Skip to main content
Log in

Irrigators’ attitudes towards environmental flows for wetlands in the Murrumbidgee, Australia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Australia and many countries worldwide environmental flows are becoming an increasingly popular tool for reducing the negative impacts of river regulation. However, there are many factors that restrict the effectiveness of these flows such as thermal pollution, existing physical infrastructure and the limited volume of water available. Since environmental flows result in reduced water allocations for irrigators, the aim of the present study was to investigate whether irrigators’ attitudes towards environmental flows for wetlands are influenced by the effectiveness of these flows. Three focus groups were used to engage with farmers in the Murrumbidgee Catchment, eastern Australia. A simulation model of the Murrumbidgee River was created to provide focus groups with a tool for examining the effectiveness of wetland-watering releases and exploring alternative management scenarios. The results showed that participants support the principle of environmental flows for wetlands. However, they believed that the flows could be more effective if the restrictions imposed by physical infrastructure were removed. They also suggested that the volume of translucency releases should be lowered, as these flows reduce the amount of water available for wetlands and lower early season allocations for general-security water users. The participants provided numerous suggestions for altering the management of water resources so that both the Mid Murrumbidgee Wetlands and farmers would benefit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Non-flow options refer to human interventions that facilitate the flooding of wetlands, other than environmental flows. Examples of non-flow options include the removal of structural constraints from the river, the creation and use of off-river storages as well as pumping water directly in wetlands (Bowmer 2002)

References

  • Australian Conservation Foundation (2004) Saving the river murray. Australian Conservation Foundation, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod LJ (1994) Balancing personal needs with environmental preservation: identifying the values that guide decisions in ecological dilemmas. J Soc Values 50(3):85–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven K (1989) Changing ideas in hydrology—the case of physically-based models. J Hydrol (Amst) 105:157–172. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(89)90101-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanch S (2000) Environmental flows: present and future. Australian Conservation Foundation, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowmer K (2002) Agriculture for the Australian environment—learning from existing practice. Reflections on developing a water sharing plan. In Wilson BP, Curtis A (eds) Proceedings of the 2002 Fenner conference on the environment, Johnstone Centre Charles Sturt University, Albury, pp 201–222

  • Bowmer K (2003) Look after the land and the rivers: reflections on water sharing. 28th International hydrology and water resources symposium, Keynote Papers. The Institution of Engineers, Wollongong, Australia, 10–14 November, pp 26–33.

  • Caldwell B (2001) Study of water use and environmental aspects of rice growing. Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Rice Production, Stuarts Point

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary JW, Wilkinson RL (1997) Perceived profitability and farmers’ conservation behaviour. J Agric Econ 48(1):13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanson H (1996) Some hydraulic aspects during overflow above inflatable flexible membrane dam. University of Queensland, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Chessman B, Jones H (2001) Integrated monitoring of environmental flows: design report. NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation, Parramatta

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments (2004) Intergovernmental agreement on addressing water overallocation and achieving environmental objectives in the Murray-Darling basin. Council of Australian Governments, Canberra

  • Crean J, Young R (2002) Modelling the farm level implications of water reforms in NSW, Australia. In: Brennan D (ed) Water policy reform, lessons from Asia and Australia: proceedings of an international workshop held in Bangkok. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra

  • Department of Infrastructure Planning and Natural Resources (2004) Water sharing plan for the Murrumbidgee regulated river water source. Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Infrastructure Planning and Natural Resources (2005) Bidgee Wetlands GetWatered. http://www.dipnr.new.gov.au/mediarel/mm20050926_3168.html. Accessed 25 April 2007

  • Department of Natural Resources (2007) Wetlands—how do the New South Wales water reforms relate to wetlands and their management in New South Wales? http://www.dnr.nsw.gov.au/water/wetlands_manage_reforms.shtml. Accessed 25 April 2007

  • Department of Water Resources (1989) Water Resources of the Murrumbidgee Valley…doing more with water. Department of Water Resources New South Wales, Parramatta

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Australia (2001) A directory of important wetlands in Australia, 3rd edn edn. Environment Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson CM, Rea N (1999) Reasons for the loss and degradation of Australian wetlands. Wetlands Ecol Manage 7:1–11. doi:10.1023/A:1008495619951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisheries NSW (2002) Aquatic ecological community in the natural drainage system of the lower Murray. NSW Fisheries, Nelson Bay

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier P, Page K (2001) Relating river flow to wetland inundation on meandering river floodplains using Landsat TM. Proceedings from the 23rd Canadian remote sensing symposium, Quebec, 21–24 August

  • Frazier P, Page K (2006) The effect of river regulation on floodplain wetland inundation, Murrumbidgee River, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 57:133–141. doi:10.1071/MF05089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham S (2002) Being green when you’re in the red: the attitudes of rice and grape growers towards environmental flows for wetlands. Honours thesis. University of Sydney, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Haisman B (2005) Impacts of water rights reform in Australia. In: Bruns BR, Ringler C, Meinzen-Dick R (eds) Water rights reform: lessons for institutional design. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington

  • Hardwick L, Maguire J, Foreman M, Frazier P (2001) Providing water to Murrumbidgee billabongs—maximising ecological value. Third Australian Stream Management Conference, Brisbane, 27–29 August 2001

  • Harrison CM, Burgess J, Clark J (1998) Discounted knowledges: farmers’ and residents’ understandings of nature conservation goals and policies. J Environ Manage 54:305–320. doi:10.1006/jema.1998.0242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffcoat K (1994) Burrinjuck to Balranald: the early days. NSW Department of Water Resources, Parramatta

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind EA, Kanfer R, Earley PC (1990) Voice, control, and procedural justice: instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. J Pers Soc Psychol 59(5):952–959. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire LA (2003) Interplay of science and stakeholder values in Neuse River total maximum daily load process. J Water Resour Plan Manage 129(4):261–270. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:4(261)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire J, Hardwick L, Foreman M, Buchan A (2001) Murrumbidgee Environmental Contingency Allowance 2000–Technical Report No. 01/01. Department of Land and Water Conservation, Leeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier HR, Burch MD, Bormans M (2001) Flow management strategies to control blooms of cyanobacterium, anabaena circinalis, in the River Murray at Morgan, South Australia. Regul Rivers Res Manage 17:637–650. doi:10.1002/rrr.623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray Darling Basin Commission (2006) River Murray Water – Hume and Dartmouth Dams Operations Review http://www.mdbc.gov.au/rmw/river_murray_system/dartmouth_reservoir/hume_and_dartmouth_dams_review. Accessed 16 June 2008

  • Murrumbidgee River Management Committee (2002) Draft water sharing plan for the Murrumbidgee regulated river water source. Department of Land and Water Conservation, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim DH (1987) Australian rainfall and runoff: a guide to flood estimation. Institution of Engineers, Barton

    Google Scholar 

  • Powersim Software AS (1997) Powersim. Powersim Software AS, Bergen

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt Water (2002) Water in the Murrumbidgee Valley—a report by the Pratt Water Group. Pratt Water Pty Ltd., Griffith

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid MA, Brooks JJ (2000) Detecting effects of environmental water allocations in wetlands of the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Regul Rivers Res Manage 16:479–496. doi:10.1002/1099-1646(200009/10)16:5<479::AID-RRR599>3.0.CO;2-Y

  • Schofield N, Burt A, Connell D (2003) Environmental water allocation: principles. Policies and Practices, Land and Water Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields J, Good R (2002) Environmental water in a regulated river system: the Murrumbidgee River planning approach to the determination of environmental needs. Water Sci Technol 45(11):241–249

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simons M, Podger G, Cooke R (1996) IQQM–A hydrological modelling tool for water resource and salinity management. Environ Softw 11(1–3):185–192. doi:10.1016/S0266-9838(96)00019-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Dietz T (1994) The value basis of environmental concern. J Soc Issues 50(3):65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syme GJ, Nancarrow BE, McCreddin JA (1999) Defining the components of fairness in the allocation of water to environmental and human uses. J Environ Manage 57:51–70. doi:10.1006/jema.1999.0282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor IR, Murray CA, Taylor SG (eds) (2006) Wetlands of the Murrumbidgee River catchment: practical management in an altered environment. Fivebough and Tuckerbil Wetlands Trust, Leeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker KF, Thoms MC (1993) Environmental effects of flow regulation on the lower River Murray, Australia. Regul Rivers Res Manage 8:103–119. doi:10.1002/rrr.3450080114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts R, Ryder D, Chisholm L, Lowe B (2001) Assessment of environmental flows for the Murrumbidgee river: developing biological indicators for assessing river flow management. Final report to NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation and the Project Technical Advisory Group. Johnstone Centre, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga

    Google Scholar 

  • Whigham PA, Young WJ (2001) Modelling river and floodplain interactions for ecological response. Math Comput Model 33:635–647. doi:10.1016/S0895-7177(00)00268-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker M (1998) Issues and recommendations relating to wetland rehabilitation in NSW: discussion paper September 1998. Wetland Rehabilitation Review, Wallsend

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XQ, Tam PWM, Zheng W (2002) Construction, operation, and maintenance of rubber dams. Can J Civ Eng 29(3):409–420. doi:10.1139/l02-016

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Dr. Phil McManus and Dr. David Chapman for their assistance throughout this project. Thank you also to Dr. Kathleen Bowmer, Dr. Jenny Langridge and two anonymous reviewers for reviewing the article and providing valuable comments. Lastly, I would like to thank all the farmers who participated in this study and shared their views on environmental flows.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia Graham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graham, S. Irrigators’ attitudes towards environmental flows for wetlands in the Murrumbidgee, Australia. Wetlands Ecol Manage 17, 303–316 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-008-9108-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-008-9108-4

Keywords

Navigation