Abstract
In this study, perceived moral obligations were included in the protection motivation theory (PMT) model to explain people’s intentions to participate in climate change mitigation behaviors. Empirical data and structural equation modeling results of a nationwide cross-sectional survey in Taiwan confirmed the higher explanatory power of the moral extension PMT model than that of the original PMT model. As expected, threat and coping appraisal of climate change affect protection motivation. In addition, perceived moral obligation affects protection motivation. This protection motivation enhances the intention to participate in climate change mitigation behaviors. The mediation effect of protection motivation was also verified in the moral extension PMT model. Practical implications and suggestions are proposed for the government and related authorities as well as environmental groups to encourage people to participate in climate change mitigation behaviors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen I (1988) Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211
Allison ST, Messick DM, Goethals GR (1989) On being better but not smarter than others: the Muhammad Ali effect. Soc Cogn 7(3):275–295
Almarshad SO (2017) Adopting sustainable behavior in institutions of higher education: a study on intentions of decision makers in the MENA region. Eur J Sustain Dev 6(2):89–110
Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103:411–423
Baldassare M, Katz C (1992) The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practices. Environ Behav 24:602–616
Bamberg S, Möser G (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol 27(1):14–25
Bamberg S, Masson T, Brewitt K, Nemetschek N (2017) Threat, coping and flood prevention—a meta-analysis. J Environ Psychol 54:116–126
Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York
Bartels DM, Bauman CW, Cushman F, Pizarro DA, McGraw AP (2014) Moral judgment and decision making. In: Keren G, Wu G (eds) The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Wiley, Chichester
Beck L, Ajzen I (1991) Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. J Res Pers 25:285–301
Bockarjova M, Steg L (2014) Can protection motivation theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in the Netherlands. Glob Environ Chang 28:276–288
Brody S, Grover H, Vedlitz A (2012) Examining the willingness of Americans to alter behavior to mitigate climate change. Clim Pol 12:1–22
Chen MF (2015) An examination of the value-belief-norm theory model in predicting pro-environmental behaviour in Taiwan. Asian J Soc Psychol 18(2):145–151
Chen MF (2016a) Extending the theory of planned behavior model to explain people’s energy savings and carbon reduction behavioral intentions to mitigate change in Taiwan—moral obligation matters. J Clean Prod 112(Part 2):1746–1753
Chen MF (2016b) Impact of fear appeals on pro-environmental behavior and crucial determinants. Int J Advert 35(1):74–92
Chen F, Dai S, Zhu Y, Xu H (2019) Will concerns for ski tourism promote pro-environmental behaviour? An implication of protection motivation theory. Int J Tour Res 1:–11
Chu PY, Chiu JF (2003) Factors influencing household waste recycling behavior: test of an integrated model. J Appl Soc Psychol 33:604–626
Cismaru M, Lavack AM (2006) Marketing communications and protection motivation theory: examining consumer decision-making. International Review on Public and Non Profit Marketing 3:9–24
Cismaru M, Cismaru R, Ono T, Nelson K (2011) “Act on climate change”: an application of protection motivation theory. Soc Mark Q 17:62–84
Conner M, Armitage CJ (1998) Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. J Appl Soc Psychol 28:1429–1464
De Groot JI, Steg L (2009) Morality and prosocial behavior: the role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. J Soc Psychol 149(4):425–449
Ding Z, Jiang X, Liu Z, Long R, Xu Z, Cao Q (2018) Factors affecting low-carbon consumption behavior of urban residents: a comprehensive review. Resour Conserv Recycl 132:3–15
Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD (1978) The ‘New Environmental Paradigm’: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J Environ Educ 9:10–19
Environmental Protection Administration, R.O.C. (Taiwan) (2018) EPA Announces Draft Phase 1 Greenhouse Gas Emission Control Goals https://www.epa.gov.tw/eng/F7AB26007B8FE8DF/36ddca51-8c30-4df4-97fe-d8801adbe930. Accessed 27 Nov 2019
Floyd DL, Prentice-Dunn S, Rogers RW (2000) A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 30(2):407–429
Gefen D, Rigdon EE, Straub D (2011) An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Q35:iii–xiv
Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazards 38:101–120
