Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi Criteria Decision Making in Selecting Stormwater Management Green Infrastructure for Industrial Areas Part 1: Stakeholder Preference Elicitation

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Green Infrastructure (GI) practices are well known strategies which are used for the source control of stormwater generated from urban land uses. However, unlike other urban land uses, industrial areas are land use types which need special attention in selecting the most suitable GI among several practices available for the stormwater management due to the certain environmental considerations. The decision making in selecting the stormwater management GI practices for an industrial area involves environmental, economic and social objectives which are represented by various performance measures. When identifying these performance measures, the opinions of stakeholders play a major role for the successful implementation of GI. This paper (part 1 of 2 part series of papers) presents the results of a stakeholder preference elicitation process carried out through a four rounded Delphi survey to identify the performance measures and obtain their weights for the decision making of GI for industrial areas. The SWING weighting method was embedded within the Delphi survey process to elicit the weights for various performance measures. The experts have identified the total runoff volume reduction as the most important performance measure in selecting a suitable GI for industrial areas. The results obtained from the Delphi survey series showed a good degree of consensus and has proven to be a valuable tool for the decision making in GI selection, for industrial areas. The stakeholder preference elicitation presented in this paper is a part of a Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) conducted to identify the most suitable stormwater management GI practices for an industrial area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandrov AV, Pullicino PM, Meslin EM, Norris JW (1996) Agreement on disease-specific criteria for do-not-resuscitate orders in acute stroke. Stroke 27(2):232–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa A, Fernandes J, David L (2012) Key issues for sustainable urban stormwater management. Water Res 46(20):6787–6798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton V, Stewart T (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Springer US, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict MA, McMahon ET (2012) Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang W-L, Lo Y-P, Hong Y-T (2009) A heuristic model of network-based group decision making for E-Services. Paper presented at the Information Technology: New Generations, 2009. ITNG'09. Sixth International Conference on

  • Davis AP (2005) Green engineering principles promote low-impact development. Environ Sci Technol 39(16):338A–344A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day J, Bobeva M (2005) A generic toolkit for the successful management of Delphi studies. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methodology 3:103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bellis Y, Santos A, Tosics I, Davies C, Hansen R, Rall E, … Lafortezza R (2015) Green infrastructure planning and implementation

  • Dietz ME (2007) Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water Air Soil Pollut 186(1–4):351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz ME, Clausen JC (2008) Stormwater runoff and export changes with development in a traditional and low impact subdivision. J Environ Manag 87(4):560–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott A, Trowsdale S (2007) A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage. Environ Model Softw 22(3):394–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English JM, Kernan GL (1976) The prediction of air travel and aircraft technology to the year 2000 using the Delphi method. Transportation research, 10, 1-8

  • Giannarou L, Zervas E (2014) Using Delphi technique to build consensus in practice. Int Journal of Business Science and Applied Management 9(2):65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes LFAM, Rangel LAD, Junior L, da Rocha M (2011) Treatment of uncertainty through the interval smart/swing weighting method: a case study. Pesquisa Operacional 31(3):467–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon T, Pease A (2006) RT Delphi: an efficient,“round-less” almost real time Delphi method. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 73:321–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21:1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen R, Pauleit S (2014) From multifunctionality to multiple ecosystem services? A conceptual framework for multifunctionality in green infrastructure planning for urban areas. Ambio 43(4):516–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson F, Keeney S, Mckenna H (2000) Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of advanced nursing, 32, 1008–1015

  • Heiko A (2012) Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 79(8):1525–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung H-L, Altschuld JW, Lee Y-F (2008) Methodological and conceptual issues confronting a cross-country Delphi study of educational program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning 31:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasooriya V, Ng A (2014) Tools for modeling of stormwater management and Economics of Green Infrastructure practices: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut 225(8):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasooriya V, Ng A, Muthukumaran S, Perera B (2016) Optimal Sizing of Green Infrastructure Treatment Trains for Stormwater Management. Water Resour Manag 30:5407–5420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juwana I (2012) Development of a Water Sustainability Index for West Java, Indonesia. (Doctoral dissertation), Victoria University, Footscray

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann H, Kuhn J, Lehner F (2004) The future of mobile technology: findings from a European Delphi study. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2004. In 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the (pp. 10-pp). IEEE

  • Mendoza GA, Martins H (2006) Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. For Ecol Manag 230(1–3):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton BA, Coutts AM, Livesley SJ, Harris RJ, Hunter AM, Williams NS (2015) Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 134:127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parnell GS, Trainor TE (2009) 2.3. 1 Using the Swing Weight Matrix to Weight Multiple Objectives. Paper presented at the INCOSE International Symposium

  • Prince George’s County (1999) Low-impact development design strategies: an integrated design approach. Department of Environmental Resources, Programs and Planning Division, Prince George’s County, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulipati SB, Mattingly SP (2013) Establishing criteria and their weights for evaluating transportation funding alternatives using a Delphi survey. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 104:922–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayens MK, Hahn EJ (2000) Building consensus using the policy Delphi method. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice 1(4):308–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe M, Mell I (2013) Negotiating value and priorities: evaluating the demands of green infrastructure development. J Environ Plan Manag 56(5):650–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Roon M (2007) Water localisation and reclamation: Steps towards low impact urban design and development. J Environ Manag 83(4):437–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villarreal EL, Semadeni-Davies A, Bengtsson L (2004) Inner city stormwater control using a combination of best management practices. Ecol Eng 22(4):279–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Chen J (2013) Investigating the effects of point source and nonpoint source pollution on the water quality of the East River (Dongjiang) in South China. Ecol Indic 32:294–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. N. (2003). Testing the Stability of Experts' Opinions between Successive Rounds of Delphi Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousuf MI (2007) Using experts’ opinions through Delphi technique. Pract Assess Res Eval 12(4):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Zardari NH, Ahmed K, Shirazi SM, Yusop ZB (2015) Literature Review Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 7–67

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. M. Jayasooriya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest Statement

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jayasooriya, V.M., Ng, A.W.M., Muthukumaran, S. et al. Multi Criteria Decision Making in Selecting Stormwater Management Green Infrastructure for Industrial Areas Part 1: Stakeholder Preference Elicitation. Water Resour Manage 33, 627–639 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2123-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2123-1

Keywords

Navigation