Skip to main content
Log in

Status update on LCA studies and networking in Tanzania

  • CORNER: UNEP/SETAC LIFE CYCLE INITIATIVE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Life cycle assessment (LCA) has become a standard for assessing what impacts do products and/or services have throughout their entire life cycle. Since the inception of LCA technique, studies have been conducted in different parts of the world, including Tanzania. This study describes the current status of LCA, capacities, and networking in Tanzania. The study has identified what has already been done and potential research gaps that could be explored in future LCA studies.

Methods

A state-of-the-art review was conducted on published articles, reports, and other materials on LCA in Tanzania (covering a time frame of 1990–2015) which were searched on databases of scientific research and the general internet using a combination of keywords: “life cycle assessment and Tanzania,” “LCA and Tanzania,” and “life cycle assessment and LCA and Tanzania.” Reviews were on current status, research gaps, and the need for future research. Information related to education or training activities and networking were also gathered and reviewed.

Results and discussion

Literature review has revealed that in Tanzania the first LCA study was published in 2007. Few articles and reports were identified in which LCA technique was used mainly for academic research in agriculture, electricity generation, charcoal, biodiesel production from jatropha oil, bioethanol production from sugarcane molasses, production of biofuels from pyrolysis of wood, and production of charcoal from sawmill residues. The very small number of LCA studies conducted in the country could be due to the lack of skilled personnel, lack of local data, and lack of research funds. Tanzania Life Cycle Assessment Network was created to link LCA practitioners and to promote and support further development of LCA in the country. Also, LCA potential is huge yet to be fully explored.

Conclusions

This state-of-the-art review is the first of its kind that summarizes and puts together all LCA studies in Tanzania. Most studies faced the challenge of lack of local data, which resulted to the use of secondary data from the literature. In LCA, the use of data from different geographical conditions could cause bias of the results and consequently could affect the decision made or to be made from the study. In this regard, the study recommends the establishment of national LCI database to solve this problem. Also, most studies covered only few impact categories prompting for full LCA studies in future studies. The study also found that there is a need to establish regular LCA training and courses for capacity development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Azapagic A (1999) Life cycle assessment and its application to process selection, design and optimisation. Chem Eng J 73:1–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azapagic A, Clift R (1999) The application of life cycle assessment to process optimisation. Comput Chem Eng 23:1509–1526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørn A, Owsianiak M, Laurent A, Molin C, Westh TB, Hauschild MZ (2013) Mapping and characterization of LCA networks. Int J Life Cycle Ass 18:812–827

  • Bouwman AF, Boumans LJM, Batjes NH (2002) Modeling global annual N2O and NO emissions from fertilized fields. Global Biogeochem Cy 16(28–21):28–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JS, Fava JA (2006) Life-cycle assessment practitioner survey—summary of results. J Ind Ecol 10:12–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F, Mdoe N (2003) Livelihoods and rural poverty reduction in Tanzania. World Dev 31:1367–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmehag E, Torosian R (2012) Life cycle assessment of an ocean energy power plant: Evaluation and analysis of the energy payback time with comparison between Sweden and Tanzania. B.Sc. Project, School of Technology and Science, University of Skövde

  • Eshton B, Katima JHY (2015) Carbon footprints of production and use of liquid biofuels in Tanzania. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:672–680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eshton B, Katima J, Kituyi E (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions from fuel ethanol production using sugarcane molasses in Tanzania. In: New Zealand Life Cycle Assessment Conference, March 28–29 2012

  • Eshton B, Katima JHY, Kituyi E (2013) Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances of jatropha biodiesel as an alternative fuel in Tanzania. Biomass Bioenerg 58:95–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felix M (2015) Future prospect and sustainability of wood fuel resources in Tanzania. Renew Sust Energ Rev 51:856–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felix M, Gheewala SH (2012) Environmental assessment of electricity production in Tanzania. Energy Sustain Dev 16:439–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felix M, Gheewala SH (2014) Environmental toxicity potential from electricity generation in Tanzania. Int J Life Cycle Ass 19:1424–1432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finkbeiner M, Inaba A, Tan RBH, Christiansen K, Kluppel HJ (2006) The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. Int J Life Cycle Ass 11:80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustain 2:3309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden G et al. (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 91:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant MJ, Booth A (2009) A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf Libr J 26:91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haug R, Hella J (2013) The art of balancing food security: securing availability and affordability of food in Tanzania. Food Security 5:415–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild M, Jeswiet J, Alting L (2005) From life cycle assessment to sustainable production: status and perspectives. Cirp Ann-Manuf Techn 54:535–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Initiative USLC (2012) Greening the economy through life cycle thinking: ten years of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. sl: United Nations Environment Programmme, 2012. ISBN 978–92–807-3268-9

  • IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds). IGES, Japan

  • Itkonen CL (2013) Life Cycle Assessment and Comparison of Power, Light, and Content Options for the SunEdu Project. BSc. Thesis, Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences

  • Komba C, Muchapondwa E (2015) Adaptation to Climate Change by Smallholder Farmers in Tanzania. EfD Discuss Pap Ser EfD DP 15–12

  • Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Schebek L (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies-challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1581–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyele SV (2007) Life cycle assessment of biofuel production from wood pyrolysis technology. Educ. Res Rev 2:141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills A et al. (2012) Equity in financing and use of health care in Ghana, South Africa, and Tanzania: implications for paths to universal coverage. Lancet 380:126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwakalila S (2006) Socio-economic impacts of irrigated agriculture in Mbarali District of south-West Tanzania. Phys Chem Earth 31:876–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyanga A, Kessler A, Tenge A (2016) Key socio-economic factors influencing sustainable land management investments in the west Usambara highlands, Tanzania. Land Use Policy 51:260–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauw K, Thurlow J (2011) Agricultural growth, poverty, and nutrition in Tanzania. Food Policy 36:795–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plassmann K, Brentrup F, Lammel J (2014) Trade-offs between agricultural product carbon footprints and land use: a case study from Tanzania. In: Schenck R, Huizenga D (eds) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2014), San Francisco, USA, October 8–10, 2014, pp 1016–1021

  • Quantis, Gmünder S, Zah R, Rainhard J, Charron-Doucet F (2014) Transforming Tanzania’s Charcoal Sector—Life Cycle Assessment Component. Quantis Switzerland/Germany, glaTec Technology Center

  • Sabai MM, Egmond van ELC, Cox MGDM, Mato RR, Lichtenberg JJN (2009) Applicability of LCA tool for building materials produced from construction and demolition waste: Case of Tanzania. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Seminar on Environment & Architecture (10th SENVAR) and the 1st International Conference on Engineering, Environment, Economic, Safety & Health (1st CONVEEESH), Manado, Indonesia

  • Senthil Kumaran D, Ong SK, Tan RBH, Nee AYC (2001) Environmental life cycle cost analysis of products. Environ Manage Health 12:260–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheya MS, Mushi SJS (2000) The state of renewable energy harnessing in Tanzania. Appl Energy 65:257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjolie HK (2012) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from households and industry by the use of charcoal from sawmill residues in Tanzania. J Clean Prod 27:109–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valdivia S, Bajaj S, Sonnemann G, Quiros A, Ugaya CML (2015) Mainstreaming life cycle sustainability Management in Rapidly Growing and Emerging Economies through Capacity-Building. In: Sonnemann G, Margni M (eds) Life Cycle Management. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 263–277

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Valdivia S et al (2011) Cooperation and Capacity Building. In: Sonnemann G, Vigon BW (eds) Global Guidance Principles for Life Cycle Assessment Databases: A Basis for Greener Processes and Products:'Shonan Guidance Principles'. United Nations Environment Programme

  • Westengen OT, Ring KH, Berg PR, Brysting AK (2014) Modern maize varieties going local in the semi-arid zone in Tanzania. BMC Evol Biol 14:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Members of the Tanzania Life Cycle Assessment Network (https://groups.google.com/d/forum/tanzanialcanetwork) are appreciated for their kind support. Comments by the anonymous reviewers are appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mwema Felix.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Sonia Valdivia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Felix, M. Status update on LCA studies and networking in Tanzania. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21, 1825–1830 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1195-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1195-5

Keywords

Navigation