Abstract
Purpose
Social life cycle assessment (SLCA) is a methodology under continuous development, which may be applied at different scales: from products to economic sectors up to systems at region (meso) and country (macro) scales. Traditionally, SLCA has been focusing on the assessment of negative social externalities, whereas also positive social impacts could be associated to human interventions. The purpose of the present study is to understand how positive impacts are defined in published literature and how they could be assessed through indicators. The aim is to clarify the concept among scholars and to support decision making in business and policy context.
Methods
The study uses a systematic review approach in order to analyse the types of indicators adopted. In the field of SLCA and according to Paragahawewa et al. (2009), “[I]ndicators are ‘pointers’ to the state of the impact categories (and/or subcategories) being evaluated by the SLCA”. Indicators can be quantitative, semi-quantitative or qualitative (UNEP/SETAC 2009). This review was carried out in order to identify and analyse positive impacts and indicators. After careful scrutiny, 47 papers containing theoretical frameworks were considered, as well as 46 papers presenting case studies.
Results and discussion
Compared to environmental life cycle assessment (E-LCA), where the presence of positive impacts is lower, evaluating benefits or positive impacts can still play a major role in SLCA (Benoît et al. 2010). A quarter of the analysed papers on theoretical frameworks take into account the topic of positive impacts and indicators. Results from case study analysis highlight as “workers”, was the most considered stakeholder (in 100 % of the analysed papers), and as the majority of positive indicators used in the case study analysed are recorded in relation to “other value chain actors”. Within the concept of “positive impacts”, no reference should be made merely to the utility of a product or service. In a broader sense, we could refer to solutions improving the conditions of one or various stakeholders involved. In other words, these are solutions that carry a positive contribution to one or more stakeholders without harming others.
Conclusions
So far, positive impacts are barely covered in literature. There is a clear need of streamlining definition and indicators, especially if they should be applied in a policy context complementing traditional—and often monetary-based, cost-benefit analysis (CBA).
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“outcome of a life cycle inventory analysis that catalogues the flows crossing the system boundary and provides the starting point for life cycle impact assessment” (ISO 14040 2006:4).
Further information can be found in Fig. 4 of Neugebauer et al. (2014).
“[t]he footprint of a product is the total sum of all the negative impacts of pollution released and resources consumed over the entire supply chain and life cycle of the product” (Norris 2015).
In Table 4, were included all the indicators built to assess a positive impact in the meaning of the authors, and not only to assess a performance that go beyond compliance.
Working hours, child labour, forced labour, health and safety.
Freedom of association and collective bargaining, fair salary, equal opportunities/discrimination, social benefits/social security.
Fair competition and respect of intellectual property rights.
Promoting social responsibility and supplier relationships.
References
Albrecht S, Brandstetter P, Beck T, et al. (2013) An extended life cycle analysis of packaging systems for fruit and vegetable transport in Europe. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1549–1567
Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013a) Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low-income countries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1106–1115
Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013b) Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1116–1128
Arcese G, Lucchetti M, Merli R (2013) Social life cycle assessment as a management tool: methodology for application in tourism. Sustainability 5:3275–3287
Archer BH, Cooper C, Ruhanen L (2005) The positive and negative impacts of tourism. In: Theobald WF (ed) Glob. Tour. Elsevier Inc., p 79–102
Atkinson AB, Cantillon B, Marlier E, Nolan B (2002) Social indicators: the EU and social inclusion. OUP, Oxford. doi:10.1093/0199253498.001.0001
Baumann H, Arvidsson R, Tong H, Wang Y (2013) Does the production of an airbag injure more people than the airbag saves in traffic? Opting for an empirically based approach to social life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 17:517–527
Belfiore E, Bennett O (2007) Rethinking the social impacts of the arts. Int J Cult Policy 13:135–151. doi:10.1080/10286630701342741
Benoît C, Vickery-Niederman G (2011) Social sustainability assessment literature review. Sustain Consort White Pap, p 1–34
Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, et al. (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:156–163
Benoît Norris C (2014) Data for social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:261–265
Benoît Norris C, Revéret J-P (2015) Partial organization and social LCA development: the creation and expansion of an epistemic community. In: Muthu SS (ed) Soc. life cycle assess. - an insight. Springer, Singapore, pp. 199–226
Benoît-Norris C (2012) Social life cycle assessment: a technique providing a new wealth of information to inform sustainability-related decision making. In: Curran MA (ed) Life Cycle Assess. Handb A Guid. Environ. Sustain. Prod. Scrivener Publishing LLC, p 433–452
Benoit-Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G (2012) Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4:1946–1965
Benoît-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, et al. (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:682–690
Bienge K, von Geibler J, Lettenmeier M et al (2009) Sustainability hot spot analysis: a streamlined life cycle assessment towards sustainable food chains. 9th Eur. IFSA Symp. Vienna, pp 1–10
Blom M, Solmar C (2009) How to Socially Assess Biofuels. Master’s thesis. Luleå University of Technology. http://epubl.luth.se/1402-1617/2009/077/LTU-EX-09077-SE.pdf. Accessed 21 Jul 2016
Bocoum I, Macombe C, Revéret J-P (2015) Anticipating impacts on health based on changes in income inequality caused by life cycles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:405–417
Bond AJ, Dockerty T, Lovett A, Riche AB, Haughton AJ, Bohan DA, Sage RB, Shield IF, Finch JW, Turner MM, Karp A (2011) Learning how to deal with values, frames and governance in sustainability appraisal. Reg Stud 45(8):1157–1170
Bossel H (1999) Indicators for sustainable development: theory, method, applications. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg. https://www.iisd.org/pdf/balatonreport.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2016
Bouzid A, Padilla M (2014) Analysis of social performance of the industrial tomatoes food chain in Algeria. New Medit 1:60–65
Brizius JA, Campbell MD (1991) Getting results: a guide for government accountability. Council of Governors Policy Advisors, Washington, DC
Brouwer R, Van Ek R (2004) Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 50:1–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.020
CEPS (2013) Assessing the costs and benefits of regulation. Study for the European Commission, Secretariat General. http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/commission_guidelines/docs/131210_cba_study_sg_final.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2016
Chang Y-J, Sproesser G, Neugebauer S, et al. (2015) Environmental and social life cycle assessment of welding technologies. Procedia CIRP:293–298
Chhipi-Shrestha GK, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2014) “Socializing” sustainability: a critical review on current development status of social life cycle impact assessment method. Clean Techn Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0841-5
Cinelli M, Coles SR, Jørgensen A, et al. (2013) Workshop on life cycle sustainability assessment: the state of the art and research needs—November 26, 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1421–1424
Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolabeled notebook. http://www.greendelta.com/uploads/media/LCA_laptop_final.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2015
De Luca AI, Iofrida N, Strano A, et al. (2015) Social life cycle assessment and participatory approaches: a methodological proposal applied to citrus farming in Southern Italy. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9999:1–14
Di Cesare S, Silveri F, Petti L (2014) The Role of indicators in Social Life Cycle Assessment : results from a literature review. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268796670_The_Role_of_indicators_in_Social_Life_Cycle_Assessment_results_from_a_literature_review. Accessed 8 Feb 2016
Drewnowski J (1972) Social indicators and welfare measurement: remarks on methodology. J Dev Stud 8(3):77–90
Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:88–97
Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2010) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:247–259
EC (1991) A social portrait of Europe. http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/a-social-portrait-of-europe-pbCA5789241/
EC (2015a) Beyond GDP initiative. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/beyond_gdp/index_en.html. Accessed 29 Nov 2015
EC (2015b) Social situation of EU, Periodic reports available at http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=22. Accessed 29 Nov 2015
EC (2015c) Europe 2020 targets. http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/europe-2020-in-a-nutshell/targets/index_en.htm. Accessed 29 Nov 2015
EC (2015d) Better Regulation Guidelines COM(2015) 215 final and SWD(2015) 110 final
Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:127–143
Ekener-Petersen E, Moberg Å (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA–part 2: reflections on a study of a complex product. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:144–154
Ekener-Petersen E, Höglund J, Finnveden G (2013) Social and socioeconomic impacts from vehicle fuels. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:721761/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2015
Ekvall T (2011) Nations in social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:1–2. doi:10.1007/s11367-010-0235-9
Feschet P, Macombe C, Garrabé M, et al. (2013) Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway: the case of banana industry in Cameroon. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:490–503
Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2:3309–3322. doi:10.3390/su2103309
Fontes J (2014) Handbook for product social impact assessment. http://www.dsm.com/content/dam/dsm/cworld/en_US/documents/handbook-for-product-social-impact-assessment.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2015
Foolmaun RK, Ramjeawon T (2013a) Life cycle sustainability assessments (LCSA) of four disposal scenarios for used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Environ Dev Sustain 15:783–806
Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013b) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:155–171
Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:366–379
Goodwin N, Nelson JA, Ackerman F, Weisskopf T (2008) Consumption and the consumer society. http://www.ase.tufts.edu/gdae/education_materials/modules/Consumption_and_the_Consumer_Society.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2016
Grießhammer R, Benoît C, Dreyer LC et al (2006) Feasibility study : integration of social aspects into LCA. http://www.saiplatform.org/uploads/Library/UNEP-SETACLifeCycleInitiativeTFonSocialIssues-FeasibilityStudy.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2015
Horsch K (1997) Indicators: definition and use in a results-based accountability system. http://www.hfrp.org/publications-resources/browse-our-publications/indicators-definition-and-use-in-a-results-based-accountability-system. Accessed 15 Nov 2015
Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:620–645
Hsu C-W, Wang S-W, Hu AH (2013) Development of a new methodology for impact assessment of SLCA. In: Nee AYC, Song B, Ong S-K (eds) Proc. 20th CIRP Int. Conf. Life Cycle Eng. Springer, Singapore, pp. 469–473
Hu M, Kleijn R, Bozhilova-Kisheva KP, Di Maio F (2013) An approach to LCSA: the case of concrete recycling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1793–1803
Hutchins MJ, Sutherland JW (2008) An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. J Clean Prod 16:1688–1698
Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles (1994) Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess 12(2):107–152
ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management - life cycle assessment - principles and framework
Jørgensen A (2010) Developing the Social Life Cycle Assessment:-addressing issues of validity and usability. http://orbit.dtu.dk/fedora/objects/orbit:82775/datastreams/file_5100400/content Accessed 4 Feb 2015
Jørgensen A (2013) Social LCA—a way ahead? Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:296–299
Jørgensen A, Dreyer LC, Wangel A (2012) Addressing the effect of social life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:828–839
Jørgensen A, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen MS, Hauschild MZ (2010a) Defining the baseline in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:376–384
Jørgensen A, Hauschild MZ, Jørgensen MS, Wangel A (2009) Relevance and feasibility of social life cycle assessment from a company perspective. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:204–214
Jørgensen A, Lai LCH, Hauschild MZ (2010b) Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:5–16
Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:96–103
Kloëpffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:89–95
Labuschagne C, Brent AC (2006) Social sustainability social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:3–15
Lähtinen K, Myllyviita T, Leskinen P, Pitkänen SK (2014) A systematic literature review on indicators to assess local sustainability of forest energy production. Renew Sust Energ Rev 40:1202–1216
Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, et al. (2011) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3:562–577
Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, et al. (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1581–1592
Luthe T, Kägi T, Reger J (2013) A systems approach to sustainable technical product design. J Ind Ecol 17:605–617
Macombe C, Loeillet D (2013) Social life cycle assessment, for who and why? In: Macombe C (ed) Social LCAs socio-economic effects in value chains. FruiTrop Thema, p 35–52
Macombe C, Feschet P, Garrabé M, Loeillet D (2011) 2nd International Seminar in Social Life Cycle Assessment—recent developments in assessing the social impacts of product life cycles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:940–943
Macombe C, Leskinen P, Feschet P, Antikainen R (2013) Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs. J Clean Prod 52:205–216
Manhart A, Grießhammer R (2006) Social impacts of the production of notebook PCs. http://www.prosa.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/notebooksurvey_final_engl.pdf. Accessed 4 Jun 2015
Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1386–1392
Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, et al. (2014) Application challenges for the social life cycle assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.044
Mathe S (2014) Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1506–1514
