Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Deliberative Democracy and Water Management in New Zealand: a Critical Approach to Collaborative Governance and Co-Management Initiatives

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article offers a critical analysis of collaborative water governance initiatives in New Zealand that is embedded in deliberative democratic theory. The article begins with a review of the scientific and political dimensions of the country’s water quality issues. The authors then discuss collaborative governance initiatives in the Canterbury region and freshwater co-management initiatives between the Crown and Maori, the indigenous people of New Zealand. The article relates these two sets of collaborative practices linked to water policies to deliberative democracy and shows how a systemic approach to deliberation and the implementation of mini-publics could mitigate some shortcomings of collaborative water governance initiatives in New Zealand, both the problems of “wallpaper” democracy, in which the public’s engagement is relegated to superficial decisions, and the power imbalance between elites and the general public in collaborative decision-making processes. The model may also apply to other water governance efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In New Zealand, the term Crown is often used in reference to the state, especially regarding Maori affairs.

References

  • Ansell C, Gash A (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory 18:543–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auditor-Generall New Zealand (2016) Principles for effectively co-governing natural resources (appendix 1). Wellington

  • Bächtiger A, Parkinson J (2019) Mapping and measuring deliberation: towards a new deliberative quality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baer M (2015) From water wars to water rights: implementing the human right to water in Bolivia. Journal of Human Rights 14:353–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barelli M (2012) Free, prior and informed consent in the aftermath of the UN declaration on the rights of indigenous rights: developments and challenges ahead international journal of human rights, 16

  • Bark RH, Garrick DE, Robinson CJ, Jackson S (2012) Adaptive basin governance and the prospects for meeting Indigenous water claims. Environmental Science & Policy 19:169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blue G, Dale J (2016) Framing and power in public deliberation with climate change: Critical reflections on the role of deliberative practitioners. Journal of Public Deliberation 12:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Boelens R, Duarte B, Manosalvas R, Mena P, Roa Avendaño T, Vera J (2012) Contested territories: Water rights and the struggles over indigenous livelihoods. The International Indigenous Policy Journal 3:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies-Colley RJ (2013) River water quality in New Zealand: an introduction and overview Ecosystem services in New Zealand: conditions and trends:432–447

  • Dore J (2014) An agenda for deliberative water governance arenas in the Mekong. Water Policy 16:194–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek JS, Pickering J (2017) Deliberation as a catalyst for reflexive environmental governance. Ecological Economics 131:353–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan R (2017) Rescaling knowledge and governance and enrolling the future in New Zealand: a co-production analysis of Canterbury’s water management reforms to regulate diffuse pollution. Society & Natural Resources 30:436–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canterbury (2017) New community members join Canterbury water zone committees. https://www.ecan.govt.nz/get-involved/news-and-events/2017/new-community-members-join-canterbury-water-zone-committees/

  • Environment Canterbury (n.d.) About the water zone committees. https://www.ecan.govt.nz/your-region/your-environment/water/whats-happening-in-my-water-zone/about-the-water-zone-committees/

  • Fishkin J (2009) When the people speak: Deliberative Democracy & Public Consultation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote K, Joy M, Death R (2015) New Zealand Dairy Farming: Milking Our Environment for All Its Worth Environmental Management 56:709–720

  • Gupta J, Hildering A, Misiedjan D (2014) Indigenous people’s right to water under international law: a legal pluralism perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 11:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann A, Thompson D (2000) Why Deliberative Democracy is Different Social Philosophy and Policy 17:161–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1975) Legitimation Crisis. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmsworth G, Awatere S, Robb M (2016) Indigenous Māori values and perspectives to inform freshwater management in Aotearoa-New Zealand Ecology and Society 21

  • Harrington C (2017) The political ontology of collaborative water governance water international 42:254-270

  • Hughey KF, Jacobson CL, Smith EF (2017) A framework for comparing collaborative management of Australian and New Zealand water resources Ecology and Society 22

  • Jenkins B (2018) Water management in New Zealand's Canterbury region : a sustainability framework. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joy M (2015) Squandered: the degradation of New Zealand's freshwaters. Palmerston North

  • Kawharu M (2000) Kaitiakitanga: a Maori anthropological perspective of the Maori socio-environmental ethic of resource management. Journal of the Polynesian Society 109:349–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge J et al (2012) A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In: Parkinson J, Mansbridge JJ (eds) Deliberative systems : deliberative democracy at the large scale. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin N (2019) Aging infrastructure means ticking waste bombs nationwide. https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/113985876/aging-infrastructure-means-ticking-waste-bombs-nationwide

