Skip to main content
Log in

Changed surface roughness by wind erosion accelerates water erosion

  • Soils, Sec 2 • Global Change, Environ Risk Assess, Sustainable Land Use • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Wind and water erosion are two dominant types of erosion that lead to losses of soil and water; understanding their interactions is important for estimating soil quality and environmental impacts in regions where both types of erosion occur. This study was devoted to investigate the characteristics of the surface roughness, runoff, and erosion rates under a one-way wind erosion-rain erosion sequence.

Materials and methods

The experimental setup included a wind tunnel and a rain simulator. Soil samples were collected from a sloped wasteland in Wuqi County, northern Shaanxi province, China. This experiment was conducted with wind erosion firstly and water erosion thereafter, with three wind speeds (0 [control], 11, and 14 m s−1) and rain intensities (60, 80, and 100 mm h−1). The physical properties of top soil samples (0–1 cm) were analyzed after each wind erosion test. The soil surface roughness (mm), runoff (mm h−1), and erosion (g m−2 h−1) rates were calculated after wind and water erosion. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the relationships between surface roughness, runoff rate, erosion rate, and erosion factors.

Results and discussion

Wind erosion increased the sand content in the top 1 cm of soil in simulation area by 6.51–6.74 % and decreased clay and silt contents by 7.65–9.15 and 17.94–18.15 %, respectively, relative to the original surface soil. Compared with the control, the wind erosion treatments increased the surface roughness, runoff, and erosion rates by 8.12–78.06, 4.5–21.69, and 7.25–38.97 %, respectively, at wind speeds of 11 and 14 m s−1. The relationship between runoff and rain duration under different rain intensities after wind erosion were described well by a logarithmic function, whereas a large degree of variation was observed in erosion rate. The increased values of runoff and erosion rates in the different treatments, however, became weaker with increasing rain intensity, probably due to the much higher energy of the rain at the highest intensity, which decreased the proportional influence of wind erosion on the microtopography of the soil. Linear regression showed that surface roughness, runoff, and erosion rates were positively associated with wind speed and rain intensity (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Wind erosion clearly has the capacity to intensify water erosion. Results demonstrate the need for controlling of wind erosion to reduce water erosion in regions where both types of erosion occur. Moreover, a consideration of the impact of wind erosion on water erosion is required for effective erosion prediction in these regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2004) A review of wind-driven rain research in building science. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 92:1079–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blocken B, Poesen J, Carmeliet J (2006) Impact of wind on the spatial distribution of rain over micro-scale topography-numerical modelling and experimental verification. Hydrol Process 20:345–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard JE, Livingstone L (2002) Interactions between aeolian and fluvial systems in dryland environments. Area 34:8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremers NHDT, Dijkvan PM, Roode APJ, Verzandvoort MA (1996) Spatial and temporal variability of soil surface roughness and the application in hydrological and soil erosion modeling. Hydrol Process 10:1035–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darboux F, Huang CH (2005) Does soil surface roughness increase or decrease water and particle Transfers? Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:748–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong ZB, Qian GQ (2007) Characterizing the height profile of the flux of wind-eroded sediment. Environ Geol 51:835–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkerley DL, Brown KJ (1999) Banded vegetation near Broken Hill, Australia: significance of surface roughness and soil physical properties. Catena 37:75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekhtesasi MR, Sepehr A (2009) Investigation of wind erosion process for estimation, prevention, and control of DSS in Yazd-Ardakan plain. Environ Monit Assess 159:267–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erpul G, Norton LD, Gabriels D (2002) Raindrop-induced and wind-driven soil particle transport. Catena 47:227–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farouk EB, Maingue M, Robinson C (2000) Fluvio-aeolian dynamics in the north-eastern Sahara: the relationship between fluvial/aeolian systems and ground-water concentration. J Arid Environ 44:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira AD, Farimani A, Sousa ACM (2011) Numerical and experimental analysis of wind erosion on a sinusoidal pile. Environ Fluid Mech 11:167–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes L, Arrue JL, Lopez MV, Sterk G, Richard D, Gracia R, Sabre JM, Gaudichet A, Frangi JP (2003) Wind erosion in a semiarid area of Spain: the welsons project. Catena 52:235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez JA, Nearing MA (2005) Runoff and sediment losses from rough and smooth soil surfaces in a laboratory experiment. Catena 59:253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo CJ, An XQ, Wu M, Hong YL (2010) Simulation experiment of erosion and sediment yield of spoil ground. Soil Water Conserv China 3:29–31 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Helming K, Romkens MJM, Prasad SN (1998) Surface roughness related processes of runoff and soil loss: a flume study. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:243–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huo Z, Shao MA, Horton R (2008) Impact of gully on soil moisture of shrubland in wind-water erosion crisscross region of the Loess Plateau. Pedosphere 18:674–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larney FJ, Bullock MS, Janzen HH, Ellert BH, Olson ECS (1998) Wind erosion effects on nutrient redistribution and soil productivity. J Soil Water Conserv 53:133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez MV (1998) Wind erosion in agricultural soil: an example of limited supply of particles available for erosion. Catena 33:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery B, Swan J, Schumacher T, Jones A (1995) Physical properties of selected soils by erosion class. J Soil Water Conserv 50:306–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Li QY, Cai GQ, Fang HY (2010) Advances in complex erosion of wind and water and ecological restoration. Prog Geogr 29:65–72 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu GB, Xu MX, Ritsema C (2003) A study of soil surface characteristics in a small watershed in the hilly, gullied area on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Catena 54:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JE, Wang ZL, Yang XM, Jiao N, Shen N, Ji PF (2013) The impact of natural polymer derivatives on sheet erosion on experimental loess hillslope. Soil Tillage Res 139:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv P, Dong ZB (2006) Wind tunnel experiments on the turbulent transmission over the near surface layer of different surfaces. Environ Geol 50:983–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv W, Li SQ, Lei TW, Li FH (2014) Effects of polyacrylamide application on rainfall runoff in composite slopes of loessial soil. Trans CSAE 30:71–79 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore DC, Singer MJ (1990) Crust formation effects on erosion processes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1117–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romkens MJM, Helming K, Prasad SN (2001) Soil erosion under different rainfall intensities, surface roughness, and soil water regimes. Catena 46:103–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Liu LY, Yan P (2006) A review on complex erosion by wind and water research. J Geogr Sci 16:231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Liu LY, Yan P, Cao T (2005) A review of soil erodibility in water and wind erosion reaserch. J Geogr Sci 15:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su YZ, Zhao HL, Zhang TH, Li YL (2002) Processes and characteristics of soil degradation in rainfed farmland in the Horqin sandy land. J Soil Water Conserv 16:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney MR, Loope DB (2001) Holocene dunesourced alluvial fans in the Nebraska Sand Hills. Geomorphology 38:31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang KL (1990) Regional characteristics of soil erosion and its control approaches on Loess Plateau. Science Press, Beijing, pp 42–103 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang KL (2000) Importance and urgency of harnessing the interlocked area with both water and wind erosion in the Loess Plateau. Soil Water Conserv China 11:11–12, 17 (in Chinese)

