Abstract
The amount of carbon stored in soil and vegetation varies according to land use. Land-use changes (LUCs) affect those carbon stocks. Changes in carbon stocks also affect greenhouse gas emissions. Predicting LUCs is therefore necessary to establish quantitative targets for carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction. This study attempts to model LUCs and the associated changes in carbon stocks for South Korea between 2005 and 2030. It examines four LUC scenarios suggested by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Each scenario is assessed in terms of its effect on South Korean carbon stocks. Under all four scenarios, afforestation leads to carbon sequestration with an average net uptake of 22.4–31.5 MtC. The scenario yielding the highest sequestration rate increase (from 12.4 to 14.1 MtC/year) results in levels of sequestration equal to 8.3 % of South Korea’s 2005 CO2 emissions. This is equivalent to a value of 304 million dollars in the European Union carbon market. Clear differences among the scenarios tested suggest that land use must be regarded as an important factor in any plan for future carbon sequestration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn S, Han K (2004) Feasibility Study for Estimating the Cost of Carbon Sink in Korea. Environment Institute, Korea
Alcamo J (2001) Scenarios as tools for international environmental assessments. Environmental Issue Report No. 24, European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen
Arrouays D, Deslais W, Badeau V (2001) The carbon content of topsoil and its geographical distribution in France. Soil Use Manag 17:7–13
Bellamy PH, Loveland PJ, Bradley RI, Lark RM, Kirk GJD (2005) Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978–003. Nature 437:245–248
Cho D (2008) Cellular automata based urban landuse change modeling considering development density. J Korean Geogr Soc 41(3):117–133
Fang S, Gertner GG, Sun Z, Anderson AA (2005) The impact of interactions in spatial simulation of the dynamics of Urban Sprawl. Landscape Urban Plan 73(4):294–306
Feddema JJ, Oleson KW, Bonan GB, Mearns LO, Buja LE, Meehl GA, Washington WM (2005) The importance of land-cover change in simulating future climates. Science 310(5754):1674–1678
Freibauer A, Rounsevell MDA, Smith P, Verhagen J (2004) Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe. Geoderma 122:1–23
Guo Z, Fang F, Pan Y, Birdsey R (2010) Inventory-based estimates of forest biomass carbon stocks in China: a comparison of three methods. For Ecol Manage 259(7):1225–1231
Houghton RA, Hackler JL, Lawrence KT (1999) The U.S. carbon budget: Contributions from land-use change. Science 285(5427):574–578
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1996) Revised IPCC Guideline for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000) Land use, land-use change and forestry, a special report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001) IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, GRID-Arendal website
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change
Janssens IA, Freibauer A, Schlamadinger B, Ceulemans R, Ciais P, Dolman AJ, Heiman M, Nabuurs GJ, Smith P, Valentini R, Schulze ED (2005) The Carbon Budget of Terrestrial Ecosystems at Country Scale—a European Case Study. Biogeosciences 2:15–26
Jeong J, Kim C, Lee W (1998) Soil organic carbon content in forest soils of Korea. J Forest Sci (in Korean) 57:178–183
Korea Forest Research Institute (1996) Korean people and Carbon dioxide, 126
Korea Forest Research Institute (2006) Development of GHGs Emission Inventory System for climate change convention
Lal R (2004) Soil Carbon Sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627
Lamlom SH, Savidge RA (2003) A reassessment of carbon content in wood: variation within and between 41 North American species. Biomass Bioenergy 25(4):381–388
Lee D, Park C (2009) The Analysis of Potential Reduction of CO2 Emission in Soil and Vegetation. J Korean Soc Environ Restor Technol 12(2):95–105
Lee K, Son Y, Kim Y (2001) Greenhouse gas inventory in land-use change and forestry in Korea. J Forest Energy 20(1):53–61
Lettens S, Jv Orshoven, Bv Wesemael, Muys B, Perrin D (2005) Soil organic carbon changes in landscape units of Belgium between 1960 and 2000 with reference to 1990. Glob Change Biol 11:2128–2140
Parrotta JA (2002) Restoration and management of degraded tropical forest landscapes. In: Ambasht RS, Ambasht NK (eds) Modern trends in applied terrestrial ecology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York, pp 135–148
Rounsevell MDA, Ewert F, Reginster I, Leemans R, Carter TR (2005) Future scenarios of European agricultural land use. II. Proj Changes Cropland Grassland Agriculture Ecosystem Environ 107(12):117–135
Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Araújo MB, Carter TR, Dendoncker N, Ewert F, House JI, Kankaanpää S, Leemans R, Metzger MJ, Schmit C, Smith P, Tuck GA (2006) Coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agriculture Ecosystem Environ 114(1):57–68
Schlamadinger B, Bird N, Johns T, Brown S, Canadell J, Ciccarese L, Dutschke M, Fiedler J, Fischlin A, Fearnside P, Forner C, Freibauer A, Frumhoff P, Hoehne N, Kirschbaum MUF, Labat A, Marland Michaelowa A, Montanarella L, Moutinho P, Murdiyarso D, Pena N, Pingoud K, Rakonczay Z, Rametsteiner E, Rock J, Sanz MJ, Schneider UA, Shvidenko A, Skutsch M, Smith P, Somogyi Z, Trines E, Ward M, Yamagata Y (2007) A synopsis of land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) under the Kyoto protocol and marrakech accords. Environ Sci Policy 10(4):271–282
Schulp CJE, Nabuurs GJ, Verburg PH (2008) Future carbon sequestration in Europe: effects of land use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127(3–4):251–264
Smith JU, Smith P, Wattenbach M, Zaehle S, Hiederer R, Jones RJA, Montanarella L, Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Ewert F (2005a) Projected changes in mineral soil carbon of European croplands and grasslands, 1990–2080. Glob Change Biol 11(12):2141–2152
Smith P, Smith JU, Wattenbach M, Meyer J, Lindner M, Zaehle S, Hiederer R, Jones RJA, Montanarella L, Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Kankaanpaa S (2005b) Projected changes in mineral soil carbon of European forests, 1990–2100. Can J Soil Sci 86:159–169
Smith P, Fang C, Dawson JJC, Moncrieff JB (2008) Impact of global warming on soil organic carbon. Adv Agron 97:1–43
Tavoni M, Sohngen B, Bosetti V (2007) Forestry and the carbon market response to stabilize climate. Energy Policy 35:5346–5353
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2003) Land use, Land-use change and forestry: definitions and modalities for including afforestation and reforestation activities under Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol. Submissions from Parties, FCCC/SBSTA/2003/MISC, Bonn
Verburg PH, Soepboer W, Veldkamp A, Limpiada R, Espaldon V, Mastura SSA (2002) The spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-S model. Environ Manage 30(3):391–405
Yim C, Choi D (2002) Predicting micro land use dynamics. A cellular automata modelling Approach, Journal of the Korean planners association 37(4):229–239
Zaehle S, Bondeau A, Carter T, Cramer W, Erhard M, Prentice I, Reginster I, Rounsevell M, Sitch S, Smith B, Smith P, Sykes M (2007) Projected changes in terrestrial carbon storage in Europe under climate and land-use change, 1990–2100. Ecosystems 10(3):380–401
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a grant (07High Tech A01) from High tech Urban Development Program funded by Ministry of Land, Transportation and Maritime Affairs of Korean government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, D.K., Park, C. & Tomlin, D. Effects of land-use-change scenarios on terrestrial carbon stocks in South Korea. Landscape Ecol Eng 11, 47–59 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-013-0235-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-013-0235-6