Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fuzzy AHP Based Multi Crteria Decision Support for Watershed Prioritization

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article presents an efficient multi-criteria decision support model (MCDSM) to prioritize susceptible areas in a watershed for soil conservation measures based on impact analysis of topography, climate, morphology, soil, land cover, management and conservation factors. The MCDS model has been developed based on fuzzy analytical hierarchical process (FAHP) by computing its weights of nine erosion hazard parameters (EHPs), which include; soil loss from revise universal soil loss equation model, sediment yield, sediment production rate, sediment transport index, slope, drainage density, channel frequency, form factor, and circulatory ratio. The MCDS model has successfully been applied to Benisagar reservoir catchment in Madhya Pradesh (India), comprised of 36 sub-watersheds for prioritizing areas require soil conservation measures. For computing weights of EHPs in FAHPs, triangular, narrow rectangular, medium rectangular and wide rectangular fuzzy membership functions have been used followed by the geometric mean method to determine the final weight matrix. The test of consistency ratio showed wide rectangular function as the most effective one in determining the weights of EHPs with soil loss as the most sensitive and circulatory ratio as the least sensitive parameter. The final priorities of the sub-watersheds have been determined using weight and their corresponding normalized values of EHPs. Based on the clustering of final priorities, the sub-watersheds have been categorized into four groups of priorities, i.e., very high, high, medium, low and very low for soil and water conservation measures. The derived methodology can successfully be used in prioritization of soil conservation measures in a basin for developing catchment area treatment plan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal R, Singh S (2013) AHP and extent fuzzy AHP approach for prioritization of performance measurement attributes. Int J Soc Manag Econ Bus Eng 7(1):43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Azizi A, Fathi K (2014) Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Manag Sci Lett 4(5):893–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman RE, Zadeh LA (1960) Decision making in fuzzy environment. Manag Sci 17B:141–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon M, Cosker D, Marshall D (2001) An expert system for multi-criteria decision making using Dempster Shafer theory. Expert Syst Appl 20(4):357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy herarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 34:187–195

  • Chen SJ, Chen SM (2005) A prioritized information fusion method for handling fuzzy decision-making problems. Appl Intell 22(3):219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM, Lee LW (2010) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl 37(4):2790–2798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM, Wang CH (2009) A generalized model for prioritized multicriteria decision making systems. Expert Sys Appl 36(3):4773–4783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Quin X, Shi Y (2011) Critical area identification of potential soil loss in a typical watershed of Three Gorges reservoir region. Water Resour Manag 25(11):3445–3463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra R, Dhiman DR, Sharma PK (2005) Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in Gurdaspur district, Punjab using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33(4):532–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdary VM, Chakraborthy D, Jeyaram A, Krishna Murthy YVN, Sharma JR, Dadhwal VK (2013) Multi-criteria decision making approach for watershed prioritization using hierarchy process technique and GIS. Water Resour Manag 27(10):3555–3571. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0364-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Steiguer JE, Duberstein J, Lopes V (2003) The analytic hierarchy process as a means for integrated watershed management. In: Renard KG (ed) First Interagency Conference on Research on the Watersheds. Benson Arizona Oct 27–30 2003: 736–740

  • Deng H (1999) Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Int J Approx Reason 21:215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu G (2008) A fuzzy optimization method for multicriteria decision making: An application to reservoir flood control operation. Expert Syst Appl 34(1):145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han WJ, Tsay WD (1998) Formulation of Quality Strategy Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. University of Northern Colorado, USA, pp 580–583, Twenty Seven Annual Meeting of the Western Decision Science Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill S, Zammet C (2000) Identification of community values for regional land use planning and management. Int Soc Eco Econ Cong Canberra Aust. July 5–8 2000

  • Hlaing TK, Haruyama S, Maung AM (2008) Using GIS-based distributed soil loss modeling and morphometric analysis to prioritize watershed for soil conservation in Bago river basin of Lower Myanmar. Earth Sci Chin 2(4):465–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans Am Geophysics Un: 350–361

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrological approach to quantative morphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 56:275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh TY, Lu ST, Tzeng GH (2004) Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. Int J Proj Manag 22(7):573–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua Z, Gong B, Xu X (2008) A DS–AHP approach for multi-attribute decision making problem with incomplete information. Expert Syst Appl 34(3):2221–2227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal RK, Dehariya DK, Nema AK, Thomas T, Galkate RV (2012) Soil erosion based prioritization and development of CAT plan for catchment of Rangawan reservoir in Bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh (India). Nat Symp on Water Resour Manage in Changing Environ (WARMICE 2012) Roorkee (India) Feb 8–9 2012: 409–420

  • Jaiswal RK, Thomas T, Galkate RV, Singh S (2013) Rainfall analysis & assessment of irrigation water in a command of drought affected Bundelkhand Region (M.P.) India. Nat Conf on Sustainable Water Resour Develop and Manage (SWARDAM 2013) Aurangabad (India) Sept 30-Oct 01 2013: 20–27

  • Jaiswal RK, Thomas T, Galkate RV, Ghosh NC, Singh S (2014) Watershed prioritization using Saaty’s AHP Based decision support for soil conservation Measures. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0494-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaganathan S, Jinson JE, Ker J (2007) Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based group decision support system to select and evaluate new manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:1253–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javanbarg MB, Scawthorn C, Junji K, Shahbodghkhan B (2012) Fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria decision making systems using particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl 39:960–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josh CS, Dash DC (1982) Geomorphic prediction models for sediment production rate and intensive priorities of watersheds in Mayurakshi catchment. Int Symp Hydrol Aspects of Mountainous Watersheds Roorkee India Nov 4–6 1982: 15–23

  • Kafaky BS, Mataji A, Naser SA (2009) Ecological capability assessment for multiple-use in forest areas using GIS- based multiple criteria decision making approach. Am J Environ Sci 5(6):714–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C, Cebi S (2009) A new multi-attribute decision making method: Hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):4848–4861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong F, Lue H (2005) Applying fuzzy analytical hierarchy process to evaluate success factors of e-commerce. Int J Inf SystSci 1(3–4):406–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Kordi M (2008) Comparison of fuzzy and crisp analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methods for spatial multicriteria decision analysis in GIS, Master Thesis, Deptt. of Technology and Built Enviroment, Univesity of Galve: 1–45

  • Kulak O (2005) A decision support system for fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling equipments. Expert Syst Appl 29(2):310–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Mishra A (2015) Critical erosion area identification based on hudrological response unit level for effective sediment control in a river basin. Water Resour Manag 29(6):1749–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee AHI, Chen WC, Chang CJ (2008) A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl 34:96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin HY, Hsu PY, Sheen GJ (2007) A fuzzy-based decision-making procedure for data warehouse system selection. Expert Syst Appl 32(3):939–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (1999) GIS and Multicriteria Desision Analysis. John Willey and Sons Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallerowicz KT, Rees HW, Chow TL, Ghanem I (1994) Soil conservation planning at the watershed level using USLE with GIS and midro-computer technologies- a case study. J Soil Water Conserv 2:91–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov L (2003) Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 134:365–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov L, Tsvetinov P (2004) Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Appl Soft Comput 5:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller VC (1953) Automated detection of drainage network from digital elevation models. Proc Sixth Int Symp Automated Cartography Ottawal USA: 288–291

  • Mishra SS, Nagarajan R (2010) Morphometric analysis and prioritization of subwatersheds using GIS and remote sensing techniques: a case study of Odisha, India. Int J Geomat Geosci 1(3):501–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra N, Satyanarayan T, Mukherjee RK (1984) Effect of topo elements on the sediment production rate from sub-watersheds in upper Damodar valley. J Agric Eng (ISAE) 21(3):65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Burch GJ (1986) Sediment transport capacity of sheet and rill flow: application of unit stream power theory. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1029/WR022i008p01350

    Google Scholar 

  • Narumon I, Songkot D (2010) Analytical hierarchy process doe landslide susceptibility mapping in lower Mae Chaem watershed, Northern Thailand. Suranaree J Sci Technol 17(3):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyatoye EO, Okpokpo GU, Adekoya GA (2010) An application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to investment portfolio selection in the banking sectors of the Nigerian capital market. J Econ Int Finance 2(12):321–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda SS, Andrianasolo H, Steele DD (2005) Application of geotechnology to watershed soil conservation planning at the field scale. J Environ Hydrol 13(16):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai SP, Sharma N, Lohani AK (2014) Risk assessment for transboundary rivers using fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique. J Hydrol 519(B 27):1551–1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao HSS and Mahabaleswara H (1990) Prediction of rate of sedimentation of Tungabhadra reservoir, Proc Symp Erosion, Sedimentation Resour Conserv Dehradun India: 12–20

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, GAW, Porter JP (1991) RUSLE, revised soil loss equation. J Soil Water Conserv 46(1):30–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with analytical hierarchical process Vol VI. RWS Publications University of Pittsburgh, Pittusburgh, pp 3–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SK, Rajput GS, Tignath S, Pandey RP (2010) Morphometric analysis and prioritization of a watershed using GIS. J Indian Water Res Soc 30(2):33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Chandra S, Babu R (1981) Soil loss and prediction research in India. Central Soil and Water Conserv Resear Training Inst India, Bulletin No. T-12/D9

  • Srdejevic Z, Bajcetic R, Srdjevic B (2012) Identifying the criteria set for multi criteria decision making based on SWOT/PESTLE analysis: A case study of reconstructing a water intake structure. Water Resour Mamag 26(12):3379–3393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srdjevic B, Mediros YDP (2008) Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans. Water Resour Manag 22:877–894. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0077-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrimali SS, Aggarwal SP, Samra JS (2001) Prioritizing erosion-prone areas in hills using remote sensing and GIS - a case study of the Sukhna lake catchment, northern India. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinf 3(1):54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tacker EC, Silvia MT (1991) Decision making in complex environments under conditions of high cognitive loading: A personal expert systems approach. Expert Syst Appl 2(2–3):121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam CM, Tong TKL, Leung AWT, Chiu GWC (2002) Site layout planning using nonstructural fuzzy decision support system. J Construction Engg Manage DOI: 10.1061(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:3(220)

  • Torfi F, Farahani RZ, Rezapour S (2010) Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives. Appl Soft Comput 10(2):520–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittala SS, Govindaiah S, Gowda HH (2004) Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in the Pavagada area of Tumkar district, south India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 32(4):351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Gertner G, Parysow P, Anderson AB (2000) Spatial prediction and uncertainty analysis of topographic factors for the revised soil loss equation (RUSLE). J Soil Water Conserv 374–384

  • Wang L, Chu J, Wu J (2007) Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 107:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Luo Y, Hua Z (2008) On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. Eur J Oper Res 186(2):735–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DP (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses-a guide to conservation planning. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, pp 58–61, Agriculture hand-book No 537

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahaya S, Ahamd N, Abdalla RF (2010) Multicriteria analysis for flood vulnerable areas in Hadejia-Jama’are river basin, Nigeria. Euro J Sci Res 42(1):72–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1991) Non-monotonic set theoretic operations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 42(2):173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1992) Second order structures in multi-criteria decision making. Int J Man–Mach Stud 36(6):553–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann HJ (1934) Fuzzy Set Theory—and Its Applications, 3rd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. K. Jaiswal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jaiswal, R.K., Ghosh, N.C., Lohani, A.K. et al. Fuzzy AHP Based Multi Crteria Decision Support for Watershed Prioritization. Water Resour Manage 29, 4205–4227 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1054-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1054-3

Keywords

Navigation