Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Incidental findings of carotid artery stenosis detected by calcifications on panoramic radiographs: report of three cases

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atherosclerosis, a progressive inflammatory disorder, may lead to coronary artery disease or stroke. The prevalence of atherosclerosis associated with mortality and morbidity is very high in developed countries, and is the underlying cause of approximately 50% of all deaths in Western societies. Panoramic radiographs (PRs) are an indispensable diagnostic tool used by dental practitioners. In the general dental population, the prevalence of positive incidental carotid artery calcifications (CACs) is reported to range from 2 to 5%. Therefore, incidental findings of CAC on PRs taken during routine dental evaluation may be useful for detecting asymptomatic patients at risk of stroke and could provide life-saving information. In this case report, we present radiological findings and follow-up of three patients with severe atherosclerosis that was incidentally detected on PRs, and discuss the role and importance of PRs in the detection of CACs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mintz BL, Hobson RW 2nd. Diagnosis and treatment of carotid artery stenosis. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2000;100:22–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beneficial effects of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–53.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gokce C, Sisman Y, Sipahioglu M, Ertas ET, Akgunlu F, Unal A, et al. The prevalence of carotid artery calcification on the panoramic radiographs of end-stage renal disease patients with peritoneal dialysis: do incidental findings provide life-saving information? J Int Med Res. 2008;36:47–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis. Nature. 2000;407:233–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ross R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:115–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Prime Ministry Republic of Turkey: Turkish Statistical Institute (Turkstat) report. 2005, http://www.turkstat.gov.tr.

  7. Yoon SJ, Yoon W, Kim OS, Lee JS, Kang BC. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in the detection of calcified carotid artery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:104–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bayram B, Uckan S, Acikgoz A, Müderrisoglu H, Aydinalp A. Digital panoramic radiography: a reliable method to diagnose carotid artery atheromas? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:266–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedlander AH, Lande A. Panoramic radiographic identification of carotid arterial plaques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981;52:102–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen SN, Friedlander AH, Jolly DA, Date L. Carotid calcification on panoramic radiographs: an important marker for vascular risk. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94:510–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedlander AH, Federico M, Yueh R, Norman KM, Chin EE. Radiation-associated carotid artery atherosclerosis: case report and review of contemporaneous literature. Spec Care Dentist. 2009;29:75–9. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dorresteijn LD, Kappelle AC, Boogerd W, Klokman WJ, Balm AJ, Keus RB, et al. Increased risk of ischemic stroke after radiotherapy on the neck in patients younger than 60 years. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:282–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsai CF, Jeng JS, Lu CJ, Yip PK. Clinical and ultrasonographic manifestations in major causes of common carotid artery occlusion. J Neuroimaging. 2005;15:50–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohba T, Takata Y, Ansai T, Morimoto Y, Tanaka T, Kito S, et al. Evaluation of calcified carotid artery atheromas detected by panoramic radiograph among 80-year-olds. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;96:647–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Adachi B. Das arteriensystem der Japaner. Bd. 1. Kyoto: Maruzen; 1928. p. 47–57.

  16. Romano-Sousa CM, Krejci L, Medeiros FM, Graciosa-Filho RG, Martins MF, Guedes VN, Fenyo-Pereira M. Diagnostic agreement between panoramic radiographs and color Doppler images of carotid atheroma. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17:45–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lewis DA, Brooks SL. Carotid artery calcification in a general dental population: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs. Gen Dent. 1999;47:98–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Almog DM. Utility of panoramic radiographs in detecting cervical calcified carotid atheroma (Letter to editor). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:451–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sisman Y, Ertas ET, Gokce C, Menku A, Ulker M, Akgunlu F. The prevalence of carotid artery calcification on the panoramic radiographs in Cappadocia Region population. Eur J Dent. 2007;1:132–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Friedlander AH, Freymiller EG. Detection of radiation-accelerated atherosclerosis of the carotid artery by panoramic radiography. A new opportunity for dentists. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134:1361–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstall PJ, Hoffman A, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1997;96:1432–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Biller J, Feinberg WM, Castaldo JE, Whittemore AD, Harbaugh RE, Dempsey RJ. Guidelines for carotidendarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1998;97:501–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Friedlander AH, Garrett NR, Chin EE, Baker JD. Ultrasonographic confirmation of carotid artery atheromas diagnosed via panoramic radiography. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136:635–40. quiz 682–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Madden RP, Hodges JS, Salmen CW, Rindal DB, Tunio J, Michalowicz BS, et al. Utility of panoramic radiographs in detecting cervical calcified carotid atheroma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:543–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Almog DM, Horev T, Illig KA, Green RM, Carter LC. Correlating carotid artery stenosis detected by panoramic radiography with clinically relevant carotid artery stenosis determined by duplex ultrasound. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94:768–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Almog DM, Illig KA, Khin M, Green RM. Unrecognized carotid artery stenosis discovered by calcifications on a panoramic radiograph. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:1593–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Papanicolaou G, Hatsukami T, Taylor LM Jr, Strandness DE Jr, et al. Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: duplex criteria for discriminating 60 percent to 90 percent stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:989–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Neale ML, Chambers JL, Kelly AT, Connard S, Lawton MA, Roche J, et al. Reappraisal of duplex criteria to assess significant carotid stenosis with special reference to reports from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial and the European Carotid Surgery Trial. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20:642–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Erdoes LS, Marek JM, Mills JL, Berman SS, Whitehill T, Hunter GC, et al. The relative contributions of carotid duplex scanning, magnetic resonance angiography, and cerebral angiography to clinical decision making: a prospective study in patients with carotid occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:950–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Py MO, André C, Azevedo FS, Domingues RC, Salomão RF. Internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex scan and magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2001;59:665–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ringelstein EB. Skepticism toward carotid ultrasonography: a virtue, an attitude, or fanaticism? Stroke. 1995;26:1743–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Droste DW, Jürgens R, Nabavi DG, Schuierer G, Weber S, Ringelstein EB. Echocontrast-enhanced ultrasound of extracranial internal carotid artery high-grade stenosis and occlusion. Stroke. 1999;30:2302–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Culebras A, Kase CS, Masdeu JC, Fox AJ, Bryan RN, Grossman CB, et al. Practice guidelines for the use of imaging in transient ischemic attacks and acute stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:1480–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Riles TS, Eidelman EM, Litt AW, Pinto RS, Oldford F, Schwartzenberg GWST. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, conventional angiography, and duplex scanning. Stroke. 1992;23:341–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sameshima T, Futami S, Morita Y, Yokogami K, Miyahara S, Sameshima Y, et al. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography. Surg Neurol. 1999;51:301–8. discussion 308–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wessels T, Harrer JU, Stetter S, Mull M, Klötzsch C. Three-dimensional assessment of extracranial Doppler sonography in carotid artery stenosis compared with digital subtraction angiography. Stroke. 2004;35:1847–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey

    Elif Tarım Ertas, Y. Sisman, H. Sahman, M. Etoz & A. E. Sekerci

  2. Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey

    E. Mavili

Authors
  1. Elif Tarım Ertas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Mavili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Sisman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. Sahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Etoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. E. Sekerci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elif Tarım Ertas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tarım Ertas, E., Mavili, E., Sisman, Y. et al. Incidental findings of carotid artery stenosis detected by calcifications on panoramic radiographs: report of three cases. Oral Radiol 26, 116–121 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-010-0047-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-010-0047-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation