Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of Low-dose, Noncontrast Computed Tomography from Integrated Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Evaluating Incidental 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose-avid Colon Lesions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Molecular Imaging and Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the contribution of concurrent low-dose, noncontrast CT in the assessment of the malignant potential of incidental focal 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG)-avid colonic lesions on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).

Procedures

Routine FDG-PET/CT scans were reviewed for identification of focal FDG-avid colon lesions, and the CT component was independently reviewed for an anatomical lesion and malignant potential based on CT criteria. Clinical, endoscopic, and histopathology follow-up was obtained.

Results

A total of 85/2,916 (3%) oncology FDG-PET/CT scans had incidental focal colon lesions. Clinical and/or endoscopic follow-up was available in 83/85 (98%) patients. Focal, corresponding CT lesions were found in 44/83 (53%) patients, but features of malignancy were not assessable. Of the 44 patients with a final diagnosis, 32/44 (73%) were FDG-PET/CT true positives; 5/44 (11%) were false positives; and 7/44 (16%) had inconclusive FDG-PET/CT findings.

Conclusions

Concurrent low-dose, noncontrast CT improves localization, but does not provide independent information on the malignant potential of incidental focal colonic activity on FDG-PET/CT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scott AM (2001) Current status of positron emission tomography in oncology. Intern Med J 31:27–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bar-Shalom R, Valdivia AY, Blaufox MD (2000) PET imaging in oncology. Semin Nucl Med 30:150–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Strauss LG, Conti PS (1991) The applications of PET in clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 32:623–648, discussion 649–650

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Israel O, Yefremov N, Bar-Shalom R, et al. (2005) PET/CT detection of unexpected gastrointestinal foci of 18F-FDG uptake: incidence, localization patterns, and clinical significance. J Nucl Med 46:758–762

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Francis IR, Brown RK, Avram AM (2005) The clinical role of CT/PET in oncology: an update. Cancer Imaging 5:S68–S75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L, et al. (2003) Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med 44:1200–1209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hannah A, Scott AM, Akhurst T, et al. (1996) Abnormal colonic accumulation of fluorine-18-FDG in pseudomembranous colitis. J Nucl Med 37:1683–1685

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shreve PD, Anzai Y, Wahl RL (1999) Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. Radiographics 19:61–77, quiz 150–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kamel EM, Thumshirn M, Truninger K, et al. (2004) Significance of incidental 18F-FDG accumulations in the gastrointestinal tract in PET/CT: correlation with endoscopic and histopathologic results. J Nucl Med 45:1804–1810

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pandit-Taskar N, Schoder H, Gonen M, et al. (2004) Clinical significance of unexplained abnormal focal FDG uptake in the abdomen during whole-body PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1143–1147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tatlidil R, Jadvar H, Bading JR, et al. (2002) Incidental colonic fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: correlation with colonoscopic and histopathologic findings. Radiology 224:783–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arslan N, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA (2005) FDG uptake in colonic villous adenomas. Ann Nucl Med 19:331–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yasuda S, Fujii H, Nakahara T, et al. (2001) 18F-FDG PET detection of colonic adenomas. J Nucl Med 42:989–992

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG (2001) Colonoscopic polypectomy and the incidence of colorectal cancer. Gut 48:753–754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiong L, Chintapalli KN, Dodd GD 3rd, et al. (2004) Frequency and CT patterns of bowel wall thickening proximal to cancer of the colon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:905–909

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pereira JM, Sirlin CB, Pinto PS, et al. (2004) Disproportionate fat stranding: a helpful CT sign in patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiographics 24:703–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moraitis D, Singh P, Jayadevan R, et al. (2006) Colonic wall thickening on computed tomography scan and clinical correlation. Does it suggest the presence of an underlying neoplasia? Am Surg 72:269–271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhuang H, Hickeson M, Chacko TK, et al. (2002) Incidental detection of colon cancer by FDG positron emission tomography in patients examined for pulmonary nodules. Clin Nucl Med 27:628–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi JY, Lee KS, Kwon OJ, et al. (2005) Improved detection of second primary cancer using integrated [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography for initial tumor staging. J Clin Oncol 23:7654–7659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, et al. (2001) CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 219:461–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Veit P, Kuhle C, Beyer T, et al. (2006) Whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) tumour staging with integrated PET/CT colonography: technical feasibility and first experiences in patients with colorectal cancer. Gut 55:68–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Obuchowski NA, et al. (2001) Multi-slice computed tomography as a screening tool for colon cancer, lung cancer and coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 11:1975–1985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, et al. (2004) Significance of missed polyps at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:127–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291:1713–1719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Macari M, Bini EJ (2005) CT colonography: where have we been and where are we going? Radiology 237:819–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Iannaccone R, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, et al. (2005) Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies. Radiology 237:927–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Agress H Jr, Cooper BZ (2004) Detection of clinically unexpected malignant and premalignant tumors with whole-body FDG PET: histopathologic comparison. Radiology 230:417–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gutman F, Alberini JL, Wartski M, et al. (2005) Incidental colonic focal lesions detected by FDG PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:495–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bond JH (2001) Clinical relevance of the small colorectal polyp. Endoscopy 33:454–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Church JM (2004) Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 47:481–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ishimori T, Patel PV, Wahl RL (2005) Detection of unexpected additional primary malignancies with PET/CT. J Nucl Med 46:752–757

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. T. Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S.T., Tan, T., Poon, A.M.T. et al. Role of Low-dose, Noncontrast Computed Tomography from Integrated Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Evaluating Incidental 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose-avid Colon Lesions. Mol Imaging Biol 10, 48–53 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-007-0117-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-007-0117-0

Key words

Navigation