Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Study of different Chemcatcher configurations in the monitoring of nonylphenol ethoxylates and nonylphenol in aquatic environment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main aim of the European Union Water Framework Directive (WFD) (2000/60/EC) is to protect rivers, lakes, coastal waters and groundwaters (EC 2000). The implementation of the WFD requires monitoring the concentration levels of several priority pollutants such as nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPEOs) and nonylphenol (NP) in the area of EU. The present practices for determining the concentration levels of various pollutants are, in many respects, insufficient, and there is an urgent need to develop more cost-effective sampling methods. A passive sampling tool named Chemcatcher was tested for monitoring NPEOs and NP in aqueous media. These environmentally harmful substances have been widely used in different household and industrial applications, and they affect aquatic ecosystems, for example, by acting as endocrine disrupting compounds. The suitability of different receiving phases which were sulfonated styrene–divinylbenzene reversed phase polymer (SDB-RPS), standard styrene–divinyl benzene polymer (SDB-XC) and C-18 (octadecyl) was assessed in laboratory and field trials. The effect of a diffusion membrane on the accumulation of studied compounds was also investigated. The SDB-XC and C-18 receiving phases collected the NPEOs and NP most effectively. The water flow affected the accumulation factor of the studied substances in the field trials, and the water concentrations calculated using sampling rates were tenfold lower than those measured with conventional spot sampling. The concentration of the analytes in spot samples taken from the sampling sites might be higher because in that case, the particle-bound fraction is also measured. The NPEOs readily attach to suspended matter, and therefore, the total concentration of such compounds in water is much higher. Also, the spot samples were not taken daily but once a week, while the passive samplers collected the compounds continuously for 2- or 4-week time periods. This may cause differences when comparing the results of those two methods as well. Both techniques can be applied for monitoring the concentration levels at different sampling sites, but the calculated and measured analyte concentrations in surrounding water are not necessarily comparable with each other. More experiments are still needed to study the effect of hydrological issues and humic substances on the accumulation of chemicals. However, the Chemcatcher passive sampler gives valuable information about the mean concentration levels of studied compounds during 2- or 4-week sampling period. This is important for comparison of annual monitoring results, especially in sampling sites with rapidly fluctuating concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilar-Martínez R, Greenwood R, Mills GA, Vrana B, Palacios-Corvillo MA, Gomez-Gomez MM (2008a) Assessment of Chemcatcher passive sampler for the monitoring of inorganic mercury and organotin compounds in water. Int J Environ Anal Chem 88:75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar-Martínez R, Palacios-Corvillo MA, Greenwood R, Mills GA, Vrana B, Gomez-Gomez MM (2008b) Calibration and use of the Chemcatcher passive sampler for monitoring organotin compounds in water. Anal Chim Acta 618:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar-Martínez R, Gomez-Gomez MM, Greenwood R, Mills GA, Vrana B, Palacios-Corvillo MA (2009) Application of Chemcatcher passive sampler for monitoring levels of mercury in contaminated river water. Talanta 77:1483–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahkola H, Herve S, Knuutinen J (2013) Overview of passive Chemcatcher sampling with SPE pre-treatment suitable for the analysis of NPEOs and NPs. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:1207–1218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allan IJ, Vrana B, Greenwood R, Mills GA, Roig B, Gonzalez C (2006) A “toolbox” for biological and chemical monitoring requirements for the European Union’s Water Framework Directive. Talanta 69:302–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allan IJ, Knutsson J, Guigues N, Mills GA, Fouillac AM, Greenwood R (2007) Evaluation of the Chemcatcher and DGT passive samplers for monitoring metals with highly fluctuating water concentrations. J Environ Monit 9:672–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blom LB, Morrison GM, Kingston J, Mills GA, Greenwood R, Pettersson TJR, Rauch S (2002) Performance of an in situ passive sampling system for metals in stormwater. J Environ Monit 4:258–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri J, Morin N, Miège C, Coquery M, Cren-Olivé C (2012) Determination of the uptake and release rates of multifamilies of endocrine disruptor compounds on the polar C18 Chemcatcher. Three potential performance reference compounds to monitor polar pollutants in surface water by integrative sampling. J Chromatogr A 1237:37–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de la Cal A, Kuster M, de Alda ML, Eljarrat E, Barcelo D (2008) Evaluation of the aquatic passive sampler Chemcatcher for the monitoring of highly hydrophobic compounds in water. Talanta 76:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Corcia A, Cavallo R, Crescenzi C, Nazzari M (2000) Occurrence and abundance of dicarboxylated metabolites of nonylphenol polyethoxylate surfactants in treated sewages. Environ Sci Technol 34:3914–3919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy

  • EU (2013) Directive 2013/39/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy

  • Finlex (2006) Government Decree on Substances Dangerous and Harmful to the Aquatic Environment, 1022/2006, Ministry of the Environment, Finland

  • Gorecki T, Namiesnik J (2002) Passive sampling. Trends Anal Chem 21:276–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gunold R, Schafer RB, Paschke A, Schuurmann G, Liess M (2008) Calibration of the Chemcatcher passive sampler for monitoring selected polar and semi-polar pesticides in surface water. Environ Pollut 155:52–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herve S (1991) Mussel incubation method for monitoring organochlorine compounds in freshwater recipients of pulp and paper industry, Doctoral Thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Finland

  • Jonkers N, Knepper TP, De Voogt P (2001) Aerobic biodegradation studies of nonylphenol ethoxylates in river water using liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol 35:335–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers N, Govers H, de Voogt P (2005) Adduct formation in LC–ESI–MS of nonylphenol ethoxylates: mass spectrometrical, theoretical and quantitative analytical aspects. Anal Chim Acta 531:217–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston JK, Greenwood R, Mills GA, Morrison GM, Persson LB (2000) Development of a novel passive sampling system for the time-averaged measurement of a range of organic pollutants in aquatic environments. J Environ Monit 2:487–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer P, Tolls J, Hermens L, Mackay D (2003) Equilibrium sampling devices. Environ Sci Technol 37:184a–191a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehtonen J, Munne P, Verta M (2012) Work package 4: identification of sources and estimation of inputs/impacts on the Baltic Sea, Summary Report Finland. www.cohiba-project.net/publications

  • Michigan, Environmental Assistance Division (2000) Pulp and paper industry voluntarily reduces use of nonylphenol ethoxylates. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Environmental Assistance Division, Lansing

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson LB, Morrison GM, Friemann JU, Kingston J, Mill G, Greenwood R (2001) Diffusional behaviour of metals in a passive sampling system for monitoring aquatic pollution. J Environ Monit 3:639–645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pessala P, Keranen J, Schultz E, Nakari T, Karhu M, Ahkola H, Knuutinen J, Herve S, Paasivirta J, Ahtiainen J (2009) Evaluation of biodegradation of nonylphenol ethoxylate and lignin by combining toxicity assessment and chemical characterization. Chemosphere 75:1506–1511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Bayo F, Hyne RV, Kibria G, Doble P (2013) Calibration and field application of Chemcatcher® passive samplers for detecting amitrole residues in agricultural drain waters. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 90:635–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens SB, Kapernick A, Eaglesham G, Mueller J (2005) Aquatic passive sampling of herbicides on naked particle loaded membranes: Accelerated measurement and empirical estimation of kinetic parameters. Environ Sci Technol 39:8891–8897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeirssen ELM, Dietschweiler C, Escher BI, van der Voet J, Hollender J (2013) Uptake and release kinetics of 22 polar organic chemicals in the Chemcatcher passive sampler. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:5225–5236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrana B, Mills GA, Allan IJ, Dominiak E, Svensson K, Knutsson J, Morrison G, Greenwood R (2005a) Passive sampling techniques for monitoring pollutants in water. Trends Anal Chem 24:845–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrana B, Mills GA, Greenwood R, Knutsson J, Svensson K, Morrison G (2005b) Performance optimisation of a passive sampler for monitoring hydrophobic organic pollutants in water. J Environ Monit 7:612–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrana B, Mills GA, Dominiak E, Greenwood R (2006) Calibration of the Chemcatcher passive sampler for the monitoring of priority organic pollutants in water. Environ Pollut 142:333–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrana B, Vermeirssen ELM, Allan IJ, Kohoutek J, Kennedy K, Mills GA, Greenwood R (2009) Passive sampling of emerging pollutants in the aquatic environment: state of the art and perspectives. NORMAN—Network of reference laboratories, research centre and related organisations for monitoring of emerging environmental substances

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Magnus Ehrnrooth Foundation, Finnish Cultural Foundation, Olvi Foundation and Maa- ja vesitekniikan tuki ry. We would also like to thank Dr. Ian Allan from the University of Portsmouth who kindly provided the material for membrane 1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Heidi Ahkola & Sirpa Herve

  2. Department of Chemistry, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Juha Knuutinen

Authors
  1. Heidi Ahkola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sirpa Herve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juha Knuutinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi Ahkola.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahkola, H., Herve, S. & Knuutinen, J. Study of different Chemcatcher configurations in the monitoring of nonylphenol ethoxylates and nonylphenol in aquatic environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21, 9182–9192 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2828-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2828-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation