Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of operation parameters on the flux stabilization of gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration system for decentralized water supply

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A pilot-scale gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration system under low gravitational pressure without any pre-treatment, backwash, flushing, or chemical cleaning was carried out to investigate the effect of operation parameters (including operation pressure, aeration mode, and intermittent filtration) on the effluent quality and permeability development. The results revealed that GDM system exhibited an efficient performance for the removal of suspended substances and organic compounds. The stabilization of flux occurred and the average values of stable flux were 6.6, 8.1, and 8.6 Lm−2 h−1 for pressures of 65, 120, and 200 mbar, respectively. In contrast, flux stabilization was not observed under continuous and intermittent aeration conditions. However, aeration (especially continuous aeration) was effective to improve flux and alleviate membrane fouling during 1-month operation. Moreover, intermittent filtration would influence the stabilization of permeate flux, resulting in a higher stable flux (ranging from 6 to 13 Lm−2 h−1). The stable flux significantly improved with the increase of intermittent period. Additionally, GDM systems exhibited an efficient recovery of flux after simple physical cleaning and the analyses of resistance reversibility demonstrated that most of the total resistance was hydraulic reversible resistance (50–75 %). Therefore, it is expected that the results of this study can develop strategies to increase membrane permeability and reduce energy consumption in GDM systems for decentralized water supply.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhondi E, Wu B, Sun S, Marxer B, Lim W, Gu J, Liu L, Burkhardt M, McDougald D, Pronk W, Fane AG (2015) Gravity-driven membrane filtration as pretreatment for seawater reverse osmosis: Linking biofouling layer morphology with flux stabilization. Water Res 70:158–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boulestreau M, Hoa E, Peter-Verbanets M, Pronk W, Rajagopaul R, Lesjean B (2012) Operation of gravity-driven ultrafiltration prototype for decentralised water supply. Desalin Water Treat 42:125–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Capodici M, Di Bella G, Di Trapani D, Torregrossa M (2015) Pilot scale experiment with MBR operated in intermittent aeration condition: analysis of biological performance. Bioresour Technol 177:398–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerón-Vivas A, Morgan-Sagastume JM, Noyola A (2012) Intermittent filtration and gas bubbling for fouling reduction in anaerobic membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci 423–424:136–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang H, Liang H, Qu F, Ma J, Ren N, Li G (2016) Towards a better hydraulic cleaning strategy for ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acid: effect of backwash water composition. J Environ Sci 43:177–186

  • Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer JA, Booksh K (2003) Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 37:5701–5710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng X, Liang H, Ding A, Qu F, Shao S, Liu B, Wang H, Wu D, Li G (2016) Effects of pre-ozonation on the ultrafiltration of different natural organic matter (NOM) fractions: membrane fouling mitigation, prediction and mechanism. J Membr Sci 505:15–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dalmau M, Monclus H, Gabarron S, Rodriguez-Roda I, Comas J (2014) Towards integrated operation of membrane bioreactors: effects of aeration on biological and filtration performance. Bioresour Technol 171:103–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Derlon N, Peter-Varbanets M, Scheidegger A, Pronk W, Morgenroth E (2012) Predation influences the structure of biofilm developed on ultrafiltration membranes. Water Res 46:3323–3333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Derlon N, Koch N, Eugster B, Posch T, Pernthaler J, Pronk W, Morgenroth E (2013) Activity of metazoa governs biofilm structure formation and enhances permeate flux during Gravity-Driven Membrane (GDM) filtration. Water Res 47:2085–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding A, Qu F, Liang H, Ma J, Han Z, Yu H, Guo S, Li G (2013) A novel integrated vertical membrane bioreactor (IVMBR) for removal of nitrogen from synthetic wastewater/domestic sewage. Chem Eng J 223:908–914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding A, Liang H, Qu F, Bai L, Li G, Ngo HH, Guo W (2014) Effect of granular activated carbon addition on the effluent properties and fouling potentials of membrane-coupled expanded granular sludge bed process. Bioresour Technol 171:240–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding A, Pronk W, Qu F, Ma J, Li G, Li K, Liang H (2015) Effect of calcium addition on sludge properties and membrane fouling potential of the membrane-coupled expanded granular sludge bed process. J Membr Sci 489:55–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding A, Liang H, Li G, Derlon N, Szivak I, Morgenroth E, Pronk W (2016) Impact of aeration shear stress on permeate flux and fouling layer properties in a low pressure membrane bioreactor for the treatment of grey water. J Membr Sci 510:382–390

  • Ferrer O, Casas S, Galvan C, Lucena F, Bosch A, Galofre B, Mesa J, Jofre J, Bernat X (2015) Direct ultrafiltration performance and membrane integrity monitoring by microbiological analysis. Water Res 83:121–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibert O, Lefèvre B, Teuler A, Bernat X, Tobella J (2015) Distribution of dissolved organic matter fractions along several stages of a drinking water treatment plant. J Water Process Eng 6:64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He XS, Xi BD, Li X, Pan HW, An D, Bai SG, Li D, Cui DY (2013) Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix spectra coupled with parallel factor and regional integration analysis to characterize organic matter humification. Chemosphere 93:2208–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Spinette R, O’Melia CR (2008) Direct-flow microfiltration of aquasols. I. Impacts of particle stabilities and size. J Membr Sci 314:90–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jermann D, Pronk W, Meylan S, Boller M (2007) Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production. Water Res 41:1713–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J-y T, Liang H, Nan J, Yang Y-l, S-j Y, G-b L (2009) Submerged membrane bioreactor (sMBR) for the treatment of contaminated raw water. Chem Eng J 148:296–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J-y T, Xu Y-p, Z-l C, Nan J, G-b L (2010) Air bubbling for alleviating membrane fouling of immersed hollow-fiber membrane for ultrafiltration of river water. Desalination 260:225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, DiGiano FA, Reardon RD (2008) Autopsy of high-pressure membranes to compare effectiveness of MF and UF pretreatment in water reclamation. Water Res 42:697–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HJ, Laskin A, Laskin J, Nizkorodov SA (2013) Excitation-emission spectra and fluorescence quantum yields for fresh and aged biogenic secondary organic aerosols. Environ Sci Technol 47:5763–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Liang H, Qu F, Shao S, Yu H, Han Z-s DX, Li G (2014) Control of natural organic matter fouling of ultrafiltration membrane by adsorption pretreatment: comparison of mesoporous adsorbent resin and powdered activated carbon. J Membr Sci 471:94–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Chen ZL, Yu WZ, You SJ (2011) Characterization of organic membrane foulants in a submerged membrane bioreactor with pre-ozonation using three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Res 45:2111–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Zhang H, Li Y, Zhang X, Yang F, Xiao J (2005) Cake layer morphology in microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater based on fractal analysis. Sep Purif Technol 44:250–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meylan S, Hammes F, Traber J, Salhi E, von Gunten U, Pronk W (2007) Permeability of low molecular weight organics through nanofiltration membranes. Water Res 41:3968–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyoshi T, Yamamura H, Morita T, Watanabe Y (2015) Effect of intensive membrane aeration and membrane flux on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors: reducing specific air demand per permeate (SADp). Sep Purif Technol 148:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peiris RH, Halle C, Budman H, Moresoli C, Peldszus S, Huck PM, Legge RL (2010) Identifying fouling events in a membrane-based drinking water treatment process using principal component analysis of fluorescence excitation-emission matrices. Water Res 44:185–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peter-Varbanets M, Zurbrugg C, Swartz C, Pronk W (2009) Decentralized systems for potable water and the potential of membrane technology. Water Res 43:245–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peter-Varbanets M, Hammes F, Vital M, Pronk W (2010) Stabilization of flux during dead-end ultra-low pressure ultrafiltration. Water Res 44:3607–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peter-Varbanets M, Margot J, Traber J, Pronk W (2011) Mechanisms of membrane fouling during ultra-low pressure ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci 377:42–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peter-Varbanets M, Gujer W, Pronk W (2012) Intermittent operation of ultra-low pressure ultrafiltration for decentralized drinking water treatment. Water Res 46:3272–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pronk W, Palmquist H, Biebow M, Boller M (2006) Nanofiltration for the separation of pharmaceuticals from nutrients in source-separated urine. Water Res 40:1405–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qu F, Liang H, Zhou J, Nan J, Shao S, Zhang J, Li G (2014) Ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by extracellular organic matter (EOM) from Microcystis aeruginosa: effects of membrane pore size and surface hydrophobicity. J Membr Sci 449:58–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wyart Y, Tamime R, Siozade L, Baudin I, Glucina K, Deumié C, Moulin P (2014) Morphological analysis of flat and hollow fiber membranes by optical and microscopic methods as a function of the fouling. J Membr Sci 472:241–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao P, Xiao F, Wang D-s, Qin T, He S-p (2012) Investigation of organic foulants behavior on hollow-fiber UF membranes in a drinking water treatment plant. Sep Purif Technol 95:109–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • X-y L, Chu HP (2003) Membrane bioreactor for the drinking water treatment of polluted surface water supplies. Water Res 37:4781–4791

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was jointly supported by the National Science Foundation for the Outstanding Youngster Fund (51522804), Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (2012ZX07404-003), Science and Technology Program for Public Wellbeing (2013GS370202-003), Science and Technology Planning Project of Chancheng District (2013A1044), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. Moreover, the authors are so thankful to Nan Jiang and Dara S.M. Ghasimi (Technische Universiteit Delft) for their help in checking the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heng Liang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Angeles Blanco

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, X., Ding, A., Qu, F. et al. Effect of operation parameters on the flux stabilization of gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration system for decentralized water supply. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23, 16771–16780 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6857-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6857-0

Keywords

Navigation