Abstract
The rapid industrialization and the lack of technological innovation over the past 40 years have caused serious environmental pollution and waste of resources. Therefore, it remains an urgent challenge to coordinate technological innovation, resource consumption, environmental quality, and high-quality industrial development in China. Using the data of Shaanxi Province from 2005 to 2019, in this paper, we adopt the 4-population grey Lotka-Volterra model (GLV) to study the competition and cooperation among technological innovation (TI), resource consumption (RE), environmental quality (EE), and industrial development quality (IQ). We also discuss the equilibrium point and stability of the GLV model and further verify its accuracy. We conduct an empirical study of the data of Shaanxi Province, and the results demonstrate that (1) TI is able to improve EE, increase IQ, and promote RE; (2) conserving resources has a positive effect on TI, EE, and IQ; (3) although EE could prevent TI and IQ, it can reduce RE; and (4) IQ can effectively reduce RE and improve EE; however, it hinders TI. (5) The result of equilibrium analysis reveals that the evolution of the four factors will tend to reach a stable equilibrium point in the future, that is, realizing co-evolution.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ahmad F, Draz MU, Outurk I, Rauf A, Su L-J (2020) Looking for asymmetries and nonlinearities: the nexus between renewable energy and environmental degradation in the Northwestern provinces of China. J Clean Prod 266:17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121714
Ang JB (2007) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35:4772–4778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.032
Ang JB (2008) Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption in Malaysia. J Policy Model 30:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2007.04.010
Anwar K, Faqir M, Yang C-G, Jamal H, Sadia B, Muhammad Awais K (2020) The impression of technological innovations and natural resources in energy-growth-environment nexus: a new look into BRICS economies. Sci Total Environ 727:138265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138265
Asumadu-Sarkodie S, Owusu PA (2016) Carbon dioxide emissions, GDP, energy use, and population growth: a multivariate and causality analysis for Ghana, 1971–2013. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:13508–13520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6511-x
Biswal S, Pahlevani F, Sahajwalla V (2020) Wastes as resources in steelmaking industry — current trends. Curr Opin Green Sust 26:100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.100377
Chapin FS III, Matson PA, Vitousek PM (2002) Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9504-9
Cherni A, Essaber Jouini S (2017) An ARDL approach to the CO2 emissions, renewable energy and economic growth nexus: Tunisian evidence. Int J Hydrogen Energ 42:29056–29066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.072
Cubas G, Ravikumar B, Ventura G (2016) Talent, labor quality, and economic development. Rev Econ Dyn 21:160–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2015.06.004
Danish, Wang Z-H (2019) Does biomass energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? Evidence from BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 670:1075–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.268
Du Y-Q, Song B-J, Duan H-B, Tsvetanov TG, Wu Y-Y (2019) Multi-renewable management: interactions between wind and solar within uncertain technology ecological system. Energ Convers Manage 187:232–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.032
Du J-G, Zhang J, Li X-W (2020) What is the mechanism of resource dependence and high-quality economic development? An empirical test from China. Sustainability 12:8144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198144
Friedl B, Getzner M (2003) Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecol Econ 45:133–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00008-9
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110:353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
Hou J, Wang J-H, Chen J-C, He F (2019) Does urban haze pollution inversely drive down the energy intensity? A perspective from environmental regulation. Sustain Dev 28:343–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2022
Howitt P, Aghion P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60:323–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599
Hung H-C, Tsai Y-S, Wu M-C (2014) A modified Lotka-Volterra model for competition forecasting in Taiwan’s retail industry. Comput Ind Eng 77:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.09.010
Jahanger A (2020) Influence of FDI characteristics on high-quality development of China’s economy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:18977–18988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09187-0
Jiang W, Chen Y-F (2020) Asymmetries in the nexus among energy consumption, air quality and economic growth in China. Energy Rep 6:3141–3149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.065
Jin B (2018) Study on the “high-quality development” economics. China Political Economy 1:163–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/CPE-10-2018-016
Kim K-H (2010) An analysis on the competition patterns between Paper-book and E-book using the Lotka-Volterra model. J Korea Acad Industr Coop Soc 11:4766–4773. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.12.4766
Kong Q-X, Peng D, Ni Y-H, Jiang X-Y, Wang Z-Q (2021) Trade openness and economic growth quality of China: empirical analysis using ARDL model. Financ Res Lett 38:101488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101488
Kreng VB, Wang HT (2009) The interaction of the market competition between LCD TV and PDP TV. Comput Ind Eng 57:1210–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2009.05.008
Kreng VB, Wang TC, Wang HT (2012) Tripartite dynamic competition and equilibrium analysis on global television market. Comput Ind Eng 63:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.01.015
Lee S-J, Lee D-J, Oh H-S (2005) Technological forecasting at the Korean stock market: a dynamic competition analysis using Lotka–Volterra model. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 72:1044–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2002.11.001
Li Z-D, Yang W-P, Wang C-J, Zhang Y-S, Yuan X-L (2019) Guided high-quality development, resources, and environmental forcing in China’s green development. Sustainability 11:1936. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071936
Li B, Tian C, Shi Z-Y, Han Z-L (2020a) Evolution and differentiation of high-quality development of marine economy: a case study from China. Complexity 2020:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5624961
Li H, Lu J, Li B (2020b) Does pollution-intensive industrial agglomeration increase residents’ health expenditure? Sustain Cities Soc 56:102092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102092
Li X-S, Lu Y-L, Huang R-T (2021) Whether foreign direct investment can promote high-quality economic development under environmental regulation: evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:21674–21683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12032-z
Lin S-F, Xiao L, Wang X-J (2021) Does air pollution hinder technological innovation in China? A perspective of innovation value chain. J Clean Prod 278:123326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123326
Lise W, Van Montfort K (2007) Energy consumption and GDP in Turkey: is there a co-integration relationship? Energy Econ 29:1166–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.08.010
Liu X-P, Zhang X-L (2021) Industrial agglomeration, technological innovation and carbon productivity: evidence from China. Resour Conserv Recycl 166:105330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105330
Liu S-R, He P, Dan J-Q (2018a) Evaluation of industry eco-industrialization: case study of Shaanxi, China. Comput Syst Sci Eng 33:389–395. https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2018.33.389
Liu W-S, Liu Y, Lin B-Q (2018b) Empirical analysis on energy rebound effect from the perspective of technological progress—a case study of China’s transport sector. J Clean Prod 205:1082–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.083
Liu B-Q, Xu M, Wang J, Wang Z-F, Zhao L (2021) Evaluation of China’s marine economic growth quality based on set pair analysis. Mar Policy 126:104405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104405
Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Roubaud D, Farhani S (2018) How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 113:356–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.050
Lotfalipour M, Falahi M, Ashena M (2010) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuels consumption in Iran. Energy 35:5115–5120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.08.004
Ma L, Liu Z, Huang X-J, Li T (2019) The impact of local government policy on innovation ecosystem in knowledge resource scarce region: case study of Changzhou, China. Sci Technol Soc 24:29–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721818806096
Mäler K-G (2001) Economic growth and the environment. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Elsevier, New York, pp 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00084-5
Mao S-H, Zhu M, Wang X-P, Xiao X-P (2020) Grey–Lotka–Volterra model for the competition and cooperation between third-party online payment systems and online banking in China. Appl Soft Comput 95:106501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106501
Mavi NK, Mavi RK (2019) Energy and environmental efficiency of OECD countries in the context of the circular economy: common weight analysis for Malmquist productivity index. J Environ Manag 247:651–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.069
Mirzadeh Phirouzabadi A, Juniper J, Savage D, Blackmore K (2020) Supportive or inhibitive? — Analysis of dynamic interactions between the inter-organisational collaborations of vehicle powertrains. J Clean Prod 244:118790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118790
