Abstract
The main objective of this study is to investigate the impact of research and development (R&D) intensity on renewable energy consumption in selected Asian economies. We have relied on the autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) method to get empirical estimates. The short- and long-run results show that a rise in R&D intensity increases renewable energy consumption in China and Japan. In the long run, energy intensity and financial development increase renewable energy consumption in China and India only. Among other control variables, a rise in CO2 emissions causes renewable energy consumption to rise in all three economies in the long run. The trade increases renewable energy consumption in India and Japan in the long run. This study shows the important policy implications of promoting R&D and renewable energy consumption in the selected Asian economies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Alvarez-Herranz A, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Cantos JM (2017) Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy 105:386–397
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Usman A, Ullah S (2020) Asymmetric J-curve in the commodity trade between Pakistan and United States: evidence from 41 industries. Eurasian Econ Rev 10(2):163–188
Bosetti V, Tavoni M (2009) Uncertain R&D, backstop technology and GHGs stabilization. Energy Econ 31:S18–S26
Carfora A, Pansini RV, Romano AA, Scandurra G (2018) Renewable energy development and green public policies complementarities: the case of developed and developing countries. Renew Energy 115:741–749
Castellani D, Pieri F (2013) R&D offshoring and the productivity growth of European regions. Res Policy 42(9):1581–1594
Churchill, S. A., Inekwe, J., & Ivanovski, K. (2021). R&D expenditure and energy consumption in OECD nations Energy Econ 105376
Churchill SA, Inekwe J, Smyth R, Zhang X (2019) R&D intensity and carbon emissions in the G7: 1870–2014. Energy Econ 80:30–37
Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455
Fernández YF, López MF, Blanco BO (2018) Innovation for sustainability: the impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. J Clean Prod 172:3459–3467
Garrone P, Grilli L (2010) Is there a relationship between public expenditures in energy R&D and carbon emissions per GDP? Empirical Investig Energy Policy 38(10):5600–5613
Grimaud A, Lafforgue G, Magné B (2011) Climate change mitigation options and directed technical change: a decentralized equilibrium analysis. Res Energy Econ 33(4):938–962
Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Ind 60:824–831
Jian, L., Sohail, M. T., Ullah, S., & Majeed, M. T. (2021). Examining the role of non-economic factors in energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China: policy options for the green economy.Environ Sci Pollut Res 1 10
Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12(2–3):231–254
Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 52(2):169–210
Komen MH, Gerking S, Folmer H (1997) Income and environmental R&D: empirical evidence from OECD countries. Environ Dev Econ 2(4):505–515
Lee KH, Min B (2015) Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. J Clean Prod 108:534–542
Li, J., Zhang, X., Ali, S., & Khan, Z. (2020). Eco-innovation and energy productivity: new determinants of renewable energy consumption. J Environ Manag 271 111028
Li, X., Ozturk, I., Majeed, M. T., Hafeez, M., & Ullah, S. (2022). Considering the asymmetric effect of financial deepening on environmental quality in BRICS economies: Policy options for the green economy. J Cleaner Prod 331 129909
Marangoni G, Tavoni M (2014) The clean energy R&D strategy for 2 C. Clim Chang Econ 5(01):1440003
Meleddu M, Pulina M (2018) Public spending on renewable energy in Italian regions. Renewable Energy 115:1086–1098
Minniti A, Venturini F (2017) R&D policy, productivity growth and distance to frontier. Econ Lett 156:92–94
Murshed M, Ahmed Z, Alam MS, Mahmood H, Rehman A, Dagar V (2021) Reinvigorating the role of clean energy transition for achieving a low-carbon economy: evidence from Bangladesh. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(47):67689–67710
Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., Ahmad, P., Rehman, A., & Alam, M. S. (2022). Pathways to Argentina’s 2050 carbon-neutrality agenda: the roles of renewable energy transition and trade globalization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1 18
Newell, S., Robertson, M., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2009). Managing knowledge work and innovation. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Ozcan B, Ozturk I (2019) Renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus in emerging countries: a bootstrap panel causality test. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 104:30–37
Ozturk I, Aslan A, Kalyoncu H (2010) Energy consumption and economic growth relationship: evidence from panel data for low and middle income countries. Energy Policy 38(8):4422–4428
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Economet 16(3):289–326
Rehman A, Ma H, Ozturk I, Ahmad M, Rauf A, Irfan M (2021) Another outlook to sector-level energy consumption in Pakistan from dominant energy sources and correlation with economic growth. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(26):33735–33750
Sohail MT, Ullah S, Majeed MT, Usman A, Andlib Z (2021) The shadow economy in South Asia: dynamic effects on clean energy consumption and environmental pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(23):29265–29275
Sohail MT, Xiuyuan Y, Usman A, Majeed MT, Ullah S (2021) Renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption: assessing the asymmetric role of monetary policy uncertainty in energy consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(24):31575–31584
Tugcu CT, Ozturk I, Aslan A (2012) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth relationship revisited: evidence from G7 countries. Energy Econ 34(6):1942–1950
Ullah, S., Ozturk, I., Majeed, M. T., & Ahmad, W. (2021). Do technological innovations have symmetric or asymmetric effects on environmental quality? Evidence from Pakistan. J Cleaner Prod 316 128239
Usman, A., Ozturk, I., Ullah, S., & Hassan, A. (2021). Does ICT have symmetric or asymmetric effects on CO2 emissions? Evidence from selected Asian economies.Tech Soc 67 101692
Wang, Q., Li, S., & Pisarenko, Z. (2020). Heterogeneous effects of energy efficiency, oil price, environmental pressure, R&D investment, and policy on renewable energy – evidence from the G20 countries.Energy 209 118322
Yao, Y., Ivanovski, K., Inekwe, J., & Smyth, R. (2019). Human capital and energy consumption: evidence from OECD countries. Energy Econ 84 104534
Zhou X, Zhang M, Zhou M, Zhou M (2017) A comparative study on decoupling relationship and influence factors between China’s regional economic development and industrial energy–related carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 142:783–800
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This idea was given by Wei Li. Wei Li and Sana Ullah analyzed the data and wrote the complete paper. While Sana Ullah read and approved the final version.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
I am free to contact any of the people involved in the research to seek further clarification and information.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, W., Ullah, S. Research and development intensity and its influence on renewable energy consumption: evidence from selected Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 54448–54455 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19650-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19650-9