Abstract
Green Infrastructure (GI) practices are well known strategies which are used for the source control of stormwater generated from urban land uses. However, unlike other urban land uses, industrial areas are land use types which need special attention in selecting the most suitable GI among several practices available for the stormwater management due to the certain environmental considerations. The decision making in selecting the stormwater management GI practices for an industrial area involves environmental, economic and social objectives which are represented by various performance measures. When identifying these performance measures, the opinions of stakeholders play a major role for the successful implementation of GI. This paper (part 1 of 2 part series of papers) presents the results of a stakeholder preference elicitation process carried out through a four rounded Delphi survey to identify the performance measures and obtain their weights for the decision making of GI for industrial areas. The SWING weighting method was embedded within the Delphi survey process to elicit the weights for various performance measures. The experts have identified the total runoff volume reduction as the most important performance measure in selecting a suitable GI for industrial areas. The results obtained from the Delphi survey series showed a good degree of consensus and has proven to be a valuable tool for the decision making in GI selection, for industrial areas. The stakeholder preference elicitation presented in this paper is a part of a Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) conducted to identify the most suitable stormwater management GI practices for an industrial area.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexandrov AV, Pullicino PM, Meslin EM, Norris JW (1996) Agreement on disease-specific criteria for do-not-resuscitate orders in acute stroke. Stroke 27(2):232–237
Barbosa A, Fernandes J, David L (2012) Key issues for sustainable urban stormwater management. Water Res 46(20):6787–6798
Belton V, Stewart T (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Springer US, New York
Benedict MA, McMahon ET (2012) Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities. Island Press, Washington, DC
Chang W-L, Lo Y-P, Hong Y-T (2009) A heuristic model of network-based group decision making for E-Services. Paper presented at the Information Technology: New Generations, 2009. ITNG'09. Sixth International Conference on
Davis AP (2005) Green engineering principles promote low-impact development. Environ Sci Technol 39(16):338A–344A
Day J, Bobeva M (2005) A generic toolkit for the successful management of Delphi studies. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methodology 3:103–116
De Bellis Y, Santos A, Tosics I, Davies C, Hansen R, Rall E, … Lafortezza R (2015) Green infrastructure planning and implementation
Dietz ME (2007) Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water Air Soil Pollut 186(1–4):351–363
Dietz ME, Clausen JC (2008) Stormwater runoff and export changes with development in a traditional and low impact subdivision. J Environ Manag 87(4):560–566
Elliott A, Trowsdale S (2007) A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage. Environ Model Softw 22(3):394–405
English JM, Kernan GL (1976) The prediction of air travel and aircraft technology to the year 2000 using the Delphi method. Transportation research, 10, 1-8
Giannarou L, Zervas E (2014) Using Delphi technique to build consensus in practice. Int Journal of Business Science and Applied Management 9(2):65–82
Gomes LFAM, Rangel LAD, Junior L, da Rocha M (2011) Treatment of uncertainty through the interval smart/swing weighting method: a case study. Pesquisa Operacional 31(3):467–485
Gordon T, Pease A (2006) RT Delphi: an efficient,“round-less” almost real time Delphi method. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 73:321–333
Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21:1553–1566
Hansen R, Pauleit S (2014) From multifunctionality to multiple ecosystem services? A conceptual framework for multifunctionality in green infrastructure planning for urban areas. Ambio 43(4):516–529
Hasson F, Keeney S, Mckenna H (2000) Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of advanced nursing, 32, 1008–1015
Heiko A (2012) Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 79(8):1525–1536
Hung H-L, Altschuld JW, Lee Y-F (2008) Methodological and conceptual issues confronting a cross-country Delphi study of educational program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning 31:191–198
Jayasooriya V, Ng A (2014) Tools for modeling of stormwater management and Economics of Green Infrastructure practices: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut 225(8):1–20
Jayasooriya V, Ng A, Muthukumaran S, Perera B (2016) Optimal Sizing of Green Infrastructure Treatment Trains for Stormwater Management. Water Resour Manag 30:5407–5420
Juwana I (2012) Development of a Water Sustainability Index for West Java, Indonesia. (Doctoral dissertation), Victoria University, Footscray
Lehmann H, Kuhn J, Lehner F (2004) The future of mobile technology: findings from a European Delphi study. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2004. In 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the (pp. 10-pp). IEEE
Mendoza GA, Martins H (2006) Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. For Ecol Manag 230(1–3):1–22
Norton BA, Coutts AM, Livesley SJ, Harris RJ, Hunter AM, Williams NS (2015) Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 134:127–138
Parnell GS, Trainor TE (2009) 2.3. 1 Using the Swing Weight Matrix to Weight Multiple Objectives. Paper presented at the INCOSE International Symposium
Prince George’s County (1999) Low-impact development design strategies: an integrated design approach. Department of Environmental Resources, Programs and Planning Division, Prince George’s County, Maryland
Pulipati SB, Mattingly SP (2013) Establishing criteria and their weights for evaluating transportation funding alternatives using a Delphi survey. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 104:922–931
Rayens MK, Hahn EJ (2000) Building consensus using the policy Delphi method. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice 1(4):308–315
Roe M, Mell I (2013) Negotiating value and priorities: evaluating the demands of green infrastructure development. J Environ Plan Manag 56(5):650–673
van Roon M (2007) Water localisation and reclamation: Steps towards low impact urban design and development. J Environ Manag 83(4):437–447
Villarreal EL, Semadeni-Davies A, Bengtsson L (2004) Inner city stormwater control using a combination of best management practices. Ecol Eng 22(4):279–298
Wu Y, Chen J (2013) Investigating the effects of point source and nonpoint source pollution on the water quality of the East River (Dongjiang) in South China. Ecol Indic 32:294–304
Yang, Y. N. (2003). Testing the Stability of Experts' Opinions between Successive Rounds of Delphi Studies
Yousuf MI (2007) Using experts’ opinions through Delphi technique. Pract Assess Res Eval 12(4):1–8
Zardari NH, Ahmed K, Shirazi SM, Yusop ZB (2015) Literature Review Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 7–67
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest Statement
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jayasooriya, V.M., Ng, A.W.M., Muthukumaran, S. et al. Multi Criteria Decision Making in Selecting Stormwater Management Green Infrastructure for Industrial Areas Part 1: Stakeholder Preference Elicitation. Water Resour Manage 33, 627–639 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2123-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2123-1