Abstract
Best management practices (BMPs) are widely used to reduce nonpoint source pollutions. In order to obtain cost-effective BMPs configurations, optimization methods are introduced. Recent studies show that knowledge on BMP placement can be used to improve existing algorithms for BMPs optimization. However, some important knowledge has not been fully utilized yet, one of which is about the spatial topology among fields and BMPs interactions. In this paper, a new method for BMPs optimization was proposed, which incorporated knowledge of BMPs interactions into a multi-objective genetic algorithm (i.e., ε-NSGAII) based on spatial topology among fields. Then this method was applied to the BMPs optimization in a small agricultural watershed in Southern Manitoba of Canada, and the performance was compared with those of conventional method. In order to make a comprehensive comparison, experiments were conducted under different population sizes (i.e., 60, 100, and 200) and different numbers of fields (i.e., 29, 52, and 79). The results showed that the proposed method was superior to conventional method on the aspect of greater sediment reductions (2% - 17%) at the same cost, and the Pareto curves obtained by the proposed method were more complete. This study demonstrated that incorporating spatial topology among fields into BMPs optimization can lead to better results and this finding could provide valuable references to similar studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) (2010) Watershed Evaluation of Beneficial Management Practices (WEBs) Technical Summary No,2: Economics Component, Four-Year Review (2004/5–2007/8). A research report to the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Ahmadi M, Arabi M, Fontane DG, Engel BA (2015) Application of multicriteria decision analysis with a priori knowledge to identify optimal nonpoint source pollution control plans. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141(2):04014054
Arabi M, Govindaraju RS, Hantush MM (2006) Cost-effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm. Water Resour Res 42(10):2405–2411. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004931
Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):91–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
Bell SB (2005) Identification of sites for BMP implementation and retrofitting: challenges and strategies. Proc Water Environ Fed 2005:6899–6909
Bi W, Dandy GC, Maier HR (2015) Improved genetic algorithm optimization of water distribution system design by incorporating domain knowledge. Environ Model Softw 69(C):370–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.010
Brodsky A, Shao G, Krishnamoorthy M, Narayanan A, Menascé D, Ak R (2017) Analysis and optimization based on reusable knowledge base of process performance models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(1–4):337–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8761-7
Cezary Z, Janikow (1993) A knowledge-intensive genetic algorithm for supervised learning. Mach Learn 13(2):189–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993043
Chambers PA, Mcgoldrick DJ, Brua RB, Vis C, Culp JM, Benoy GA (2012) Development of environmental thresholds for nitrogen and phosphorus in streams. J Environ Qual 41(1):7–20. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2010.0273
Chaubey I, Maringanti C, Popp J (2009) Development of a multiobjective optimization tool for the selection and placement of best management practices for nonpoint source pollution control. Water Resour Res 45(1):51–53. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007094
Chen L, Qiu J, Wei G, Shen Z (2015a) A preference-based multi-objective model for the optimization of best management practices. J Hydrol 520:356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.032
Chen L, Wei G, Shen Z (2015b) An auto-adaptive optimization approach for targeting nonpoint source pollution control practices. Sci Rep-Uk 5:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15393
Chen D, Chen Q, Leon AS, Li R (2016) A genetic algorithm parallel strategy for optimizing the operation of reservoir with multiple eco-environmental objectives. Water Resour Manag 30(7):2127–2142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1274-1
Collins-Thompson K (2009) Reducing the risk of query expansion via robust constrained optimization. ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2009, Hong Kong, China, November (pp.837-846). DBLP. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1645953.1646059
Cooper CM (1993) Biological effects of agriculturally derived surface water pollutants on aquatic systems—a review. J Environ Qual 22(3):402–408. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1993.00472425002200030003x
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE T Evol Comput 6(2):182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
Devireddy V, Reed P (2004) Efficient and reliable evolutionary multiobjective optimization using ε-dominance archiving and adaptive population sizing. LNCS 3103:390–391
Gitau MW, Veith TL, Gburek WJ (2004) Farm-level optimization of BMP placement for cost-effective pollution reduction. T ASABE 47(6):1923–1931. 10.13031/2013.17805
Gong W, Duan Q, Li J, Wang C, Di Z, Ye A, Miao C, Dai Y (2016) Multiobjective adaptive surrogate modeling-based optimization for parameter estimation of large, complex geophysical models. Water Resour Res 52(3):1984–2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018230
Hoorman J, Hone T, Sudman T, Dirksen T, Iles J (2008) Agricultural impacts on lake and stream water quality in grand Lake St. Marys, western Ohio. Water Air Soil Pollut 193(1):309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9692-1
Hsieh PH, Kuo J, Wu M, Ciou S, Liu W (2010) Optimal best management practice placement strategies for nonpoint source pollution management in the fei-tsui reservoir watershed. Environ Eng Sci 27(6):441–449. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2010.0003
Jia B, Simonovic SP, Zhong P, Yu Z (2016) A multi-objective best compromise decision model for real-time flood mitigation operations of multi-reservoir system. Water Resour Manag 30(10):3363–3387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1356-0
Jin X, Reynolds RG (1999) Using knowledge-based evolutionary computation to solve nonlinear constraint optimization problems: a cultural algorithm approach. Evol Comput, 1999. CEC 99. Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on (Vol.3, pp.1678). IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.1999.785475
Jovovic Z, Kratovalieva S (2015) Global strategies for sustainable use of agricultural genetic and indigenous traditional knowledge. Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge for Food Security. Springer Singapore. 39–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0060-7_3
Kollat JB, Reed PM (2006) Comparing state-of-the-art evolutionary multi-objective algorithms for long-term groundwater monitoring design. Adv Water Resour 29(6):792–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.07.010
Liu YB, Gebremeskel S, De Smedt F, Hoffmann L, Pfister L (2003) A diffusive transport approach for flow routing in GIS-based flood modeling. J Hydrol 283(1–4):91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00242-7
Liu YB, Gebremeskel S, De Smedt F, Hoffmann L, Pfister L (2006) Predicting storm runoff from different landuse classes using a geographical information system based on a distributed model. Hydrol Process 20(3):533–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5920
Liu YB, Yu Z, Chung S, Lung I, Yang W, Yarotski J, Elliott J (2013) Developing a Modular, Fully Distributed Hydrologic Model for Examining Place-Based BMP Effects in the Steppler and South Tobacco Creek Watersheds. A research report to the AAFC WEBs project Guelph Watershed Evaluation Group, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont
Liu J, Zhu AX, Liu YB, Zhu T, Qin CZ (2014) A layered approach to parallel computing for spatially distributed hydrological modeling. Environ Model Softw 51(1):221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.005
Liu J, Zhu AX, Qin CZ, Wu H, Jiang J (2016) A two-level parallelization method for distributed hydrological models. Environ Model Softw 80:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.032
Logan TJ (1993) Agricultural best management-practices for water-pollution control: current issues. Agric Ecosyst Environ 46(1–4):223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(93)90026-L
Maringanti C, Chaubey I, Arabi M, Engel B (2011) Application of a multi-objective optimization method to provide least cost alternatives for NPS pollution control. Environ Manag 48(3):448–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9696-2
National Sedimentation Laboratory (1998) AnnAGNPS user documentation, U.S. Dep. of Agric., Oxford, Miss. Available at http://www.sedlab.olemiss.edu
Panagopoulos Y, Makropoulos C, Mimikou M (2012) Decision support for diffuse pollution management. Environ Model Softw 30(5):57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.006
Qi HH, Altinakar MS (2011) Vegetation buffer strips design using an optimization approach for non-point source pollutant control of an agricultural watershed. Water Resour Manag 25(2):565–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9714-9
Rabotyagov S, Campbell T, Jha M, Gassman PW, Arnold J, Kurkalova L, Kurkalova L, Secchi S, Feng H, Kling CL (2010) Least-cost control of agricultural nutrient contributions to the gulf of mexico hypoxic zone. Ecol Appl 20(6):1542–1555. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0680.1
Rahnamayan S (2007) A novel population initialization method for accelerating evolutionary algorithms. Comput Math Appl 53(10):1605–1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2006.07.013
Srivastava P, Hamlett JM, Robillard PD, Day RL (2002) Watershed optimization of best management practices using AnnAGNPS and a genetic algorithm. Water Resour Res 38(3):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000365
Stewart BA, Woolhiser DA, Wischmeier WH, Caro JH, Frere MH (1975) Control of water pollution from cropland. Rep. ARS-H-5-1, vols.1-2, Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Of Agric., Washington, D. C
Van Veldhuizen DA (1999) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: classifications, analyses, and new innovations. Evol Comput 8(2):125–147 oai: CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.77.8349
Veith TL, Wolfe ML, Heatwole CD (2004) Cost-effective BMP placement: optimization versus targeting. T ASABE 47(5):1585–1594. 10.13031/2013.17636
Yang W, Yu Z, Liu Y, Khakbazan M, Yarotski J, Boxall P, Weber M (2013) Integrated Economic-Hydrologic Modelling for Examining Cost Effectiveness of BMP Scenarios in the South Tobacco Creek Watershed. A research report to the AAFC WEBs project, Guelph Watershed Evaluation Group, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont
Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L (2000) Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evol Comput 8(2):173–195. https://doi.org/10.1162/106365600568202
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LQ16D010005), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41701520; 41431177; 41601413; 41601423), National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2015CB954102), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu, China (No. BK20150975), Program of Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (No. 14KJA170001; 14KJB170009), and PAPD (No. 164320H116). The support received by A-Xing Zhu through the Vilas Associate Award, the Hammel Faculty Fellow, and the Manasse Chair Professorship from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and through the “One-Thousand Talents” Program of China is greatly appreciated. Supports from the State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Smart City Collaborative Innovation Center of Zhejiang Province are also greatly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, H., Zhu, AX., Liu, J. et al. Best Management Practices Optimization at Watershed Scale: Incorporating Spatial Topology among Fields. Water Resour Manage 32, 155–177 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1801-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1801-8