Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of total edentulism on the internal bone structure of mandibular condyle: a preliminary study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the internal structure of the mandibular condyles in patients with total edentulism by applying fractal analysis on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and compare with dentate subjects.

Methods

A total of 136 mandibular condyles were assessed. All CBCT images were prepared with 0.25-mm slice thickness and maximum magnification. A 64 × 64 pixel region of interest (ROI) within the trabecular bone in the center of the condyle was selected. Fractal analysis was performed using White and Rudolph’s box-counting method.

Results

Control and study groups were age and gender-matched. The mean fractal dimension (FD) value of the study group was significantly lower compared to the control group (p < 0.01). In the study group, the mean FD value of the females was significantly lower than males (p = 0.01). For the control group, there was no significant difference between the genders for FD (p = 0.11). There was no significant difference between the age subgroups of the female study group and the male control group for FD (p = 0.22, p = 0.33). The mean FD value of the younger age subgroup was significantly higher compared to the older age subgroup in the female control and male study group (p = 0.03, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

The internal bone structure of mandibular condyles in edentulous patients was found to be affected by edentulism. Fractal analysis can be used as an effective method for assessing temporomandibular joint health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Razak PA, Richard KMJ, Thankachan RP, Hafiz KAA, Kumar KN, Sameer KM. Geriatric oral health: a review article. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(6):110–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hatcher D, Faulkner M, Hay A. Development of mechanical and mathematic models to study temporomandibular joint loading. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55(3):377–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grunert I, Grubwieser G, Ulmer H. Bilateral investigation of the temporomandibular joint. An autopsy study of edentulous individuals. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27(8):671–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schuster AJ, Pastorino DA, Marcello-Machado RM, Faot F. Influence of age and time since edentulism on masticatory function and quality of life in implant-retained mandibular overdenture wearers: 1-year results from a paired clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(6):1466–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kapur KK, Garrett NR. Studies of biologic parameters for denture design. Part II: comparison of masseter muscle activity, masticatory performance, and salivary secretion rates between denture and natural dentition groups. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52(3):408–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Geraets W. Comparison of two methods for measuring orientation. Bone. 1998;23(4):383–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka T, Sakurai T, Kashima I. Structuring of parameters for assessing vertebral bone strength by star volume analysis using a morphological filter. J Bone Miner Metab. 2001;19(3):150–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sánchez I, Uzcátegui G. Fractals in dentistry. J Dent. 2011;39(4):273–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. White SC, Rudolph DJ. Alterations of the trabecular pattern of the jaws in patients with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;88(5):628–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Law AN, Bollen A-M, Chen S-K. Detecting osteoporosis using dental radiographs: a comparison of four methods. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127(12):1734–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alman A, Johnson L, Calverley D, Grunwald G, Lezotte D, Hokanson J. Diagnostic capabilities of fractal dimension and mandibular cortical width to identify men and women with decreased bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(5):1631–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kayipmaz S, Akçay S, Sezgin ÖS, Çandirli C. Trabecular structural changes in the mandibular condyle caused by degenerative osteoarthritis: a comparative study by cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Oral Radiol. 2019;35:51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gumussoy I, Duman S. Alternative cone-beam CT method for the analysis of mandibular condylar bone in patients with degenerative joint disease. Oral Radiol. 2019;36:177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sugisaki M, Agematsu H, Matsunaga S, Saka H, Sakiyama K, Ide Y. Three-dimensional analysis of the internal structure of the mandibular condyle in dentulous and edentulous jaws using micro-CT. Cranio. 2009;27(2):78–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giesen EB, Ding M, Dalstra M, van Eijden TM. Changed morphology and mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the mandibular condyles of edentate people. J Dent Res. 2004;83(3):255–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aggarwal H, Singh RD, Kumar M, Singh R, Siddhartha R, Jurel SK, et al. Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of the bone density of mandibular condyle in dentulous and edentulous jaws: an in vivo study. J Clin Densitom. 2015;18(1):50–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Helkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. II. Index for anamnestic and clinical dysfunction and occlusal state. Sven Tandlak Tidskr. 1974;67(2):101–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Larheim TA, Abrahamsson AK, Kristensen M, Arvidsson LZ. Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Seeman E, Delmas PD. Bone quality—the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(21):2250–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Renders G, Mulder L, Van Ruijven L, Van Eijden T. Porosity of human mandibular condylar bone. J Anat. 2007;210(3):239–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Arsan B, Köse TE, Çene E, Özcan İ. Assessment of the trabecular structure of mandibular condyles in patients with temporomandibular disorders using fractal analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123(3):382–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, et al. A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT): part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75(2):265–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hua Y, Nackaerts O, Duyck J, Maes F, Jacobs R. Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(8):767–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pothuaud L, Benhamou C, Porion P, Lespessailles E, Harba R, Levitz P. Fractal dimension of trabecular bone projection texture is related to three-dimensional microarchitecture. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(4):691–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gaalaas L, Henn L, Gaillard PR, Ahmad M, Islam MS. Analysis of trabecular bone using site-specific fractal values calculated from cone beam CT images. Oral Radiol. 2014;30(2):179–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Milam SB. Pathogenesis of degenerative temporomandibular joint arthritides. Odontology. 2005;93(1):7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Malheiros AS, Carvalhal ST, Pereira TL, Filho EM, Tonetto MR, Goncalves LM, et al. Association between tooth loss and degree of temporomandibular disorders: a comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17(3):235–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sener E, Cinarcik S, Baksi BG. Use of fractal analysis for the discrimination of trabecular changes between individuals with healthy gingiva or moderate periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2015;86(12):1364–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Veenland JF, Grashuis J, Weinans H, Ding M, Vrooman HA. Suitability of texture features to assess changes in trabecular bone architecture. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2002;23(4):395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Ruijven L, Giesen E, Mulder L, Farella M, Van Eijden T. The effect of bone loss on rod-like and plate-like trabeculae in the cancellous bone of the mandibular condyle. Bone. 2005;36(6):1078–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Choi DY, Sun KH, Won SY, Lee JG, Hu KS, Kim KD, et al. Trabecular bone ratio of the mandibular condyle according to the presence of teeth: a micro-CT study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34(6):519–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen J, Sorensen K, Gupta T, Kilts T, Young M, Wadhwa S. Altered functional loading causes differential effects in the subchondral bone and condylar cartilage in the temporomandibular joint from young mice. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17(3):354–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dufour R, Winzenrieth R, Heraud A, Hans D, Mehsen N. Generation and validation of a normative, age-specific reference curve for lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS) in French women. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(11):2837–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hongo T, Orihara K, Onoda Y, Nakajima K, Ide Y. Quantitative and morphological studies of the trabecular bones in the condyloid processes of the Japanese mandibles; changes due to aging. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 1989;30(3):165–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Riggs BL, Melton LJ III, Robb RA, Camp JJ, Atkinson EJ, McDaniel L, et al. A population-based assessment of rates of bone loss at multiple skeletal sites: evidence for substantial trabecular bone loss in young adult women and men. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(2):205–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Magnusson C, Nilsson M, Magnusson T. Degenerative changes in human temporomandibular joints in relation to occlusal support. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010;68(5):305–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Beaupré G, Orr T, Carter D. An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: a preliminary remodeling simulation. J Orthop Res. 1990;8(5):662–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lai Y, Qin L, Hung V, Chan K. Regional differences in cortical bone mineral density in the weight-bearing long bone shaft—a pQCT study. Bone. 2005;36(3):465–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aykağan Coşgunarslan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coşgunarslan, A., Soydan Çabuk, D. & Canger, E.M. Effect of total edentulism on the internal bone structure of mandibular condyle: a preliminary study. Oral Radiol 37, 268–275 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00444-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00444-z

Keywords

Navigation