Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive models for identifying the binding activity of structurally diverse chemicals to human pregnane X receptor

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Toxic chemicals entered into human body would undergo a series of metabolism, transport and excretion, and the key roles played in there processes were metabolizing enzymes, which was regulated by the pregnane X receptor (PXR). However, some chemicals in environment could activate or antagonize human pregnane X receptor, thereby leading to a disturbance of normal physiological systems. In this study, based on a larger number of 2724 structurally diverse chemicals, we developed qualitative classification models by the k-nearest neighbor method. Moreover, the logarithm of 20 and 50% effective concentrations (log EC 20 and log EC 50) was used to establish quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. With the classification model, two descriptors were enough to establish acceptable models, with the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy being larger than 0.7, highlighting a high classification performance of the models. With two QSAR models, the statistics parameters with the correlation coefficient (R 2) of 0.702–0.749 and the cross-validation and external validation coefficient (Q 2) of 0.643–0.712, this indicated that the models complied with the criteria proposed in previous studies, i.e., R 2 > 0.6, Q 2 > 0.5. The small root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.254–0.414 and the good consistency between observed and predicted values proved satisfactory goodness of fit, robustness, and predictive ability of the developed QSAR models. Additionally, the applicability domains were characterized by the Euclidean distance-based approach and Williams plot, and results indicated that the current models had a wide applicability domain, which especially included a few classes of environmental contaminant, those that were not included in the previous models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AbdulHameed MDM, Ippolito DL, Wallqvist A (2016) Predicting rat and human pregnane x receptor activators using Bayesian classification models. Chem Res Toxicol 29:1729–1740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, He NH, Chen WS, Sun FJ, Li LQ, Deng R, Hu Y (2014) Molecular insights into the promiscuous interaction of human pregnane x receptor (hPXR) with diverse environmental chemicals and drug compounds. Chemosphere 96:138–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dybdahl M, Nikolov NG, Wedebye EB, Jonsdottir SO, Niemela JR (2012) Qsar model for human pregnane x receptor (PXR) binding: screening of environmental chemicals and correlations with genotoxicity, endocrine disruption and teratogenicity. Toxicol Appl Pharm 262:301–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins S, Kortagere S, Iyer M, Reschly EJ, Lill MA, Redinbo MR, Krasowski MD (2009) Challenges predicting ligand-receptor interactions of promiscuous proteins: the nuclear receptor PXR. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golbraikh A, Shen M, Xiao ZY, Xiao YD, Lee KH, Tropsha A (2003) Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models. J Comput Aid Mol Des 17:241–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gramatica P (2007) Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external. QSAR Comb Sci 26:694–701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs MN (2004) In silico tools to aid risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Toxicology 205:43–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal A, Krasowski MD, Reschly EJ, Sinz MW, Swaan PW, Ekinst S (2008) Machine learning methods and docking for predicting human pregnane x receptor activation. Chem Res Toxicol 21:1457–1467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kliewer SA, Goodwin B, Willson TM (2002) The nuclear pregnane x receptor: a key regulator of xenobiotic metabolism. Endocr Rev 23:687–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima H, Sata F, Takeuchi S, Sueyoshi T, Nagai T (2011) Comparative study of human and mouse pregnane x receptor agonistic activity in 200 pesticides using in vitro reporter gene assays. Toxicology 280:77–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kovarich S, Papa E, Gramatica P (2011) QSAR classification models for the prediction of endocrine disrupting activity of brominated flame retardants. J Hazard Mater 190:106–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Letcher RJ, Lemmen JG, van der Burg B, Brouwer A, Bergman A, Giesy JP, van den Berg M (2002) In vitro antiestrogenic effects of aryl methyl sulfone metabolites of polychlorinated biphenyls and 2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dichloroethene on 17 beta-estradiol-induced gene expression in several bioassay systems. Toxicol Sci 69:362–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lille-Langøy R, Goldstone JV, Rusten M, Milnes MR, Male R, Stegeman JJ, Blumberg B, Goksoyr A (2015) Environmental contaminants activate human and polar bear (Ursus maritimus) pregnane x receptors (PXR, nr1i2) differently. Toxicol Appl Pharm 284:54–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HH, Yang XH, Lu R (2016) Development of classification model and QSAR model for predicting binding affinity of endocrine disrupting chemicals to human sex hormone-binding globulin. Chemosphere 156:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matter H, Anger LT, Giegerich C, Gussregen S, Hessler G, Baringhaus KH (2012) Development of in silico filters to predict activation of the pregnane x receptor (PXR) by structurally diverse drug-like molecules. Bioorgan Med Chem 20:5352–5365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007) Guidance document on the validation of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships [(Q)SAR] models. Organisation for economic co-operation and development, paris, france <http://www.OECD.Org/env/ehs/risk-assessment/guidancedocumentsandreportsrelatedtoqsars.Htm>

