Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What initiates carbon dioxide emissions along the Belt and Road Initiative? An insight from a dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis based on incarnated carbon panel

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), as an economic cooperation, provides interaction between the relevant countries and China. This cooperation between the BRI economies is basically aimed at increasing economic development. However, economic cooperation affects humanity in many ways, such as job creation, economic growth, environmental changes, and changes in the consumption of energy. Among these changes, considerable attention has been drawn to CO2 emissions arising from economic growth and its related environmental changes. This attention is vital in order to achieve the UN sustainable development goal 13: urgent action to combat climate change and regulations for the emissions of CO2. Thus, this study explores the determinants of CO2 emissions along the BRI, taking into consideration if countries are net importers or exporters of incarnated carbon dioxide. The econometrics applied indicated the presence of slope heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependencies across the various panels. Applying the Westerlund bootstrap co-integration unveiled the presence of a long-run equilibrium association among the variables. The results from the dynamic common correlated estimator (DCCE) revealed that the contribution weight (order of importance) to CO2 emissions varies across panel clusters. The causality results unveiled a bidirectional causation in all panels between economic growth and CO2 emissions. Trade openness and CO2 emissions have a bidirectional effect in the belt and road and net exporters of incarnated carbon dioxide panels. Based on the results obtained, the policy implications suggested that (a) energy transition from fossil fuel usage to renewables will play a crucial role in mitigating economic growth’s environmental pressures and (b) governments along the BRI could also implement subsidy swaps involving the transfer of government aid from oil and coal gas to renewable sources, including wind and solar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All data used in this study are publicly available online. The information on the sources of data is provided in Table 2.

Notes

  1. Goal 13: Take urgent steps and impact measures to tackle climate change. In 2019, the atmospheric levels of greenhouse gases especially CO2 have gained new high. Climate change is actually affecting one country and the other as well as each continent. This is undermining countries’ economies and affects human lives. Climate trends are really changing, sea levels are continuously stepping up, and climate events are becoming more austere. The Paris Agreement, espoused in 2015, seeks to improve the global response to climate change by sustaining a rise in global temperatures well below 2 °C. The agreement as well aimed to enhance the capacity of countries to cope with the impacts of this global change via a suitable new model of technology, financial flows, and an enhanced process of capacity building.

Abbreviations

GP:

gross domestic product

CO2 :

carbon dioxide emissions

FF:

fossil fuel consumption

IND:

industrialization

DF:

domestic financial assistance

TR:

trade openness

ARDL:

autoregressive distributed lag

GMM:

generalized method of moments augmented mean group

CCEMG:

common correlated effects mean group

VIF:

variance inflation factor

PMG:

pooled mean group

CADF:

cross-sectional dependent augmented Dickey Fuller

CIPS:

cross-sectionally IPS

CSD:

cross-sectional dependency

BRI:

Belt and Road Initiative

BRICS:

Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa

OECD:

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

References

  • Abban OJ, Hongxing Y (2021) Investigation on the main contributors of economic growth in a dynamic heterogeneous panel data (DHPD) in Africa: evidence from their income classification. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12222-9

  • Abban OJ, Wu J, Mensah IA (2020) Analysis on the nexus amid CO 2 emissions, energy intensity, economic growth, and foreign direct investment in Belt and Road economies: does the level of income matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:11387–11402

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adebayo TS (2021) Do CO2 emissions, energy consumption and globalization promote economic growth? Empirical evidence from Japan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12495-8

  • Ali S, Yusop Z, Kaliappan SR, Chin L (2020) Dynamic common correlated effects of trade openness, FDI, and institutional performance on environmental quality: evidence from OIC countries. Environ Sci Poll Res 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07768-7

  • Al-Mulali U, Tang CF, Tan BW, Ozturk I (2019) The nexus of electricity consumption and economic growth in Gulf cooperation council economies: evidence from non-stationary panel data methods. Geosyst Eng 22:40–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ameyaw B, Yao L (2018) Analyzing the impact of GDP on CO2 emissions and forecasting Africa’s total CO2 emissions with non-assumption driven bidirectional long short-term memory. Sustainability 10:3110

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameyaw B, Yao L, Oppong A, Agyeman JK (2019) Investigating, forecasting and proposing emission mitigation pathways for CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion only: a case study of selected countries. Energy Policy 130:7–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anwar A, Ahmad N, Madni GR (2020) Industrialization, freight transport and environmental quality: evidence from belt and road initiative economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:7053–7070

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arshad Z, Robaina M, Shahbaz M, Veloso AB (2020) The effects of deforestation and urbanization on sustainable growth in Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07507-7

  • Asane-Otoo E (2015) Carbon footprint and emission determinants in Africa. Energy 82:426–435

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ascensão F, Fahrig L, Clevenger AP, Corlett RT, Jaeger JA, Laurance WF, Pereira HM (2018) Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative. Nat Sustain 1:206–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH, Feng Q, Kao C (2012) A Lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. J Econ 170:164–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J, Das S (2005) Panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence. Statistica Neerlandica 59:414–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47:239–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai HY, Xu YZ (2018) Co-agglomeration, trade openness and haze pollution. China Popul Resour Environ 28:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai Y, Sam CY, Chang T (2018) Nexus between clean energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions. J Clean Prod 182:1001–1011

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetin M, Ecevit E, Yucel AG (2018) The impact of economic growth, energy consumption, trade openness, and financial development on carbon emissions: empirical evidence from Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:36589–36603

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econ 188:393–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadon I (2019) Planning the second generation of smart cities: technology to handle the pressures of urbanization. IEEE Electrif Mag 7:6–15

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza Mendonça AK, de Andrade Conradi Barni G, Moro MF, Bornia AC, Kupek E, Fernandes L (2020) Hierarchical modeling of the 50 largest economies to verify the impact of GDP, population and renewable energy generation in CO2 emissions. Sustain Prod Consum 22:58–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Inglesi-Lotz R (2020) The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: evidence from European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07878-2

  • Dombrowski K (2017) Clean at home, dirty abroad. https://www.dandc.eu/en/article/china-massively-invests-coal-power-belt-and-road-countries. Accessed 17 Oct 2020

  • Dong F, Wang Y, Su B, Hua Y, Zhang Y (2019a) The process of peak CO2 emissions in developed economies: a perspective of industrialization and urbanization Resources. Conserv Recycl 141:61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong K, Dong X, Dong C (2019b) Determinants of the global and regional CO2 emissions: what causes what and where? Appl Econ 51:5031–5044

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong X-Y, Ran Q, Hao Y (2019c) On the nonlinear relationship between energy consumption and economic development in China: new evidence from panel data threshold estimations. Qual Quant 53:1837–1857

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu E-I, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt M, Presbitero AF (2015) Public debt and growth: heterogeneity and non-linearity. J Int Econ 97:45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang J, Gozgor G, Mahalik MK, Padhan H, Xu R (2021) The impact of economic complexity on energy demand in OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12089-w

  • Gallagher KS, Bhandary R, Narassimhan E, Nguyen QT (2021) Banking on coal? Drivers of demand for Chinese overseas investments in coal in Bangladesh, India, Indonesia and Vietnam. Energy Res Soc Sci 71:101827

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of economic research. Res WorkPaper Set 3914:1–57. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafeez M, Chunhui Y, Strohmaier D, Ahmed M, Jie L (2018) Does finance affect environmental degradation: evidence from One Belt and One Road Initiative region? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:9579–9592

    Google Scholar 

  • Han L, Zhou W, Li W, Qian Y (2018) Urbanization strategy and environmental changes: an insight with relationship between population change and fine particulate pollution. Sci Total Environ 642:789–799

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hashmi R, Alam K (2019) Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: a panel investigation. J Clean Prod 231:1100–1109

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou J, Deng X, Springer CH, Teng F (2020) A global analysis of CO2 and non-CO2 GHG emissions embodied in trade with Belt and Road Initiative countries. Ecosyst Health Sustain 2020:1761888

    Google Scholar 

  • Humbatova SI, Ahmadov FS, Seyfullayev YZ, Hajiyev NGO (2020) The relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth: evidence from Azerbaijan. Int J Energy Econ Policy 10:436

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain J, Khan A, Zhou K (2020) The impact of natural resource depletion on energy use and CO2 emission in Belt & Road Initiative countries: a cross-country analysis. Energy 199:117409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115:53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamel L, Maktouf S (2017) The nexus between economic growth, financial development, trade openness, and CO2 emissions in European countries. Cogent Econ Finance 5:1341456

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson F, Kjärstad J, Rootzén J (2019) The threat to climate change mitigation posed by the abundance of fossil fuels. Clim Pol 19:258–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahia M, Jebli MB, Belloumi M (2019) Analysis of the impact of renewable energy consumption and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions in 12 MENA countries. Clean Techn Environ Policy 21:871–885

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalayci C (2019) The impact of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: the case of NAFTA countries. Int J Energy Econ Policy 9:356

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan ZA, Koondhar MA, Khan I, Ali U, Tianjun L (2021) Dynamic linkage between industrialization, energy consumption, carbon emission, and agricultural products export of Pakistan: an ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13738-4

  • Kim S (2019) CO2 emissions, foreign direct investments, energy consumption, and GDP in developing countries: a more comprehensive study using panel vector error correction model Korean. Econ Rev 35:5–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Le HP, Bao HHG (2020) Renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, government expenditure, institution quality, financial development, trade openness, and sustainable development in Latin America and Caribbean emerging Market and developing economies. Int J Energy Econ Policy 10:242

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Yin M, Wang K, Zou J, Kong Y (2020) Long-term impacts of urbanization through population migration on China’s energy demand and CO 2 emissions. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 25:1053–1071

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv Z, Xu T (2019) Trade openness, urbanization and CO2 emissions: dynamic panel data analysis of middle-income countries. J Int Trade Econ Dev 28:317–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood H, Alkhateeb TTY, Al-Qahtani MMZ, Allam Z, Nawaz A, Furqan M (2020) Urbanization, oil price and pollution in Saudi Arabia. Int J Energy Econ Policy 10:477

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeed MT, Samreen I, Tauqir A, Mazhar M (2020) The asymmetric relationship between financial development and CO 2 emissions: the case of Pakistan SN. Appl Sci 2:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad B (2019) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in developed, emerging and Middle East and North Africa countries. Energy 179:232–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad S, Long X, Salman M, Dauda L (2020) Effect of urbanization and international trade on CO2 emissions across 65 belt and road initiative countries. Energy 196:117102

    Google Scholar 

  • Munir Q, Lean HH, Smyth R (2020) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in the ASEAN-5 countries: a cross-sectional dependence approach. Energy Econ 85:104571

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutascu M (2018) A time-frequency analysis of trade openness and CO2 emissions in France. Energy Policy 115:443–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosheen M, Iqbal J, Khan HU (2021) Analyzing the linkage among CO 2 emissions, economic growth, tourism, and energy consumption in the Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:16707–16719

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odhiambo NM (2020) Financial development, income inequality and carbon emissions in sub-Saharan African countries: a panel data analysis. Energy Explor Exploit 38:1914–1931

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogwu MC (2019) Towards Sustainable Development in Africa: The Challenge of Urbanization and Climate Change Adaptation. In: Cobbinah P, Addaney M (eds) The Geography of Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04873-0_2

  • Ozcan B, Tzeremes PG, Tzeremes NG (2020) Energy consumption, economic growth and environmental degradation in OECD countries. Econ Model 84:203–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Park Y, Meng F, Baloch MA (2018) The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO 2 emissions: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:30708–30719

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Fac Econ 1–39. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.5113

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22:265–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2015) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econ Rev 34:1089–1117

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econ 142:50–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafindadi AA, Muye IM, Kaita RA (2018) The effects of FDI and energy consumption on environmental pollution in predominantly resource-based economies of the GCC. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 25:126–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafique MZ, Li Y, Larik AR, Monaheng MP (2020) The effects of FDI, technological innovation, and financial development on CO2 emissions: evidence from the BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08715-2

  • Raheem ID, Ogebe JO (2017) CO2 emissions, urbanization and industrialization: evidence from a direct and indirect heterogeneous panel analysis. Manag Environ Qual 28:851–867

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Velayutham E (2020) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus: new evidence from South Asia. Renew Energy 147:399–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauf A, Liu X, Amin W, Rehman OU, Li J, Ahmad F, Bekun FV (2020) Does sustainable growth, energy consumption and environment challenges matter for Belt and Road Initiative feat? A novel empirical investigation. J Clean Prod 262:121344

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehman A, Rauf A, Ahmad M, Chandio AA, Deyuan Z (2019) The effect of carbon dioxide emission and the consumption of electrical energy, fossil fuel energy, and renewable energy, on economic performance: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:21760–21773

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saidi K, Mbarek MB (2017) The impact of income, trade, urbanization, and financial development on CO 2 emissions in 19 emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:12748–12757

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Ali MI, Vink N, Gow J (2019) The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO 2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:2699–2709

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen A, Sheng J, Arshad S, Salam S, Hafeez M (2020) The dynamic linkage between income, energy consumption, urbanization and carbon emissions in Pakistan. Pol J Environ Stud 29(1):267–276. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/95033

  • Sodiq A, Baloch AA, Khan SA, Sezer N, Mahmoud S, Jama M, Abdelaal A (2019) Towards modern sustainable cities: review of sustainability principles and trends. J Clean Prod 227:972–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulaiman C, Abdul-Rahim A (2018) Population growth and CO2 emission in Nigeria: a recursive ARDL approach. SAGE Open 8:2158244018765916

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Attuquaye Clottey S, Geng Y, Fang K, Clifford Kofi Amissah J (2019) Trade openness and carbon emissions: evidence from belt and road countries. Sustainability 11:2682

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzar U, Eyuboglu K (2019) The nexus between income inequality and CO2 emissions in Turkey. J Clean Prod 227:149–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z (2019) Does biomass energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? Evidence from BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 670:1075–1083

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Li G, Fang C (2018) Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2144–2159

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Zheng X, Wang H, Shan Y (2019) Emission drivers of cities at different industrialization phases in China. J Environ Manag 250:109494

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Rasool Y, Zhang B, Ahmed Z, Wang B (2020) Dynamic linkage among industrialisation, urbanisation, and CO2 emissions in APEC realms: evidence based on DSUR estimation. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 52:382–389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J, Edgerton DL (2007) A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Econ Lett 97:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Abban OJ, Boadi AD, Haris M, Ocran P, Addo AA (2020) Exploring the relationships among CO2 emissions, urbanization, economic growth, economic structure, energy consumption, and trade along the BRI based on income classification. Energy Ecol Environ 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-020-00176-0

  • Zafar MW, Mirza FM, Zaidi SAH, Hou F (2019a) The nexus of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade openness, and CO 2 emissions in the framework of EKC: evidence from emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:15162–15173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zafar MW, Saud S, Hou F (2019b) The impact of globalization and financial development on environmental quality: evidence from selected countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:13246–13262

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Zhang N, Liao W (2018) How do population and land urbanization affect CO2 emissions under gravity center change? A spatial econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 202:510–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Zhang H, Yuan J (2019) Economic growth, energy consumption, and carbon emission nexus: fresh evidence from developing countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:26367–26380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S, Wang R, Mak TM, Hsu S-C, Tsang DC (2021) How energy service companies moderate the impact of industrialization and urbanization on carbon emissions in China? Sci Total Environ 751:141610

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful for the critical comments made by the Editor (Prof. Roula Inglesi-Lotz) handling the manuscript and the anonymous referees, who have significantly improved the quality of the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China with Grant No. 71701082.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.H supervised the research from the beginning to the end. O.J.A and Y.H conceived the study. O.J.A collected the data, O.J.A estimated the econometric model, and O.J.A drafted the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Olivier Joseph Abban or Yao Hongxing.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abban, .J., Hongxing, Y. What initiates carbon dioxide emissions along the Belt and Road Initiative? An insight from a dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis based on incarnated carbon panel. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 64516–64535 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14779-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14779-5

Keywords

Navigation