Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Impacts of Celastrus-primed soil on common native and invasive woodland species

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Invasive plant species have been shown to alter soil environments resulting in changes in soil chemistry, biota, and nutrient cycling. Few studies have focused on how soil changes affect co-occurring native species or plants of different growth forms. This study, located in Connecticut, USA, focused on the soil effects of the liana, Celastrus orbiculatus (oriental bittersweet), a prominent invader of eastern North America, using two different approaches. In a litter addition experiment, addition of C. orbiculatus leaf litter to uninvaded field soils showed an increase in soil nutrients, pH, and nitrogen mineralization over 2 years across a range of soil and forest community types. In a complimentary common garden-pot experiment, a suite of common, ecologically similar, native and invasive lianas and shrubs were grown in soils primed with C. orbiculatus. Invaded soil was compared to uninvaded field and control potting soils. The change in soil attributes was not significantly different when grown with native or invasive plants; however, soils grown with lianas had a greater decrease in nutrients than those grown with shrubs. Although soils from locations with C. orbiculatus were higher in nutrients than uninvaded soils, plant growth, as measured in root:shoot, root and stem biomass, relative growth rate of volume, and final biomass were not different in invaded and uninvaded soils for either lianas or shrubs. However, lianas had similar growth patterns in nutrient-sparse potting soil, while shrubs growing in potting soil had lower growth. Thus, negative impacts of invaded soils on plant growth are not universal, and the plant community may show a varied response to C. orbiculatus-primed soils depending on the level of resource competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen JM, Leininger TJ, Hurd JD, Civco DL, Gelfand AE, Silander JA (2013) Socioeconomics drive woody invasive plant richness in New England USA through forest fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 28(9):1671–1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur MA, Bray SR, Kuchle CR, McEwan RW (2012) The influence of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, on leaf decomposition and microbial community dynamics. Plant Ecol 213(10):1571–1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton IW, Hyatt LA, Howe KM, Gurevitch J, Lerdau MT (2005) Invasive species accelerate decomposition and litter nitrogen loss in a mixed deciduous forest. Ecol Appl 15(4):1263–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer JT, Flory SL (2011) Suppression of the woodland herb Senna hebecarpa by the invasive grass Microstegium vimineum. Am Midl Nat 165(1):105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bois ST, Ibáñez I, Silander Jr. JA (2012) Colonization potential of three invasive species and their ecological analogs in New England; capitalizing on environmental stochasticity to understand seedling establishment and spread. Unpublished Manuscript

  • Bongard CL, Navaranjan G, Yan W, Fulthorpe RR (2013) Fungal colonization of the invasive vine Vincetoxicum rossicum and native plants. Plant Ecol Evolut 146(1):45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai ZQ, Poorter L, Cao KF, Bongers F (2007) Seedling growth strategies in Bauhinia species: comparing lianas and trees. Ann Bot 100(4):831–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Ridenour WM (2004) Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Fr Ecol Environ 2(8):436–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Cipollini D, Barto K, Thelen GC, Hallett SG, Prati D, Stinson K, Klironomos J (2008) Novel weapons: invasive plant suppresses fungal mutualists in America but not in its native Europe. Ecology 89(4):1043–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cipollini D, Dorning M (2008) Direct and indirect effects of conditioned soils and tissue extracts of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, on target plant performance. Castanea 73(3):166–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cipollini KA, McClain GY, Cipollini D (2008) Separating above-and belowground effects of Alliaria petiolata and Lonicera maackii on the performance of Impatiens capensis. Am Midl Nat 160(1):117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cipollini KA, Titus K, Wagner C (2012) Allelopathic effects of invasive species (Alliaria petiolata, Lonicera maackii, Ranunculus ficaria) in the midwestern United States. Allelopath J 29:63–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin JD, D’Antonio CM (2012) Gone but not forgotten? Invasive plants’ legacies on community and ecosystem properties. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 5(1):117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Bier L, Bushelle E, Diegel C, Johnson A, Kujala B (2005) Non-indigenous grasses impede woody succession. Plant Ecol 178(2):249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Colehour A, Daney J, Foster E, MacMillen C, Merrill E, O’Neil J, Pearson M, Whitney M, Anderson MD, Dosch JJ (2012) The population dynamics and ecological effects of garlic mustard, Alliaria petiolata, in a Minnesota oak woodland. Am Midl Nat 168(2):364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirr MA (1987) The reference manual of woody plant propagation: from seed to tissue culture. Varsity Press Inc, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld JG, Kourtev P, Huang WZ (2001) Changes in soil functions following invasions of exotic understory plants in deciduous forests. Ecol Appl 11(5):1287–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgersma KJ, Ehrenfeld JG, Yu S, Vor T (2011) Legacy effects overwhelm the short-term effects of exotic plant invasion and restoration on soil microbial community structure, enzyme activities, and nitrogen cycling. Oecologia 167(3):733–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elgersma KJ, Yu S, Vor T, Ehrenfeld JG (2012) Microbial-mediated feedbacks of leaf litter on invasive plant growth and interspecific competition. Plant Soil 356(1–2):341–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flory SL, Clay K (2009) Invasive plant removal method determines native plant community responses. J Appl Ecol 46(2):434–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flory SL, Clay K (2010) Non-native grass invasion alters native plant composition in experimental communities. Biol Invasions 12(5):1285–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith-Kent SL, Handel SN (2012) Acer rubrum (red maple) growth is negatively affected by soil from forest stands dominated by its invasive congener (Acer platanoides, Norway maple). Plant Ecol 213(1):77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner BL (1991) Relative growth rates of vines and shrubs of western poison oak, Toxicodendron diversilobum (Anacardiaceae). Am J Bot 78:1345–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove S, Haubensak KA, Parker IM (2012) Direct and indirect effects of allelopathy in the soil legacy of an exotic plant invasion. Plant Ecol 213(12):1869–1882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heneghan L, Fatemi F, Umek L, Grady K, Fagen K, Workman M (2006) The invasive shrub European buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica, L.) alters soil properties in Midwestern US woodlands. Appl Soil Ecol 32(1):142–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herron PM, Martine CT, Latimer AM, Leicht-Young SA (2007) Invasive plants and their ecological strategies: prediction and explanation of woody plant invasion in New England. Divers Distrib 13:633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Vilà M (2013) Bias and error in understanding plant invasion impacts. Trends Ecol Evol 28(4):212–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp. Released (2012) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. IBM Corp, Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan NR, Larson DL, Huerd SC (2008) Soil modification by invasive plants: effects on native and invasive species of mixed-grass prairies. Biol Invasions 10(2):177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko Y, Homma K (2006) Differences in the allocation patterns between liana and shrub Hydrangea species. Plant Species Biol 21(3):147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417(6884):67–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kourtev P, Huang W, Ehrenfeld J (1999) Differences in earthworm densities and nitrogen dynamics in soils under exotic and native plant species. Biol Invasions 1(2–3):237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourtev PS, Ehrenfeld JG, Häggblom M (2002) Exotic plant species alter the microbial community structure and function in the soil. Ecology 83(11):3152–3166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourtev PS, Ehrenfeld JG, Häggblom M (2003) Experimental analysis of the effect of exotic and native plant species on the structure and function of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 35(7):895–905

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuebbing SE, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D (2013) Current mismatch between research and conservation efforts: the need to study co-occurring invasive plant species. Biol Conserv 160:121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuebbing SE, Classen AT, Simberloff D (2014) Two co-occurring invasive woody shrubs alter soil properties and promote subdominant invasive species. J Appl Ecol 51(1):124–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhman TR, Pearson SM, Turner MG (2013) Why does land-use history facilitate non-native plant invasion? A field experiment with Celastrus orbiculatus in the southern Appalachians. Biol Invasions 15(3):613–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulmatiski A, Beard KH, Stevens JR, Cobbold SM (2008) Plant–soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review. Ecol Lett 11(9):980–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ladwig L, Meiners S, Pisula N, Lang K (2012) Conditional allelopathic potential of temperate lianas. Plant Ecol 213(12):1927–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankau RA, Nuzzo V, Spyreas G, Davis AS (2009) Evolutionary limits ameliorate the negative impact of an invasive plant. Proc Nat Acad Sci 106(36):15362–15367

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leicht-Young SA, Silander JA, Latimer AM (2007) Comparative performance of invasive and native Celastrus species across environmental gradients. Oecologia 154(2):273–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leicht-Young SA, O’Donnell H, Latimer AM, Silander JA (2009) Effects of an invasive plant species, Celastrus orbiculatus, on soil composition and processes. Am Midl Nat 161:219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leicht-Young SA, Latimer AM, Silander JA (2011) Lianas escape self-thinning: experimental evidence of positive density dependence in temperate lianas Celastrus orbiculatus and C. scandens. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 13(3):163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lett CN, DeWald LE, Horton J (2011) Mycorrhizae and soil phosphorus affect growth of Celastrus orbiculatus. Biol Invasions 13(10):2339–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell G (2014) Long-term monitoring of the forest ecosystem at cary. Cary Institute of Ecosystems Studies. http://www.caryinstitute.org/science-program/research-projects/long-term-monitoring-forest-ecosystem-cary. Accessed 18 Nov 2014

  • Lyons SM, Gifford GF (1980) Impact of incremental surface soil depths on plant production, transpiration ratios, and nitrogen mineralization rates. J Range Manag 33(3):189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrhoff LJ, Silander JA, Leicht SA, Mosher ES, Tabak NM (2003) IPANE: invasive plant atlas of New England (http://ipane.org). Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. University of Connecticut, Storrs. www.ipane.org

  • Mosher ES, Silander JA, Latimer AM (2009) The role of land-use history in major invasions by woody plant species in the northeastern North American landscape. Biol Invasions 11:2317–2328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzo VA, Maerz JC, Blossey B (2009) Earthworm invasion as the driving force behind plant invasion and community change in northeastern North American forests. Conserv Biol 23(4):966–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlovic NB, Leicht-Young SA (2011) Are temperate mature forests buffered from invasive lianas? J Torrey Bot Soc 138(1):85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins LB, Nowak RS (2013) Native and non-native grasses generate common types of plant-soil feedbacks by altering soil nutrients and microbial communities. Oikos 122(2):199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisula NL, Meiners SJ (2010) Relative allelopathic potential of invasive plant species in a young disturbed woodland. J Torrey Bot Soc 137(1):81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulette MM, Arthur MA (2012) The impact of the invasive shrub Lonicera maackii on the decomposition dynamics of a native plant community. Ecol Appl 22(2):412–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins PP (1999) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzer SA, Kuzee ME, Bongers F (2005) Disentangling above-and below-ground competition between lianas and trees in a tropical forest. J Ecol 93(6):1115–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silander JA, Klepeis DM (1999) The invasion ecology of Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii) in the New England landscape. Biol Invasions 1:189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1(1):21–32

  • Smith LM, Reynolds HL (2012) Positive plant-soil feedback may drive dominance of a woodland invader Euonymus fortunei. Plant Ecol 213(5):853–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith LL, DiTommaso A, Lehmann J, Greipsson S (2008) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the exotic invasive vine pale swallow-wort (Vincetoxicum rossicum). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1(2):142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson KA, Campbell SA, Powell JR, Wolfe BE, Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Hallett SG, Prati D, Klironomos JN (2006) Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLoS Biol 4(5):727–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland MS, DeVore JL, Maerz JC, Bradford MA (2011) Loss of faster-cycling soil carbon pools following grass invasion across multiple forest sites. Soil Biol Biochem 43(2):452–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner RA, Gange AC (2013) The impact of two non-native plant species on native flora performance: potential implications for habitat restoration. Plant Ecol 214(3):423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trammell TL, Ralston HA, Scroggins SA, Carreiro MM (2012) Foliar production and decomposition rates in urban forests invaded by the exotic invasive shrub Lonicera maackii. Biol Invasions 14(3):529–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilà M, Ibáñez I (2011) Plant invasions in the landscape. Landsc Ecol 26(4):461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warncke D (2011) Recommended test procedures for greenhouse growth media. In: Sims JT, Wolf A (eds) Recommended soil testing procedures for the northeastern United States. Newark (DE). University of Delaware Agricultural Experiment Station. Northeastern Regiolnal Bulletin, Newark

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe BE, Rodgers VL, Stinson KA, Pringle A (2008) The invasive plant Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) inhibits ectomycorrhizal fungi in its introduced range. J Ecol 96(4):777–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanai RD, Arthur MA, Acker M, Levine CR, Park BB (2012) Variation in mass and nutrient concentration of leaf litter across years and sites in a northern hardwood forest. Can J For Res 42(8):1597–1610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The initial funding for this study was made possible by a grant from the University of Connecticut Bamford Fund. This project was funded in part by a USDA-NRI Grant (2008-35615-19014) to JAS. The authors would like to thank Joseph Keller for data collection and plot maintenance, Clint Morse and the University of Connecticut greenhouse staff for assistance in maintenance and watering, and Dawn Pettinelli and the University of Connecticut soils lab staff for assistance with soils analysis. Three anonymous reviewers made suggestions that helped to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Stacey A. Leicht-Young

    Present address: RK&K, 81 Mosher St., Baltimore, MD, USA

  2. Sarah T. Bois

    Present address: Linda Loring Nature Foundation, Nantucket, MA, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Connecticut, 75 North Eagleville Rd, Storrs, CT, USA

    Stacey A. Leicht-Young, Sarah T. Bois & John A. Silander Jr.

Authors
  1. Stacey A. Leicht-Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah T. Bois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John A. Silander Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stacey A. Leicht-Young.

Additional information

Communicated by Martin Nunez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leicht-Young, S.A., Bois, S.T. & Silander, J.A. Impacts of Celastrus-primed soil on common native and invasive woodland species. Plant Ecol 216, 503–516 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-015-0451-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-015-0451-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation