Skip to main content
Log in

Application of an index of sediment connectivity in a lowland area

  • Sediments, Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Sediment connectivity at the landscape scale has gained interest in the last few decades. Distributed approaches, such as topographic indices, are widely used to evaluate this connectivity. However, most of the research efforts are concentrated in mountainous areas while little work has been done in lowland areas where evidence of high connectivity has been reported. The objectives of this study are as follows: (i) to integrate landscape infiltration/runoff properties in the assessment of connectivity to account for lowland processes and (ii) to apply this approach to a large territory with both mountainous and lowland areas.

Materials and methods

The topographic index of connectivity (IC) of Borselli et al. (2008) was computed for the Loire–Brittany River Basin (>105 km2). A distributed parameter (IDPR) that reflects landscape infiltration and saturation properties due to underlying geological formation characteristics is introduced. We integrated this parameter in a revised index (IC revised ) as an indicator of landscape hydrologic connectivity. Results at the pixel scale are aggregated at the watershed scale.

Results and discussion

Two maps of connectivity are produced, considering the initial IC and the revised form (IC revised ). As expected, the IC gives the highest connectivity in the steepest areas and does not reflect the existing connectivity in lowland areas. On the contrary, the IC revised computed in this study profoundly modifies the sediment connectivity values. These changes are evenly distributed over the entire territory and affected 51.5 % of the watersheds. As a result, we obtained a better correlation between calculated connectivity and the observed drainage density (which reflects the actual connections between hillslopes and rivers) in areas where slopes are gentle (<7 %).

Conclusions

Topographic indices do not reflect the real sediment connectivity in lowland areas, but their adaptation by considering runoff processes of such areas is possible. The IC revised presents an interesting perspective to define other highly connected areas at the country scale, as 17 % of the French territory is characterized by very gentle slopes with high runoff capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali GA, Birkel C, Tetzlaff D, Soulsby C, McDonnell JJ, Tarolli P (2013) A comparison of wetness indices for the prediction of observed connected saturated areas under contrasting conditions: wetness indices for the prediction of connected saturated areas. Earth Surf Process Landf 39:399–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoine M, Javaux M, Bielders C (2009) What indicators can capture runoff-relevant connectivity properties of the micro-topography at the plot scale? Adv Water Res 32:1297–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baartman JEM, Masselink R, Keesstra SD, Temme AJAM (2013) Linking landscape morphological complexity and sediment connectivity. Earth Surf Process Landf 38:1457–1471

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisantino T, Bingner R, Chouaib W, Gentile F, Trisorio Liuzzi G (2015) Estimation of runoff, peak discharge and sediment load at the event scale in a medium-size Mediterranean watershed using the Annagnps model. Land Degrad Dev 26:340–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borselli L, Cassi P, Torri D (2008) Prolegomena to sediment and flow connectivity in the landscape: a GIS and field numerical assessment. Catena 75:268–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken LJ, Croke J (2007) The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff-dominated geomorphic systems. Hydrol Process 21:1749–1763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken LJ, Wainwright J, Ali GA, Tetzlaff D, Smith MW, Reaney SM, Roy AG (2013) Concepts of hydrological connectivity: research approaches, pathways and future agendas. Earth-Sci Rev 119:17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken LJ, Turnbull L, Wainwright J, Bogaart B (2015) Sediment connectivity: a framework for understanding sediment transfer at multiple scales. Earth Surf Process Landf 40:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brierley G, Fryirs K, Jain V (2006) Landscape connectivity: the geographic basis of geomorphic applications. Area 38:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli M, Trevisani S, Comiti F, Marchi L (2013) Geomorphometric assessment of spatial sediment connectivity in small alpine catchments. Geomorphology 188:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerdà A, Doerr SH (2010) The effect of ant mounds on overland flow and soil erodibility following a wildfire in eastern Spain. Ecohydrol 3:392–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerdan O, Govers G, Le Bissonnais Y, Van Oost K, Poesen J, Saby N, Gobin A, Vacca A, Quinton J, Auerswald K, Klik A, Kwaad FJPM, Raclot D, Ionita I, Rejman J, Rousseva S, Muxart T, Roxo MJ, Dostal T (2010) Rates and spatial variations of soil erosion in Europe: a study based on erosion plot data. Geomorphology 122:167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chartin C, Evrard O, Onda Y, Patin J, Lefèvre I, Ottlé C, Ayrault S, Lepage H, Bonté P (2013) Tracking the early dispersion of contaminated sediment along rivers draining the Fukushima radioactive pollution plume. Anthropocene 1:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croke J, Mockler S, Fogarty P, Takken I (2005) Sediment concentration changes in runoff pathways from a forest road network and the resultant spatial pattern of catchment connectivity. Geomorphology 68:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darboux F, Davy P, Gascuel-Odoux C, Huang C (2001) Evolution of soil surface roughness and flowpath connectivity in overland flow experiments. Catena 46:125–540

  • Degan F, Cerdan O, Salavador-Blanes S (2015) Cartographie de l’aléa érosif sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne. Technical report. Agence de l’Eau Loire-Bretagne, laboratoire GéoHydrosystèmes COntinentaux de l’Université François Rabelais de Tours, Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, Orléans, France

  • Delmas M (2011) Origine des exports de sédiments fluviatiles: prise en compte de l’hétérogénéité spatiale des versants. Unpublished PhD thesis, Université Paris VI, Paris, France

  • Delmas D, Cerdan O, Mouchel J-M, Garcin M (2009) A method for developing a large scale sediment yield index for european river basins. J Soils Sediments 9:613–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Haen K, Dusar B, Verstraeten G, Degryse P, De Brue H (2013) A sediment fingerprinting approach to understand the geomorphic coupling in an eastern Mediterranean mountainous river catchment. Geomorphology 197:64–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupas R, Delmas M, Dorioz J-M, Garnier J, Moatar F, Gascuel-Odoux C (2015) Assessing the impact of agricultural pressures on N and P loads and eutrophication risk. Ecol Ind 48:396–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foerster S, Wilczok C, Brosinsky A, Segl K (2014) Assessment of sediment connectivity from vegetation cover and topography using remotely sensed data in a dryland catchment in the Spanish Pyrenees. J Soils Sediments 14:1982–2000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foucher A, Salvador-Blanes S, Desmet M, Simonneau A, Chapron E, Evrard O, Courpt T, Cerdan O, Lefèvre I, Adriaensen H, Lecompte F (2015) Increase in after agricultural intensification: evidence from a lowland basin in France. Anthropocene. doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2015.02.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryirs KA, Brierley GJ, Preston NJ, Kasai M (2007) Buffers, barriers and blankets: the (dis)connectivity of catchment-scale sediment cascades. Catena 70:49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriels D, Ghekiere G, Schiettecatte W, Rottiers I (2003) Assessment of USLE cover-management C-factors for 40 crop rotation systems on arable farms in the Kemmelbeek watershed, Belgium. Soil Till Res 74:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay A, Cerdan O, Delmas M, Desmet M (2014) Variability of suspended sediment yields within the Loire river basin (France). J Hydrol 519:1225–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Wu P, Zhao X, Wang J, Shi Y (2014) Effects of land use on soil moisture variation in a semi-arid catchment: implications for land and agricultural water management. Land Degrad Dev 25:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumiere SJ, Le Bissonnais Y, Raclot D, Cheviron B (2011) Vegetated filter effects on sedimentological connectivity of agricultural catchments in erosion modelling: a review. Earth Surf Process Landf 36:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haregeweyn N, Poesen J, Verstraeten G, Govers G, de Vente J, Nyssen J, Deckers J, Moeyersons J (2013) Assessing the performance of a spatially distributed soil erosion and sediment delivery model (WATEM/SEDEM) in Northern Ethiopia. Land Degrad Dev 24:188–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckmann T, Schwanghart W (2013) Geomorphic coupling and sediment connectivity in an alpine catchment – Exploring sediment cascades using graph theory. Geomorphology 182:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 56:275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesel J, Schmalz B, Fohrer N (2009) SEPAL-a simple GIS-based tool to estimate sediment pathways in lowland catchments. Adv Geosci 21:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesel J, Fohrer N, Schmalz B, White MJ (2010) Incorporating landscape depressions and tile drainages of a northern german lowland catchment into a semi-distributed model. Hydrol Process 24:1472–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby M (2014) Do not only connect: a model of infiltration-excess overland flow based on simulation. Earth Surf Process Landf 39:952–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landemaine V, Gay A, Cerdan O, Salvador-Blanes S, Rodrigues S (2015) Morphological evolution of a rural headwater stream after channelisation. Geomorphology 230:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane SN, Reaney SM, Heathwaite AL (2009) Representation of landscape hydrological connectivity using a topographically driven surface flow index. Water Resour Res 45, W08423. doi:10.1029/2008WR007336

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bissonnais Y, Montier C, Jamagne M, Daroussin J, King D (2002) Mapping erosion risk for cultivated soil in France. Catena 46:207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bissonnais Y, Cerdan O, Lecomte V, Benkhadra H, Souchère V, Martin P (2005a) Variability of soil surface characteristics influencing runoff and interrill erosion. Catena 62(2–3):111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bissonnais Y, Jamagne M, Lambert JJ, Le Bas C, Daroussin J, King D, Cerdan C, Léonard J, Bresson LM, Jones R (2005b) Pan-European soil crusting and erodibility assessment from the European soil geographical database using pedotransfer rules. Adv Environ Monit Model 2:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Vicente M, Navas A, Gaspar L, Machín J (2013) Advanced modelling of runoff and soil redistribution for agricultural systems: the SERT model. Agric Water Manag 125:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardhel V, Frantar P, Uhan J, Andjelov M (2004) Index of development and persistence of the river networks (IDPR) as a component of regional groundwater vulnerability assessment in Slovenia. In Proceedings on the International Conference on Groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping, Ustron, Poland, pp 15–18

  • Mardhel V, Gravier A (2006) Carte de vulnérabilité simplifiée des eaux souterraines du bassin Loire Bretagne. Technical Report BRGM/RP-54553-FR, BRGM, Paris

  • Mekonnen M, Keesstra SD, Stroosnijder L, Baartman JEM, Maroulis J (2014) Soil conservation through sediment trapping: a review. Land Degrad Dev. doi:10.1002/ldr.2308

    Google Scholar 

  • Meßenzehl K, Hoffmann T, Dikau R (2014) Sediment connectivity in the high-alpine valley of Val Müschauns, Swiss National Park - linking geomorphic field mapping with geomorphometric modelling. Geomorphology 221:215–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novara A, Gristina L, Saladino SS, Santoro A, Cerdà A (2011) Soil erosion assessment on tillage and alternative soil managements in a Sicilian vineyard. Soil Till Res 117:140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid SC, Lane SN, Montgomery DR, Brookes CJ (2007) Does hydrological connectivity improve modelling of coarse sediment delivery in upland environments? Geomorphology 90:263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook 703. US Department of Agriculture, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell MA, Walling DE, Hodgkinson RA (2001) Suspended sediment sources in two small lowland agricultural catchments in the UK. J Hydrol 252:1–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sougnez N, van Wesemael B, Vanacker V (2011) Low erosion rates measured for steep, sparsely vegetated catchments in southeast Spain. Catena 84:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oost K, Govers G, Desmet P (2000) Evaluating the effects of changes in landscape structure on soil erosion by water and tillage. Landsc Ecol 15:577–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigiak O, Borselli L, Newham LTH, McInnes J, Roberts AM (2012) Comparison of conceptual landscape metrics to define hillslope-scale sediment delivery ratio. Geomorphology 138:74–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt J, Soille P, de Jager A, Rimaviciuté E, Mehl W, Foisneau S, Bodis K, Dusart J, Paracchini ML, Haastrup P, Bamps C (2007) A pan-European river and catchment database. European Commission, EUR 22920 EN – Joint Research Centre – Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, p 120

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE (1983) The sediment delivery problem. J Hydrol 65:209–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE, Collins AL (2008) The catchment sediment budget as a management tool. Environ Sci Policy 11:136–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western AW, Blöschl G, Grayson RB (2001) Toward capturing hydrologically significant connectivity in spatial patterns. Water Resour Res 37:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses-a guide to conservation planning. Agricultural Handbook 537. US Department of Agriculture, Washington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Loire Brittany river basin agency (AELB), and the authors would like to thank Xavier Bourrain and Jean-Noël Gautier for funding the VERSEAU project “Transfert de particules des VERSants aux masses d’EAU.” The authors would also like to thank Artemi Cerdà and an anonymous reviewer for their interesting comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurore Gay.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Rajith Mukundan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gay, A., Cerdan, O., Mardhel, V. et al. Application of an index of sediment connectivity in a lowland area. J Soils Sediments 16, 280–293 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1235-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1235-y

Keywords

Navigation