  • Muru-Lanning M (2012) The key actors of Waikato River co-governance : situational analysis at work. AlterNative 8:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand, Department of Internal Affairs (2017) Report of the Havelock north drinking water inquiry: stage 2. Auckland

  • New Zealand, Parliament (2016) Environment Canterbury (transitional governance arrangements) bill — second Reading. 10 March,

  • New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (2014) Water Managment in New Zealand: A Road Map for Understanding Water Value

  • New Zealand Labour Party (2017) Manifesto 2017: water

  • O'Sullivan D (2007) Beyond biculturalism : the politics of an indigenous minority. Huia, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Sullivan J, Mills C (2009) The Maori cultural institution of hui : when meeting means more than a meeting

  • Office of Treat Settlements (2015) Healing the past, building a future: a guide to treaty of Waitangi claims and negotiations with the crown. Office of Treaty Settlements, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirsoul N (2019) The deliberative deficit of prior consultation mechanisms. Australian journal of political science. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2019.1601681

  • Rata E (2005) ‘Marching through the institutions’: the Neotribal elite and the treaty of Waitangi. New Zealand Research for Political Research,

  • República del Ecuador (2017) Gestión Comunitaria del Agua: guía. Secretaría del Agua, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D, Robinson K (2005) Pacific ways of talk - hui and talanoa. Social and Civic Policy Institute/ Council on Public Policy Education, Wellington/Dayton

  • Rouse H, Norton N (2017) Challenges for freshwater science in policy development: reflections from the science-policy interface in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 51:7–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Villaverde A, García-Rubio M (2017) Public Participation in European Water Management: from Theory to Practice Water Resources Management 31:2479–2495

  • Salmon G (2012) Canterbury water management strategy–a case study in collaborative governance. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith G (2003) Deliberative democracy and the environment. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith LT (1999) Decolonizing methodologies : research and indigenous peoples. University of Otago Press, Dunedin

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith N (2018) Bluegreen achievements of the Key / English Government. https://bluegreens.national.org.nz/bluegreen_achievements_of_the_key_english_government

  • Srdjevic Z, Funamizu N, Srdjevic B, Bajčetić R (2018) Public participation in water management of Krivaja river. Serbia: understanding the problem through grounded theory methodology Water resources management 32:5081–5092

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan P-L, Bowmer KH, Mackenzie J (2012) Deliberative tools for meeting the challenges of water planning in Australia Journal of Hydrology 474:2–10

  • Te Aho L (2012) Ngā Whakataunga Waimāori: Freshwater Settlements. In: Wheen NR, Hayward J, Belgrave M (eds) Treaty of Waitangi settlements. Bridget Williams Books and the New Zealand Law Foundation, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Brandeler F, Hordijk M, von Schönfeld K, Sydenstricker-Neto J (2014) Decentralization, participation and deliberation in water governance: a case study of the implications for Guarulhos. Brazil Environment and Urbanization 26:489–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas A, Lo A, Howes M, Rohde N (2017) The problem of inclusion in deliberative environmental valuation. Environmental Values 26:157–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vince J (2006) Maori consultation under the resource management act and the 2005 amendments New Zealand. Journal of Environmental Law 10:295–327

    Google Scholar 

  • von der Porten S, de Loë RC (2013) Collaborative approaches to governance for water and indigenous peoples: a case study from British Columbia. Canada Geoforum 50:149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waitangi Tribunal (2019) National Fresh Water and Geothermal Resources Inquiry. https://www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz/inquiries/kaupapa-inquiries/national-fresh-water-and-geothermal-resources-inquiry/

  • Watanabe M, LRdRG M, Yamaguchi CK, ACP V, Jenoveva-Neto R (2014) Decision making and social learning: the case of watershed committee of the state of Rio Grande Do Sul. Brazil Water resources management 28:3815–3828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurbriggen C (2014) Políticas latinoamericanas en la gestión del agua: De la gobernanza neoliberal a una gobernanza pública Agua y territorio:89–99

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Massey University, Palmerston North, Auckland (Albany), Wellington, New Zealand

    Nicolas Pirsoul

  2. The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Maria Armoudian

Authors
  1. Nicolas Pirsoul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Armoudian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Pirsoul.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pirsoul, N., Armoudian, M. Deliberative Democracy and Water Management in New Zealand: a Critical Approach to Collaborative Governance and Co-Management Initiatives. Water Resour Manage 33, 4821–4834 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02400-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02400-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation