Skip to main content
Log in

A New Inverse Solution Assessment for the Recovery Test Using Radial Basis Function Collocation Method

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recovery pumping tests are still one of the most commonly preferred preliminary design steps in the assessment of aquifer hydraulics. The use of the existing methods would be insufficient under non-ideal aquifer conditions (i.e. heterogeneity, measurement errors, and boundary effect, etc.) which violate the Theis model assumptions developed for recovery test analysis. In this study, a new parameter estimation methodology based on the Radial Basis Collocation Method (RBFCM) was formulated to access the hydraulic parameters in a reliable, robust and accurate manner using recovery pump test. The suggested approach was established on the idea that the dimensionless time value at the pump-cessation which serves as a matching value is obtained by means of RFBCM. The proposed approach is straightforward to implement; which requires no data refinement, additional parameter, and visual match. The performance of the proposed method was tested with several aquifer conditions including homogeneous synthetic data, heterogeneous aquifer simulation and real field applications. The results confirm that the proposed method has a parameter estimation capacity as high as the available techniques in the literature and provides the practitioners to understand a more accurate portrayal of the effects of heterogeneity on the hydraulic parameters during the test process. In addition, the suggested methodology for the interpretation of aquifer recovery test can be evaluated to be employed as a diagnostic tool to identify non-ideal conditions. The potential use of RBFCM in this study was also presented as the supplement of aquifer test interpretation assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avci CB, Sahin AU, Ciftci E (2013) A new method for aquifer system identification and parameter estimation. Hydrol Process 27(17):2485–2497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler JJ (1988) Pumping tests in nonuniform aquifers: the radially symmetric case. J Hydrol 101:15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler JJ, Liu WZ (1993) Pumping tests in nonuniform aquifers: the radially asymmetric case. Water Resour Res 29:259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case CM, Pidcoe WW, Fenske PR (1974) Theis equation analysis of residual drawdown data. Water Resour Res 10(6):1253–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay PB, Vedanti N, Singh VS (2015) A conceptual numerical model to simulate aquifer parameters. Water Resour Manag 29:771–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenof D, Chapius RP (2002) Methods to determine storativity of infinite confined aquifers from a recovery test. Ground Water 10:385–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang WH, Kinzelbach W (2001) 3D-groundwater modeling with PMWIN a simulation system for modeling groundwater flow and pollution. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinchapatnam PP, Djidjeli K, Nair PB (2006) Unsymmetric and symmetric meshless schemes for the unsteady convection-diffusion equation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:2432–2453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciftci E, Avci CB, Borekci OS, Sahin AU (2012) Assessment of advective–dispersive contaminant transport in heterogeneous aquifers using a meshless method. Environmental Earth Sciences 67(8):2399–2409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper HHJ, Jacob CE (1946) A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history. Trans Am Geophys Union 27:526–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copty NK, Findikakis AN (2004) Stochastic analysis of pumping test drawdown data in heterogeneous geologic formations. J Hydraul Res 42:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, AD, Stetler LD (2007) Pumping Well Test Analysis: Hell Creek Aquifer, North Cave Hills, Harding County, South Dakota, http://uranium.sdsmt.edu/Downloads/NCH%20Pumping%20Test%20Final.pdf, Accessed 12 Jan 2015

  • Frenzel H (1995) A field generator based on Mejia’s algorithm. University of Heidelberg, Germany, Institut für Umweltphysik

  • Goode DJ (1997) Composite recovery type curves in normalized time from theis exact solution. Ground Water 35:672–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hantush MS (1961) Drawdown around a partially penetrating well: proceedings of the American society of civil engineers. J Hydraul Div 87:83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy RL (1971) Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces. Geophys Res 176:1905–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jean JS (1996) Pumping testing using a siphon well. Water Resour Manag 10:81–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha MK, Namgial D, Kamii Y, Peiffer S (2008) Hydraulic parameters of coastal aquifer systems by direct methods and an extended tide–aquifer interaction technique. Water Resour Manag 22:1899–1923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawecki MW (1993) Recovery analysis from pumping tests with stepped discharge. Ground Water 31(4):585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Chen Y, Pepper D (2003) Radial basis function method for 1-D and 2-D groundwater contaminant transport modeling. Comput Mech 32:10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier PM, Carrera J, Sanchez-Vila X (1998) An evaluation of Jacob's method for the interpretation of pumping tests in heterogeneous formations. Water Resour Res 34:1011–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra GC, Chachadi AG (1985) Analysis of flow to a large diameter well during the recovery period. Ground Water 23(5):646–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman SP (1975) Analysis of pumping test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resour Res 11(2):329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman SP, Guadagnini A, Riva M (2004) Type-curve estimation of statistical heterogeneity. Water Resour Res 40:W04201. doi:10.1029/2001WR001072

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard P, Glenz D, Mejias M (2009) Understanding diagnostic plots for well-test interpretation. Hydrogeol J 17:589–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhode KL, Osiensky JL, Miller SM (2007) Numerical evaluation of volumetric weighted mean transmissivity estimates in laterally heterogeneous aquifers. J Hydrol 347(3–4):381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Vila X, Meier PM, Carrera J (1999) Pumping tests in heterogeneous aquifers: an analytical study of what can be obtained from their interpretation using Jacob's method. Water Resour Res 35:943–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz WF, Zhang H (2003) Fundamentals of groundwater. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Theis CV (1935) The relationship between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage. Trans Am Geophys Union 16:519–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Interior (USDI) (1995) Ground Water Manual. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Government Printing Office, Second Edition, Washington, DC

  • Willmann M, Carrera J, Sánchez-Vila X, Vázquez-Suñé E (2007) On the meaning of the transmissivity values obtained from recovery tests. Hydrogeol J 15(5). doi:10.1007/s10040-006-0147-8

  • Wu Z, Hon YC (2003) Convergence error estimate in solving free boundary diffusion problem by radial basis functions method. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 27:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu CM, Yeh TCJ, Lee TH, Hsu NS, Chen CH, Sancho AF (2005) Traditional analysis of aquifer tests: comparing apples to oranges? Water Resour Res 41(9):W09402. doi:10.1029/2004WR003717

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng L, Guo JQ, Lei Y (2005) An improved straight-line fitting method for analyzing pumping test recovery data. Ground Water 43:939–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ufuk Sahin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahin, A.U. A New Inverse Solution Assessment for the Recovery Test Using Radial Basis Function Collocation Method. Water Resour Manage 30, 947–962 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1201-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1201-x

Keywords

Navigation