Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation of CO2 flux components over northern hemisphere forest ecosystems by using random forest method through temporal and spatial data scanning procedures

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modeling CO2 flux components is an important task in ecosystem analysis and terrestrial studies. Net ecosystem exchange (NEE), ecosystem respiration (R), and gross primary production (GPP) are three CO2 flux components. Despite the ecosystem land cover characteristics, climatic factors can make considerable impact on quantity and mechanism of these components. Nevertheless, such climatic factors are not available in most of the areas, especially in developing regions. Therefore, obtaining the models that can exempt using locally recorded variables would be of great importance. A modeling study was carried out here to simulate CO2 flux components using soft computing-based random forest (RF) model in both local and external (spatial) scales, assessed by k-fold validation procedure. Data from 11 sites located in three forest ecosystems, e.g. deciduous broad leaf (DBF), evergreen needle leaf (ENF), and mixed forest (MF), were used to simulate the flux components. The obtained results showed that the temperature-related parameters (e.g., air and soil temperature, vapor pressure deficit) along with the net radiation play key role in determining the flux components in all studied ecosystems. It was confirmed that a chronologic scan of the available patterns is needed for a thorough assessment of the performance accuracy of the local models. The external models provided promising results when compared with the locally trained models. This is a very great step forward in estimating CO2 flux components under data scarcity conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Baldocchi DD, Wilson KB (2001) Modeling CO2 and water vapor exchange of a temperate broadleaved forest across hourly to decadal time scales. Ecol Model 142:155–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baldocchi DD, Falge E, Gu L, Olson R, Hollinger D, Running S, Anthoni P, Bernhofer C, Davis K, Evans R, Fuentes J, Goldstein A, Katul G, Law B, Lee X, Malhi Y, Meyers T, Munger W, Oechel W, Paw KT, Pilegaard K, Schmid HP, Valentini R, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wolsy S (2001) FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and energy flux densities. Bull Am Geol Soc 82:2415–2434

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldocchi D (2003) Assessing ecosystem carbon balance: problems and prospects of the eddy covariance technique. Glob Chang Biol 9:478–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Random Forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann N, Schulze ED (1999) Net CO2 and H2O fluxes of terrestrial ecosystems. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 13:751–760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Gong L, Xu C-Y, Halldin S (2007) A high-resolution, gridded dataset for monthly temperature normals (1971–2000) in Sweden. Geogr Ann Ser A 89(4):249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Yu G, Wang Q (2020) Effects of climate and forest age on the ecosystem carbon exchange of afforestation. J For Res 31(2):365–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dou X, Yang Y (2018) Estimating forest carbon fluxes using four different data-driven techniques based on long-term eddy covariance measurements: model comparison and evaluation. Sci Total Environ 627:78–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dou X, Yang Y, Lu J (2018) Estimating forest carbon fluxes using machine learning techniques based on eddy covariance measurements. Sustainability 10:203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evrendilek F (2013) Quantifying biosphere–atmosphere exchange of CO2 using eddy covariance, wavelet denoising, neural networks, and multiple regression models. Agric Forest Meteor 1-8:171–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Evrendilek F (2014) Assessing CO2 sink/source strength of a degraded temperate peatland: atmospheric and hydrological drivers and responses to extreme events. Ecohydrol 8(8):1429–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaumont-Guay D, Black TA, Barr AG, Jassal RS, Nesic Z (2008) Biophysical controls on rhizospheric and heterotrophic components of soil respiration in a boreal black spruce stand. Tree Physiol 28:161–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hermle H, Lavigene MB, Berier PY, Bergeronn O, Pare D (2010) Component respiration, ecosystem respiration and net primary production of a mature black spruce forest in northern Quebec. Tree Physiol 30(4):527–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joiner J, Yoshida Y, Zhang Y, Duveiller G, Jung M, Lyapustin A, Wanng Y, Tucker CJ (2018) Estimation of terrestrial global gross primary production (GPP) with satellite data-driven models and eddy covariance flux data. Remote Sens 10:1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi S, Shiri J, Kisi P, Xu T (2018) Forecasting daily streamflow values: assessing heuristic models. Hydrol Res 49(3):658–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J Econ 54(1–3):159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Zhuang Q, He Y, Noormets A, Chen J, Gu L (2016) Evaluating atmospheric CO2 effects on gross primary productivity and net ecosystem exchanges of terrestrial ecosystems in the conterminous United States using the AmeriFlux data and an artificial neural network approach. Agric Forest Meteor 220:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroufpoor S, Bozorg-Haddad O, Maroufpoor E (2020) Reference evapotranspiration estimating based on optimal input combination and hybrid artificial intelligent model: Hybridization of artificial neural network with grey wolf optimizer algorithm. J Hydrol 588:125060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melesse AM, Hanley RS (2005) Artificial neural network application for multi-ecosystem carbon flux simulation. Ecol Model 189:305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes KR, Campus S, da Silva LL, Mutti PR, Ferreira RR et al (2020) Seasonal variation in net ecosystem CO2 exchange of a Brazilian seasonally dry tropical forest. Sci Rep 10:9454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papale D, Valentini R (2003) A new assessment of European forests carbon exchanges by eddy fluxes and artificial neural network spatialization. Glob Chang Biol 9:525–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papale D, Andrew Black T, Carvalhai N, Cescatti A, Chen J, Jung M, Kiely G et al (2015) Effect of spatial sampling from European flux towers for estimating carbon and water fluxes with artificial neural networks. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 120:1941–1957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin Z, Su GL, Zhang JE, Ouyang Y, Yu Q, Li J (2010) Identification of important factors for water vapor flux and CO2 exchange in a cropland. Ecol Model 221:575–581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raich JW, Schlesinger WH (1992) The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus 44(B):81–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson AD, Hollinger DY, Aber JD, Ollinger SV, Braswell BH (2007) Environmental variation is directly responsible for short- but not long-term variation in forest-atmosphere carbon exchange. Glob Chang Biol 13:788–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MG, Lavigne MB, Gower ST (1997) Annual carbon cost of autotrophic respiration in boreal forest ecosystems in relation to species and climate. J Geophys Res 102:28871–28883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schelde K, Kelliher FM, Massman WJ, Jensen KH (1997) Estimating sensible and latent heat fluxes from a temperate broad-leaved forest using the Simple Biosphere (SiB) model. Agric For Meteorol 84:285–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(3):379–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi P, Sun X, Xu L, Zhang X, He Y, Zhang D, Yu G (2006) Net ecosystem CO2 exchange and controlling factors in a steppe—Kobresia meadow on the Tibetan Plateau. Sci China Ser D Earth Sci 4:207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiri N, Shiri J, Nourani V, Karimi S (2020a) Coupling wavelet transform with multivariate adaptive regression spline for simulating suspended sediment load: Independent testing approach. ISH J Hydra Eng:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2020.1801528

