Skip to main content
Log in

A Simple Feedforward Neural Network for the PM10 Forecasting: Comparison with a Radial Basis Function Network and a Multivariate Linear Regression Model

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of air pollution is a frequently recurring situation and its management has social and economic considerable effects. Given the interaction of the numerous factors involved in the raising of the atmospheric pollution rates, it should be considered that the relation between the intensity of emission produced by the polluting source and the resulting pollution is not immediate. The aim of this study was to realise and to compare two support decision system (neural networks and multivariate regression model) that, correlating the air quality data with the meteorological information, are able to predict the critical pollution events. The development of a back-propagation neural network is presented to predict the daily PM10 concentration 1, 2 and 3 days early. The measurements obtained by the territorial monitoring stations are one of the primary data sources; the forecasting of the major weather parameters available on the website and the forecasting of the Saharan dust obtained by the “Centro Nacional de Supercomputaciòn” website, satellite images and back trajectories analysis are used for the weather input data. The results obtained with the neural network were compared with those obtained by a multivariate linear regression model for 1 and 2 days forecasting. The relative root mean square error for both methods shows that the artificial neural networks (ANN) gives more accurate results than the multivariate linear regression model mostly for 1 day forecasting; moreover, the regression model used, in spite of ANN, failed when it had to fit spiked high values of PM10 concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amari, S., Finke, M., Yang, H., Muller, K. R., & Murata, N. (1997). Asymptotic statistical theory of overtraining and cross-validation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 8, 985–996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arena, P., Baglio, S., Castorina, C., Fortuna, L., & Nunnari, G. (1996). A neural architecture to predict pollution in industrial areas. IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 4, 2107–2112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. M. (1995). Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boznar, M. (1997). Pattern selection strategies for a neural network-based short term air pollution prediction model. Proceedings of intelligent information systems. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 340–345.

  • Broomhead, D. S., & Lowe, D. (1988). Multivariable function interpolation and adaptive networks. Complex Systems, 2, 321–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cataltepe, Z., Abu-Mostafa, Y. S., & Magdon-Ismail, M. (1999). No free lunch for early stopping. Neural Computation, 11, 995–1009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaloulakou, A., Demokritou, P., Kasspmenos, P., Koutrakis, P., & Speyrellis, N. (2003). Measurements of PM10 and PM2.5 particle concentrations in Athens, Greece. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 649–660.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y. C., Bailey, G. M., Cohen, D. D., Mctainsh, G. H., Simpson, R. W., & Vowles, P. D. (1999). Source apportionment of PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols in Brisbane (Australia) by receptor modelling. Atmospheric Environment, 33, 3237–3250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Billings, S. A., & Luo, W. (1989). Ortogonal least squares methods and their application to nonlinear system identification. International Journal of Control, 50, 1873–1896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigizoglu, H. K., Alp, K., & Kömürcü, M. (2006). Two neural networks methods in estimation of air pollution time series. Environmental Simulation Chambers: Application to Atmospheric Chemical Processes, 62.

  • Corani, G. (2005). Air quality prediction in Milan: Neural networks, pruned neural networks and lazy learning. Ecological Modelling, 185, 513–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockery, D. W., Speizer, F. E., Ware, J. H., Spengler, J. D., & Ferris, B. G. Jr..(1989). Effects of inhalable particles on respiratory health of children. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 139, 587–594.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dockery, D., Pope III, C., Spengler, J., Fay, J., Ferris, M., & Speizer, F. (1993). An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. The New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 1753–1759.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Febo, A., Bruno, P., Giusto, M., Allegroni, I., & De Saeger, E. (2000). PM10 field studies (Berlin April–November 1999). Final Report, CNR-IIA, National Research Council, Institute for Atmospheric Pollution, Rome, and Joint Research Centre, European Reference Laboratory for Air Pollution, ISPRA.

  • Gamble, J. F. (1998). PM2.5 and mortality in long-term prospective cohort studies: Cause–effect or statistical associations? Environmental Health Perspectives, 106, 535.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grivas, G., & Chaloulakou, A. (2006). Artificial neural network models for prediction of PM10 hourly concentrations, in the Greater Area of Athens, Greece. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 1216–1229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, J., Krogh, A., & Palmer, R. G. (1991). Introduction to the theory of neural computation. CA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht-Nielsen, R. (1989). Theory of the backpropagation neural network. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IEEE Press, New York, vol. 1, pp. 543–611.

  • Hecht-Nielsen, R. (1990). Neurocomputing. CA: Addison Wesley.

  • Hooyberghs, J., Mensink, C., Dumont, G., Fierens, F., & Brasseur, O. (2005). A neural network forecast for daily average PM10 concentrations in Belgium. Atmospheric Environment, 39(18), 3279–3289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Berastegi, G., Elias, A., Barona, A., Sáenz, J., Ezcurra, A., & Díaz de Argandoña, J. (2008). From diagnosis to prognosis for forecasting air pollution using neural networks: Air pollution monitoring in Bilbao. Environmental Modelling & Software, 23, 622–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (1987). Overall evaluation of carcinogenicity: An updating of IARC Monographs, Suppl. 7, IARC, Lyon.

  • Kohonen, T. (1988). An introduction to neural computing. Neural Networks, 1, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korn, G. A. (1991). Neural network experiments on personal computers and workstations p. 248. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukkonen, J., Cawley, G., Chatterton, T., Dorling, S., Foxall, R., Junninen, H., et al. (2003). Extensive evaluation of neural network models for the prediction of NO2 and PM10 concentrations, compared with deterministic modelling system and measurements in central Helsinki. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 4539–4550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W., Wang, W., Wang, X., Yan, S., & Lam, J. (2006). Potential assessment of a neural network model with PCA/RBF approach for forecasting pollutant trends in Mong Kok urban air, Hong Kong. Environmental Research, 96(1), 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965). A Simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journalen, 7, 308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, M., Poulsen, N., & Ravn, O. (2000). Neural networks for modelling and control of dynamic systems. Berlin: Spring.

  • Oberdorster, G. (2001). Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 74, 1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papanastasiou, D., Melas, D., & Kioutsioukis, I. (2007). Development and assessment of neural network and multiple regression models in order to predict PM10 levels in a medium-sized mediterranean city. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 182(1–4), 325–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, P., & Reyes, J. (2006). An integrated neural network model for PM10 forecasting. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 2854–2851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. J. D. (1987). Radial basis functions for multivariable interpolation: A review. In J. C. Mason, & M. G. Cox (Eds.), Algorithms for approximation (pp. 143–167). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rege, M. A., & Tock, R. W. (1996). A simple neural network for estimating emission rates of hydrogen sulfide and ammonia from single point sources. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 46, 953–962.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, J. C., Kim, E., & Sheppard, L. (2005). Association between particulate matter and emergency room visits, hospital admissions and mortality in Spokane, Washington. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 15, 153–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zickus, M., Greig, A., & Niranjan, M. (2002). Comparison of four machine learning methods for predicting PM10 concentrations in Helsinki, Finland. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 2, 717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Trizio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caselli, M., Trizio, L., de Gennaro, G. et al. A Simple Feedforward Neural Network for the PM10 Forecasting: Comparison with a Radial Basis Function Network and a Multivariate Linear Regression Model. Water Air Soil Pollut 201, 365–377 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9950-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9950-2

Keywords

Navigation