Abstract
This study aimed to compare the kinetics of lipopeptide production in solid-state fermentation (SSF) under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. Models based on the logistic, modified Gompertz and Luedeking–Piret-like equations were developed to describe the time course of fermentation under different conditions. The experiments were conducted in 250 mL flasks and a 50 L fermenter. The results showed that the non-isothermal process had higher levels of product formation rate and substrate utilization rate compared to the isothermal process. The part of substrate carbon to meet microbial maintenance—energy, biomass and lipopeptides formation requirements got increased using the non-isothermal technique. In addition, fermenter conditions positively influenced the lipopeptides formation rate with significantly higher levels of substrate for the microbial growth and product formation, though the product productivity and biomass both decreased as compared to flask. This is the first report that investigates the effects of temperature changing on the kinetics of lipopeptide production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain under SSF condition using soybean flour and rice straw as major substrates in flask and in fermenter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altiok D, Tokatli F, Harsa S (2006) Kinetic modeling of lactic acid production from whey by Lactobacillus casei (NRRL B-441). J Chem Technol Biotechnol 81:1190–1197
Cameotra SS, Makkar RS (2004) Recent applications of biosurfactants biological and immunological molecules. Curr Opin Microbiol 7:262–266
Das K, Mukherjee AK (2007) Comparison of lipopeptide biosurfactants production by Bacillus subtilis strains in submerged and solid state fermentation systems using a cheap carbon souce: some industrial applications of biosurfactants. Process Biochem 42:1191–1199
Dodić JM, Vučurović DG, Dodić SN, Grahovac JA, Popov SD, Nedeljković NM (2012) Kinetic modelling of batch ethanol production from sugar beet raw juice. Appl Energy 99:192–197
Fujikawa H, Kai A, Morozumi SA (2004) A new logistic model for Escherichia coli growth at constant and dynamic temperatures. Food Microbiol 21:501–509
Hashemi M, Mousavi SM, Razavi SH, Shojaosadati SA (2011) Mathematical modeling of biomass and α-amylase production kinetics by Bacillus sp. in solid-state fermentation based on solid dry weight variation. Biochem Eng J 53:159–164
Heerklotz H, Seelig J (2007) Leakage and lysis of lipid membranes induced by the lipopeptide surfactin. Eur Biophys J 36:305–314
Hensing MCM, Rouwenhorst RJ, Heijnen JJ, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT (1995) Physiological and technological aspects of large-scale heterologous-protein production with yeasts. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 67:261–279
Holker U, Lenz J (2005) Solid-state fermentation—are there any biotechnological advantages? Curr Opin Microbiol 8:301–306
Ikasari L, Mitchell DA, Stuart DM (1999) Response of Rhizopus oligosporus to temporal temperature profiles in a model solid-state fermentation system. Biotechnol Bioeng 64:722–728
Mazutti MA, Zabot G, Boni G, Skovronski A, de Oliveira D, Di Luccio M, Rodrigues MI, Mauqeri F, Treichel H (2010) Mathematical modeling of Kluyveromyces marxianus growth in solid-state fermentation using a packed-bed bioreactor. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37:391–400
Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Anal Chem 31:426–428
Mitchell DA, von Meien OF, Krieger N, Dalsenter FDH (2004) A review of recent developments in modeling of microbial growth kinetics and intraparticle phenomena in solid-state fermentation. Biochem Eng J 17:15–26
Mizumoto S, Hirai M, Shoda M (2006) Production of lipopeptide antibiotic iturin A using soybean curd residue cultivated with Bacillus subtilis in solid-state fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72:869–875
Mu Y, Wang G, Yu HQ (2006) Kinetic modeling of batch hydrogen production process by mixed anaerobic cultures. Bioresour Technol 97:1302–1307
Nath K, Das D (2011) Modeling and optimization of fermentative hydrogen production. Bioresour Technol 102:8569–8581
Özilgen M (1998) Kinetics of multiproduct acidogenic and solventogenic batch fermentations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 29:536–543
Pandey A, Soccol CR, Mitchell D (2000) New developments in solid state fermentation. I-Bioprocess-products. Process Biochem 35:1153–1169
Prabhakar A, Krishnaiah K, Janaun J, Bono A (2005) An overview of engineering aspects of solid-state fermentation. Malays J Microbiol 1:10–16
Raghavarao KSMS, Ranganathan TV, Karanth NG (2003) Some engineering aspects of solid-state fermentation. Biochem Eng J 13:127–135
Sella SR, Dlugokenski RE, Guizelini BP, Vandenberghe LP, Medeiros AB, Pandey A, Soccol CR (2008) Selection and optimization of Bacillus atrophaeus inoculum medium and its effect on spore yield and thermal resistance. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 151:380–392
Sriram MI, Kalishwaralal K, Deepak V, Gracerosepat R, Srisakthi K, Gurunathan S (2011) Biofilm inhibition and antimicrobial action of lipopeptide biosurfactant produced by heavy metal tolerant strain Bacillus cereus NK1. Colloid Surf B 85:174–181
Tsuge K, Ohata Y, Shoda M (2001) Gene yerP, involved in surfactin self-resistance in Bacillus subtilis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:3566–3573
Van Ginkel S, Sung S, Lay JJ (2001) Biohydrogen production as a function of pH and substrate concentration. Environ Sci Technol 35:4726–4730
Votruba J, Volesky B, Yerushalmi L (1985) Mathematical model of batch acetone–butanol fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:247–255
Wachenheim DE, Patterson JA, Ladisch MR (2003) Analysis of the logistic function model: derivation and applications specific to batch cultured microorganisms. Bioresour Technol 86:157–164
Yalcin SK, Özbas ZY (2005) Determination of growth and glycerol production kinetics of a wine yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kalecik 1 in different substrate media. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:1303–1310
Yang JS, Rasa E, Tantayotai P, Scow KM, Yuan HL, Hristova KR (2011) Mathematical model of Chlorella minutissima UTEX2341 growth and lipid production under photoheterotrophic fermentation conditions. Bioresour Technol 102:3077–3082
Zhu Z, Zhang GY, Luo Y, Ran W, Shen QR (2012) Production of lipopeptides by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens XZ-173 in solid state fermentation using soybean flour and rice straw as the substrate. Bioresour Technol 112:254–260
Zhu Z, Li R, Yu GH, Ran W, Shen QR (2013a) Enhancement of lipopepitdes production in a two-temperature-stage process under SSF conditions and its bioprocess in the fermenter. Bioresour Technol 127:209–215
Zhu Z, Zhang FG, Wei Z, Ran W, Shen QR (2013b) The usage of rice straw as a major substrate for the production of surfactin by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens XZ-173 in solid-state fermentation. J Environ Manag 127:96–102
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Key Technology Support Program (Grant No. 2013BAD08B04-7), Innovative Research Team Develoment Plan of the Ministry of Education of China (IRT256), the Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and the 111 Project (B12009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, Z., Sun, L., Huang, X. et al. Comparison of the kinetics of lipopeptide production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens XZ-173 in solid-state fermentation under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30, 1615–1623 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1587-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1587-7