Skip to main content
Log in

Variations of flower size and reproductive traits in self-incompatible Trollius ranunculoides (Ranunculaceae) among local habitats at Alpine Meadow

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For plants that rely on animals for pollination, the ability to attract the animals to their flowers can be a crucial component of fitness. A large number of studies have documented pollinators to be important selective agents driving the evolution of flower size and correlated traits on a large scale. In this paper, we studied variations of reproductive traits in self-incompatible Trollius ranunculoides (Ranunculaceae) among local habitats at Alpine Meadow. The results showed significant variations of floral size, seed mass per fruit and sex allocation (male/female mass ratio) between different habitats, where floral size and seed mass was not explained fully by variation of plant size among habitats. It suggested that other factors unrelated to plant size might also influence floral variation. However, in our manipulated experiment, it showed no effects of manipulated floral size not only on visit rate of effective pollinators (bees and flies) but also on female success (seed set, seed mass per fruit), irrespective of flower density. Consequently, we could not conclude that the variation of floral size in T. ranunculoides was due to phenotypic plasticity, or natural selection. But if selection occurred, it should not be mediated by pollinators. It was likely that variation of sex allocation between habitats lead to changes of flower or corolla size, because plant invested much less to male function (female-biased sex allocation and larger single seed mass) in shade habitat (bottom of bush) than other exposed habitats, to gain higher fitness. In addition, high-floral density in T. ranunculoides had a negative effect on service of main pollinator (bees) and female success. This situation would influence the strength of selection on floral size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashman TL, Stanton ML (1991) Seasonal variation in pollination dynamics of sexually dimorphic Sidalcea oregana spp. spicata (Malvaceae). Ecology 72:993–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashman TL, Morgan MT (2004) Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context? Proc R Soc Lond Ser B—Biol Sci 271:553–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashman TL (1999) Determinants of sex allocation in a gynodioecious wild strawberry: implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. J Evol Biol 12:648–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell G (1985) On the function of flowers. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B—Biol Sci 224:223–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch M, Waser NM (2001) Experimental manipulation of plant density and its effect on pollination and reproduction of two confamilial montane herbs. Oecologia 126:76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch M, Waser NM (1999) Effects of local density on pollination and reproduction in Delphinium nuttallianum and Aconitum columbianum (Ranunculaceae). Am J Bot 86:871–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR (1989) Measurements of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: variation in male and female reproductive success. Evolution 43:318–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR (1991) Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata. Am Nat 137:713–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR (1996) Evolution of floral characters in a hermaphroditic plant: field measurements of heritability and genetic correlations. Evolution 50:1442–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR, Halama KJ (1993) Resource and pollen limitation to lifetime seed production in a natural population. Ecology 74:1043–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR, Waser NM, Melendez-Ackerman EJ (1997) Analyzing pollinator-mediated selection in a plant hybrid zone: hummingbird visitation patterns on three spatial scales. Am Nat 149:295–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso CM (2000) Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 54:1546–1557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conner JK, Rush S (1996) Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105:509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner JK, Rush S, Jennetten P (1996) Measurements of natural selection on floral traits in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). I. Selection trough lifetime female fitness. Evolution 50:1127–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell JE, Galen C (1991) Frequency-dependent selection and adaptive surfaces for floral character combinations: the pollination of Polemonium viscosum. Am Nat 138:1342–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1877) The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Du GZh, Wang G (1995) Succession and qualitative change of artificial grassland of Gan Nan Sub-Alpine Meadow. Acta Bot Sini 37:306–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart VM (1991) The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evol Ecol 5:370–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galen C (1989) Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric floral traits: bumblebees and the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 43:882–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galen C, Zimmer KA, Newport ME (1987) Pollination in floral scent morphs of Polemonium viscosum a mechanism for disruptive selection on flower size. Evolution 41:599–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galen C (1996) The evolution of floral form: insights from an alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum (Polemoniaceae). In: Lloyd DC, Barrett SCH (eds) Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall. pp 273–291

  • Greimler J, Dobes C (2000) High genetic diversity and differentiation in relict lowland populations of Gentianella austriaca (A and J. Kern.) Holub (Gentianceae). Plant Biol 2:628–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig D, Westoby M (1988) On limits to seed production. Am Nat 131:757–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harder LD, Cruzan MB (1990) An evaluation of the physiological and evolutionary influence of inflorescence size and flower depth on nectar production. Funct Ecol 4:559–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwaizumi MG, Sakai S (2004) Variation in flower biomass among nearby populations of Impatiens textori (Balsaminaceae): effects of population plant densities. Can J Bot 82:563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SE, Delph LF, Elderkin CF (1995) The effect of petal-size manipulation on pollen removal, seed set, and insect behavior in Campanula americana. Oecologia 102:174–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SD, Steiner KE (1997) Long-tongued fly pollination and evolution of floral spur length in the Disa draconis complex (Orchidaccae). Evolution 51:45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner F, Luijten SH, Imbert E, Riba M, Mayol M, González-Martínez SC, Mignot A, Colas B (2005) Effects of local density on insect visitation and fertilization success in the narrow-endemic Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). Oikos 111:130–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollman J, Pflugshaupt K (2001) Flower and fruit characteristics in small and isolated populations of a fleshy-fruited shrub. Plant Biol 14:181–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudo G, Molau U (1999) Variations in reproductive traits at inflorescence and flower levels of an artic legume, Astragalus alpinus L.: comparisons between a subalpine and an alpine population. Plant Species Biol 14:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1997a) Population biology and rarity: on the complexity of density dependence in insect-plant interactions. In: Kunin WE, Gaston KH (eds) The biology of rarity. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 150–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1997b) Population size and density effects in pollination: Pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. J Eco 85:225–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak MM (1987) Pollination and pollen flow disturbed by honeybees in bumblebee-pollinated Rhinanthus populations? In: van Andel J, Bakker JP, Snaydon RW (eds) Disturbance in grasslands. Junk, Dordrecht, pp 273–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence WS (1993) Resource and pollen limitation: plant size-dependent reproductive patterns in Physalis longifolia. Am Nat 141:296–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RJ (1994) Effects of floral traits, pollinator visitation, and plant size on Ipomopsis aggregata fruit production. Am Nat 143:870–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RJ, Shaw RG, Waser NM (1998) Pollinator selection, quantitative genetics, and predicted evolutionary responses of floral traits in Penstemon centranthifolius (Scrophulariaceae). Int J Plant Sci 159:331–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MT, Schoen DJ (1997) Selection on reproductive characters: floral morphology in Ascelpias syriaca. Heredity 79:433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MT, Barrett SCH (1989) Reproductive correlates of mating system variation in Eichhornia paniculata Spreng. Solms (Pontederiaceae). J Evol Biol 2:183–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1992) The measurements of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariance between traits and fitness. Evolution 46:616–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury EJ (1942) The reproductive capacity of plants. G. Belland Sons, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML, Preston RE (1988) Ecological consequences and phenotypic correlates of petal size variation in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 75:528–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML, Snow AA, Handel SN (1986) Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness. Science 232:1625–1627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD (1988) Effects of variation in inflorescence size and floral reward in the visitation rates of traplining pollinators of Aralia hispida. Evol Ecol 2:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Monographs in Population Biology, 26. Princeton University Press

  • Totland Ø (2001) Environment-dependent pollen limitation and selection on floral traits in an alpine species. Ecology 82:2233–2244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totland Ø (2004) No evidence for a role of pollinator discrimination in causing selection on flower size through female reproduction. Oikos 106:558–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totland Ø, Andersen HL, Bjelland T, Dahl V, Eide W, Houge S, Pedersen TR, Vie EU (1998) Variation in pollen limitation among plants and phenotypic selection on floral traits in an early-spring flowering herb. Oikos 82:491–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totland Ø, Eide W (1999) Environmentally-dependent pollen limitation on seed production in alpine Ranunculus acris. Ecoscience 6:173–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Totland Ø, Matthews I (1998) Determinants of pollinator activity and flower preference in the early spring flowering Crocus vernus. Acta Oecol 19:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM (1983) The adaptive nature of floral traits: ideas and evidence. In: Real L (ed) Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 241–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JL, Conner JK (2001) Sources of phenotypic variation in floral traits in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 88:1577–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson P, Thomson JD, Stanton ML (1994) Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination success. Am Nat 143:283–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worley AC, Barrett SCH (2000) Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): direct and correlated responses to selection on flower size and number. Evolution 54:1533–1545

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young HJ, Stanton ML (1990) Influence of floral variation on pollen removal and seed production in wild radish. Ecology 71:536–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z, Du G (2003) Mating system characters and the strategies of resource allocation in Ranunculaceae. J Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences) 39:70–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z, Du G, Zhou XH, Wang MT, Ren QJ (2006) Variations with altitude in reproductive traits and resource allocation of three Tibetan species of Ranunculaceae. Aus J Bot 54:691–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M, Pyke GH (1988) Reproduction in Polemonium: assessing the factors limiting seed set. Am Nat 131:723–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Men Jinliu and Fan Baoli for helps in the field and lab. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. This project was funded by a State key project for natural science foundation (90202009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guozhen Du.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, Z., He, Y., Wang, M. et al. Variations of flower size and reproductive traits in self-incompatible Trollius ranunculoides (Ranunculaceae) among local habitats at Alpine Meadow. Plant Ecol 193, 241–251 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9262-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9262-9

Keywords

Navigation