Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Three-dimensional assessment of anatomical balance and oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnoea

  • Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
  • Published:
Sleep and Breathing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Mandibular advancement splints (MAS) are an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, MAS are not equally efficacious across all patients and the reasons are not well understood. Craniofacial and upper airway structure individually influence MAS response. We aimed to assess anatomical balance, defined as the ratio of upper airway soft tissue (ST) volume to maxillomandibular enclosure volume, between MAS treatment responders and non-responders.

Methods

OSA patients (apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) >10 h−1) were recruited for MAS treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper airway was performed during wakefulness without and with MAS in situ. Images were processed for volumetric analysis of upper airway soft tissues (tongue, soft palate, paraphayrngeal fat pads and lateral pharyngeal walls) and three-dimensional cephalometry to acquire intra-mandibular space area (IMA) and total maxillomandibular (Mm) volume. Anatomical balance ratios were compared between MAS treatment responders (AHI <10 h−1 + 50 % reduction) and non-responders.

Results

Image analysis was completed in 69 patients (68 % male, age 50.5 ± 10.1 years, BMI 29.6 ± 5.0 kgm2, AHI 27.0 ± 14.7 h−1) including 36 responders. Soft tissue volumes did not differ between MAS responders and non-responders. Non-responders had increased ST/IMA compared to responders (4.9 ± 0.6 vs. 4.6 ± 0.6, p = 0.031). In multivariate logistic regression with AHI and BMI, ST/IMA was the only predictive variable (p = 0.036, ROC AUC 0.7). However, changes in ST/Mm did not directly relate to treatment response.

Conclusions

Anatomical imbalance assessed by intra-mandibular space area was associated with poor MAS treatment response. However, changes in anatomical balance with mandibular advancement did not reflect treatment outcome as static imaging may not adequately capture improvements in upper airway function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Phillips CL, Grunstein RR, Darendeliler MA, Mihailidou AS, Srinivasan VK, Yee BJ, Marks GB, Cistulli PA (2013) Health outcomes of continuous positive airway pressure versus oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 187(8):879–887. doi:10.1164/rccm.201212-2223OC

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sutherland K, Takaya H, Qian J, Petocz P, Ng AT, Cistulli PA (2015) Oral appliance treatment response and polysomnographic phenotypes of obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med

  3. Ng AT, Qian J, Cistulli PA (2006) Oropharyngeal collapse predicts treatment response with oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 29(5):666–671

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan AS, Sutherland K, Schwab RJ, Zeng B, Petocz P, Lee RW, Darendeliler MA, Cistulli PA (2010) The effect of mandibular advancement on upper airway structure in obstructive sleep apnoea. Thorax 65(8):726–732. doi:10.1136/thx.2009.131094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Iida-Kondo C, Yoshino N, Kurabayashi T, Mataki S, Hasegawa M, Kurosaki N (2006) Comparison of tongue volume/oral cavity volume ratio between obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients and normal adults using magnetic resonance imaging. J Med Dent Sci 53(2):119–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shelton KE, Gay SB, Hollowell DE, Woodson H, Suratt PM (1993) Mandible enclosure of upper airway and weight in obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 148(1):195–200. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/148.1.195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Watanabe T, Isono S, Tanaka A, Tanzawa H, Nishino T (2002) Contribution of body habitus and craniofacial characteristics to segmental closing pressures of the passive pharynx in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165(2):260–265. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.165.2.2009032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mostafiz W, Dalci O, Sutherland K, Malhotra A, Srinivasan V, Darendeliler MA, Cistulli PA (2011) Influence of oral and craniofacial dimensions on mandibular advancement splint treatment outcome in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 139(6):1331–1339. doi:10.1378/chest.10-2224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gotsopoulos H, Chen C, Qian J, Cistulli PA (2002) Oral appliance therapy improves symptoms in obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166(5):743–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gotsopoulos H, Kelly JJ, Cistulli PA (2004) Oral appliance therapy reduces blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized, controlled trial. Sleep 27(5):934–941

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehta A, Qian J, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA, Cistulli PA (2001) A randomized, controlled study of a mandibular advancement splint for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163(6):1457–1461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pitsis AJ, Darendeliler MA, Gotsopoulos H, Petocz P, Cistulli PA (2002) Effect of vertical dimension on efficacy of oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166(6):860–864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeng B, Ng AT, Darendeliler MA, Petocz P, Cistulli PA (2007) Use of flow-volume curves to predict oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175(7):726–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sutherland K, Deane SA, Chan AS, Schwab RJ, Ng AT, Darendeliler MA, Cistulli PA (2011) Comparative effects of two oral appliances on upper airway structure in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 34(4):469–477

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kairaitis K, Stavrinou R, Parikh R, Wheatley JR, Amis TC (2006) Mandibular advancement decreases pressures in the tissues surrounding the upper airway in rabbits. J Appl Physiol (1985) 100(1):349–356. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00560.2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Isono S, Tanaka A, Tagaito Y, Sho Y, Nishino T (1997) Pharyngeal patency in response to advancement of the mandible in obese anesthetized persons. Anesthesiology 87(5):1055–1062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsuiki S, Ito E, Isono S, Ryan CF, Komada Y, Matsuura M, Inoue Y (2013) Oropharyngeal crowding and obesity as predictors of oral appliance treatment response to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 144(2):558–563. doi:10.1378/chest.12-2609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsuiki S, Isono S, Ishikawa T, Yamashiro Y, Tatsumi K, Nishino T (2008) Anatomical balance of the upper airway and obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 108(6):1009–1015. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e318173f103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shigeta Y, Ogawa T, Ando E, Clark GT, Enciso R (2011) Influence of tongue/mandible volume ratio on oropharyngeal airway in Japanese male patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 111(2):239–243. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.10.013

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chi L, Comyn FL, Mitra N, Reilly MP, Wan F, Maislin G, Chmiewski L, Thorne-FitzGerald MD, Victor UN, Pack AI, Schwab RJ (2011) Identification of craniofacial risk factors for obstructive sleep apnoea using three-dimensional MRI. Eur Respir J 38(2):348–358. doi:10.1183/09031936.00119210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee RW, Chan AS, Grunstein RR, Cistulli PA (2009) Craniofacial phenotyping in obstructive sleep apnea—a novel quantitative photographic approach. Sleep 32(1):37–45

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee RW, Petocz P, Prvan T, Chan AS, Grunstein RR, Cistulli PA (2009) Prediction of obstructive sleep apnea with craniofacial photographic analysis. Sleep 32(1):46–52

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Perri RA, Kairaitis K, Cistulli P, Wheatley JR, Amis TC (2014) Surface cephalometric and anthropometric variables in OSA patients: statistical models for the OSA phenotype. Sleep Breath 18(1):39–52. doi:10.1007/s11325-013-0845-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Sutherland.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding

The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, SomnoMed Ltd. provided support in-kind in provision of mandibular advancement splints for the study.

Conflict of interest

PAC holds an endowed Academic Chair position at the University of Sydney, funded by ResMed Inc. He has received research support from ResMed, SomnoMed, Zephyr Sleep Technologies and Exploramed Inc. He is a consultant to Zephyr Sleep Technologies and NovoNordisk. He has a pecuniary interest in SomnoMed, resulting from previous involvement in research and development. Other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sutherland, K., Chan, A.S.L. & Cistulli, P.A. Three-dimensional assessment of anatomical balance and oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnoea. Sleep Breath 20, 903–910 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-015-1304-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-015-1304-x

Keywords

Navigation