Modis T (1999) Technological forecasting at the stock market. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 62:173–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00046-3
Mohsin M, Kamran HW, Atif Nawaz M, Sajjad Hussain M, Dahri AS (2021) Assessing the impact of transition from nonrenewable to renewable energy consumption on economic growth-environmental nexus from developing Asian economies. J Environ Manag 284:111999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111999
Ndoricimpa A (2017) Analysis of asymmetries in the nexus among energy use, pollution emissions and real output in South Africa. Energy 125:543–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.065
Pao H-T, Chen C-C (2020) Decoupling of environmental pressure and economic growth: evidence from high-income and nuclear-dependent countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:5192–5210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07122-6
Pao H-T, Fu H-C (2015) Competition and stability analyses among emissions, energy, and economy: application for Mexico. Energy 82:98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.076
Pao H-T, Chen H-P, Li Y-Y (2015) Competitive dynamics of energy, environment, and economy in the U.S. Energy 89:449–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.113
Pata UK (2018) Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J Clean Prod 187:770–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236
Perman R, Stern DI (2003) Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the Environmental Kuznets Curve does not exist. Aust J Agr Resour Econ 47:325–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.00216
Puliafito SE, Puliafito JL, Grand MC (2008) Modeling population dynamics and economic growth as competing species: an application to CO2 global emissions. Ecol Econ 65:602–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.010
Rahman MM (2017) Do population density, economic growth, energy use and exports adversely affect environmental quality in Asian populous countries? Renew Sust Energ Rev 77:506–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.041
Rahman MM, Vu X-B (2020) The nexus between renewable energy, economic growth, trade, urbanisation and environmental quality: a comparative study for Australia and Canada. Renew Energy 155:617–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.135
Sanden BA, Hillman KM (2011) A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden. Res Policy 40:403–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.12.005
Sandilands RJ (2009) Solovian and new growth theory from the perspective of Allyn Young on macroeconomic increasing returns. Hist Polit Econ 42:285–303. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2009-028
Shahbaz M, Kumar Tiwari A, Nasir M (2013) The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61:1452–1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.006
Sharif A, Raza SA, Ozturk I, Afshan S (2019) The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: a global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations. Renew Energy 133:685–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.052
Sharif N, Chandra K, Mansoor A, Sinha KB (2021) A comparative analysis of research and development spending and total factor productivity growth in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Singapore. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 57:108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.02.004
Shen Y-C, Yue S-J, Sun S-Q, Guo M-Q (2020) Sustainable total factor productivity growth: the case of China. J Clean Prod 256:120727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120727
Singh S, Bhat JA, Shah S, Pala NA (2021) Coastal resource management and tourism development in Fiji Islands: a conservation challenge. Environ Dev Sustain 23:3009–3027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00764-4
Sun S-H, Wang W-C (2018) Analysis on the market evolution of new energy vehicle based on population competition model. Transport Res D-Tr E 65:36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.08.005
Tsai B-H, Chen C-C (2019) Forecasting interactive relationships and long-term equilibrium of CO 2 emissions in industrial interdependent regions. Carbon Manag 11:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2019.1703156
Tseng F-M, Liu Y-L, Wu H-H (2014) Market penetration among competitive innovation products: the case of the Smartphone Operating System. J EngTechnol Manage 32:40–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.10.002
Twrdy E, Batista M (2016) Modeling of container throughput in Northern Adriatic ports over the period 1990–2013. J Transp Geogr 52:131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.03.005
Wang Z-X, Chen Y-N (2015) Tripartite dynamic competition and prediction analysis: coal, oil and gas, and clean energy consumption in China. Energy Environ 26:1115–1127. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305X.26.6-7.1115
Wang H-R, Cui H-R, Zhao Q-Z (2021) Effect of green technology innovation on green total factor productivity in China: evidence from spatial Durbin model analysis. J Clean Prod 288:125624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125624
Wu L-F, Wang Y-N (2011) Estimation the parameters of Lotka–Volterra model based on grey direct modelling method and its application. Expert Syst Appl 38:6412–6416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.013
Wu L-F, Liu S-F, Wang Y-N (2012) Grey Lotka–Volterra model and its application. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 79:1720–1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.020
Wu J, Zhu Q-Y, Chu J-F, Liu H-W, Liang L (2016) Measuring energy and environmental efficiency of transportation systems in China based on a parallel DEA approach. Transport Res D-Tr E 48:460–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.08.001
Wu J, Li M-J, Zhu Q-Y, Zhou Z-X, Liang L (2019) Energy and environmental efficiency measurement of China’s industrial sectors: a DEA model with non-homogeneous inputs and outputs. Energy Econ 78:468–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.11.036
Yang HM (2014) The basic reproduction number obtained from Jacobian and next generation matrices - a case study of dengue transmission modelling. Biosystems 126:52–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.10.002
Yang C-H, Shyu J, Li Y-M (2009) A dynamic analysis of industrial cluster evolution based on Lotka-Volterra Model: Studies of Southern and Central Taiwan Science Park. AIP Conference Proceedings 1148:514–517. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3225362
Young A (1995) The Tyranny of numbers: confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian Growth Experience. Q J Econ 110:641–680. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946695
Yuan C-Q, Liu S-F, Fang Z-G (2016) Comparison of China’s primary energy consumption forecasting by using ARIMA (the autoregressive integrated moving average) model and GM(1,1) model. Energy 100:384–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.001
Zhang N, Choi Y (2013) Environmental energy efficiency of China’s regional economies: a non-oriented slacks-based measure analysis. Soc Sci J 50:225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2013.01.003
Zhang W, Lam JSL (2013) Maritime cluster evolution based on symbiosis theory and Lotka–Volterra model. Marit Policy Manag 40:161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2012.757375
Zhang W, Lam JSL (2017) An empirical analysis of maritime cluster evolution from the port development perspective – cases of London and Hong Kong. Transp Res Pt A-Policy Pract 105:219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.015
Zhang T, Tan Q, Yu X-N, Zhang S (2020) Synergy assessment and optimization for water-energy-food nexus: modeling and application. Renew Sust Energ Rev 134:110059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110059
Zhang Y, Liu W-X, Cai Y, Khan SU, Zhao M-J (2021) Decoupling analysis of water use and economic development in arid region of China – based on quantity and quality of water use. Sci Total Environ 761:143275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143275
Zhou B, X-y Z, Jiang L, Xue B (2020) High-quality economic growth under the influence of technological innovation preference in China: a numerical simulation from the government financial perspective. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 54:163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2020.04.010
Zhu H-T (2016) Testing the trade relationships between China, Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand using grey Lotka-Volterra competition model. Kybernetes 45:931–945. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2015-0110
Zhu L-Y, Hao Y, Lu Z-N, Wu H-T, Ran Q-Y (2019) Do economic activities cause air pollution? Evidence from China’s major cities. Sustain Cities Soc 49:101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101593
Zhu Q-Y, Li X-C, Li F, Wu J, Zhou D-Q (2020) Energy and environmental efficiency of China’s transportation sectors under the constraints of energy consumption and environmental pollutions. Energy Econ 89:104817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104817
Funding
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 71874134), Natural Science Basic Research Program-Key Project of Shaanxi Province, China (grant number 2019JZ-30), and Social Science Fund Project of Shaanxi Province, China (grant number 2018S49, 2017S035).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Zhang developed the design of the manuscript and prepared the draft manuscript and figures. Huang reviewed the scientific literature, designed the final manuscript structure, and supervised the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Huang, G. Grey Lotka-Volterra model for the co-evolution of technological innovation, resource consumption, environmental quality, and high-quality industrial development in Shaanxi Province, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 57751–57768 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14656-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14656-1