  • Shiri J, Kisi O, Yoon H, Kazemi MH, Shiri N, Poorrajabali M, Karimi S (2020b) Prediction of groundwater level variations in coastal aquifers with tide and rainfall effects using heuristic data driven models. ISH J Hydra Eng:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2020.1729876

  • Urbanski S, Barford C, Wofsy S, Kucharik C, Pyle E, Budney J, McKain K, Fitzjarrald D, Czikowsky M, Munger JW (2007) Factors controlling CO2 exchange on timescales from hourly to decadal at Harvard forest. J Geophys Res 112:G02020. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valentini R, Matteucci G, Dolman AJ, Schulze ED, Rebmann C, Moors EJ, Granier A, Gross P, Jensen NO, Pilegaard K, Lindroth A, Grelle A, Bernhofer C, Grünwald T, Aubinet M, Ceulemans R, Kowalski AS, Vesala T, Rannik Ü, Berbigier P, Loustau D, Guamundsson J, Thorgeirsson H, Ibrom A, Morgenstern K, Clement R, Moncrieff J, Montagnani L, Minerbi S, Jarvis PG (2000) Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature 404:861–865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whartona S, Falk M, Bible K, Schroeder M, PawU KT (2012)Old-growth CO2 flux measurements reveal high sensitivity to climate anomalies across seasonal, annual and decadal time scales. Agric Forest Meteor 161:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NS made the investigation, simulation, and validation phases. J.S made the fundamental concept of the study and defined the methodology. He had contribution in writing the paper. MHK prepared the necessary resources and software and had contribution in modeling phase. TX helped with preparing necessary data and had contribution in conceptualization and writing the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jalal Shiri.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Marcus Schulz

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shiri, N., Shiri, J., Kazemi, M.H. et al. Estimation of CO2 flux components over northern hemisphere forest ecosystems by using random forest method through temporal and spatial data scanning procedures. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 16123–16137 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16501-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16501-x

Keywords

Navigation