Skip to main content
Log in

Degradation of 1,2-dichloroethane from wash water of ion-exchange resin using Fenton’s oxidation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

Chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs), widely used in industry as solvents and chemical intermediates in the production of synthetic resins, plastics, and pharmaceuticals, are highly toxic to the environment and public health. Various studies reported that Fenton’s oxidation could degrade a variety of chlorinated VOCs in aqueous solutions. In acidic conditions, ferrous ion catalyzes the decomposition of H2O2 to form a powerful OH radical. In this study, wastewater from wash of ion-exchange resin containing typical CVOC, 1,2-dichloroethane, was treated using Fenton’s oxidation. To reduce environmental load and processing costs of wastewater, Fenton process as a simple and efficient treatment method was applied to degrade 1,2-dichloroethane of wash water.

Materials and methods

The water samples were collected from three different washing stages of ion-exchange resin. The degradation of 1,2-dichloroethane and total organic carbon (TOC) of wash water of ion-exchange resin by Fenton process was studied with response surface method (RSM). Design of the experiments was conducted by central composite face, and factors included in three models were Fe2+ and H2O2 doses and treatment time. Relevant quadratic and interaction terms of factors were investigated.

Results

According to ANOVA, the model predicts well 1,2-dichloroethane reduction of all water samples and TOC reduction of samples 2 and 3. The Fe2+ and H2O2 doses used in the present study were most suitable when 1,2-dichloroethane concentration of the wash water is about 120 mg L−1. In that case, Fenton’s oxidation reduced 1,2-dichloroethane and TOC up to 100% and 87%, respectively, according to the RSM model. With 90-min reaction time and H2O2 dose of 1,200 mg L−1, the required Fe2+ doses for 1,2-dichloroethane and TOC were 300 and 900 mg L−1, respectively. The optimal H2O2/Fe2+ stoichiometric molar ratio was between 4–6. Then, concentration of Fe2+ was low enough and the amount of residual sludge can thus be reduced. It seems that most of TOC and part of 1,2-dichloroethane were removed by coagulation.

Discussion

Up to a certain extent, increase of Fe2+ and H2O2 doses improved the removal of 1,2-dichloroethane and TOC. High Fe2+ doses increased the formation of ferric-based sludge, and excessive H2O2 doses in sample 2 decreased the degradation of 1,2-dichloroethane. Excess amount of hydrogen peroxide may scavenge hydroxyl radicals, thus leading to loss of oxidative power. Also, the residual hydrogen peroxide of different samples increased with increasing H2O2 dose and H2O2/Fe2+ molar ratio and decreasing treatment time probably also due to scavenging reactions. Due to the saturated nature of 1,2-dichloroethane, the oxidation mechanism involves hydrogen abstraction before addition of hydroxyl radical, thus leading to lower rate constants than for direct hydroxyl radical attack, which for one increases the treatment time.

Conclusions

Complete removal of 1,2-dichloroethane was attained with initial concentration <120 mg L−1. Also, TOC degraded effectively. Wash water with higher concentration of 1,2-dichloroethane requires longer treatment times and higher concentrations of Fe2+ and H2O2 for sufficient 1,2-dichloroethane removal.

Recommendations and perspectives

Due to the results achieved in this study, Fenton’s oxidation could be recommended to be used for organic destruction of wash water of ion-exchange resin. Residual sludge, the main disadvantage in Fenton process, can be reduced by optimizing the ferrous dose or by using heterogeneous treatment where most of the reusable iron remains in the solid phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badawy MI, Ali MEM (2006) Fenton’s peroxidation and coagulation processes for the treatment of combined industrial and domestic wastewater. J Hazard Mater B136:961–966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benatti CT, Granhen Tavares CR, Guedes TA (2006) Optimization of Fenton’s oxidation of chemical laboratory wastewaters using the response surface methodology. J Environ Manag 80:66–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Hoag GE, Chedda P, Nadim F, Woody BA, Dobbs GM (2001) The mechanism and applicability of in situ oxidation of trichloroethylene with Fenton’s reagent. J Hazard Mater B87:171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine JS, Wieland HL (1992) Onsite pilot testing of UV-enhanced oxidation and chemical oxidation by Fenton’s reagent. In Air & Waste Management 85th Annual Meeting & Exhibition, Kansas City, Missouri, June 21–26, 1992

  • Gogate PR, Pandit AB (2004a) A review of imperative technologies for wastewater treatment I: oxidation technologies at ambient conditions. Adv Environ Res 8:501–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gogate PR, Pandit AB (2004b) A review of imperative technologies for wastewater treatment II: hybrid methods. Adv Environ Res 8:553–597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grčić I, Vujević D, Šepčić J, Koprivanac N (2009) Minimization of organic content in simulated industrial wastewater by Fenton type processes: a case study. J Hazard Mater 170:954–961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janda V, Vasek P, Bizova J, Belohlav Z (2004) Kinetic models for volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons removal by zero-valent iron. Chemosphere 54:917–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kang YW, Hwang K-Y (2000) Effects of reaction conditions on the oxidation efficiency in the Fenton process. Water Res 34:2786–2790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kastanek F, Maleterova Y, Kastanek P, Rott J, Jiricny V, Jiratova K (2007) Complex treatment of wastewater and groundwater contaminated halogenated organic compounds. Desalination 211:261–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurniawan TA, Lo W-H, Chan GYS (2006) Radicals-catalyzed oxidation for degradation of recalcitrant compounds from landfill leachate. Chem Eng J 125(1):35–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kušić H, Lončarić Božić A, Koprivanac N (2007) Fenton type processes for minimization of organic content in coloured wastewaters: Part I: process optimization. Dyes Pigments 74:380–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal M, Schöneich C, Mönig J, Asmus K-D (1988) Rate constants for the reactions of halogenated organic radicals. Int J Radiat Biol 54:773–785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey ME, Tarr MA (2000) Quantitation of hydroxyl radical during Fenton oxidation following a single addition of iron and peroxide. Chemosphere 41:409–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez A, Pagano M, Volpe A, Di Pinto AC (2004) Fenton’s pre-treatment of mature landfill leachate. Chemosphere 54:1005–1010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munter R (2001) Advanced oxidation processes—current status and prospects. Proc Estonian Acad Sci Chem 50:59–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Musialik-Piotrowska A, Mendyka B (2004) Catalytic oxidation of chlorinated hydrocarbons in two-component mixtures of selected VOCs. Catal Today 90:139–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers R, Montgomery D (2002) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyens E, Baeyens J (2003) A review of classic Fenton’s peroxidation as an advanced oxidation technique. J Hazard Mater 98:33–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pignatello JJ, Oliveros E, MacKay A (2006) Advanced oxidation processes for organic contaminant destruction based on the Fenton reaction and related chemistry. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 36:1–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seol Y, Javandel I (2008) Citric acid-modified Fenton’s reaction for the oxidation of chlorinated ethylenes in soil solution systems. Chemosphere 72:537–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J-H, Sun S-P, Fan M-H, Guo H-Q, Qiao L-P, Sun R-X (2007) A kinetic study on the degradation of p-nitroaniline by Fenton oxidation process. J Hazard Mater 148:172–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang WZ, Huang CP (1997) Stochiometry of Fenton’s reagent in the oxidation of chlorinated aliphatic organic pollutants. Environ Technol 18:13–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang WZ, Tassos S (1997) Oxidation kinetics and mechanisms of trihalomethanes by Fenton’s reagent. Water Res 31(5):1117–1125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teel AL, Warberg CR, Atkinson DA, Watts RJ (2001) Comparison of mineral and soluble iron Fenton’s catalysts for the treatment of trichloroethylene. Water Res 35(4):977–984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vilhunen S, Vilve M, Vepsäläinen M, Sillanpää M (2009) Removal of organic matter from a variety of water matrices by UV photolysis and UV/H2O2 method. Manuscript

  • Walling C (1975) Fenton’s reagent revisited. Acc Chem Res 8:125–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Choi HJ, Canazo P, Huang C-P (2009) Multivariate approach to the Fenton process for the treatment of landfill leachate. J Hazard Mater 161:1306–1312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The financial support from EU, City of Mikkeli and Finex Oy is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank the European Commission (EC) for the Marie Curie Fellowship for transfer of knowledge (no. MTKD-CT-2006-042637).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miia Vilve.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Ake Bergman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vilve, M., Vilhunen, S., Vepsäläinen, M. et al. Degradation of 1,2-dichloroethane from wash water of ion-exchange resin using Fenton’s oxidation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17, 875–884 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-009-0291-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-009-0291-5

Keywords

Navigation