Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Multifunctional trade-off and compensation mechanism of arable land under the background of rural revitalization: a case study in the West Mountain Regions of Hubei Province

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exploring the spatial relationship and ecological compensation mechanism of each function of arable land in poor mountainous areas is important to promote rural revitalization and enhance arable land protection. Taking the mountainous region of Western Hubei (MRWH) as an example, this study quantified the “three living” functions of arable land and its secondary functions. Using the root mean square deviation method to calculate the trade-off index, a quantitative method can more scientifically reflect the trade-off relationship between arable land functions and measure the overall ecological compensation. Studies have shown that (1) the value of the production function exhibits a growing and subsequently a falling trend, whereas the value of living function and ecological function exhibits an increasing trend over time, with an average functional value of 5310, 220 and 6496 million yuan, respectively. The spatial pattern of the “three living” functional values decreases from west to east. Among them, water conservation and soil conservation function values show a high distribution in the south and low in the north, gas purification and agricultural pollution functional values show a scattered spatial pattern, and the value of other functions shows an increasing trend from southeast to northwest; (2) among the primary functions, the trade-off between production and ecological functions is the strongest, decreasing, and then increasing over time, with an average trade-off index of 0.89. Among the secondary functions, there is the most obvious trade-off between the food supply function and the five ecological functions, which requires coordination; (3) overall, the total amount of ecological compensation has shown an upward trend, with priority areas for level I ecological compensation increasing year by year. Optimized compensation zones and potential compensation zones are concentrated in the northwest, ecological balance zones are located in the central part, and optimized development compensation zones and key development compensation zones are located in the southeast. According to the research, MRWH is oriented to ecological function, followed by the production function, supplemented by the living function. Green agriculture should be vigorously developed and ecological function space should be compressed by strictly limiting the excessive expansion of production activities. Promoting the improvement of production function through ecological function, while exploring the potential value of living function. Ecological compensation in strict accordance with the priority of ecological compensation, zoning. Realizing cross-regional cooperation, low compensation areas drive high compensation areas to achieve sustainable development of arable land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The availability of data and materials is based on personal requests.

References

  • Blicharska M, Hedblom M, Josefsson J, Widenfalk O, Ranius T, Öckinger E, Widenfalk LA (2022) Operationalisation of ecological compensation – obstacles and ways forward. J Environ Manag 304:114277

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford JB, D’Amato AW (2011) Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management. Front Ecol Environ 10:210–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao W, Zhou W, Wu T, Wang XC, Xu JH (2022) Spatial-temporal characteristics of cultivated land use eco-efficiency under carbon constraints and its relationship with landscape pattern dynamics. Ecol Indic 141:109140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Central People’s Government of China (2021) Regulations for the Implementation of the Land Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-07/30/content_5628461.htm. Accessed 30 Mar 2023 (In Chinese)

  • Chen TQ, Feng Z, Zhao HF, Wu KN (2020) Identification of ecosystem service bundles and driving factors in Beijing and its surrounding areas. Sci Total Environ 711:134687

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato D, Rekola M, Li N, Toppinen A (2016) Monetary valuation of forest ecosystem services in China: a literature review and identification of future research needs. Ecol Econ 121:75–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng XZ, Huang JK, Rozelle S, Zhang JP, Li ZH (2015) Impact of urbanization on cultivated land changes in China. Land Use Policy 45:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding ZM, Yao SB (2022) Theory and valuation of cross-regional ecological compensation for cultivated land: a case study of Shanxi province, China. Ecol Indic 136:108609

    Google Scholar 

  • Du HQ, Zhao L, Zhang PT, Li JX, Yu S (2023) Ecological compensation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on ecosystem services flow. J Environ Manag 331:117230

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan YM, Wang H, Huang A, Xu YQ, Lu LH, Ji ZX (2021) Identification and spatial-temporal evolution of rural “production-living-ecological” space from the perspective of villagers’ behavior – a case study of Ertai Town, Zhangjiakou City. Land Use Policy 106:105457

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng DY, Zhao GS (2020) Footprint assessments on organic farming to improve ecological safety in the water source areas of the South-to-North Water Diversion project. J Clean Prod 254:120130

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Z, Jin XR, Chen TQ, Wu JS (2021) Understanding trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services to support the decision-making in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. Land Use Policy 106:105446

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Shen JQ, He WJ, Zhao X, Li ZC, Hu WF, Wang JZ, Ren YJ, Zhang X (2021) Spatial-temporal analysis of ecosystem services value and research on ecological compensation in Taihu Lake Basin of Jiangsu Province in China from 2005 to 2018. J Clean Prod 317:128241

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng WL, Li YY, Zhang PY, Yang D, Jing WL, Rong TQ (2022) Analyzing spatio-temporal changes and trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services in the Yellow River Basin, China. Ecol Indic 138:108825

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo BS, He DW, Zhao XD, Zhang ZY, Dong Y (2020a) Analysis on the spatiotemporal patterns and driving mechanisms of China’s agricultural production efficiency from 2000 to 2015. Phys Chem Earth 120:102909

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo S, Wang Y, Wang Y, Wang MX, He P, Feng L (2020b) Inequality and collaboration in north China urban agglomeration: evidence from embodied cultivated land in Jing-Jin-Ji’s interregional trade. J Environ Manag 275:111050

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo BS, He DW, Jin G (2023) Agricultural production efficiency estimation and spatiotemporal convergence characteristic analysis in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: a semi-parametric metafrontier approach. Land Degrad Dev 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4798

  • He YF, Xie HL (2019) Exploring the spatiotemporal changes of ecological carrying capacity for regional sustainable development based on GIS: a case study of Nanchang City. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 148:119720

    Google Scholar 

  • He QS, Zeng C, Xie P, Liu YL, Zhang MK (2018) An assessment of forest biomass carbon storage and ecological compensation based on surface area: a case study of Hubei Province, China. Ecol Indic 90:392–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Himes A, Puettmann K, Muraca B (2020) Trade-offs between ecosystem services along gradients of tree species diversity and values. Ecosyst Serv 44:101133

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu T, Wu JS, Li WF (2019) Assessing relationships of ecosystem services on multi-scale: a case study of soil erosion control and water yield in the Pearl River Delta. Ecol Indic 99:193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang GH, Wang MZ, Qu YB, Zhou DY, Ma WQ (2020) Towards cultivated land multifunction assessment in China: applying the “influencing factors-functions-products-demands” integrated framework. Land Use Policy 99:104982

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang YN, Guan DJ, He XJ, Yin BL, Zhou LL, Sun LL, Huang DN, Li ZH, Zhang YJ (2022) Quantification of the coupling relationship between ecological compensation and ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Land Use Policy 114:105995

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Chen K, Wang P, Guo BS, Dong Y, Yang J (2019a) Trade-offs in land-use competition and sustainable land development in the North China Plain. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 141:36–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Li ZH, Deng XZ, Yang J, Cheng DD, Li WQ (2019b) An analysis of spatiotemporal patterns in Chinese agricultural productivity between 2004 and 2014. Ecol Indic 105:591–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Chen K, Zhang L, Liao T, Najmuddin O (2020a) Measuring ecosystem services based on government intentions for future land use in Hubei Province: implications for sustainable landscape management. Landsc Ecol 37:2025–2042

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Shi X, He DW, Guo BS, Li ZH, Shi XB (2020b) Designing a spatial pattern to rebalance the orientation of development and protection in Wuhan. J Geogr Sci 30:569–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Peng J, Zhang LX, Zhang ZY (2023) Understanding land for high-quality development. J Geogr Sci 33:217–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Jopke C, Kreyling J, Maes J, Koellner T (2015) Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns. Ecol Indic 49:46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju F, Zhou JJ, Jiang K (2022) Evolution of stakeholders’ behavioral strategies in the ecological compensation mechanism for poverty alleviation. Resour Conserv Recycl 176:105915