Hair JF, Anderson RW, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Hannigan J (2006) Environmental sociology. Routledge, New York
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018) Global warming of 1.5° C: an IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5° C Above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. file:///F:/Environmental%20Science%20and%20Pollution%20Research%20PMT%2020191009/Online%20File%20Inventory%20for%20Revision%2020191125/sr15_spm_final.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2019
Johnson RJ, Scicchitano MJ (2000) Uncertainty, risk, trust, and information: public perceptions of environmental issues and willingness to take action. Policy Stud J28:633–647
Kim M, Hunter JE (1993) Attitude-behavior relations: a meta-analysis of attitude relevance and topic. J Commun 43:101–142
Kim S, Jeong SH, Hwang Y (2013) Predictors of pro-environmental behaviors of American and Korean students: the application of the theory of reasoned action and protection motivation theory. Sci Commun 35(2):168–188
Klöckner CA (2013) A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—a meta-analysis. Glob Environ Chang 23(5):1028–1038
Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environ Educ Res 8:239–260
Kothe EJ, Ling M, North M, Klas A, Mullan BA, Novoradovskaya L (2019) Protection motivation theory and pro-environmental behaviour: a systematic mapping review. Aust J Psychol 71:411–432
Lindenberg S, Steg L (2007) Normative, gain and hedonic goal-frames guiding environmental behavior. J Soc Issues 63(1):117–137
MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods 7(1):83–104
Maddux J, Rogers RW (1983) Protection motivation and self-efficacy: a revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Exp Soc Psychol 19:469–479
Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE (1996) Advanced structural equation modeling. Erlbaum, Mahwah
Masud MM, Al-Amin AQ, Junsheng H, Ahmed F, Yahaya SR, Akhtar R, Banna H (2016) Climate change issue and theory of planned behaviour: relationship by empirical evidence. J Clean Prod 113:613–623
Milne S, Sheeran P, Orbell S (2000) Prediction and intervention in health-related behavior: a meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 30:106–143
Nordlund AM, Garvill J (2003) Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. J Environ Psychol 23:339–347
Norman P, Boer H, Seydel ER (2005) Protection motivation theory. In: Conner M, Norman P (eds) Predicting health behaviour: research and practice with social cognition models. Open University Press, London, pp 81–126
Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S (2009) “Fear won’t do it”: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun 30:355–379
Quaglione D, Cassetta E, Crociata A, Sarra A (2017) Exploring additional determinants of energy-saving behaviour: the influence of individuals' participation in cultural activities. Energy Policy 108:503–511
Rainear AM, Christensen JL (2017) Protection motivation theory as an explanatory framework for proenvironmental behavioral intentions. Commun Res Rep 34:239–248
Rogers RW (1975) A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Aust J Psychol 91:93–114
Rogers RW (1983) Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In: Cacioppo J, Petty R (eds) Social psychophysiology. Guilford, New York
Rogers RW, Prentice-Dunn S (1997) Protection motivation theory. In: Gochman DS (ed) Handbook of health behavior research. I: personal and social determinants. Plenum, New York, pp 113–132
Sapiains R, Beeton RJ, Walker IA (2016) Individual responses to climate change: framing effects on pro-environmental behaviors. J Appl Soc Psychol 46(8):483–493
Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (2004) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on altruism. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 10. Academic, New York, pp 221–279
Schwartz SH, Howard JA (1981) A normative decision-making model of altruism. In: Rushton JP, Sorrentino RM (eds) Altruism and helping behavior, pp 189–211
Schwirplies C (2018) Citizens’ acceptance of climate change adaptation and mitigation: a survey in China, Germany, and the US. Ecol Econ 145:308–322
Shi H, Fan J, Zhao D (2017) Predicting household PM2.5-reduction behavior in Chinese urban areas: an integrative model of theory of planned behavior and norm activation theory. J Clean Prod 145:64–73
Steg L, Nordlund A (2012) Models to explain environmental behaviour. In: Steg L, van den Berg AE, de Groot JIM (eds) Environmental psychology: an introduction. Wiley, Oxford, pp 185–195
Steinhorst J, Matthies E (2016) Monetary or environmental appeals for saving electricity?—potentials for spillover on low carbon policy acceptability. Energy Policy 93:335–344
Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. J Soc Issues 56:407–424
Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev 6(2):81–97
Tolppanen S, Aksela M (2018) Identifying and addressing students’ questions on climate change. J Environ Educ 49(5):375–389
Tuckman BW (1999) Conducting educational research, 5th edn. Wadsworth Group, Davidson
van Zomeren M, Spears R, Leach CW (2010) Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis. J Environ Psychol 30:339–346
Vining J, Ebreo A (2002) Emerging theoretical and methodological perspectives on conservation behavior. In: Bechtel RB, Churchman A (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 541–558
Wang S, Lin S, Li J (2018) Exploring the effects of non-cognitive and emotional factors on household electricity saving behavior. Energy Policy 115:171–180
Werner C, Schermelleh-Engel K (2010) Deciding between competing models: chi-square difference tests. In: Werner C, Schermelleh-Engel K (eds) Introduction to structural equation modeling with LISREL–version February
Witte K (1992) Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model. Commun Monogr 59:329–349
Witte K (1998) Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: using the EPPM to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In: Andersen PA, Guerrero LK (eds) The handbook of communication and emotion. Academic, New York, pp 423–450
Witte K, Allen M (2000) A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for the effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav 27:591–615
Yadav R, Pathak GS (2017) Determinants of consumers’ green purchase behavior in a developing nation: applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecol Econ 134:114–122
Ybarra O, Chan E, Park D (2001) Young and old adults’ concerns about morality and competence. Motiv Emot 25(2):85–100
Zhou Y, Fang W, Li M, Liu W (2018) Exploring the impacts of a low-carbon policy instrument: a case of carbon tax on transportation in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 139:307–314
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Council, Republic of China (NSC 100- 2410-H-036-001-MY3) and the Ministry of Science and Technology, R.O.C. (MOST 105-2410-H-036-003-MY3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Baojing Gu
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(TXT 62 kb)
Appendix
Appendix
Threat Appraisal (Cismaru and Lavack 2006) | |
Perceived severity | Climate change is a serious issue. |
Perceived vulnerability | Considering all the factors that may influence your chances of getting harm from climate change. |
Coping Appraisal (Cismaru and Lavack 2006) | |
Response efficacy | By following the recommendations, I will be able to avoid the negative consequences of climate change. |
Self-efficacy | There are simple things I can do that reduce the negative consequences of the climate crisis. |
I can change my daily routines to combat the climate crisis. | |
There are things I can do that can make a difference in reducing the negative consequences of the climate crisis. | |
My individual actions will contribute to a solution of the climate crisis. | |
Changes in my daily routines will contribute to reducing the negative consequences of the climate crisis. | |
Moral Obligation (Brody et al. 2012) | |
I have a moral obligation to reduce my impact on climate change. | |
I have an obligation to future generations to reduce my impact on climate change. | |
Protection Motivation (van Zomeren et al. 2010) | |
I would like to do something together with others to fight the climate crisis. | |
I would like to sign a petition to promote measures against the climate crisis. | |
I will vote for a political party that fights against the climate crisis. | |
Climate Change Mitigation Behavioral Intentions (Brody et al. 2012) | |
Drive less | |
Replace old appliances with new energy-efficient ones | |
Replace light bulbs with compact fluorescent bulbs | |
Choose a fuel-efficient vehicle when I buy vehicles | |
Plant trees | |
Set the thermostat lower in winter and higher in summer | |
Use recycled products | |
Take steps to reduce my contribution to global warming and climate change | |
Change my driving habits to reduce my contribution to climate change |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, MF. Moral extension of the protection motivation theory model to predict climate change mitigation behavioral intentions in Taiwan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 13714–13725 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07963-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07963-6