Skip to main content
Log in

Emission characteristics of PM, heavy metals, and dioxins in flue gases from sintering machines with wet and semi-dry flue gas desulfurization systems

  • Environmental Concerns and Pollution control in the Context of Developing Countries
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In iron and steel industry, sintering process releases large amount and different kinds of pollutants. Most sintering plants had applied the dust removal system and the flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system for exhaust treatment in China. Previous studies of FGD systems were focused on the removal of air pollutants from coal-fired boiler, rather than in the iron ore sintering process. In this study, PM, heavy metals, and dioxins were sampled at a China typical sintering plant with both wet and semi-dry FGDs. The results showed that the PM removal efficiencies of the wet and semi-dry FGDs were 29.44% and 22.28%, respectively. The size distributions of PM were at the range of 0.7~4.7 μm in the inlet flue gases of both FGDs. The overall removal efficiencies of heavy metals were above 65%. In both outlet flue gases, Pb as the most elements accounted for 93.33% of total at the wet FGD, while Pb, Cr, and Zn accounted for 76.34% at the semi-dry FGD. The proportions of gaseous heavy metals in the inlets of both FGDs were improved than those in the outlets. Furthermore, the total emission amounts of dioxins in both inlets and outlets of the flue gases were 0.0385 ng-TEQ/m3 and 0.0248 ng-TEQ/m3 at the wet FGD and 0.0078 ng-TEQ/m3 and 0.0050 ng-TEQ/m3 at the semi-dry FGD, respectively. The overall removal efficiencies of dioxins were all above 35%. The polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) ratio in the dioxins lightly increased from 84.46 to 88.80% through wet FGD, while it decreased from 80.83 to 44.35% in semi-dry FGD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

  • Alvarez-Ayuso E, Querol X, Tomás A (2006) Environmental impact of a coal combustion-desulphurisation plant: abatement capacity of desulphurisation process and environmental characterisation of combustion by-products. Chemosphere 65:2009–2017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Annamalai M, Dhinesh B, Nanthagopal K, Sivaramakrishnan P, Lalvani JR, Parthasarathy M, Annamalai K (2016) An assessment on performance, combustion and emission behavior of a diesel engine powered by ceria nanoparticle blended emulsified biofuel. Energy Convers Manag 123:372–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Kuo Y, Chen M, Wang Y, Chen C, Lin M, Yoon C, Tsai P (2016) Reducing polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/F) emissions from a real-scale iron ore sinter plant by adjusting its sinter raw mix. J Clean Prod 112:1184–1189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang D, Liao X, Zhang X, Teng A, Xue X (2018) A novel resource utilization of the calcium-based semi-dry flue gas desulfurization ash: as a reductant to remove chromium and vanadium from vanadium industrial wastewater. J Hazard Mater 342:436–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdlička J, Dlouhý T (2018) Full-scale evaluation of SO2 capture increase for semi-dry FGD technology. J Energy Inst 92:1–7

  • Li H, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Li D, Wang J (2019) Characteristic analysis of fine particles in semi-dry desulfurization of sintering flue gas. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress 38:2022–2029

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lv Y, Huang J, Yu G, Yang X (2008) Comparison of the dioxins release inventories of China and other countries. Environmental Pollution & Control 30:71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Ooi TC, Thompson D, Anderson DR, Fisher R, Fray T, Zandi M (2011) The effect of charcoal combustion on iron-ore sintering performance and emission of persistent organic pollutants. Combustion and Flame 158:979–987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qian L, Chun T, Long H, Li J, Di Z, Meng Q, Wang P (2018) Emission reduction research and development of PCDD/Fs in the iron ore sintering. Process Saf Environ Prot 117:82–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Zheng C, Xu L, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Liu S, Gao X (2019) Atmospheric emission inventory of SO3 from coal-fired power plants in China in the period 2009–2014. Atmos Environ 197:14–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi W, Lin C, Chen W, Hong J, Chang J, Dong Y, Zhang Y (2017) Environmental effect of current desulfurization technology on fly dust emission in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sofilič T, Rastovčan-Mioč A, Cerjan-Stefanovič T, Novosel-Radovič V, Jenko M (2004) Characterization of steel mill electric-arc furnace dust. J Hazard Mater 109:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van DBM, Birnbaum LM, De VM, Farland W, Feeley M, Fiedler H, Hakansson H, Hanberg A, Haws L, Rose M (2006) The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. Toxicol Sci 93:223–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Zhang P (2020) Study on the emission characteristics of PCDD/Fs and other multiple pollutants in flue gas from sintering plant in China. Rev Chim 71:536–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Wang C, Lu X, Chen J (2007) Scenario analysis on CO2 emissions reduction potential in China’s iron and steel industry. Energy Policy 35:2320–2335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Song Q, Yao Q, Chen C (2008) Experimental study on the removal of fine particles in flue gas by wet desulfurization system of power plant. Proceedings of The Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering 28:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Tian H, Hua S, Zhu C, Gao J, Xue Y, Hao J, Wang Y, Zhou J (2016) A comprehensive emission inventory of multiple air pollutants from iron and steel industry in China: temporal trends and spatial variation characteristics. Sci Total Environ 559:7–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Zhang P, Yang J (2018) An experimental study on effect of coke ratio on SO2 and NOX emissions in sintering process. Earth & Environmental Science 121:1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wen Z, Di J, Liu S, Han J, Lee JCK (2018) Evaluation of flue-gas treatment technologies for municipal waste incineration: a case study in Changzhou, China. J Clean Prod 184:912–920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Zhang G, Chen S, Su B (2014) Influencing factors and effects of assimilation characteristic of iron ores in sintering process. ISIJ Int 54:582–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong T, Jiang W, Gao W (2016) Current status and prediction of major atmospheric emissions from coal-fired power plants in Shandong province, China. Atmos Environ 124:46–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan XM, Yu-Ran LI, Zhu TY, Feng QI (2015) Review of emission and simultaneous control of multiple pollutants from iron-steel sintering flue gas. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology

  • Yu Y, Zheng M, Li X, He X (2012) Operating condition influences on PCDD/Fs emissions from sinter pot tests with hot flue gas recycling. J Environ Sci 24:875–881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z, Zhou Y, Qiu L, Jie Z (2017) Quantifying the uncertainties of China’s emission inventory for industrial sources: from national to provincial and city scales. Atmos Environ 165:207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan L, Li Y (2012) Comparison of technologies for controlling dioxin in flue gas from sintering process and waste incineration. China Metallurgy 22:31–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Z, Sha QE, Zheng J, Yuan Z, Gao Z, Ou J, Zheng Z, Li C, Huang Z (2017) Sector-based VOCs emission factors and source profiles for the surface coating industry in the Pearl River Delta region of China. Sci Total Environ 583:19–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFC0705302. We are very thankful for the insightful suggestions from potential reviewers to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFC0705302.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The first author and corresponding author, Wang Hui, is mainly responsible for original draft writing, experiment organization, data analysis, as well as conclusion summary, and the second author Zhang Pu is mainly responsible for field experiments, sample analysis, and data compilation of experimental analysis results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

All authors have checked the manuscript and have agreed to the publication on ESPR.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Zhang, P. Emission characteristics of PM, heavy metals, and dioxins in flue gases from sintering machines with wet and semi-dry flue gas desulfurization systems. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 46089–46099 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11500-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11500-w

Keywords

Navigation