Abstract
The resolution of existing DOA estimation methods in multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) radar is restricted by the number of antennas. In this paper, a new method to expand the number of valid receiving antennas virtually in MIMO radar without adding any extra actual antenna is proposed. In comparison with the existing DOA estimation methods, e.g. Capon method and Compressive Sensing method, the proposed method show its superiority if the autocorrelation property of transmitting waveform keeps good. In order to relax such limitation, we further proposed two improved version of the proposed method. Simulation results validate the superiority of the proposed methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Krim, H., & Viberg, M. (1996). Two decades of array signal processing research: The parametric approach. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 13(4), 67–94.
Fishler, E., et al. (2004). Performance of MIMO radar systems: Advantages of angular diversity. In Conference record of the thirty-eighth Asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers, 2004. IEEE.
Capon, J. (1969). High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE, 57(8), 1408–1418.
Yu, Y. (2010). Colocated MIMO radar using compressive sensing. Drexel University.
Kelly, E. J. (1986). An adaptive detection algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2, 115–127.
Schmidt, R. (1986). Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 34(3), 276–280.
Candès, E. J. (2006). Compressive sampling. In Proceedings oh the international congress of mathematicians: Madrid, August 22–30, 2006: invited lectures.
Donoho, D. L. (2006). Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(4), 1289–1306.
Yu, Y., Petropulu, A. P., & Poor, H. V. (2010). MIMO radar using compressive sampling. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 4(1), 146–163.
Li, J., & Stoica, P. (2007). MIMO radar with colocated antennas. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 24(5), 106–114.
Barker, R. (1953). Group synchronizing of binary digital systems. In Communication theory (pp. 273–287).
Frank, R. (1963). Polyphase codes with good Nonperiodic correlation properties. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 9(1), 43–45.
Lewis, B. L., & Kretschmer, F. F. (1982). Linear frequency modulation derived polyphase pulse compression codes. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 5, 637–641.
Yu, L., Liu, W., & Langley, R. (2010). SINR analysis of the subtraction-based SMI beamformer. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 58(11), 5926–5932.
Candes, E., & Tao, T. (2007). The Danzig selector: Statistical estimation when p is much larger than n. Annals of Statistics, 35(6), 2313–2351.
Hsu, C.-H., et al. (2012). Robust pointing error compensation technique based on rooting method for CDMA signals. In 2012 8th International symposium on communication systems, networks and digital signal processing (CSNDSP). IEEE.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by Natural Science Foundations of China (No. 61001182), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong, China (No. 2016A030313046, No. S2013010012227, No. 10451806001004788), the Key Project of Department of Education of Guangdong Province (No. 2013KJCX0160), 2014 Foundation for Distinguished Young Teacher in Higher Education of Guangdong (No. YQ2014153), Fundamental Research Programs of Shenzhen City (No. JCYJ20150324141711690, No. JCYJ20130329105415965), Shenzhen-Hong Kong Innovative Technology Cooperation Funding (No. SGLH20131009154139588).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
For simplifying (12) and (13), we set,
We assume that the reflection coefficients of all targets are equal, i.e., \( \beta_{1} = \beta_{2} = 1 \). Then Eqs. (12) and (13) can be rewritten as, respectively,
The auto-correlation property of transmitting waveforms is denoted as,
If the auto-correlation property keeps good, i.e., \( \varepsilon \) is very small, \( \gamma_{ij} \) can be recovered as,
where \( \tilde{\gamma }_{11} = \varepsilon \gamma_{12} + \varepsilon^{\prime}\sigma_{1} \), \( \tilde{\gamma }_{12} = \varepsilon \gamma_{11} + \varepsilon^{\prime}\sigma_{1} \), \( \tilde{\gamma }_{21} = \varepsilon \gamma_{21} + \varepsilon^{\prime}\sigma_{2} \) and \( \tilde{\gamma }_{22} = \varepsilon \gamma_{21} + \varepsilon^{\prime}\sigma_{2} \) are estimation errors. \( \varepsilon^{\prime} \) is the value of the cross-correlation between the transmitting waveform and noise signal.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, N., Guo, W., Zhang, L. et al. High Resolution DOA Estimation Method in MIMO Radar. Wireless Pers Commun 91, 219–236 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3456-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3456-9