment

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on knowledge cultivation often focuses on explicit forms of knowledge. However, knowledge can also take a tacit form—a form that is often difficult or impossible to tease out, even when it is considered critical in an educational context. A review of the literature revealed that few studies have examined tacit knowledge issues in online learning environments. The purpose of this study was to develop a greater understanding of the conditions and processes that help promote the sharing or cultivation of tacit knowledge in a formal online course setting. Using naturalistic inquiry as the methodology of this study, an online graduate business course offered at a private, non-profit United States-based university was purposively selected as the research site. The study found that the online course encouraged processes and created conditions consistent with Nonaka‘s model of knowledge creation and the concept of ba (or shared context)—encouraging students to share, and to construct knowledge through socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization. The results suggest that purposefully developing a ba-like environment may be a useful approach to facilitating online learning, creating a strong potential to support learning processes necessary for students to cultivate tacit knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arvaja, M. (2007). Contextual perspective in analysing collaborative knowledge construction of two small groups in web-based discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 2(2–3), 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. H., III. (1998). The importance of tacit knowledge in strategic liberations and decisions. Management Decision, 36(9), 589–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann, E. N., & Simmonds, P. G. (1997). Strategic decision making: The influence of CEO experience and use of tacit knowledge. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(4), 454–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann, E. N., & Anthony, W. P. (2002). Tacit knowledge and strategic decision making. Group & Organization Management, 27(4), 436–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham Shum, S. (1998). Negotiating the construction of organisational memories. In U. M. Borghoff & R. Pareschi (Eds.), Information technology for knowledge management (pp. 55–78 (Reprinted from: Journal of Universal Computer Science, 53 (58), 1997, 1899–1928)). Berlin: Springer.

  • Eisner, E. W. (1994). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goguen, J. A. (1997). Toward a social, ethical theory of information. In G. C. Bowker, S. L. Star, W. Turner, & L. Gasser (Eds.), Social science, technical systems and cooperative work: Beyond the great divide (pp. 27–56). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, D., & Bowman, M. (2003). Constructing knowledge at a distance: The learner in context. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), The handbook of distance education (pp. 169–180). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (2002). The theory & practice of teaching. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, A., Bruce, B., Haythornthwaite, C., Burbules, N., Wade, J., Bowker, G., et al. (2000). Modeling distributed knowledge processes in next generation multidisciplinary alliances. Information Systems Frontiers, 2(3/4), 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, P., & Varian, H. R. (2004). How much information. Retrieved September 10, 2004, from http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/how-much-info-2003

  • Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muukkonen, H., & Lakkala, M. (2009). Exploring metaskills of knowledge-creating inquiry in higher education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 4, 187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. F. (2001). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. New York: Monthly Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Nishiguchi, T. (2001). Knowledge emergence: Social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33, 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Byosiere, P. (2001). A theory of organizational knowledge creation: Understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 491–517). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge; towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & K. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(3), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1). Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/79/152

  • Simpson, D. J., Jackson, M. J. B., & Aycock, J. C. (2005). John Dewey and the art of teaching: Toward reflective and imaginative practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrtic, T. (1985). Doing naturalistic research into education organizations. In Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Organization theory and inquiry: The paradigm revolution (pp. 185–220). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2003). Meaning and interpretation in collaboration. Paper presented at the Designing for change in networked learning environments: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL ’03), Bergen, Norway. In Stahl, G. (2006) Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT. Pp. 331–346.

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1999). Tacit knowledge in professional practice: Researcher and practitioner perspectives. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, H., & Nonaka, I. (2004). Hitotsubashi on knowledge management. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons (Asia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tee, M. Y. (2005). Sharing and cultivating tacit knowledge in an e-learning environment: A naturalistic study. Lawrence: University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1998). Research directions for knowledge management. California Management Review, 40(3), 289–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A., & Stappenbeck, G. (2002). The business strategy game (Version 7th ed., version 7.20 (w/disc)). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Nestor-Baker, N. (2004). The tacit knowledge of productive scholars in education. Teachers College Record, 106(7), 1484–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (2003). Do we really understand tacit knowledge? [Electronic source: http://is.lse.ac.uk/Events/ESRCseminars/tsoukas.pdf]. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Malden: Blackwell Pub.

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurman, R. S. (1989). Information anxiety (1st ed.). New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Garcia and his students for making this study possible as well as the peer debriefers and reviewers, whose insightful comments and probing questions greatly improved the quality and readability of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meng Yew Tee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tee, M.Y., Karney, D. Sharing and cultivating tacit knowledge in an online learning environment. Computer Supported Learning 5, 385–413 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9095-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9095-3

Keywords

Navigation