Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Operational Conceptual Model for Global Communication Infrastructures

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The global communication infrastructure has taken an increased relevance for the future global multimedia village. This global infrastructure has suffered from a mismatch between the conceptual models being used, and the effective operational networks deployed to support it. This mismatch is now affecting the much needed developments to support a global village. This paper presents a novel model for structuring communication networks which closely reflects the visions and needs from an operational network. This model shows a path for protocol evolutions for the global communication infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cherry, S. (2007). Nothing but Net: Britain switches its entire phone network to the Internet protocol. IEEE Spectrum.

  2. International Telecommunication Union. Next generation networks—frameworks and functional architecture models. December 2004.

  3. Kennedy, D., et al. (2006). The future network society. White paper from the EIFFEL Think-Tank. December 2006.

  4. Andersen, F., et al. (2007). Future Internet from mobile and wireless requirements perspective. E-mobility Technology Platform Whitepaper.

  5. Jähnert, J., Zhou, J., Aguiar, R., Marques, V., Wetterwald, M., Melin, E., Moreno, J., Cuevas, A., Liebsch, M., Schmitz, R., Pacyna, P., Melia, T., Kurtansky, P., Hasan, D. Singh, Zander, S., Einsiedler, H., & Stiller, B. (2005). Moby Dick: A pure-IP 4G architecture. Elsevier Computer Communications COMCOM 2679, 28(9).

  6. Aguiar, R., Einsiedler, H., & Karrer, R. (2006). Daidalos: The operator’s vision of the next-generation Internet. In IEEE INFOCOM 2006, 23–29 April 2006, Barcelona, Spain.

  7. Perkins, C. (2002). IP mobility support for IPv4. Internet RFC 3344. August 2002.

  8. Perkins, C., & Arkko, J. (2004). Mobility support in IPv6. Internet RFC 3775. June 2004.

  9. Moby Dick: Mobility and differentiated services in a future IP network. http://www.ist-mobydick.org/.

  10. Daidalos: Designing advanced network interfaces for the delivery and administration of location independent, optimised personal services. http://www.ist-daidalos.org/.

  11. Ambient Network Project. http://www.ambient-networks.org/.

  12. IPSphere Forum. (2007). IPsphere Framework Technical Specification (Release 1), March 2007.

  13. Doval D., O’Mahony D. (2003) Overlay networks: A scalable alternative for P2P. IEEE Internet Computing 7(4): 79–82 ISSN: 1089-7801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wroclawski, J. (1997). The use of RSVP with IETF integrated services. Internet RFC 2210, September 1997.

  15. Dharmalingam, K., Kowalik, K., & Collier, M. (2003). RSVP reservation gaps: Problems and solutions. IEEE International Conference on Communications (pp. 1590–1595). ICC ‘03, 11–15 May 2003, ISBN: 0-7803-7802-4.

  16. Blake, S., Black, D., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z., & Weiss, W. (1998). An architecture for differentiated services. December 1998, Internet RFC 2475.

  17. IEEE 802.21 Standardisation. Home Page: http://www.ieee802.org/21/.

  18. Aguiar, R. (2008). Some comments on hourglasses. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review, 38(5). ISSN:0146-4833.

    Google Scholar 

  19. IPsphere Forum—the Business of IP. http://www.ipsphereforum.org/, http://www.tmforum.org/IPsphereFramework/.

  20. Next Generation Mobile Networks (NGMN). http://www.ngmn.org/.

  21. Telemanagement Forum (TMF). http://www.tmforum.org/browse.aspx.

  22. IMS Subscription and access scenarios—3GPP TS 22.800. http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/22800.htm.

  23. ITU-T NGN Management Focus Group: NGN Management Specification Roadmap v3.1. March 2007.

  24. Nolle, T. (2005). A new business layer for ip networks. July Issue of Business Comunications Review, 999 Oakmont Plaza Drive, Suite 100, Westmont, IL 60559, 630/986-1432, http://www.bcr.comhttp://www.ipsphereforum.org/Files/A%20New%20Business%20Layer%20for%20IP%20Networks%20-%20TN1.pdf.

  25. Einsiedler, H. (2006). Interface layers—an extension to the common communication stack. IST Mobile & Wireless Telecommunications Summit, 4–8 June 2006, Myconos, Greece.

  26. Clean Slate Design for the Internet. http://cleanslate.stanford.edu/.

  27. Einsiedler, H. Beyond the Internet protocol—revolution or evolution?. Eurescom mess@ge 3/2006 (November): Wireless Sensor Networks. http://www.eurescom.de/message/messageNov2006/Beyond-the%20Internet-Protocol-Revolution-orevolution.asp.

  28. Dovrolis, C. (2008). What would Darwin think about clean-slate architectures?. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. January 2008.

  29. Braden, R., Faber, T., & Handley, M. From protocol stack to protocol heap—role-based architecture. http://www.isi.edu/newarch/DOCUMENTS/hotrba.paper.pdf.

  30. Rexford, J., et al. (2004). NetworkWide decision making: Toward a waferthin control plane. In Third workshop on hot topics in networks hotnets-III, November 15–16 2004, San Diego, CA, USA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui L. Aguiar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aguiar, R.L., Einsiedler, H.J. & Moreno, J.I. An Operational Conceptual Model for Global Communication Infrastructures. Wireless Pers Commun 49, 335–351 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-009-9692-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-009-9692-5

Keywords

Navigation