Introduction

Nowadays, with growing concerns about viral pandemics in the last year, and the importance of ventilation systems in reducing the transmission of these diseases, there is a growing interest in using advanced oxidation systems to purify the indoor air of medical, hospital, and public settings (Habibi-Yangjeh et al. 2020). Many studies have identified SARS-Cov-2 in air samples that highlight its airborne potential (Abbasipour et al. 2014). In this regard, variety ventilation systems are used to ventilate confined indoor spaces. Heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems as a well-known mechanical air cleaners are applied to provide appropriate temperature and humidity and clean air in indoor settings. HVAC systems provide clean air by passing air through different filters such as fiberglass, cotton or polyester, and high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters. In recent months, with the occurrence of COVID-19 pandemic, the role of portable ventilation systems in reducing the load of virus in indoor air has received much attention. The use of conventional filters in these air purifiers cannot remove particle-like viruses from air and are generally used for the removal of odors and larger particles. In this regard, adding a photocatalyst unit to the commercial HVACs is proposed for enhancing the microbial retention capability.

Nowadays, there is a growing interest in the use of advance oxidation processes (AOPs) for the removal of air pollutants. In these processes, active radicals play a key role in pollutant degradation, while the air stream is passing through the reactor. The main limitations of the most AOPs for the removal of air pollutants are associated with the short contact time of the pollutants in the reactor. Among the AOPs, photocatalytic processes have been severally used an efficient method for the removal of organic pollutants present in aqueous and gas phases (Rahimi et al. 2016). Until now, the efficiency of these processes has been tested for a wide range of air pollutants, such as pesticides, dyes, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (Abdennouri et al. 2016; Mamaghani et al. 2017). Despite the importance of photocatalytic processes in the removal of biological contaminants in indoor air, few studies have been focused on their applicability and efficiency. This might be related to the difficulties in identification and quantitative measurement of biological agents, especially viruses in air. In this regard, in the present study, with respect to Habibi-Yangjeh et al.’s study (Habibi-Yangjeh et al. 2020) on the heterogeneous photocatalytic disinfection of waterborne, airborne, and foodborne viruses, we focused on the last photocatalysis processes for the removal of viruses from indoor air. Table 1 presents the photocatalytic processes that have been used for the removal of different viruses in air streams.

Table 1 Summarization of photocatalytic processes for inactivation and removal of airborne viruses in indoor air
Full size table

Type of process

Todays, photocatalytic processes are commonly used as promising technology for the degradation and removal of organic pollutants from the environments. There is a wide variety of photocatalytic processes that are mostly used for aqueous media in a batch reactor. In this regard, the application of such processes for purifying air streams is still a challenge due to the very short exposure time. In the application of photocatalytic processes for the removal of organic compounds, the air stream containing the pollutants is passed through a photocatalyst filter, which results in a very short contact time between the pollutant molecules and the photocatalyst surface. This is considered a major limitation for the application of these technologies in air. Previous studies have showed that the photocatalytic processes are able to remove the VOCs from air streams with a limited efficiency in the range 50–70% depending on the air flow rate and used source light (Cao et al. 2000; Liang et al. 2010). However, many efforts have been made to improve the efficiency of the photocatalytic processes for air purifying (Long et al. 2012; Samarghandi et al. 2017). Due to the advantages of the photocatalytic processes, many researchers have recently focused on the use of ultraviolet (UV) along with catalyst for the inactivation of pathogenic microorganisms in water as an on-site disinfection method (De Vietro et al. 2019; Gerrity et al. 2008). Few studies have investigated the application of these technologies for inactivation of viruses in air. As we know, with growing concerns about viral pandemics in the last year, and the importance of using ventilation systems for reducing the transmission of these diseases, there is an increasing interest in the use of photocatalytic processes for the removal and reducing the load of airborne microbial agents. For this reason, different types of photocatalytic processes can be used for inactivation of viruses in air due to their organic nature as follows:

TiO2 photocatalyst

As previously mentioned, various materials have been used as photocatalytic, which are typically made of metal oxides, metal sulfides, oxysulfides, oxynitrides, and composites (Sakka 2013). Among them, TiO2 has been more commonly used for the sterilization of microbial agents and organic compounds (Li et al. 2018). For instance, in Kim et al.’s study, TiO2/UV photocatalyst showed the highest activity for inactivation of airborne MS2 viruses (Kim and Jang 2018). In order to use TiO2 as a photocatalyst in air purifiers, it should be used in the form of a filter similar to other filter type, which provides enough surfaces for passing a determined volume of polluted air and trapping pollutants in the air stream. For this reason, in the Kim et al.’s study, four types of catalyst frame shapes, including two mm-pleated, five mm-pleated, spiral, and flat sheet types, were applied with a thickness of 0.2 mm of titanium sheets, and it was found that the 2 mm pleated catalyst offered the highest efficiency for the inactivation of airborne MS2 viruses (Kim and Jang 2018). They also used a vacuum UV (VUV, wavelength ≤200 nm) for the photocatalysis of the target virus. The VUV refers to the wavelength range below ≈ 200 nm. In the vacuum UV range, light is strongly absorbed in air and thereby can improve the performance of the photocatalytic process for air applications. In this regard, a previous study reported a higher disinfection efficacy for vacuum UV in comparison with UV light on Bacillus subtilis spores (Wang et al. 2010). Zan et al. (2007) also investigated the efficiency of nano-TiO2 particles and TiO2-coated ceramic plates as photocatalytic processes on the inactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV). However, in the Zan et al.’s study, HBV surface antigen in aqueous solution was removed using the photocatalytic process, and it cannot be generalized to the origin virus. They reported that both TiO2 suspension and TiO2-coated ceramic plates were capable of destroying most HBV antigens under weak ultraviolet light, weak sunlight, or indoor sunlight (Zan et al. 2007).

In another study, a thin film of TiO2-coated glass (T3 sample, 50 × 50 mm) along with a low intensity of UV-A (0.01 mW cm−2) was successfully applied for inactivation of influenza virus (Nakano et al. 2012a). TiO2 in combination with other compounds such as copper(II) has been applied for the inactivation of airborne viruses. For instance, in a recent study, Cu(II)–TiO2 nanocomposite was synthesized and used for viral inactivation in air, which showed suitable antiviral activity (Liu et al. 2015). Recently, many efforts have been made to improve the photocatalytic characteristics of commercial TiO2 as a photocatalyst for inactivation of microbial agents. In a related study, Ahmed et al. introduced a simple method for the synthesis of anatase TiO2 quantum dots using a single step microwave–hydrothermal method, which offered a higher energy gap compared to the commercially available anatase TiO2 nanoparticles. They also reported an increase in the absorbance of ultraviolet light for superior photocatalytic inactivation ability of E. coli (Ahmed et al. 2019). In Daikoku et al.’s study on the inactivation of aerosol-associated influenza by photocatalysis using an air cleaner and the porous ceramic substrate, due to the use of porous ceramic coated with nanoTiO2, the viral inactivation efficiency of photocatalysis was greatly attributed to the surface area of the used coated ceramic, and the photocatalytic air cleaner showed a high efficiency for the decomposition of organic chemicals including acetaldehyde and dioxins and inactivation of aerosol-associated influenza virus in air stream (Daikoku et al. 2015). Moreover, Nakano et al. also reported that TiO2 thin film could disinfect influenza virus through degradation of viral proteins, in which this inactivation effect depended on the UV irradiation time and its intensity (Nakano et al. 2012b). Therefore, it can be concluded that TiO2 thin film can be successfully used for disinfection of the influenza virus in the air, which can be also used for other airborne viruses and hinder viral transition through air. Moreover, doping TiO2 with other metals like Pt, Ag, Pd, and Au has been recently introduced as effective strategy to enhance its photocatalytic activity. The application of metal nanoparticle provides a high specific surface area to generate special barrier, which results in an increase in the photocatalytic activity of the basic TiO2 through the improvement of charge separation rate. It has been also reported that in the decoration of TiO2 with Au and Ag, the localized surface plasmon resonance as an additional effect leads to a strong absorption of the visible light, which improves the photocatalytic activity of the decorated TiO2 (Yu et al. 2017).

Ag photocatalyst

Silver (Ag) has been widely used as an antibacterial materials due to its high surface area and chemo-physical properties (Marambio-Jones and Hoek 2010). Ag+ and silver nanoparticles can inactivate the viruses and denature their enzymes through the reaction with sulfhydra, amino, carboxyl, phosphate, and imidazole groups. In this case, Joe et al. (2016) synthesized silver nanoparticles using spark discharge generation (SDG) system and then coated the particles onto the air filter surface to provide antiviral ability (Joe et al. 2016). SDG is one of the mechanical methods that uses a high voltage to a pair of close-set silver electrodes, in which a spark is produced between the two electrodes. In this system, under the effect of the electric field, the accelerated ions and electrons affect the surface of the silver node and results in the vaporization of the electrode surface. The metallic vapors cool downstream from the spark. Eventually, nucleation condensation and coagulation of the silver nanoparticles occurred (Byeon et al. 2008; Joe et al. 2016). In addition, silver-doped titanium dioxide (Ag/TiO2) nanocomposites with various silver contents have been also developed for oxidation of microbial agents. Moongraksathum et al. reported that the presence of silver on TiO2 significantly improved the virucidal effects (greater than 99.99%) under UV-A irradiation (Moongraksathum et al. 2019). Therefore, coating Ag with TiO2 can be used as absolution for improving the photocatalytic properties of Ag in the inactivation of viral particles in air. For instance, Mehdizadeh and Tavangar showed that the presence of 1.5% Ag coated on N/TiO2 (with 2:1 mole ratio) resulted in the highest activity under visible and ultraviolet irradiation in the photocatalytic processes (Mehdizadeh and Tavangar 2017). Moreover, Liga et al. demonstrated that the inactivation rate of MS2 was enhanced by more than 5-fold through silver-doped titanium dioxide nanoparticles (nAg/TiO2), depending on the base TiO2 material, and the inactivation efficiency increased with increasing silver content. They also reported that the inactivation efficiency of MS2 virus in drinking water using the nAg/TiO2 nanoparticles was attributed to increased production of hydroxyl-free radicals under the effect of UV-A irradiation provided by four 8 W UV-A lamps (in a wavelength range 315–400 nm) (Liga et al. 2011). Therefore, it can be concluded by doping TiO2 with Ag nanoparticles; a synergic effect occurs between them for inactivating viruses under UV radiation. It has been also reported that TiO2 doped with silver causes a slight increase in virus adsorption on the catalyst surface and also increases the photocatalytic inactivation of viruses through the increase of the production of hydroxyl-free radicals (Liga et al. 2011). It should be noted that most of the mentioned studies have focused on the photocatalytic inactivation of viruses in water and aqueous solutions, and very few research have investigated the effects of such processes for inactivation of viral agents in air.

Cu photocatalyst

Some recent studies have evaluated the role of copper (Cu) in the photocatalysis of various organic compounds in air (Arana et al. 2005; Papadaki et al. 2019; Tri et al. 2019; Wu et al. 2018). It has been reported that the presence of Cu in the catalyst surface could modify the interactions of the organic pollutants with the catalysts surface and thereby improves the process efficiency (Araña et al. 2005). Cu is most commonly used as doping agent with TiO2 and ZnO photocatalyst in order to improve their photocatalytic activity. In a related research, it was reported that the Cu-doped ZnO exhibits 3.5-fold higher photocatalytic activity compared to pure corn seed-shaped ZnO (Kadam et al. 2017). Cu has also been used in Cu-TiO2 nano-fibers under visible light for inactivation of viral agents, in which the Cu-TiO2 nano-fibers offered a suitable efficiency for the inactivation of bacteriophage f2 under visible light (Zheng et al. 2018). Cuprous oxide (Cu2O) as a semiconductor with optical-band-gap absorption has been also applied as a promising photocatalyst (Singh et al. 2018). To the best of our knowledge, until now, there has been no study evaluating the use of Cu2O as photocatalytic for the inactivation of virus in air. Based on the previous studies, the efficient antiviral properties of Cu2O can convert it as a suitable alternative for rapid inactivation of viral agents in air stream with continuous flows through photocatalytic processes. CuxO/TiO2 photocatalyst has been also applied as an antivirus agent through denaturalizing the protein of the virus in the photocatalytic oxidation process (Abidi et al. 2019). Cu(II) species in the CuxO can act an electron acceptor through photo-induced interfacial charge transfer, resulting in the production of Cu(I) species with antivirus activity and holes with high oxidation potential under visible light irradiation in the valence band similar to TiO2. The CuxO/TiO2 photocatalyst can maintain its antiviral effect under dark conditions, due to the remaining active Cu (I) species. Hence, it has been suggested that the proposed CuxO/TiO2 photocatalyst can decrease the risk of transmission of viral infection in indoor air by applying such coating photocatalyst (Miyauchi et al. 2020).

Type of virus

Due to the difficulty in quantifying viruses in the air, it is very difficult to determine the efficiency of photocatalytic processes to remove and inactivate airborne viruses. Because, so far, no standard method has been introduced for the sampling and detection of virus in air streams, little attention has been paid to the sampling and determination of viruses in air. This limitation has been well addressed in our previous paper (Rahmani et al. 2020). On the other hand, most of the airborne viruses are associated with dangerous respiratory diseases such as SARS-associated coronaviruses, which makes it difficult to work with them at laboratory environments. In this regard, bacteriophages have received much attention from researchers worldwide as an indicator of airborne viruses. Bacteriophages as a group of viruses can infect and kill bacteria without adverse health effects on human or animal (Principi et al. 2019). Moreover, previous studies showed that bacteriophages are appropriate model organisms for virus emergence research due to their characteristics (Dennehy 2009). As can be seen in Table 1, some previous studies have also evaluated the effectiveness of photocatalytic processes for the removal of bacteriophages as a viral model in indoor air. For instance, in Kim et al.’s study, TiO2/UV photocatalyst was applied for inactivation of airborne MS2 viruses (Kim and Jang 2018). In another study, sealed UV-C flow reactors operating with fluences near at a wavelength of 253 ± 1 nm were efficiently applied for the inactivation of coronaviruses in indoor air. In the mentioned study, it was concluded that that UV-C flow reactors can efficiently inactivate coronaviruses in air and hence can be used in HVAC ducts or recirculating air purifiers (Cho et al. 2003). However, the short contact time during the passage of high air flow in these processes is considered a major limitation. In a previous study, a high-intensity UV cell with a length of 91.4 cm consisted of a highly reflective inner surface and a longitudinally extending helical baffle system was applied for the inactivation of several viruses, and it was found that inactivation rates of greater than 99.9% were obtained for the studied viruses including influenza, Sindbis, Coxsackie, and vaccinia viruses. Moreover, a slightly less efficiency was observed for adenovirus that was 96.8 %. In this case, the inactivation efficiency of the proposed UV based system decreased with an increase in the flow rate from 100 to 200 ft3/min (Jensen 1964). Therefore, the photocatalytic processes offer various performances for the inactivation of viruses in air, and therefore, a constant viral model may not be generalizable to other airborne viruses.

Viral load

Viral load as the initial pollutant concentration can affect the performance of photocatalytic processes. Many studies have investigated the effect of initial load of organic pollutants (e.g., benzene, toluene, and other pollutants) on the photocatalytic process efficiency (Al-Sabahi et al. 2017; Einaga et al. 2004). Regarding the effect of initial viral load, Yu et al. used a reactor equipped with two ultraviolet lamps and a TiO2 filter at 365 nm wavelength for the removal of various types of airborne microorganisms and showed that the photocatalytic filter was able to remove about 36% of the airborne phages with an initial viral load of 8.7 × 104-1.2 × 107. They also reported that the single UVA at a wavelength of 365 nm (without TIO2 filter) did not offer a significant efficiency and therefore cannot be used in single mode for inactivation of airborne virus in continuous-flow rate reactors. Similar results have been reported by other studies such as Jensen et al.’s study (Jacoby et al. 1998). Moreover, in Nakano et al.’s study, it was found that despite the partial intensity of UVA, a 4 log10 decrease was observed in the viral load during the illumination time. As mentioned above, the UVA along with a thin layer of TiO2 can also be useful for disinfection of air containing airborne viruses. Moreover, Qiao et al. reported a higher than 3-log reduction in the concentration of in viable coronavirus aerosol under UV-C irradiation (Qiao et al. 2020c). Ghezz et al. showed that a photocatalyst system based on a filter combining tungsten trioxide-based photocatalysis and an antiviral fabric treated-copper nanocluster could decrease the load of SARS-Cov-2 by 1.5 log10 after 30 min (Ghezzi et al. 2020).

Environmental factors

Air flow rate

In air disinfection, air velocity is an important parameter that affects the performance of biological aerosol removal. The airflow in terms of velocity and air distribution should provide effective contact between microbial agents such as viruses with optical photons and radicals responsible for the destruction of these agents in air stream. At high air velocities, the residence time of the bioaerosols in the reactor is not sufficient to inactivate them during passing through the filter installed in the photocatalytic reactor (Lin and Li 2003). In order to inactivate airborne agents, they first should be trapped on the filter surface (TiO2, Ag, Cu, and other composite coated filters) and then inactivated under the effect of UV or other kind of light irradiation. In this case, the filter penetrations of microorganisms also increased as face velocities increased (Cho et al. 2003). Hence, the flow velocity is proportional to the flow rate and can mainly affect the photocatalytic process performance. Recently, VUV has been introduced as a very effective light source for inactivation of viruses at short contact times (Habibi-Yangjeh et al. 2020). In Kim and Jang’s study, photocatalytic processes were capable of removing 90% of MS2 (as an airborne virus) using the Pd-TiO2/VUV system at very short irradiation times of about 0.009 s with a flow rate of 33 L/min. In many studies, the effect of air velocity in photo reactors has been investigated below 0.5 m/s, and in some studies, it was investigated even at 0.05 m/s (Chen et al. 2009). In this regard, Jost et al. designed an optical reactor to purify air contaminated with existing Legionella pneumophila bacteria at high airflow velocities in the range 2.7–4.1 m/s, with a disinfection efficiency of 93% in a single pass mode (Josset et al. 2007).

Reactor temperature

A review of the literature showed that most photocatalytic processes have been used to remove viruses at room temperature (Goswami et al. 1997). Until now, no studies have specifically investigated the effect of reactor temperature on the photocatalytic performance for the inactivation of airborne viruses and even other airborne microbial agents. The effect of temperature is also less studied in continuous-flow reactors for organic compounds. Goswami et al. had stated that temperature does not affect the UV disinfection process, and the temperature rise caused by the UV lamps in the duct did not play a significant role in the inactivation of bacteria (Goswami et al. 1997). However, some studies highlighted the role of air temperature as an effective factor on the photocatalytic performance of different materials. In heat-based processes, high temperatures can cause damage and death to microorganisms, through destructing proteins and disrupting the structure of polypeptides. However, its disadvantage is the high energy consumption for applying thermal energy at high temperatures (Cho et al. 2003; Lin and Li 2003). Therefore, photocatalytic processes can be operated at low temperatures and hence do not require high temperatures and high energy consumption. In general, rising temperature reduces the population of viruses in air, but this phenomenon happens without the use of a photocatalytic process and requires a long contact time. For this reason, the use of combined processes along with UV irradiation can efficiently inactivate viruses and other microbial agents at shorter contact times. The use of higher temperatures can also accelerate the degradation process. In a recent study on the removal of MS2 (as an indicator if airborne virus) using VUV photocatalysis, when viruses were exposed to VUV irradiation, the inactivation rate of MS2 at 25 °C was higher than at 4 °C. However, the normal deactivation rate after 12 h was reported to be 53% and 55% at 4°C and 25 °C, respectively (Habibi-Yangjeh et al. 2020). This study has been conducted on waterborne viruses and may not be generalizable to air. In a recent study, it was also found that by increasing the temperature of the photocatalytic materials, the photocatalytic activity enhanced, indicating the role of reactor temperature in photocatalytic process (Costacurta et al. 2010). Another study reported an increase in the efficiency of photocatalytic oxidation of benzene with increasing reactor temperature up to 45 °C (Jafari et al. 2019). Due to the greater complexity of the effect of temperature on the virus as an organism, this cannot be generalized to viruses as a general rule. It has been also reported that low temperatures in air in the range 7–8 °C provide an optimal condition for airborne influenza survival, and their survival decreased with increasing environmental temperature in the range 20.5–24°C, and then this decrease intensifies at higher temperatures (> 30°C) (Tang 2009).

Relative humidity

Relative humidity is another important environmental factor affecting the photocatalytic performance through the intervention of water molecules in occupying the free sites on the catalyst surface (Samarghandi et al. 2014). Regarding the effect of relative humidity in air on the virus inactivation, a recent study has reported that there was no determined relationship between coronavirus inactivation and relative humidity in indoor air, and a higher survival rate was observed for SARS-Cov-2 at 20% as a low humidity level and its survival rate decreased by increasing the relative humidity from 50 to 80% (Harmooshi et al. 2020). Also Koet al et al. demonstrated that a relative humidity of 70% is suitable for eliminating airborne microorganisms (19). In another study, photocatalytic inactivation of airborne microorganisms using TiO2 coated on fiberglass filter increased by increasing relative humidity between 30 and 80%, while it decreased by decreasing the relative humidity lower than 30% (Lee 2011). In Yu et al.’s study on the use of photocatalytic of three different types of airborne microorganisms, it was found that the relative humidity causes an increase in the removal efficiency of airborne viruses, and the removal efficiency of phages, as viral model, increased from about 10 to 20% by increasing relative humidity from 30 to 70% (Yu et al. 2008). However, they reported an opposite trend for E. coli in the proposed photocatalytic process. This difference may be due to the difference in the size of viruses with bacteria, which have higher contact with the TiO2 photocatalyst (Nakano et al. 2012b).

Light sources

Light source as an agent activating catalyst in the photocatalytic process plays a key role in the removal of pollutants in air stream. In this regard, various light sources such as UV light (subdivided into UV-A, UV-B, and UV-C), visible light, light-emitting diode (LED), and sun light (as a natural light source) have been applied in the photocatalytic processes (De Vietro et al. 2019; Gerrity et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2015). Sunlight as an inexhaustible source has received much attention to be used in photocatalysis processes. When a photocatalyst is irradiated with light source with energy greater than the band gap energy leads to the generation of the formed e−–h+ pairs. These excited holes and electrons with strong energy potentials could migrate to the semiconductor surface for generating highly reactive free radicals or recombining (Tsang et al. 2019). The mechanisms of virus inactivation using photocatalytic processes have been completely described in Habibi-Yangjeh et al.’s study (Habibi-Yangjeh et al. 2020). In this regard, by increasing the energy intensity of the light source, the generation of reactive free radicals from the photocatalyst surface is increased and thereby results in an increase in the inactivation of microbial agents in passing air. However, the band gap of the photocatalyst plays a key role in the feasibility of using a light source. For instance, TiO2 as the most commonly used photocatalyst, due to its advantages such as high chemical stability, low cost, and low toxic, has a limited band gap of 3.2 eV, which can be activated under UV-light region. Four to five percent of solar light lies in the UV region [15], while 45% of solar light lies in the visible light region. Many researches have been conducted to expand the spectral response of TiO2 to the visible light region such as doping with non-metal, coupled semiconductors, metal deposition, and defect-induced visible light active photocatalyst. For example, in Zan et al.’s study, weak ultraviolet light, weak sunlight, or indoor sunlight could activate the TiO2-coated ceramic plates for inactivation of hepatitis B virus (Zan et al. 2007). In Jafry et al.’s study, it was reported that adding silica to TiO2 nanoparticles led to an increase in the band gap of the TiO2 nanoparticles, which increased the OH• and thereby increased photocatalytic activity of the proposed photocatalyst. In the mentioned study, the silica-doped TiO2 nanoparticles were used for the inactivation of viruses (bacteriophage MS2) (Jafry et al. 2011). It is noteworthy that the addition of silica did not increase the surface area of the resulting photocatalyst, and the higher virus inactivation rate of silica doping TiO2 was reported to be due to the increased adsorption of viruses onto the catalyst and higher generation of OH•, which are responsible for the viral inactivation (Jafry et al. 2011). Nakano et al. also reported that UVA along with TiO2 thin film could disinfect influenza virus through degradation of viral proteins and was successfully used for disinfection of the influenza virus in the air. This inactivation effect depended on time of UV and its intensity (Nakano et al. 2012b). Ghezzi et al. used tungsten trioxide-based photocatalyst and UV irradiation based on a filter combining and an antiviral fabric treated-copper nanocluster for inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 in indoor conditions. Based on their results, the viral load decreased by 98% after 10 min and then reached 100% inactivation after 30 min. They also reported that the SARS-CoV-2 RNA load decreased by 1.5 log10 after 30 min, indicating appropriate performance for inactivation SARS-CoV-2 (Ghezzi et al. 2020). As mentioned earlier, LED has been also applied as light source in photocatalytic systems. In a related study, Doss et al. for the first time introduced LED photocatalytic system with TiO2/β-SiC solid alveolar foams for inactivation of airborne viruses like T2 bacteriophage and demonstrated the potential application of LEDs and solid alveolar foam as an effective and cost-effective technology for inactivation of airborne virus using photocatalyst. Moreover, Shiraki et al. proposed an air purifier system based on UV-LED for inactivation of the aerosol-associated influenza virus. In this case, they constructed a TiO2-coated aluminum plate under the irradiation of UV-LED, showing a high performance for inactivation of the aerosol-associated influenza virus in indoor air (Shiraki et al. 2017).

Virus detection

Detecting virus in air is still a challenge among researchers. Until now, no valid and general procedure has been introduced for the sampling and detection of virus in air to monitor the performance of different purifier devices. Detecting airborne viruses requires two steps: (1) sampling with a suitable sampler (that have been completely reviewed in our previous paper (Rahmani et al. 2020) and (2) identifying trapped viruses in samplers using molecular amplification methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). In this regard, in this section, we reviewed the detection methods for the determination of viral load in the photocatalysis processes. The Median Tissue Culture Infectious Dose (TCID50) assay is a common method for quantifying the number of infectious virus particles. The TCID50 assay as an endpoint dilution assay can determine the point in which 50% of the cells in the culture are infected, and hence it can offer a ratio of infected and uninfected cells. The TCID50 assay method is based on the addition of a serial dilution of the virus sample to cells in a 96-well plate format. The assay results are determined based on the morphological changes of upon infection with the virus or cell death. In this regard, after a determined time, the wells are checked and scored to determine the presence or absence of cytopathic effects. Therefore, the dilution of virus at which 50% of the wells are infected is determined by plotting graphs and calculating the percentage of infected cells at each dilution (Smither et al. 2013). Consistent with the application of this method for determination of viral load in air, Yoshizawa et al. used the TCID50 assay on confluent monolayers of HRT-18G cells in 96-well plates for quantifying bovine coronavirus in suspension and investigating the efficiency of photocatalytic process for inactivation of this virus (Yoshizawa et al. 2020). It is noteworthy that this method has been only used for viral suspensions. In Kormuth et al.’s study, the TCID50 was directly used for determination of influenza virus infectivity in aerosols and droplets independent, in which virus stocks were prepared in MDCK cells until the onset of cytopathic effect (Kormuth et al. 2018).

As can be seen in Table 1, molecular amplification methods such as PCR and RT-PCR have been commonly used for the detection of airborne viruses to evaluate the performance of different photocatalytic processes. For instance, in Ghezzi et al.’s study, in the application of tungsten trioxide-based photocatalysis for rapid inactivation of SARS-Cov-2 in air, qPCR was applied for measuring the viral RNA content in the air taken samples (Ghezzi et al. 2020). They have also used viral plaque assay for counting infectious viral particles in air. The viral plaque assay is a classic method for counting and determining the virus particles in air. In this regard, Yin et al. introduced the plague assay as a simple and highly repeatable method for enterovirus (Yin et al. 2015). In this method that is based on the formation of clear plagues on a 24-well plate or a 96-well plate are visible with naked eyes without immunostaining (Yin et al. 2015). In Qiao et al.’s study, RT-PCR along with measurement of fluorescein concentrations (doped into the nebulized aerosol) was applied for determining the performance of HVAC systems for removing and inactivating coronaviruses in air (Qiao et al. 2020b).

Mechanism of photocatalysis

After introduction photocatalysis as an effective and efficient system for the inactivation of viruses for the few attention first time by Sierka and Sjogren in 1994, various scientists made many efforts to justify its mechanism. Herein, we discuss the effect of the single photocatalysts in the virus inactivation. Cu as one of the most commonly used photocatalysts is able to inactive microbial agents even in dark. However, the illuminated catalyst can accelerate microbial inactivation rate. Antimicrobial effects of Cu occurred due to (a) surface contact killing, (b) Cu ions, and (c) chemical oxidation by generated ROSs in the presence of O2 (Rtimi et al. 2019). Also, Ag as a well-known antimicrobial agent can inactivate germs by only releasing silver ions and penetrating into the microbial agents. It has been also reported that Ag can inactivate bacteria and other pathogens through oligodynamic effect of metals. It has been also reported that Ag shows a higher toxicity towards bacteria, fungi, and viruses compared with mammalian cells (Prasher et al. 2018). Moreover, in the presence of moisture, Ag particles release highly oxidative Ag ions, which can complex with DNA and RNA of microorganisms and hence inhibit their replication. Previous studies have even reported a different efficiency for various size, shape, and concentration of Ag particles.

There is limited information regarding the mechanisms of TiO2 antimicrobial activity. However, it has been well studied that TiO2 can inactivate microorganisms through oxidative attack on the outer or inner cell membrane of the microbial agents (Barbas Arribas and Rojo Blanco 2015). In this regard, Moon et al. investigated virucidal effects of a Cu/TiO2 non-woven fabric (NWF) on viral particles of HuNoV genogroup II genotype 4 (HuNoV GII.4) under irradiation of UVA-LED. The results showed that the proposed system degraded HuNoV viral particles in the air samples (Moon et al. 2020). Kim et al. indicated UV-assisted TiO2 photocatalysis, and high hydrostatic pressure treatments were effective for inactivating internalized murine norovirus and the infectious viral content (Kim et al. 2017). Photocatalysis using semiconductor has been proven to effectively degrade a vast variety of pollutants (Fig. 1). The suggested three major mechanisms for viral inactivation in photocatalysis included chemical oxidation by ROS, the toxicity of metal ions released from metal-containing photocatalysts, and morphological damage of viruses by sharp edges of two-dimensional nano-structural photocatalysts (Kumar and Devi 2011). However, the detailed mechanism of photocatalyst is different for different pollutants. It is well known that semiconductor is characterized by a band energetic structure, with a band gap between the lower valence band or negative electrons (e–: electron hole), entirely filled with electrons, and the unoccupied, higher energetic conduction band or positive holes (h+) that with a different process generates superoxide anions (O2 + e– → O2–) and hydroxyl radicals (OH– + h+ → OH•) in the surface of semiconductor (Kumar and Devi 2011; Visai et al. 2011), following by the generation of highly ROS like OH, O-2 ,h+, and HO2 with high oxidation potential, which can reduce inorganic contaminants to nontoxic ions, oxidize organic contaminants into CO2 and inorganic ions, and inactivate microorganisms without producing noxious compounds (Kanakaraju et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2014). It is also noteworthy that the generation of ROSs from the mentioned photocatalytic processes can destroy the shell and/or capsid of viruses, resulting in the release of genetic materials, minerals, and proteins inside viruses; also organic compounds available in the structure of viruses could be completely mineralized, which causes virus inactivation (Candiani and Soliani n.d.). Many researchers have proposed diverse mechanisms by different photocatalysis processes for inactivation of viruses. Regarding the Ag photocatalysis for the inactivation of airborne viruses, Ag reacts with oxygen and relative humidity in air and causes the formation of AgOH. Then, the generated AgOH with a 2–3 atomic layer, on the catalyst surface, decomposes to Ag2O as follows:

Fig. 1
figure 1

The suggested major mechanisms for viral inactivation in photocatalytic processes

Full size image
$$ 2 AgOH\to {Ag}_2O+{H}_2O $$
(1)

The generated Ag2O is a thermodynamically stable agent in the pH range 6–8, and most of the pathogens are active in this pH range. Visible light can activate the generated Ag2O and thereby produces electrons and holes according to the following equation:

$$ {Ag}_2O+ light\to {Ag}_2{O_{cbe}}^{-}+{Ag}_2{O_{vbh}}^{+} $$
(2)

Afterwards, the photogenerated radicals are produced according to the following equation:

$$ {e}^{-}+{O}_2\to {O_2}^{\bullet } $$
(3)
$$ {e}^{-}+{H}^2O+1/2{O}_2\to {OH}^{\bullet }+{OH}^{-} $$
(4)
$$ {h}^{+}+{H}_2O\to {OH}^{\bullet }+{OH}^{-} $$
(5)
$$ {O_2}^{\bullet }-+{H}^{+}\to {H}_2{O}^{\bullet } $$
(6)

In the presence of a light source, a higher amount of hydroxyl radicals are produced and consequently results in a faster pathogen inactivation (Rtimi and Kiwi 2021).

$$ AgOH+ light\to {Ag}^{\bullet }+{OH}^{\bullet } $$
(7)

Moreover, the main mechanisms of virus inactivation are summarized in the following equations:

$$ {CuO}_{cbe}+{O}_2\to CuO+{O_2}^{-} $$
(8)
$$ CuO{\left(2+\right)}_{cbe^{-}}\kern0.5em \to CuO\ (1)\ {Cu}^{+} $$
(9)
$$ CuO\left({Cu}^{+}\right)+{O}_2\to CuO\left( Cu{2}^{+}\right)+{O_2}^{-} $$
(10)
$$ CuO\left({Cu}^{+}\right)\to {Cu}_{Ovacancy}+{Cu}^{+} $$
(11)

As shown, by using a photon energy exceeding the band gap of CuO, ROS O2•- is produced or Cu2+ is reduced to Cu+ as a result of the reaction of cbe- and O2 (Rtimi and Kiwi 2021).

The virus inactivation in the TiO2 photocatalysis is conducted according to the following reactions:

$$ {TiO}_2+{cbe}^{-}\to {hv_{cbe}}^{-}+{ hv b}^{+} $$
(12)

The photogenerated electrons and holes in the presence of relative humidity in the environment may undergo charge trapping and act as e- and h+ scavengers, respectively. This reaction results in the formation of O2 −• and OH•, respectively. These reactions are presented in the following equation:

$$ {O}_2+{cbe}^{-}\to O{2}^{-\bullet } $$
(13)
$$ {Hvb}^{+}+H2O\to OH\bullet +{Haq}^{+} $$
(14)

In the presence of relative humidity, O2−• and OH• can further react and produce a hydroperoxyl radical (OOH•) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as follows:

$$ {O_2}^{-\bullet }+{H}^{+}\kern0.5em \to OOH\bullet $$
(15)
$$ OH\bullet + OH\bullet \to {H}_2{O}_2 $$
(16)
$$ {H}_2{O}_2+{cbe}^{-}\to OH\bullet +{OH}^{-} $$
(17)

The produced oxygen-centered radicals such as OOH•, OH•, and O2−• react with organic molecules present in microorganisms like proteins and polyunsaturated fatty acids and hence result in the inactivation of microorganism (Bono et al. 2021).

In this regard, Daikoku et al. indicated nano-TiO2 photocatalytic coated with porous ceramic inactivated influenza virus by decomposition of aldehyde and dioxins and inactivation of aerosol-associated influenza virus infectivity (Daikoku et al. 2015). In a comprehensive review study, it has been reported that TiO2 photocatalysis processes can inactivate viruses through protein damage, resulting in viral capsids, and releasing viral DNA, which cause the degradation of protein and genome. In this case, the inactivation processes of viruses occur in the four following steps, including (a) modification of the protein sequence, (b) disruption of the protein conformation, (c) disruption of the protein aggregated size, and (d) disruption of the binding of spike virus protein to protein to the host cells. In the use of TiO2, the particle size, surface area, porosity, and crystallographic structure affect the levels of generated ROS, which affect the inactivation performance. Yoshizawa et al. used scrubber photocatalytic oxidation and UV irradiation for inactivating infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). They determined mechanism of UV inactivation of viruses was mainly due to uracil dimerization in viral RNA (Zhao et al. 2014). Moreover, Valdez-Castillo et al. indicted that the photocatalytic system based on Cu/TiO2 non-woven fabric achieved the highest percentage of bioaerosol inactivation (70%) caused by cell death (Valdez-Castillo et al. 2019). Nakano et al. showed that TiO2 thin film significantly disinfected the influenza virus through degradation of viral proteins. They realized that the degradation relied on the illumination time of UV and its intensity (Nakano et al. 2012a). The mentioned mechanisms are affected when the photocatalyst surface and the viral particles collide, resulting in an increase of the photocatalytic efficiecny due to the higher production of ROSs (Foster et al. 2011; Gao et al. 2014).

Conclusion

Photocatalysis processes as promising technology can be used for purifying air containing airborne viruses from indoor air. Catalyst type plays a key role in the performance of the photocatalytic processes for the inactivation of airborne viruses. The photocatalytic processes offer various efficiencies for the inactivation of viruses in air, and hence, a constant viral model may not be generalizable to other airborne viruses. Environmental factors including temperature and humidity had distinct effects on the photocatalyst process for the inactivation of viruses by means of changing photocatalytic rate. Chemical oxidation by ROS, toxicity of metal ions released from metal-containing photocatalysts, and morphological damage of airborne viruses by sharp edges of two-dimensional nano-structural photocatalysts are considered the main mechanisms for the inactivation of airborne viruses.