Skip to main content
Log in

Revealing preconditions for trustful collaboration in CSCL

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyses preconditions for trust in virtual learning environments. The concept of trust is discussed with reference to cases reporting trust in cyberspace and through a philosophical clarification holding that trust in the form of self-surrender is a common characteristic of all human co-existence. In virtual learning environments, self-surrender might fail, due to a setting that affords strategic communication and impression management. To obtain the kind of unconditional commitment necessary for learning, one might benefit from the insights from open-source communities, in which self-articulation of goals and volunteerism promote productivity. Balancing free will in connection with study initiatives with inquiry teaching methods might encourage a practice which favours mastery-oriented learning strategies and the seeking of knowledge for its own sake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arendt, H. (1973). Remarks by Hannah Arendt, Advisory Council, Princeton University, Princeton.

  • Aristotle, transl. by L. H. G. Greenwood (1909). Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge: University Press.

  • Barnett, R. (2007). A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based peer production and virtue. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 394–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Laat, P. B. (2005). Trusting virtual trust. Ethics and Information Technology, 7, 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning—cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, G. (2002). Presence in “Teleland”. In K. Rudestam & J. Schoenholtz-Read (Eds.), A handbook on teaching in the virtual classroom: A guide to excellence in online education (pp. 29–53). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (1993). Truth and method. London: Sheed & Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J.-W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(3), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R., & Courtright, C. (2004). Group behaviour and learning in electronic formus: A socio-technical approach. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 91–120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, R., & Bayne, S. (2005). Screen or monitor? Issues of surveillance and disciplinary power in online learning environments. In R. Land & S. Bayne (Eds.), Education in cyberspace (pp. 165–179). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levey, M. D. (2007). No time to think: Reflections on information technology and contemplative scholarship. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power: Two works. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Løgstrup, K. E. (1997). The ethical demand. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1999). After virtue. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (2004). Trust, reliance and the Internet. Analyse und Kritik, 26, 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platon, transl. with notes by C. C. W. Taylor (1991). Protagoras. Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Salmon, G. (2005). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, L. (2000). The nature and purpose of online conversations: A brief synthesis of current research. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(1), 19–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, E. (2002). Distributed CSCL—a situated, collaborative tapestry. In L. Dircknick-Holmfeld & B. Fibiger (Eds.), Learning in virtual environments (pp. 165–192). Gylling: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Gerdes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerdes, A. Revealing preconditions for trustful collaboration in CSCL. Computer Supported Learning 5, 345–353 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9090-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9090-8

Keywords

Navigation