Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Groundwater dynamic response mechanism and quantity vulnerability assessment under the influence of human activities

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater depletion becomes a prominent issue due to the fast-growing water demand in semiarid and arid regions, which poses serious hydrogeological problems and restrains regional sustainable development. Groundwater dynamic response mechanism analysis and quantity vulnerability assessment are useful methods for groundwater protection and management. This paper analyzed the spatial and temporal variation of groundwater level in Xi’an, and studied the response characteristic of groundwater dynamic to its driving forces in different periods under the influence of human activities. Considering both hydrological settings and human disturbances, a modified evaluation system based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and DRYTECL model was proposed to assess groundwater quantity vulnerability. In order to make the results more reasonable and in line with actual situation of the study area, a weighting system that builds on subjective and objective weights was put forward as well. The results show that groundwater level sharply dropped in the last few decades, and the spatial autocorrelation of groundwater level has gotten weaker, suggesting that the contribution of natural factors to groundwater-level variation decreased. Land use, exploitation, and other human activities had a great influence on groundwater dynamic by changing the discharge and recharge condition of groundwater, and the response characteristic of groundwater level to precipitation, runoff, and exploitation varied with time and hydrogeological conditions. Groundwater quantity vulnerability map showed 63.8% of the study area fell within moderate-to-high quantity risk, which indicated that groundwater depletion mainly occurred in highly urbanized areas. The single-parameter sensitivity analysis showed that the exploitation is the most sensitive factor to groundwater quantity vulnerability, the real effects of land use on groundwater quantity risk are greater than its theoretical effects, and net recharge is important to groundwater recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armengol S, Sanchez-Vila X, Folch A (2014) An approach to aquifer vulnerability including uncertainty in a spatial random function framework. J Hydrol 517:889–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron OV, Barr AD, Donn MJ (2013) Effect of urbanization on the water balance of a catchment with shallow groundwater. J Hydrol 485:162–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braud I, Breil P, Thollet F, Lagouy M, Branger F, Jacqueminet C, Kermadi S, Michel K (2013) Evidence of the impact of urbanization on the hydrological regime of a medium-sized periurban catchment in France. J Hydrol 485:5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui D, Kawamura A, Tong T, Amaguchi H, Nakagawa N (2012) Spatio-temporal analysis of recent groundwater-level trends in the red River Delta, Vietnam. Hydrogeol J 20:1635–1650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dams J, Woldeamlak ST, Batelaan O (2008) Predicting land-use change and its impact on the groundwater system of the Kleine Nete catchment, Belgium. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12(6):1369–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon B (2005) Applicability of Neuro-fuzzy techniques in predicting groundwater vulnerability: a GIS-based sensitivity analysis. J Hydrol 309(1/4):17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng HM, Zhang GH, Wang DL, Yan MJ (2014) Analysis on driving forces for groundwater flow field evolution in Shijiazhuang area in recent 50 years. [in Chinese.]. J Hydraul Eng 45(2):180–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Fresca BG, Sharp JM (2005) Hydrogeologic considerations of urban development: urban-induced recharge. Rev Eng Geol 16:123–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamza SM, Ahsan A, Imteaz MA, Rahman A, Mohammad TA, Ghazali AH (2015) Accomplishment and subjectivity of GIS-based DRASTIC groundwater vulnerability assessment method: a review. Environ Earth Sci 73(7):3063–3076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoque MA, Hoque MM, Ahmed KM (2007) Declining groundwater level and aquifer dewatering in Dhaka metropolitan area, Bangladesh: causes and quantification. Hydrogeol J 15(8):1523–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huan H, Wang JS, Teng YG (2012) Assessment and validation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate based on a modified DRASTIC model: a case study in Jilin City of northeast China. Sci Total Environ 440:14–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koop SHA, van Leeuwen CJ (2015) Assessment of the sustainability of water resources management: a critical review of the city blueprint approach. Water Resour Manage 29(15):5649–5670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda K, Hayashi T, An TD, Vu DC, Tran TVN, Funabiki A, Takizawa S (2017) Groundwater recharge in suburban areas of Hanoi, Vietnam: effect of decreasing surface-water bodies and land-use change. Hydrogeol J 25(3):727–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konikow LF (2015) Long-term groundwater depletion in the United States. Groundwater 53(1):2–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Lee K, Sung I (2001) Urbanization and the groundwater budget in metropolitan Seoul area, Korea. Hydrogeol J 9(4):401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazakis N, Voudouris K. 2011. Comparison of three applied methods of groundwater vulnerability mapping: a case study from the Florina basin, Northern Greece. In: Lambrakis N, Stournaras G, Katsanou K (eds) Advances in the research of aquatic environment. Environ Earth Sci, 359–367

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lana-Renault N, Regues D, Serrano P, Latron J (2016) Spatial and temporal variability of groundwater dynamics in a sub-Mediterranean mountain catchment. Hydrol Process 28:3288–3299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li PY, Tian R, Xue CY (2017) Progress, opportunities, and key fields for groundwater quality research under the impacts of human activities in China with a special focus on western China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(15):13224–13234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Ma C, Zhou WB, Yan Q, Song Y (2018) Characterizing the evolution of groundwater flow field and its driving forces in Xi’an. J Hydrol Eng 23(8):05018017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moratalla A, Gomez-Alday J, Sanz D, Castano S, Heras J (2011) Evaluation of a GIS-based integrated vulnerability risk assessment for the Mancha Oriental System (SE Spain). Water Resour Manag 25:3677–3697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mpamba NH, Hussen A (2008) Evidence and implications of groundwater mining in the Lusaka urban aquifers. Phys Chem Earth 33(8–13):648–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao D, Cherkauer KA (2009) Impacts of land-use change on hydrologic responses in the Great Lakes region. J Hydrol 374(1–2):71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie WM, Yuan YP, Kepner W, Nashi MS, Jackson M, Erickson C (2011) Assessing impacts of land use and land cover changes on hydrology for the upper San Pedro watershed [J]. J Hydrol 407(1–4):105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naik PK, Tambe JA, Dehury BN, Tiwari AN (2008) Impact of urbanization on the groundwater regime in a fast growing city in central India. Environ Monit Assess 146:339–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre RCM, Rotunno OC, Mansur WJ, Nobre MMM, Cosenza CAN (2007) Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping using GIS, modeling and a fuzzy logic tool. J Contam Hydrol 94:277–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Praveena SM, Aris AZ (2010) Groundwater resources assessment using numerical model: a case study in low-lying coastal area. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7(1):135–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Kumar A (2017) Commentary on “Evaluating the criteria for human resource for science and technology (HRST) based on an integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL approach”. Appl Soft Comput 51:351–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahnemaei M, Zare M, Nematollahi AR, Sedghi H (2005) Application of spectral analysis of daily water level and spring discharge hydrographs data for comparing physical characteristics of karstic aquifers. J Hydrol 311:106–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saidi S, Bouri S, Ben DH (2010) Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping of the Hajeb-jelma aquifer (Central Tunisia) using a GIS-based DRASTIC model. Environ Earth Sci 59:1579–1588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sener E, Davraz A (2013) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability based on a modified DRASTIC model, GIS and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method: the case of Egirdir Lake basin (Isparta, Turkey). Hydrogeol J 21(3):701–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song LY, Song JX (2009) Analysis on correlation between groundwater table and precipitation in Xi’an City. [in Chinese.]. Groundwater 31(5):34–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao H, Tao F, Tao P, Liu W, Liu B (2013) Characteristics and influencing factors of groundwater dynamics in Guanzhong urban agglomeration during the last 50 years. [in Chinese.]. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 40(6):37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylan O, Bafail AO, Abdulaal RMS, Kabli MR (2014) Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Appl Soft Comput 17:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vu TT, Tran TVN (2018) Assessment of urbanization impact on groundwater resources in Hanoi, Vietnam. J Environ Manag 227:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JZ, Zhang GH, Mu HD (2011) Quantitative valuation and validation of the influence degree of human activities on shallow groundwater. [in Chinese.]. J Hydraul Eng 42(12):1445–1451

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HF, Yue CQ, Shi JS (2005) Lowering of groundwater level and its negative environment effects in the area of Xi’an [in Chinese.]. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 32(3):78–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the editors and reviewers for reviewing the manuscript and providing insightful comments for improving the quality of this paper.

Funding

This research was supported by China Geological Survey’s project (12120113004800).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Hui.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Marcus Schulz

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Hou, E. Groundwater dynamic response mechanism and quantity vulnerability assessment under the influence of human activities. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 22046–22064 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08645-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08645-z

Keywords

Navigation