Abstract
Recovery pumping tests are still one of the most commonly preferred preliminary design steps in the assessment of aquifer hydraulics. The use of the existing methods would be insufficient under non-ideal aquifer conditions (i.e. heterogeneity, measurement errors, and boundary effect, etc.) which violate the Theis model assumptions developed for recovery test analysis. In this study, a new parameter estimation methodology based on the Radial Basis Collocation Method (RBFCM) was formulated to access the hydraulic parameters in a reliable, robust and accurate manner using recovery pump test. The suggested approach was established on the idea that the dimensionless time value at the pump-cessation which serves as a matching value is obtained by means of RFBCM. The proposed approach is straightforward to implement; which requires no data refinement, additional parameter, and visual match. The performance of the proposed method was tested with several aquifer conditions including homogeneous synthetic data, heterogeneous aquifer simulation and real field applications. The results confirm that the proposed method has a parameter estimation capacity as high as the available techniques in the literature and provides the practitioners to understand a more accurate portrayal of the effects of heterogeneity on the hydraulic parameters during the test process. In addition, the suggested methodology for the interpretation of aquifer recovery test can be evaluated to be employed as a diagnostic tool to identify non-ideal conditions. The potential use of RBFCM in this study was also presented as the supplement of aquifer test interpretation assessment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avci CB, Sahin AU, Ciftci E (2013) A new method for aquifer system identification and parameter estimation. Hydrol Process 27(17):2485–2497
Butler JJ (1988) Pumping tests in nonuniform aquifers: the radially symmetric case. J Hydrol 101:15–30
Butler JJ, Liu WZ (1993) Pumping tests in nonuniform aquifers: the radially asymmetric case. Water Resour Res 29:259–269
Case CM, Pidcoe WW, Fenske PR (1974) Theis equation analysis of residual drawdown data. Water Resour Res 10(6):1253–1256
Chattopadhyay PB, Vedanti N, Singh VS (2015) A conceptual numerical model to simulate aquifer parameters. Water Resour Manag 29:771–784
Chenof D, Chapius RP (2002) Methods to determine storativity of infinite confined aquifers from a recovery test. Ground Water 10:385–389
Chiang WH, Kinzelbach W (2001) 3D-groundwater modeling with PMWIN a simulation system for modeling groundwater flow and pollution. Springer, Berlin
Chinchapatnam PP, Djidjeli K, Nair PB (2006) Unsymmetric and symmetric meshless schemes for the unsteady convection-diffusion equation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:2432–2453
Ciftci E, Avci CB, Borekci OS, Sahin AU (2012) Assessment of advective–dispersive contaminant transport in heterogeneous aquifers using a meshless method. Environmental Earth Sciences 67(8):2399–2409
Cooper HHJ, Jacob CE (1946) A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history. Trans Am Geophys Union 27:526–534
Copty NK, Findikakis AN (2004) Stochastic analysis of pumping test drawdown data in heterogeneous geologic formations. J Hydraul Res 42:59–67
Davis, AD, Stetler LD (2007) Pumping Well Test Analysis: Hell Creek Aquifer, North Cave Hills, Harding County, South Dakota, http://uranium.sdsmt.edu/Downloads/NCH%20Pumping%20Test%20Final.pdf, Accessed 12 Jan 2015
Frenzel H (1995) A field generator based on Mejia’s algorithm. University of Heidelberg, Germany, Institut für Umweltphysik
Goode DJ (1997) Composite recovery type curves in normalized time from theis exact solution. Ground Water 35:672–678
Hantush MS (1961) Drawdown around a partially penetrating well: proceedings of the American society of civil engineers. J Hydraul Div 87:83–98
Hardy RL (1971) Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces. Geophys Res 176:1905–1910
Jean JS (1996) Pumping testing using a siphon well. Water Resour Manag 10:81–105
Jha MK, Namgial D, Kamii Y, Peiffer S (2008) Hydraulic parameters of coastal aquifer systems by direct methods and an extended tide–aquifer interaction technique. Water Resour Manag 22:1899–1923
Kawecki MW (1993) Recovery analysis from pumping tests with stepped discharge. Ground Water 31(4):585–592
Li J, Chen Y, Pepper D (2003) Radial basis function method for 1-D and 2-D groundwater contaminant transport modeling. Comput Mech 32:10–15
Meier PM, Carrera J, Sanchez-Vila X (1998) An evaluation of Jacob's method for the interpretation of pumping tests in heterogeneous formations. Water Resour Res 34:1011–1025
Mishra GC, Chachadi AG (1985) Analysis of flow to a large diameter well during the recovery period. Ground Water 23(5):646–651
Neuman SP (1975) Analysis of pumping test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resour Res 11(2):329–342
Neuman SP, Guadagnini A, Riva M (2004) Type-curve estimation of statistical heterogeneity. Water Resour Res 40:W04201. doi:10.1029/2001WR001072
Renard P, Glenz D, Mejias M (2009) Understanding diagnostic plots for well-test interpretation. Hydrogeol J 17:589–600
Rhode KL, Osiensky JL, Miller SM (2007) Numerical evaluation of volumetric weighted mean transmissivity estimates in laterally heterogeneous aquifers. J Hydrol 347(3–4):381–390
Sanchez-Vila X, Meier PM, Carrera J (1999) Pumping tests in heterogeneous aquifers: an analytical study of what can be obtained from their interpretation using Jacob's method. Water Resour Res 35:943–952
Schwartz WF, Zhang H (2003) Fundamentals of groundwater. Wiley, New York
Theis CV (1935) The relationship between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage. Trans Am Geophys Union 16:519–524
U.S. Department of the Interior (USDI) (1995) Ground Water Manual. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Government Printing Office, Second Edition, Washington, DC
Willmann M, Carrera J, Sánchez-Vila X, Vázquez-Suñé E (2007) On the meaning of the transmissivity values obtained from recovery tests. Hydrogeol J 15(5). doi:10.1007/s10040-006-0147-8
Wu Z, Hon YC (2003) Convergence error estimate in solving free boundary diffusion problem by radial basis functions method. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 27:73–79
Wu CM, Yeh TCJ, Lee TH, Hsu NS, Chen CH, Sancho AF (2005) Traditional analysis of aquifer tests: comparing apples to oranges? Water Resour Res 41(9):W09402. doi:10.1029/2004WR003717
Zheng L, Guo JQ, Lei Y (2005) An improved straight-line fitting method for analyzing pumping test recovery data. Ground Water 43:939–942
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sahin, A.U. A New Inverse Solution Assessment for the Recovery Test Using Radial Basis Function Collocation Method. Water Resour Manage 30, 947–962 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1201-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1201-x