  • Pan YM, Li LH, Kim G, Ekins S, Wang HB, Swaan PW (2011) Identification and validation of novel human pregnane x receptor activators among prescribed drugs via ligand-based virtual screening. Drug Metab Dispos 39:337–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papa E, Kovarich S, Gramatica P (2013) QSAR prediction of the competitive interaction of emerging halogenated pollutants with human transthyretin. SAR QSAR Environ Res 24:333–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao HB, Wang YY, Zeng XY, Wang XX, Liu Y, Yin JJ, He H, Zhu F, Li ZR (2012) In silico identification of human pregnane x receptor activators from molecular descriptors by machine learning approaches. Chemometr Intell Lab 118:271–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • REACH. Registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of chemicals. http://echa.Europa.Eu/information-on-chemicals/pre-registered-substances. Last updated 10 may 2016

  • Schnur DM, Grieshaber MV, Bowen JP (1991) Development of an internal searching algorithm for parameterization of the MM2/MM3 force fields. J Comput Chem 12:844–849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi HL, Tian S, Li YY, Li D, Yu HD, Zhen XC, Hou TJ (2015) Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity evaluation in drug discovery. 14. Prediction of human pregnane x receptor activators by using naive bayesian classification technique. Chem Res Toxicol 28:116–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sui YP, Ai N, Park SH, Rios-Pilier J, Perkins JT, Welsh WJ, Zhou CC (2012) Bisphenol A and its analogues activate human pregnane x receptor. Environ Health Persp 120:399–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talete srl (2012) Dragon (software for molecular descriptor calculation) version 6.0. <http://www.Talete.Mi.It/>

  • Tijani JO, Fatoba OO, Babajide OO, Petrik LF (2016) Pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors, personal care products, nanomaterials and perfluorinated pollutants: a review. Environ Chem Lett 14:27–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ung CY, Li H, Yap CW, Chen YZ (2007) In silico prediction of pregnane x receptor activators by machine learning approaches. Mol Pharmacol 71:158–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrijheid M, Casas M, Gascon M, Valvi D, Nieuwenhuijsen M (2016) Environmental pollutants and child health-a review of recent concerns. Int J Hyg Envir Heal 219:331–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CY, Li CW, Chen JD, Welsh WJ (2006) Structural model reveals key interactions in the assembly of the pregnane x receptor/corepressor complex. Mol Pharmacol 69:1513–1517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins RE, Wisely GB, Moore LB, Collins JL, Lambert MH, Williams SP, Willson TM, Kliewer SA, Redinbo MR (2001) The human nuclear xenobiotic receptor PXR: structural determinants of directed promiscuity. Science 292:2329–2333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20150771) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21507038, 21507061, and 41671489).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xianhai Yang or Huihui Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Transparency document

The transparency document associated with this article can be found in online version.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Electronic supplementary material

Table S1

(XLSX 582 kb)

Table S2

(XLSX 32 kb)

Table S3

(XLSX 176 kb)

ESM 1

(DOCX 108 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, C., Yang, X., Wei, M. et al. Predictive models for identifying the binding activity of structurally diverse chemicals to human pregnane X receptor. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 20063–20071 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9690-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9690-1

Keywords

Navigation