Abstract
The energy profile of India is dominated by fossil fuels, which create concerns over resource and environmental sustainability as fossil fuels are non-renewable and high carbon emitting. This scenario has necessitated the call for more renewables to replace fossil fuels to address resource and environmental sustainability concerns. This study, therefore, investigates the possibility of switching the fossil fuels of oil, coal, and natural gas for renewable energy in India. Using annual Indian data spanning more than four decades, a transcendental logarithmic production function based on a second-order Taylor Series approximation is estimated with the ridge regression technique. To achieve robustness, two equations with gross domestic product and adjusted net savings as regressands are estimated to proxy economic growth and sustainable development, respectively. The empirical results show substantial substitution possibilities between the fuels for both gross domestic product and adjusted net savings equations. The empirical findings show that India has the capacity to satisfy its energy needs through renewables to pursue not only economic growth but sustainable development. To actualize this potential, the Indian government should promote investment in renewables as this also promotes economic growth and development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Notes
See Appendix A for the detailed formula for the output elasticity of each of the fuel inputs.
For more details on the elasticity of substitution between the respective inputs, see Appendix B.
ANS provides a more robust representation (relative to net national savings) of sustainable development in that apart from capturing the genuine economic growth in an economy, it also accounts for environmental factors, which are critical elements of sustainable development. Sustainable development encompasses economic, environmental and social aspects and as such it is extremely difficult for a single measure to capture these factors. Just like any other measure of sustainable development, the ANS also has its limitation as it does not adequately capture the social aspect of sustainable development. It nevertheless takes account of the economic and environmental aspects. We have relied on OECD (2004) and Salahodjaev and Jarilkapova (2019) in choosing the ANS as a measure of sustainable development.
. It is noted that variations in the penalty parameters cause the coefficients on the explanatory variables to change until the penalty parameters converge.
We sincerely appreciate one of the anonymous reviewers for pointing out this fact to us.
References
(OECD), (2004). Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measuring sustainable development: integrated economic, environmental and social frameworks. Available at www.oecd.org/site/worldforum/33703829.pdf (accessed on 25 October, 2020)
Andrikopoulos AA, Brox JA, Paraskevopoulos CC (1989) Interfuel and interfactor substitution in Ontario manufacturing, 1962-82. Appl Econ 21(12):1667–1681
Andruszkiewicz J, Lorenc J, Weychan A (2020) Seasonal variability of price elasticity of demand of households using zonal tariffs and its impact on hourly load of the power system. Energy 196:117175
Arshad M, Bano I, Khan N, Shahzad MI, Younus M, Abbas M, Iqbal M (2018) Electricity generation from biogas of poultry waste: an assessment of potential and feasibility in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:1241–1246
Bello MO, Solarin SA, Yen YY (2018) Hydropower and potential for interfuel substitution: The case of electricity sector in Malaysia. Energy 151:966–983
Bello MO, Solarin SA, Yen YY (2020) Interfuel substitution, hydroelectricity consumption and CO2 emissions mitigation in Malaysia: evidence from a transcendental logarithm (trans-log) cost function framework. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:17162–17174
Berndt ER, Wood DO (1975) Technology, prices, and the derived demand for energy. Rev Econ Stat 57(3):259–268
British Petroleum (2018) Statistical Review of World Energy. Available online https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html. Accessed 17 March 2019
Climate Policy Initiative (2018). Indian renewable energy is now a more lucrative investment than fossil fuels Available online https://climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/an-assessment-of-indias-energy-choices/ (accessed on 17 March 2019)
Conference Board, (2018). Economic data and analysis. Available at: conference-board.org/data/. (accessed on 17 February 2019)
Destek MA (2016) Renewable energy consumption and economic growth in newly industrialized countries: evidence from asymmetric causality test. Renew Energy 95:478–484
Destek MA, Sinha A (2020) Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 242:118537
Energy Information Administration (2016) Energy information administration. Available at https://www.eia.gov/. Accessed 25 July 2020
Gómez MA (2018) Factor substitution and convergence speed in the neoclassical model with elastic labor supply. Econ Lett 172:89–92
Griffin JM (1977) Inter-fuel substitution possibilities: a translog application to intercountry data. Int Econ Rev 18(3):755–770
Guidolin M, Alpcan T (2019) Transition to sustainable energy generation in Australia: interplay between coal, gas and renewables. Renew Energy 139:359–367
Güney T (2019) Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 26(5):389–397
Halvorsen R (1977) Energy substitution in US manufacturing. Rev Econ Stat 59(4):381–388
Higgins PA (2005) Exercise-based transportation reduces oil dependence, carbon emissions and obesity. Environmental Conservation 32(3):197–202
Hoerl AE, Kennard RW (1970) Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12(1):55–67
Huh SY, Lee H, Shin J, Lee D, Jang J (2018) Inter-fuel substitution path analysis of the korea cement industry. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:4091–4099
International Energy Agency (2019). World Energy Balances 2019. Available online at https://www.iea.org/subscribe-to-data-services/world-energy-balances-and-statistics (accessed on 20 May 2020)
International Energy Association (2020). IEA World Energy Balances 2020. Available at https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-balances-overview (accessed on 25 October, 2020)
Jones CT (2014) The role of biomass in US industrial interfuel substitution. Energy Policy 69:122–126
Kar J, Chakraborty D (1986) Inter-fuel substitution possibilities in. Indian manufacturing industries: a translog approach 28(2):133–151
Khalid W, Jalil A (2019) An econometric analysis of inter-fuel substitution in energy sector of Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(17):17021–17031
Kim K (2019) Elasticity of substitution of renewable energy for nuclear power: evidence from the Korean electricity industry. Nucl Eng Technol 51(6):1689–1695
Kumar S, Fujii H, Managi S (2015) Substitute or complement? Assessing renewable and nonrenewable energy in OECD countries. Appl Econ 47(14):1438–1459
Li J, Zhang Y, Tian Y, Cheng W, Yang J, Xu D, Wang Y, Xie K, Ku AY (2020) Reduction of carbon emissions from China ' s coal-fired power industry: Insights from the province-level data. J Clean Prod 242:118518
Lim JY, How BS, Rhee G, Hwangbo S, Yoo CK (2020) Transitioning of localized renewable energy system towards sustainable hydrogen development planning: P-graph approach. Appl Energy 263:114635
Lin B, Ankrah I (2019) On Nigeria’s renewable energy program: Examining the effectiveness, substitution potential, and the impact on national output. Energy 167:1181–1193
Lin B, Raza MY (2020) Energy substitution effect on transport sector of Pakistan: A trans-log production function approach. J Clean Prod 251:119606
Lin B, Xu M (2019) Exploring the green total factor productivity of China’s metallurgical industry under carbon tax: a perspective on factor substitution. J Clean Prod 233:1322–1333
Liu K, Bai H, Yin S, Lin B (2018) Factor substitution and decomposition of carbon intensity in China ' s heavy industry. Energy 145:582–591
Ma M, Cai W, Cai W (2018) Carbon abatement in China ' s commercial building sector: a bottom-up measurement model based on Kaya-LMDI methods. Energy 165:350–368
Ma M, Cai W, Cai W, Dong L (2019) Whether carbon intensity in the commercial building sector decouples from economic development in the service industry? Empirical evidence from the top five urban agglomerations in China. J Clean Prod 222:193–205
Magnus JR (1979) Substitution between energy and non-energy inputs in the Netherlands 1950-1976. Int Econ Rev 20(2):465–484
Masike K, Vermeulen C (2020) The time-varying elasticity of South African electricity demand: 1980–2018. Economic Research Southern Africa, ERSA working paper 839:1–25
Menegaki AN, Tugcu CT (2018) Two versions of the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) in the energy-growth nexus for selected Asian countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption 14:21–35
Moore S, Durant V, Mabee WE (2013) Determining appropriate feed-in tariff rates to promote biomass-to-electricity generation in Eastern Ontario, Canada. Energy Policy 63:607–613
National Institution for Transforming India (2017). Draft National Energy Policy NITI Aayog, Government of India. Available online http://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/new_initiatives/NEP-ID_27.06.2017.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2019)
Perera P, Sarker T, Bélaïd F, Taghizadeh Hesary F, & Nazmul Islam K M (2021). How precious is the reliability of the residential electricity service in developing economies? Evidence from India. ADBI Working Paper 1211, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3798084 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3798084
Pindyck RS (1979) Interfuel substitution and the industrial demand for energy: an international comparison. Rev Econ Stat 61(2):169–179
Rahman MM, Velayutham E (2020) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus: new evidence from South Asia. Renew Energy 147:399–408
Ramanathan R (1975) The elasticity of substitution and the speed of convergence in growth models, The Economic Journal. 85, 85(339):612, 612–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/2230903
Rehfeldt M, Fleiter T, Worrell E (2018) Inter-fuel substitution in European industry: a random utility approach on industrial heat demand. J Clean Prod 187:98–110
Sadaf S, Iqbal J, Ullah I, Bhatti HN, Nouren S, Nisar J, Iqbal M (2018) Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: An efficient technique to convert waste into biodiesel. Sustain Cities Soc 41:220–226
Sadi M, Arabkoohsar A (2020) Techno-economic analysis of off-grid solar-driven cold storage systems for preventing the waste of agricultural products in hot and humid climates. J Clean Prod 275:124143
Salahodjaev R, Jarilkapova D (2019) Female parliamentarism and genuine savings: A cross-country test. Sustain Dev 27(4):637–646
Sarkar S, Roy J (1995) Inter-fuel substitution during post oil embargo period-case study of two energy intensive manufacturing industries in India. Indian Economic Journal 43(2):33
Shankar K R, & Pacauri R K (1983). A study of energy use in India ' s manufacturing industries. Report for the agency for international development under cooperative agreement no. AID/DSAN-CA-0179. Resources for the future 1983
Shell (2017) Shell world energy model: A view to 2100. Available online https://www.shell.com/energy-and-innovation/the-energy-future/scenarios/shell-scenarios-energy-models/world-energy-model.html (accessed on 17 March 2019)
Solarin SA, Bello MO (2019) Interfuel substitution, biomass consumption, economic growth, and sustainable development: evidence from Brazil. J Clean Prod 211:1357–1366
Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2017) Validating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in India and China: the role of hydroelectricity consumption. Renew Sust Energ Rev 80:1578–1587
Suh DH (2017) Biofuel substitution and carbon dioxide emission: Implication for biofuel mandate. In: 2017 Annual Meeting of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, 4-7 February 2017, Mobile, Alabama (No. 251888)
Taheri AA (1994) Oil shocks and the dynamics of substitution adjustments of industrial fuels in the US. Appl Econ 26(8):751–756
Tiba S, Omri A (2017) Literature survey on the relationships between energy, environment and economic growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev 69:1129–1146
Tiwari AK, Menegaki AN (2019) A time varying approach on the price elasticity of electricity in India during 1975–2013. Energy 183:385–397
Tsita KG, Pilavachi PA (2013) Evaluation of next generation biomass derived fuels for the transport sector. Energy Policy 62:443–455
Uri ND (1979) Energy demand and interfuel substitution in India. Eur Econ Rev 12(2):181–190
Vashist DC (1984) Substitution possibilities and price sensitivity of energy demand in Indian manufacturing. Indian Economic Journal 32(2):84
Vlachou AS, Samouilidis EJ (1986) Interfuel substitution: results from several sectors of the Greek economy. Energy Econ 8(1):39–45
Webb J, de Silva HN, Wilson C (2020) The future of coal and renewable power generation in Australia: a review of market trends. Economic Analysis and Policy 68:363–378
Wei Z, Han B, Han L, Shi Y (2019) Factor substitution, diversified sources on biased technological progress and decomposition of energy intensity in China ' s high-tech industry. J Clean Prod 231:87–97
Wesseh PK Jr, Lin B (2018) Energy consumption, fuel substitution, technical change, and economic growth: Implications for CO2 mitigation in Egypt. Energy Policy 117:340–347
Wesseh PK, Lin B (2016) Output and substitution elasticities of energy and implications for renewable energy expansion in the ECOWAS region. Energy Policy 89:125–137
World Bank (2018). World development indicators. Available online www.data.worldbank.org (accessed on 17 March 2019)
Acknowledgements
The item is not applicable.
Funding
The item is not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SAS conceived the idea of the paper and wrote the introduction, wrote the literature review and discussion in the paper. MOB did the literature review, methodology, and conclusion sections of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The item is not applicable.
Consent for publication
The item is not applicable.
Competing interests
The autors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Output elasticity
Given the general formula in equation (3), the output elasticity for the respective individual input
are given as follows:
Oil: \( {\eta}_{ot}=\frac{\partial \ln {q}_t}{\partial \ln {o}_{ot}}={\alpha}_o+2{\alpha}_{oo}\ln {o}_t+{\alpha}_{or}\ln {r}_t+{\alpha}_{oc}\ln {c}_t+{\alpha}_{og}\ln {g}_t, \)(1b)
Gas: \( {\eta}_{gt}=\frac{\partial \ln {q}_t}{\partial \ln {g}_{gt}}={\alpha}_g+2{\alpha}_{gg}\ln {g}_t+{\alpha}_{gr}\ln {\alpha}_t+{\alpha}_{gc}\ln {c}_t+{\alpha}_{go}\ln {o}_t, \)(2b)
Coal: \( {\eta}_{ct}=\frac{\partial \ln {q}_t}{\partial \ln {c}_{ct}}={\alpha}_c+2{\alpha}_{cc}\ln {c}_t+{\alpha}_{cr}\ln {r}_t+{\alpha}_{cg}\ln {g}_t+{\alpha}_{co}\ln {o}_t, \)(3b)
Renewable: \( {\eta}_{rt}=\frac{\partial \ln {q}_t}{\partial \ln {r}_{rt}}={\alpha}_r+2{\alpha}_{rr}\ln {r}_t+{\alpha}_{rc}\ln {c}_t+{\alpha}_{rg}\ln {g}_t+{\alpha}_{ro}\ln {o}_t, \)(4b)Where ηot, ηgt, ηct, and ηrt respectively stands for the elasticity of output for oil, gas, coal, and renewable energy.
Substitution elasticity
From the general equation given in (5), the specific substitution elasticity between two input fuels are given as follows:
Where σgo measures elasticity of substitution between gas and oil, σco is between coal and oil, σcg is between coal and gas while the elasticities between renewable energy and oil, renewable energy and gas, and between renewable energy and coal are respectively measured by σroσrgandσrc.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solarin, S.A., Bello, M.O. Output and substitution elasticity estimates between renewable and non-renewable energy: implications for economic growth and sustainability in India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 65313–65332 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15113-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15113-9