  • Visser SM, Sterk G, Ribolzi O (2004) Techniques for simultaneous quantification of wind and water erosion in semi-arid regions. J Arid Environ 59:699–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner LE (1992) PMP: Profile Meter Program, documentation manual. United States Department of Agriculture pp. 27–2.8

  • Wang L, Shi ZH, Wu GL, Fang NF (2014) Freeze/thaw and soil moisture effects on wind erosion. Geomorphology 207:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zha X, Tang KL, Zhang PC (1997) Monitoring and research methods on eco-environment evolution in the crisscross region of water-wind erosion. Bull Soil Water Conserv 17:6–9 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CL, Zou XY, Yang P, Dong YX, Li S, Wei XH, Yang S, Pan XH (2007a) Wind tunnel test and 137Cs tracing study on wind erosion of several soils in Tibet. Soil Tillage Res 94:269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GH, Liu GB, Wang GL, Wang YX (2011) Effects of vegetation cover and rainfall intensity on sediment-bound nutrient loss, size composition and volume fractal dimension of sediment particles. Pedosphere 21:676–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GS, Chan KY, Oates A, Heenan DP, Huang GB (2007b) Relationship between soil structure and runoff/soil after 24 years of conservation tillage. Soil Tillage Res 92:122–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao HL, Yi XY, Zhou RL, Zhao XY, Zhang TH, Drake S (2006) Wind erosion and sand accumulation effects on soil properties in Horqin Sandy Farmland, Inner Mongolia. Catena 65:71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu BB, Li ZB, Li P, Liu GB, Xue S (2010) Soil erodibility, microbial biomass, and physical-chemical property changes during long-term natural vegetation restoration: a case study in the Loess Plateau, China. Ecol Res 25:531–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobeck TM, Onstad CA (1987) Tillage and rainfall effects on random roughness: a review. Soil Tillage Res 9:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou YR, Zhang ZX, Wang CY, Zhao XL, Liu B (2003) Analysis on the distribution characteristics of the interleaving zones of water/wind erosion in China. Arid Zone Res 3:67–70 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41171422 and 40971174), the Strategic Guide Special Branch Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA05050504), and the Talent Cultivation Project: Light of the West of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The authors thank Dr. Matthew Alan Bowker in Northern Arizona University for his significant comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingxiang Xu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Fanghua Hao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tuo, D., Xu, M., Gao, L. et al. Changed surface roughness by wind erosion accelerates water erosion. J Soils Sediments 16, 105–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1171-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1171-x

Keywords

Navigation