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney SP, Fonte SJ, García E, Siles P, Chan KMA, Smukler SM (2019) Evaluating ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies from slash-and-mulch agroforestry systems in El Salvador. Ecol Indic 105:264–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger DJ (2001) The economic value of forest ecosystem services: a review. The Wilderness Society, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai ZH, Chen MQ, Liu TJ (2020) Changes in and prospects for cultivated land use since the reform and opening up in China. Land Use Policy 97:104781

    Google Scholar 

  • Langemeyer J, Madrid-Lopez C, Beltran AM, Mendez GV (2021) Urban agriculture — a necessary pathway towards urban resilience and global sustainability? Landsc Urban Plan 210:104055

    Google Scholar 

  • Li BY, Wang W (2018) Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services for the Yinchuan Basin in China. Ecol Indic 84:837–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Li SC, Zhao YL, Xiao W, Yellishetty M, Yang DS (2022) Identifying ecosystem service bundles and the spatiotemporal characteristics of trade-offs and synergies in coal mining areas with a high groundwater table. Sci Total Environ 807:151036

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li SN, Shao TZ, Hong MJ, Zhu CM, Dong BY, Li YJ, Lin Y, Wang K, Gan MY, Zhu JX, Zhang L, Lin NF, Zhang J (2023) Impact mechanisms of urbanization processes on supply-demand matches of cultivated land multifunction in rapid urbanization areas. Habitat Int 131:102726

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao GT, He P, Gao XS, Lin ZY, Huang CY, Zhou W, Deng OP, Xu CH, Deng LJ (2022) Land use optimization of rural production–living–ecological space at different scales based on the BP–ANN and CLUE–S models. Ecol Indic 137:108710

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu YS, Zhou Y (2021) Reflections on China’s food security and land use policy under rapid urbanization. Land Use Policy 109:105699

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu MC, Liu WW, Yang L, Jiao WJ, He SY, Min QW (2019) A dynamic eco-compensation standard for Hani Rice Terraces System in southwest China. Ecosyst Serv 36:100897

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu YS, Zang YZ, Yang YY (2020) China’s rural revitalization and development: theory, technology and management. J Geogr Sci 30:1923–1942

    Google Scholar 

  • Locatelli B, Imbach PA, Wunder S (2014) Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica. Environ Conserv 41:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Long HL, Ma L, Zhang YN, Qu LL (2022) Multifunctional rural development in China: pattern, process and mechanism. Habitat Int 121:102530

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv CM, Xu XY, Guo X, Feng JZ, Yan DH (2023) Basin water ecological compensation interval accounting based on dual perspectives of supply and consumption: Taking Qingyi River Basin as an example. J Clean Prod 385:135610

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma XF, Zhu JT, Zhang HB, Yan W, Zhao CY (2020) Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem service values of inland lake wetlands in Central Asia under land use/cover change: a case study on Ebinur Lake, China. Glob Ecol Conserv 24:e01253

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes J, Paracchini ML, Zulian G, Dunbar MB, Alkemade R (2012) Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol Conserv 155:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsboom C, Vrebos D, Staes J, Meire P (2018) Using dimension reduction PCA to identify ecosystem service bundles. Ecol Indic 87:209–260

    Google Scholar 

  • National Development and Reform Commission (2020) Announcement on public consultation of the regulations on ecological protection compensation (draft for public consultation). https://hd.ndrc.gov.cn/yjzx/yjzx_add.jsp?SiteId=350. Accessed 30 Mar 2023 (In Chinese)

  • Pan XL, Xu LY, Yang ZF, Yu B (2017) Payments for ecosystem services in China: policy, practice, and progress. J Clean Prod 158:200–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Hu XX, Wang XY, Meersmans J, Liu YX, Qiu SJ (2019) Simulating the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services trade-offs in Northwestern Yunnan, China. Ecosyst Serv 39:100998

    Google Scholar 

  • People’s government of Hubei province (2019) Strategic plan for rural revitalization in Hubei Province (2018–2022). http://www.hubei.gov.cn/zwgk/hbyw/hbywqb/201905/t20190517_1490539.shtml. Accessed 28 Mar 2023 (In Chinese)

  • Qiao XN, Gu YY, Zou CX, Xu DL, Wang L, Ye X, Yang Y, Huang XF (2019) Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of the trade-offs and synergies among multiple ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China. Sci Total Environ 651:218–229

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe S-E, Koellner T, Marzelli S, Schumacher P, Grêt-Regamey A (2016) National ecosystem services mapping at multiple scales - the German exemplar. Ecol Indic 70:357–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao J (2022) Comprehensive land consolidation as a development policy for rural vitalisation: rural in situ urbanisation through semi socio-economic restructuring in Huai Town. J Rural Stud 93:386–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasheed S, Venkatesh P, Singh DR, Renjini VR, Jha GK, Sharma DK (2021) Ecosystem valuation and eco-compensation for conservation of traditional paddy ecosystems and varieties in Kerala, India. Ecosyst Serv 49:101272

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5242–5247

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schirpke U, Candiago S, Vigl LE, Jäger H, Labadini A, Marsoner T, Meisch C, Tasser E, Tappeiner U (2019) Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 651:928–941

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shang WX, Gong YC, Wang ZJ, Stewardson MJ (2018) Eco-compensation in China: theory, practices and suggestions for the future. J Environ Manag 210:162–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen JQ, Gao X, He WJ, Sun FH, Zhang ZF, Kong Y, Wan ZC, Zhang X, Li ZC, Wang JZ, Lai XP (2021) Prospect theory in an evolutionary game: construction of watershed ecological compensation system in Taihu Lake Basin. J Clean Prod 291:125929

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng JC, Qiu WG, Han X (2020) China’s PES-like horizontal eco-compensation program: Combining market-oriented mechanisms and government interventions. Ecosyst Serv 45:101164

    Google Scholar 

  • Song W, Pijanowski BC (2014) The effects of China’s cultivated land balance program on potential land productivity at a national scale. Appl Geogr 46:158–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Song M, Jin G, Yan WY (2021) Which pro-environmental farming behaviors should be priorities for funding? An approach based on matching ecosystem services (ESs) demand and supply. J Environ Manag 297:113368

    Google Scholar 

  • Sponagel C, Angenendt E, Piepho HP, Bahrs E (2021) Farmers’ preferences for nature conservation compensation measures with a focus on eco-accounts according to the German Nature Conservation Act. Land Use Policy 104:105378

    Google Scholar 

  • Sposób J (2011) Water Balance in Terrestrial Ecosystems. In: Gliński J, Horabik J, Lipiec J (eds) Encyclopedia of Agrophysics. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3585-1_267

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Su K, Sun XT, Guo HQ, Long QQ, Li S, Mao XQ, Niu T, Yu Q, Wang YR, Yue DP (2020) The establishment of a cross-regional differentiated ecological compensation scheme based on the benefit areas and benefit levels of sand-stabilization ecosystem service. J Clean Prod 270:122490

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun W, Li DH, Wang XR, Li RX, Li K, Xie YJ (2019) Exploring the scale effects, trade-offs and driving forces of the mismatch of ecosystem services. Ecol Indic 103:617–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Ti JS, Yang YH, Pu LL, Wen XY, Yin XG, Chen F (2021) Ecological compensation for winter wheat fallow and impact assessment of winter fallow on water sustainability and food security on the North China Plain. J Clean Prod 328:129431

    Google Scholar 

  • van Berkel DB, Verburg PH (2014) Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecol Indic 37:163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Veen M, Spaans M, Janssen-Jansen L (2010) Using compensation instruments as a vehicle to improve spatial planning: challenges and opportunities. Land Use Policy 27:1010–1017

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan XM, Lei M, Chen TB, Yang JX (2017) Intercropped Pteris vittata L. and Morus alba L. presents a safe utilization mode for arsenic-contaminated soil. Sci Total Environ 579:1467–1475

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Lin YF, Glendinning A, Xu YQ (2018) Land-use changes and land policies evolution in China’s urbanization processes. Land Use Policy 75:375–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang WX, Wang WJ, Xie PC, Zhao DQ (2020) Spatial and temporal disparities of carbon emissions and interregional carbon compensation in major function-oriented zones: a case study of Guangdong province. J Clean Prod 245:118873

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Zhang B, Wang S, Xie GD (2021) Dynamic changes in water conservation in the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control Project Area: a case study of Xilin Gol League in China. J Clean Prod 293:126054

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang XJ, Wang DY, Wu SZ, Yan ZR, Han JQ (2023) Cultivated land multifunctionality in undeveloped peri-urban agriculture areas in China: implications for sustainable land management. J Environ Manag 325:116500

    Google Scholar 

  • White PCL, Lovett JC (1999) Public preferences and willingness-to-pay for nature conservation in the North York Moors National Park, UK. J Environ Manag 55:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggering H, Dalchow C, Glemnitz M, Helming K, Müller K, Schultz A, Stachow U, Zander P (2006) Indicators for multifunctional land use—linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials. Ecol Indic 6:238–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu L, Jin LS (2020) How eco-compensation contribute to poverty reduction: a perspective from different income group of rural households in Guizhou, China. J Clean Prod 275:122962

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu YZ, Shan LP, Guo Z, Peng Y (2017) Cultivated land protection policies in China facing 2030: dynamic balance system versus basic farmland zoning. Habitat Int 69:126–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZN, Guo X, Lv CM, Wang HL, Di DY (2018) Study on the quantification method of water pollution ecological compensation standard based on emergy theory. Ecol Indic 92:189–194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang JW, Li XM, Xiao RB, Wang Y (2021) Effects of land use transition on ecological vulnerability in poverty-stricken mountainous areas of China: a complex network approach. J Environ Manag 297:113206

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Wu XZ, Wang L, Liang J (2017) Optimal farmland conversion in China under double restraints of economic growth and resource protection. J Clean Prod 142:524–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Wang R, Wang F, Huang H, Wang J (2022) Investigation on spatial and temporal variation of coupling coordination between socioeconomic and ecological environment: a case study of the Loess Plateau, China. Ecol Indic 136:108667

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie GD, Zhang CX, Zhen L, Zhang LM (2017) Dynamic changes in the value of China’s ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 26:146–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong ZX, Li H (2019) Ecological deficit tax: a tax design and simulation of compensation for ecosystem service value based on ecological footprint in China. J Clean Prod 230:1128–1137

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu KP, Wang JN, Wang JJ, Wang XH, Chi YY, Zhang X (2020) Environmental function zoning for spatially differentiated environmental policies in China. J Environ Manag 255:109485

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue CL, Chen XH, Xue LR, Zhang HQ, Chen JP, Li DD (2023) Modeling the spatially heterogeneous relationships between tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services and potential drivers considering geographic scale in Bairin Left Banner, China. Sci Total Environ 855:158834

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Li J, Qin K, Li T, Liu J (2015) Trade-offs between ecosystem services in Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region. Acta Geogr Sin 70:1762–1773 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Yao CX, Xu DL (2020) Ecological compensation standards of national scenic spots in western China: a case study of Taibai Mountain. Tour Manag 76:103950

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Zhang YY, Yang H, Yang FY (2022a) Horizontal ecological compensation as a tool for sustainable development of urban agglomerations: exploration of the realization mechanism of Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration in China. Environ Sci Policy 137:301–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang YY, Lu HW, Liang DZ, Chen YZ, Tian PP, Xia J, Wang H, Lei XH (2022b) Ecological sustainability and its driving factor of urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on three-dimensional ecological footprint analysis. J Clean Prod 330:129802

