Abstract
This study aims to decompose the changes in CO2 emission, in 1990–1995 and 2010–2015, to identify the main drivers of those changes at the sectoral level. Using energy input and input-output table, the emission changes were decomposed into six factors: energy intensity, carbonization factor, technology, structural demand, consumption pattern effect, and scale effect. This model would allow a given country to identify the impacts of energy consumption, energy mix, and production efficiency (as direct sources of emission) while paying close attention to their linkages with both the economic structure and the accretion of final demand. This research was the first attempt to decompose CO2 emission changes using the input-output framework in Indonesia. The results revealed that the scale effect was the main driving factor of emission in 1990–1995. In 2010–2015, embodied emission in the chemical industry, mining, rubber, and plastic industry significantly rose due to an increase in energy intensity. Meanwhile, the embodied emission in electricity, road and air transportations, and non-metallic mineral production rose due to inefficiency in production. The energy policy to improve efficiency and diversified primary energy seemed to be negative between 2010 and 2015. Consequently, the embodied emission from energy intensity factor in several energy-intensive sectors increased along with a lack of contribution to changes in primary energy composition. This study also demonstrated that there was a decline in structural demand for electricity and mining between 2010 and 2015, which contributed negatively to the emission and yet outdrew with the rise from scale effect.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Notes
Detailed calculation of two polar decompositions can be found in Nie et al. (2016)
References
Alcantara V, Padilla E (2006). An input-output analysis of the “key” sectors in CO2 emissions from a production perspective: an application to the spanish economy. http://www.eacb.uab.es
Bappenas (2012). Policy Paper Keselarasan Kebijakan Energi Nasional (KEN) Dengan Rencana Umum Energi Nasional (RUEN) Dan Rencana Umum Energi Daerah (RUED). 49
Brizga J, Feng K, Hubacek K (2014) Drivers of greenhouse gas emissions in the Baltic States: a structural decomposition analysis. Ecol Econ 98:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.001
Cansino JM, Román R, Ordóñez M (2016) Main drivers of changes in CO2 emissions in the Spanish economy: a structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 89:150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.020
Clements B, Jung HS, Gupta S (2007) Real and distributive effects of petroleum price liberation: the case of Indonesia. Developing Economies 45(2):220–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2007.00040.x
Das A, Paul SK (2014) CO2 emissions from household consumption in India between 1993 – 94 and 2006 – 07 : a decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 41:90–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.10.019
Dietzenbacher E, Los B (1998) Structural decomposition techniques: sense and sensitivity. Econ Syst Res 10(4):307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319800000023
Estiri H, Gabriel R, Howard E, Wang L (2013) Different regions, differences in energy consumption: do regions account for the variability in household energy consumption?
Fan JL, Cao Z, Zhang X, Da Wang J, Zhang M (2019) Comparative study on the influence of final use structure on carbon emissions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Sci Total Environ 668:271–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.363
Freitas LC, Kaneko S (2011) Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions and economic growth in Brazil. Ecol Econ 70:1459–1469
Guan D, Hubacek K, Weber CL, Peters GP, Reiner DM (2008) The drivers of Chinese CO 2 emissions from 1980 to 2030. 18, 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.001
Hartono D, Resosudarmo BP (2008) The economy-wide impact of controlling energy consumption in Indonesia: an analysis using a social accounting matrix framework. Energy Policy 36(4):1404–1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.12.011
Hoekstra R, J J, der Bergh V (1994) Comparing structural and index decomposition analysis. Quintessence Int 8:541–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00059-2
Hu Y, Yin Z, Ma J, Du W, Liu D, Sun L (2017). Determinants of GHG emissions for a municipal economy : structural decomposition analysis of Chongqing. 196, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.085
Hwang J-H, Yoo S-H (2014) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: evidence from Indonesia. Qual Quant 48(1):63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9749-5
IEA IEA (2017) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion 2017 - highlights. International Energy Agency 1:1–162. https://doi.org/10.1787/co2_fuel-2017-en
Imansyah MH, Putranti T, Mangkurat L (2017) The identification of key sector in CO2 emissions in production perspective of Indonesia: an input output analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Future for Human Security 5(2):21–29. https://doi.org/10.24910/jsustain/5.2/2129
Irawan T, Anggraeni L, Oktaviani R (2010). The role of manufacturing industry to Indonesian economic performance: input-output analysis. http://web.ipb.ac.id/~economics/doc/10.pdf
Isaksen E (2011) Compilation of energy intensity indicators
Kartiasih F, Syaukat Y, Anggraeni L (2012) Determinan Intensitas Energi di Indonesia The Determinants of Energy Intensity in Indonesia Pendahuluan 12(2):192–214
Kim YG, Yoo J, Oh W (2015) Driving forces of rapid CO<inf>2</inf> emissions growth: a case of Korea. Energy Policy 82(1):144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.017
Kurniawan R, Sugiawan Y, Managi S (2018) Cleaner energy conversion and household emission decomposition analysis in Indonesia. J Clean Prod 201:334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.051
Lapillonne B (2006). Simple macro-economic indicators: energy intensities. Training Seminar Evaluation of Energy Efficiency Trends and Potentials. http://www.eie.gov.tr/projeler/document/4_Indicators_macro.pdf
Lee K, Oh W (2006) Analysis of CO2 emissions in APEC countries: a time-series and a cross-sectional decomposition using the log mean Divisia method. Energy Policy 34(17):2779–2787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.04.019
Leontief W (1967) An alternative to aggregation in input–output analysis and national accounts. Rev Econ Stat 49:412–419
Lim HJ, Yoo SH, Kwak SJ (2009) Industrial CO2emissions from energy use in Korea: a structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 37(2):686–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.025
Lin B, Sun C (2010) Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China $. Energy Policy 38(1):613–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.014
Liu Q, Long Y, Wang C, Wang Z, Wang Q, Guan D (2019) Drivers of provincial SO2 emissions in China – based on multi-regional input-output analysis. J Clean Prod 238:117893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117893
Llop M (2017) Changes in energy output in a regional economy : a structural decomposition analysis. Energy 128:145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.003
Markaki, M., Belegri-roboli, A., Michaelides, P., Mirasgedis, S., & Lalas, D. P. (2020). The Impact of clean energy investments on the Greek economy : an input – output analysis ( 2010 – 2020 ). 57(2013), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.047
MEMR. (2018). Statistik Ketenalistrikan. http://www.djk.esdm.go.id
Miller RE, Blair PD (2009). Input-output analysis foundations and extensions. Cambridge
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR) (2016). Investment Guideline Bioenergy in Indonesia
Nie H, Kemp R, Font Vivanco D, Vasseur V (2016) Structural decomposition analysis of energy-related CO 2 emissions in China from 1997 to 2010. Energy Efficiency 9:1351–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9427-x
Olivier JG, Schure K, Peter JAH (2017). Trends in global CO 2 and total greenhouse gas emissions Summary of the 2017 report Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions Summary of the 2017 report. September 2017. http://themasites.pbl.nl/publications/pbl-2017-summary-trends-in-global-co2-and-total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-2983.pdf
Pan W, Pan W, Shi Y, Liu S, He B, Hu C, Tu H, Xiong J, Yu D (2018) China’s inter-regional carbon emissions: an input-output analysis under considering national economic strategy. J Clean Prod 197:794–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.207
Priambodo A, Kumar S (2001) Energy use and carbon dioxide emission of Indonesian small and medium scale industries. Energy Convers Manag 42(11):1335–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00127-8
Putranti TM, Imansyah MH (2017). The change of CO2 emission on manufacturing sectors in Indonesia: an input-output analysis. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1918. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5018500
Rustandi D (2017). Measuring the progress of energy efficiency in Indonesia (Menakar Progres Efisiensi Energi di Indonesia). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10075.57128
Sitompul RF, Owen AD (2006). Energy-related CO 2 emissions in the Indonesian manufacturing sector. March
Su B, Ang BW (2013) Input-output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: competitive versus non-competitive imports. Energy Policy 56:83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.041
Su B, Ang BW (2015) Multiplicative decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity change using input-output analysis. Appl Energy 154:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.101
Su B, Ang BW (2017) Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities. Energy Econ 65:137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.002
Su B, Ang BW, Li Y (2017) Input-output and structural decomposition analysis of Singapore’s carbon emissions. Energy Policy 105(March):484–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.027
Supasa T, Hsiau S, Lin S, Wongsapai W, Wu J (2016) Has energy conservation been an effective policy for Thailand ? An input – output structural decomposition analysis from 1995 to 2010. Energy Policy 98:210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.028
Thorbecke, E. (1992). Adjustment and equity in Indonesia
Wahid IN, Abd Aziz A, Nik Mustapa NH (2013). Energy consumption , economic growth and CO2 emissions in selected ASEAN countries. Prosiding Perkembangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia Ke VIII 2013, 2, 758–765. http://www.ukm.my/fep/perkem/pdf/perkemVIII/PKEM2013_3D2.pdf
Wang M, Feng C (2018) Exploring the driving forces of energy-related CO2 emissions in China’s construction industry by utilizing production-theoretical decomposition analysis. J Clean Prod 202:710–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.152
Wang H, Zhou P (2018) Multi-country comparisons of CO2 emission intensity: the production-theoretical decomposition analysis approach. Energy Econ 74:310–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.038
Wang H, Ang BW, Su B (2017) Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of energy and emission intensities : some methodological issues. Energy 123:47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.141
Wang C, Zhan J, Li Z, Zhang F, Zhang Y (2019a) Structural decomposition analysis of carbon emissions from residential consumption in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. J Clean Prod 208:1357–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.257
Wang S, Zhu X, Song D, Wen Z, Chen B, Feng K (2019b) Drivers of CO 2 emissions from power generation in China based on modified structural decomposition analysis. J Clean Prod 220:1143–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.199
Weber CL, Peters G, Guan D, Hubacek K (2008) The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change. Energy Policy 36:3572–3577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.009
Wei T, Liu Y (2017) Estimation of global rebound effect caused by energy efficiency improvement. Energy Econ 66:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.030
Wei J, Huang K, Yang S, Li Y, Hu T, Zhang Y (2017) Driving forces analysis of energy-related carbon dioxide ( CO 2 ) emissions in Beijing : an input e output structural decomposition analysis. J Clean Prod 163:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.086
World Bank (2018). GDP annual growth from various countries. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG
Xu XY, Ang BW (2014) Multilevel index decomposition analysis: approaches and application. Energy Econ 44:375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.05.002
Xu M, Li R, Crittenden JC, Chen Y (2011) CO2 emissions embodied in China’ s exports from 2002 to 2008 : a structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 39(11):7381–7388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.068
Yusuf AA, Resosudarmo BP (2015) On the distributional impact of a carbon tax in developing countries: the case of Indonesia. Environ Econ Policy Stud 17(1):131–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-014-0093-y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Sasmita Hastri H. concepted the paper, processed the data, interpreted and analyzed the result, wrote original draft and editing; Djoni Hartono concepted the paper, interpreted and analyzed the result, reviewed the paper, supervising; Titi Muswati Putranti prepared the data; Muhammad Handry Imansyah prepared the data.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The authors commit to uphold integrity of the scientific record by complying with ethical standards.
Contest to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hastuti, S.H., Hartono, D., Putranti, T.M. et al. The drivers of energy-related CO2 emission changes in Indonesia: structural decomposition analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 9965–9978 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11414-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11414-7