Moberg Å, Picha M, Erlandsson-Segerström B et al (2009) Using a life-cycle perspective to assess potential social impacts of ICT services: a pre-study. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:355953/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2015
Molteni M (2007) Gli stadi di sviluppo della CSR nella strategia aziendale. Impresa Progetto 2:1–25
Moriizumi Y, Matsui N, Hondo H (2010) Simplified life cycle sustainability assessment of mangrove management: a case of plantation on wastelands in Thailand. J Clean Prod 18:1629–1638
Nazarkina L, Le Bocq A (2006) Social aspects of Sustainability assessment: Feasibility of Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). EDF 2006, Moretsur-Loing, France
Nemarumane T, Mbohwa C (2015) Social impact assessment of sugar production operations in South Africa: a social life cycle assessment perspective. In: Muthu SS (ed) Soc. life cycle assess. - an insight. Springer, Singapore, pp. 71–113
Neugebauer S, Traverso M, Scheumann R, et al. (2014) Impact pathways to address social well-being and social justice in SLCA—fair wage and level of education. Sustainability 6:4839–4857
Norris G (2015) Doing more good than harm: footprints, handprints, and beneficience. http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic979867.files/Basic%20Beneficience%20Primer.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2015
Norris GA (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:97–104
Norris GA (2013) The new requirement for social leadership: healing. Uncertainty, divers. Common Good Chang. Norms New Leadersh. Paradig
Paragahawewa U, Blackett P, Small B (2009) Social Life Cycle Analysis (S-LCA): some methodological issues and potential application to cheese production in New Zealand. http://www.saiplatform.org/uploads/Library/SocialLCA-FinalReport_July2009.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2015
Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:164–171
Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2013) Revisiting the role of LCA and SLCA in the transition towards sustainable production and consumption. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1642–1652
Pelletier N, Ustaoglu E, Benoit C, Norris G (2013) Social Sustainability in trade and development policy contact information. doi:10.2788/659
Pelletier N, Ustaoglu E, Benoit C, Norris G, Rosenbaum E, Vasta A, Sala S (2016) Social sustainability in trade and development policy. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1059-z (this issue)
Petti L, Campanella P (2009) The social LCA: the state of art of an evolving methodology. Ann “Stefan cel Mare” Univ Suceava Fascicle Fac Econ Public Adm 9:47–56
Petti L, Ugaya CML, Di Cesare S (2014) Systematic review of Social- Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA ) case studies. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Pre-proceedings of the 4th International Seminar in Social LCA. Frui Trop Thema, p 34–41
Pizzirani S, McLaren SJ, Seadon JK (2014) Is there a place for culture in life cycle sustainability assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1316–1330. doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0722-5
Reitinger C, Dumke M, Barosevcic M, Hillerbrand R (2011) A conceptual framework for impact assessment within SLCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:380–388. doi:10.1007/s11367-011-0265-y
Ren J, Manzardo A, Mazzi A, et al. (2015) Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:842–853
Revéret J-P, Couture J-M, Parent J (2015) Socioeconomic LCA of milk production in Canada. In: Muthu SS (ed) Soc. life cycle assess. - an insight. Springer, Singapore, pp. 25–69
Sala S, Farioli F, Zamagni A (2013) Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: part 1. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1653–1672
Samson R (2012) Environmental and socioeconomic life cycle assessment of Canadian milk. https://www.dairyresearch.ca/file.php?filename=/var/www/cdrplive/files/news/19/LCA-DFCExecSum_e.pdf. Accessed 21 Jul 2016
Sanchez Ramirez PK, Petti L (2011) Social life cycle assessment: methodological and implementation issues. Ann “Ştefan cel Mare” Univ Suceava Fascicle Fac Econ Public Adm 11:11–17
Sanchez Ramirez PK, Del Sordo M, Petti L (2013) La Social Life Cycle Assessment del Pomodoro Cuore di bue. DEc Working Paper Series. no. 27
Sanchez Ramirez PK, Petti L, Brones F, Ugaya CML (2016) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 2: application in Natura’s cocoa soap. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:106–117
Sanchez Ramirez PK, Petti L, Haberland NT, Ugaya CML (2014) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 1: methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1515–1523
Schulenkorf N, Edwards D (2012) Maximizing positive social impacts: strategies for sustaining and leveraging the benefits of intercommunity sport events in divided societies. J Sport Manag 26:379–390
Seager TP, Melton J, Eighmy TT (2004) Working towards sustainable science and engineering: introduction to the special issue on highway infrastructure. Resour Conserv Recycl 42(3):205–207
Sheldon EB, Freeman HE (1970) Notes on social indicators: promises and potential. Policy Sci 1(1):97–111
Slootweg R, Vanclay F, van Schooten M (2001) Function evaluation as a framework for the integration of social and environmental impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 19:19–28
Srinivasan S, O’Fallon LR, Dearry A (2003) Creating healthy communities, healthy homes, healthy people: initiating a research agenda on the built environment and public health. Am J Public Health 93:1446–1450. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1446
Swarr TE (2009) Societal life cycle assessment-could you repeat the question? Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:285–289
The European Network For Rural Development (ENRD) (2014) How to set the indicators? https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/en/leader/leader-tool-kit/the-strategy-design-and-implementation/the-strategy-design/how-to-set-the-indicators
Traverso M, Asdrubali F, Francia A, Finkbeiner M (2012a) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: an implementation to photovoltaic modules. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:1068–1079
Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen A, Schneider L (2012b) Life cycle sustainability dashboard. J Ind Ecol 16:680–688
Treccani (2012) Utilità. Dizionario di Economia e Finanza. http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/utilita_res-cc18589b-8cd0-11e2-b3e0-00271042e8d9_(Dizionario-di-Economia-e-Finanza)/. Accessed 25 July 2016
Ugaya CML, Brones F, Corrêa S (2011) S-LCA: preliminary results of Natura’s cocoa soap bar. http://www.lcm2011.org/papers.html?file=tl_files/pdf/paper/13_Session_Life_Cycle_Sustainability_Assessement_I/6_Ugaya-SLCA_Preliminary_results_of_Naturas_cocoa_soap_bar-763_b.pdf
Umair S, Björklund A, Ekener-Petersen E (2013) Social life cycle inventory and impact assessment of informal recycling of electronic ICT waste in Pakistan. In: Hilty LM, Aebischer B, Andersson G, Lohmann W (eds) Proc. First Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. Sustain. Zurich, p 52–58
Umair S, Björklund A, Petersen EE (2015) Social impact assessment of informal recycling of electronic ICT waste in Pakistan using UNEP SETAC guidelines. Resour Conserv Recycl 95:46–57
UN (2015b) Sustainable development goals. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. http://www.cdo.ugent.be/publicaties/280.guidelines-sLCA.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2015
UNEP/SETAC (2013) The Methodological Sheets For Subcategories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/S-LCA_methodological_sheets_11.11.13.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2015
United Nations (UN) (2015a) Millennium development goals. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/
United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2014) Human development index. http://hdr.undp.org/en/data
Valdivia S, Ugaya CML, Hildenbrand J, et al. (2012) A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio + 20. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1673–1685
Vanclay (2003a) International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 21:5–11
Vanclay F (2002) Conceptualising social impacts. Environ Impact Assess Rev 22:183–211
Vanclay F (2003b) Why have principles for social impact assessment? Int Assoc Impact Assess 2:1–8
Vinyes E, Oliver-Solà J, Ugaya C, et al. (2013) Application of LCSA to used cooking oil waste management. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:445–455
Wan H (2012) Assessing CSR and applying social life cycle assessment: a case study on biochemical oxygen demand online monitor. Master’s thesis. Uppsala University. http://www.greenbusinessregion.se/file/assesing-csr-and-applying-social-life-cycle-assesment.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2016
Weldegiorgis FS, Franks DM (2014) Social dimensions of energy supply alternatives in steelmaking: comparison of biomass and coal production scenarios in Australia. J Clean Prod 84:281–288
Wilhelm M, Hutchins M, Mars C, Benoit-Norris C (2015) An overview of social impacts and their corresponding improvement implications: a mobile phone case study. J Clean Prod 102:302–315
Woolcock M, Narayan D (2000) Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy. World Bank Res Obs 15(2):225–249. doi:10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
World Bank (2012) Designing a results framework for achieving results: a how-to guide. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTEVACAPDEV/Resources/designing_results_framework.pdf
Wu R, Yang D, Chen J (2014) Social life cycle assessment revisited. Sustainability 6:4200–4226
Yu M, Halog A (2015) Solar photovoltaic development in Australia—a life cycle sustainability assessment study. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su7021213
Zamagni A, Amerighi O, Buttol P (2011) Strengths or bias in social LCA? Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:596–598
Zamagni A, Pesonen H-L, Swarr T (2013) From LCA to life cycle sustainability assessment: concept, practice and future directions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1637–1641
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Catherine Macombe
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Di Cesare, S., Silveri, F., Sala, S. et al. Positive impacts in social life cycle assessment: state of the art and the way forward. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23, 406–421 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1169-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1169-7