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu M, Yang YJ, Chen F, Zhu FW, Qu JF, Zhang SL (2019) Response of agricultural multifunctionality to farmland loss under rapidly urbanizing processes in Yangtze River Delta, China. Sci Total Environ 666:1–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu YY, Li J, Zhou ZX, Ma XP, Zhang XF (2021) Response of multiple mountain ecosystem services on environmental gradients: how to respond, and where should be priority conservation? J Clean Prod 278:123264

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai R, Tao FL (2017) Contributions of climate change and human activities to runoff change in seven typical catchments across China. Sci Total Environ 605–606:219–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai TL, Zhang D, Zhao CC (2021) How to optimize ecological compensation to alleviate environmental injustice in different cities in the Yellow River Basin? A case of integrating ecosystem service supply, demand and flow. Sust Cities Soc 75:103341

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Pagiola S (2011) Assessing the potential for synergies in the implementation of payments for environmental services programmes: an empirical analysis of Costa Rica. Environ Conserv 38:406–416

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YN, Long HL, Tu SS, Ge DZ, Ma L, Wang LZ (2019) Spatial identification of land use functions and their tradeoffs/synergies in China: implications for sustainable land management. Ecol Indic 107:105550

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang SY, Hu WY, Li MR, Guo ZX, Wang LY, Wu LH (2021) Multiscale research on spatial supply-demand mismatches and synergic strategies of multifunctional cultivated land. J Environ Manag 299:113605

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YX, Guan DJ, Wu L, Su XY, Zhou LL, Peng GC (2022) How can an ecological compensation threshold be determined? A discriminant model integrating the minimum data approach and the most appropriate land use scenarios. Sci Total Environ 852:158377

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng DF, Wang YH, Hao S, Xu WJ, Lv LT, Yu S (2020) Spatial-temporal variation and tradeoffs/synergies analysis on multiple ecosystem services: a case study in the Three-River Headwaters region of China. Ecol Indic 116:106494

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong SZ, Geng Y, Huang BB, Zhu QH, Cui XW, Wu F (2020) Quantitative assessment of eco-compensation standard from the perspective of ecosystem services: a case study of Erhai in China. J Clean Prod 263:121530

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou D, Xu JC, Lin ZL (2017) Conflict or coordination? Assessing land use multi-functionalization using production-living-ecology analysis. J Environ Manag 577:136–147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Guo LY, Liu YS (2019) Land consolidation boosting poverty alleviation in China: theory and practice. Land Use Policy 82:339–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Li YM, Xu CC (2020a) Land consolidation and rural revitalization in China: mechanisms and paths. Land Use Policy 91:104379

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Li YR, Liu YS (2020b) The nexus between regional eco-environmental degradation and rural impoverishment in China. Habitat Int 96:102086

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Li XH, Liu YS (2021) Cultivated land protection and rational use in China. Land Use Policy 106:105454

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou ZX, Sun XR, Zhang XT, Wang Y (2022) Inter-regional ecological compensation in the Yellow River Basin based on the value of ecosystem services. J Environ Manag 322:116073

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the National Nature Science Foundation Program of China (Grant number 42171270).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China

    Chen Yin, Yan Nie, Yimin Li, Yong Zhou & Lei Yu

  2. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China

    Chen Yin, Yan Nie, Yimin Li, Yong Zhou, Lei Yu & Hong Qin

  3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Hubei University, Wuhan, 430062, China

    Jing Yu

Authors
  1. Chen Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yan Nie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yimin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yong Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lei Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hong Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jing Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The manuscript was reviewed and approved for publication by all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Chen Yin and Jing Yu: laboratory work and statistical analysis. Chen Yin and Yimin Li: conceptualization, writing the first draft, and supervision. Yan Nie and Hong Qin: methodology and writing the final draft. Yong Zhou and Lei Yu: conceptualization, methodology, resources, and funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Yu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors approved the version to be published.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Zhihong Xu

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, C., Nie, Y., Li, Y. et al. Multifunctional trade-off and compensation mechanism of arable land under the background of rural revitalization: a case study in the West Mountain Regions of Hubei Province. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 96329–96349 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29146-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29146-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation