Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamics, diversity, and resource gradient relationships in the herbaceous layer of an old-growth Appalachian forest

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ecological drivers of herbaceous layer composition and diversity in deciduous forests of eastern North America are imperfectly understood. We analyzed the herbaceous layer, across the growing season, in a central Appalachian old-growth forest to examine dynamics, diversity, and relationships to resource gradients. We found clear variation in herb species composition over the growing season. We identified intermingled resource gradients, including soil nutrients, light availability, and topography, that were related to herbaceous composition. We found that herb layer diversity was different among previously identified tree communities, but was not variable over the growing season. We identified a unimodal relationship between diversity and productivity in the herb flora that held throughout the growing season despite changing composition and levels of productivity. Diversity and distributions in the herbaceous community of our study site are linked to a complex of resource gradients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht MA, McCarthy BC (2006) Seed germination and dormancy in the medicinal woodland herbs Collinsonia canadensis L. (Lamiaceae) and Dioscorea villosa L. (Dioscoreaceae). Flora 201:24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht MA, McCarthy BC (2009) Seedling establishment shapes the distribution of shade-adapted forest herbs across a topographical moisture gradient. J Ecol 97:1037–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mufti MM, Sydes CL, Furness SB, Grime JP, Band SR (1977) A quantitative analysis of shoot phenology and dominance in herbaceous vegetation. J Ecol 65:759–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty SW (1984) Influence of microtopography and canopy species on spatial patterns of forest understory plants. Ecology 65:1406–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beers TW, Dress PE, Wensel LC (1966) Aspect transformation in site productivity research. J For 64:691–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierzychudek P (1982) Life histories and demography of shade-tolerant temperate forest herbs: a review. New Phytol 90:757–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boerner REJ (2006) Unraveling the Gordian Knot: interactions among vegetation, topography, and soil properties in the central and southern Appalachians. J Torrey Bot Soc 133:321–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley NL, Leopold AC, Ross J, Huffaker W (1999) Phenological changes reflect climate change in Wisconsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9701–9704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton SP (1976) Resource division in an understory herb community: responses to temporal and microtopographic gradients. Am Nat 110:679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun EL (1937) Some relationships of the flora of the Cumberland Mountains in Kentucky. Rhodora 39:193–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun EL (1940) An ecological transect of Black Mountain, Kentucky. Ecol Monogr 10:195–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun EL (1942) Forests of the Cumberland Mountains. Ecol Monogr 12:413–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun EL (1950) Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Blakiston, Philadelphia 596 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer R (1980) A half-century of changes in the herb layer of a climax deciduous forest in Michigan. J Ecol 68:823–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter MR (1993) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Lewis Publishing, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM (2010) Stochastic community assembly causes higher biodiversity in more productive environments. Science 328:1388–1391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Leibold MA (2002) Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship. Nature 416:427–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clements FE (1916) Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington, DC, 520 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier MH, Vankat JL, Hughes MR (2002) Diminished plant richness and abundance below Lonicera maackii, an invasive shrub. Am Midl Nat 147:60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier CR, Boerner REJ (1984) Correlations of understory herb distribution with microhabitats under different tree species in a mixed mesophytic forest. Oecologia 62:337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino RB, Belanger A, D’Agostino RB Jr (1990) A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. Am Stat 44:316–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy CD, Meier AJ (1992) Do Appalachian herbaceous understories ever recover from clearcutting? Conserv Biol 6:196–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford MF, Odom RH, Hale PE, Chapman BR (2000) Stand-age, stand characteristics, and landform effects on understory herbaceous communities in southern Appalachian cove-hardwoods. Biol Conserv 93:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornara DA, Tilman D (2009) Ecological mechanisms associated with positive diversity–productivity relationship in an N-limited grassland. Ecology 90:408–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frazer GW, Canham CD, Lertzman KP (1999) Gap Light Analyzer (GLA). Imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-color fisheye photographs. Copyright 1999, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York. http://www.ecostudies.org/gla. Last accessed November 3, 2010

  • Gilliam FS (2007) The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. Bioscience 57:845–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam FS, Roberts MR (2003a) The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam FS, Roberts MR (2003b) Interactions between the herbaceous layer and overstory canopy of eastern forests. In: Gilliam FS, Roberts MR (eds) The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason HA (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 53:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goebel PC, Hix DM, Olivero AM (1999) Seasonal ground-flora patterns and site factor relationships of second-growth and old-growth south facing forest ecosystems, southeastern Ohio, USA. Nat Areas J 19:12–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace JB (1999) The factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 2:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks DJ (1980) Intrastand distribution patterns of southern Appalachian cove forest herbaceous species. Am Midl Nat 104:206–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JD (1976) Climate of Kentucky. Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station Progress Report 221, College of Agriculture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY

  • Hintze J (2001) NCSS and PASS. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems, Kaysville, UT

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston M (1979) A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am Nat 113:81–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson TF, Boerner REJ, Iverson LR, Sutherland S, Sutherland EK (1999) Landscape patterns of understory composition and richness across a moisture and nitrogen mineralization gradient in Ohio (U.S.A.) Quercus forests. Plant Ecol 144:177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RL (2005) Plant life of Kentucky: an illustrated guide to the vascular flora. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY

    Google Scholar 

  • Jules ES (1998) Habitat fragmentation and demographic change for a common plant: trillium in old-growth forest. Ecology 79:1645–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liira J, Zobel K (2000) The species richness-biomass relationship in herbaceous plant communities: what difference does the incorporation of root biomass data make? Oikos 91:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin WH (1975) The Lilley Cornett woods: a stable mixed mesophytic forest in Kentucky. Bot Gazette 136:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlack GR (1994) Plant species migration in a mixed-history forest landscape in eastern North America. Ecology 75:1491–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlack GR (2005) Slow plants in a fast forest: local dispersal as a predictor of species frequencies in a dynamic landscape. J Ecol 93:50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy BC (2003) The herbaceous layer of eastern old-growth forests. In: Gilliam FS, Roberts MR (eds) The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–176

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (2006) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 5.0. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan RW, Muller RN (2006) Spatial and temporal dynamics in canopy dominance of an old-growth mixed mesophytic forest. Can J For Res 36:1536–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan RW, Muller RN, Arthur MA, Housman HH (2000) Temporal and ecological patterns of flowering dogwood mortality in the mixed mesophytic forest of eastern Kentucky. J Torrey Bot Soc 127:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan RW, Muller RN, McCarthy BC (2005a) Vegetation–environment relationships among four canopy-layers in an old-growth mixed mesophytic forest. Castanea 70:32–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan RW, Muller RN, Paratley RD, Riccardi CL (2005b) The vascular flora of Big Everidge Hollow, an old-growth mixed mesophytic forest. J Torrey Bot Soc 132:618–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan RW, Brecha RJ, Geiger DR, John GP (2010) Flowering phenology change and climate warming in southwestern Ohio. Plant Ecol 212:55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier AJ, Bratton SP, Duffy DC (1995) Possible ecological mechanisms for loss of vernal-herb diversity in logged Eastern Deciduous Forests. Ecol Appl 5:935–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller RN (1982) Vegetation patterns in the mixed mesophytic forests of eastern Kentucky. Ecology 63:1901–1917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller RN (2003) Nutrient relations of the herbaceous layer in deciduous forest ecosystems. In: Gilliam FS, Roberts MR (eds) The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 15–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller RN, Bormann FH (1976) Role of Erythronium americanum Ker. in energy flow and nutrient dynamics of a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Science 193:1126–1128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J (1996) Is the humped relationship between species richness and biomass an artifact due to plot size? J Ecol 84:293–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapson GL, Thompson K, Hodgson JG (1997) The humped relationship between species richness and biomass—testing its sensitivity to sample quadrat size. J Ecol 85:99–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raunkiaer C (1934) The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Collected papers of C Raunkiaer (translated into English by Carter HG, Tansley AG, Fausboll MS). Clarendon Press, Oxford

  • Ricketts TH, Dinerstein E, Olson DM, Loucks C (1999) Who’s where in North America. Bioscience 49:369–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers RS (1982) Early spring herb communities in mesophytic forests of the Great Lakes Region. Ecology 63:1050–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romme WH, Martin WH (1982) Natural disturbance by tree falls in old growth mixed mesophytic forest: Lilley Cornett Woods, Kentucky. In: Muller RN (ed) Proceedings of the 4th Central Hardwood Forest Conference, 8–10 November 1982, Lexington, KY. University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, pp 367–383

  • Rooney TP, Dress WJ (1997) Species loss over sixty-years in the ground-layer vegetation of Heart’s content, an old-growth forest in Pennsylvania, USA. Nat Areas J 17:297–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster B, Diekmann M (2005) Species richness and environmental correlates in deciduous forest of Northwest Germany. For Ecol Manag 206:197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small CJ, McCarthy BC (2002) Spatial and temporal variation in the response of understory vegetation to disturbance in a central Appalachian oak forest. J Torrey Bot Soc 129:136–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small CJ, McCarthy BC (2005) Relationship of understory diversity to soil nitrogen, topographic variation, and stand age in an eastern oak forest, USA. For Ecol Manag 217:229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1980) Treefalls and colonization patterns of temperate forest herbs. Am Midl Nat 104:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trewartha GT (1968) An introduction to climate, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler G (1989) Interacting effects of soil acidity and canopy cover on the species composition of field-layer vegetation in oak/hornbeam forests. For Ecol Manag 28:104–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellend M, Verheyen K, Jacquemyn H, Kolb A, Calster HV, Peterken G, Hermy M (2006) Extinction dept of forest plants persists for more than a century following habitat fragmentation. Ecology 87:542–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vellend M, Verheyen K, Flinn KM et al (2007) Homogenization of forest plant communities and weakening of species–environment relationships via agricultural land-use. J Ecol 95:565–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whigham DF (2004) Ecology of woodland herbs in temperate deciduous forests. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:583–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney GG, Foster DR (1988) Overstorey composition and age as determinants of the understory flora of woods of central New England. J Ecol 76:867–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1956) Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecol Monogr 26:1–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobel K, Liira J (1997) A scale-independent approach to the richness vs biomass relationship in ground-layer plant communities. Oikos 80:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the University of Kentucky, Department of Forestry, for supporting the initiation of this project. Particular thanks are owed to Robert Paratley, curator of the University of Kentucky Herbarium, who provided taxonomic expertise. We are grateful to Eastern Kentucky University for providing access to the site. In particular, we would like to thank Lilley Cornett Woods site manager Rob Watts, who is a true professional. He helped us out of several jams in the field and was always friendly and helpful. We also thank Rachel Barker, Julia Chapman, Amy Hruska Eryn Moore, Lesley Rigg, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on previous drafts of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan W. McEwan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McEwan, R.W., Muller, R.N. Dynamics, diversity, and resource gradient relationships in the herbaceous layer of an old-growth Appalachian forest. Plant Ecol 212, 1179–1191 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9896-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9896-0

Keywords

Navigation