Skip to main content
Log in

The ideal position of the peritoneal dialysis catheter is not always ideal

  • Nephrology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Peritoneal catheter dysfunction is a frequent complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Traditionally, dysfunction has been attributed to catheter malposition, but whether the location of the catheter tip in the small pelvis really determines proper function is unclear.

Methods

We reviewed 900 abdominal X-ray images of PD patients from a 7-year period in two PD units that use different catheter types (straight and Swan Neck Curled).

Results

In 52% of the images, the dialysis catheter tip was located in the ideal position in the small pelvis and in 48% in other sites. Peritoneal catheter function was normal at the time of imaging in 87% of those with ideal catheter tip position, and in 74% of those with other than ideal position. The tip was located in small pelvis in 35% of images performed during catheter dysfunction and in 56% of those performed during normal catheter function. There were no differences between two catheter types. The positive predictive value of abdominal X-ray images to predict catheter function was 26%, and the negative predictive value 87%. We also found a significant positive correlation between polycystic kidney disease and normal catheter function. In contrast, obese patients were more likely to have catheter malfunction. Previous abdominal surgery was not associated with catheter dysfunction.

Conclusion

Our data showed a higher probability of normal function of peritoneal catheters whose tips were located in the small pelvis. However, also malpositioned catheters generally functioned well, and malpositioning of the PD catheter did not in itself explain its malfunction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. George N, Alexander S, David VG, Basu G, Mohapatra A, Valson AT, Jacob S, Pathak HK, Devasia A, Tamilarasi V, Varughese S (2016) Comparison of early mechanical and infective complications in first time blind, bedside, midline percutaneous Tenckhoff catheter insertion with ultra-short break-in period in diabetics and non-diabetics: setting new standards. Perit Dial Int 36(6):655–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim JE, Park SJ, Oh JY, Kim JH, Lee JS, Kim PK, Shin JI (2015) Noninfectious complications of peritoneal dialysis in Korean children: a 26-year single-center study. Yonsei Med J 56(5):1359–1364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ouyang CJ, Huang FX, Yang QQ, Jiang ZP, Chen W, Qiu Y, Yu XQ (2015) Comparing the incidence of catheter-related complications with straight and coiled Tenckhoff catheters in peritoneal dialysis patients—a single-center prospective randomized trial. Perit Dial Int 35(4):443–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Krezalek MA, Bonamici N, Lapin B, Carbray J, Velasco J, Denham W, Linn J, Ujiki M, Haggerty SP (2016) Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using rectus sheath tunnel and selective omentopexy significantly reduces catheter dysfunction and increases peritoneal dialysis longevity. Surgery 160(4):924–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Diaz-Buxo JA (1998) Management of peritoneal catheter malfunction. Perit Dial Int 18:256–259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saka Y, Ito Y, Iida Y, Maruyama S, Matsuo S (2015) Efficacy and safety of fluoroscopic manipulation using the alpha-replacer for peritoneal catheter malposition. Clin Exp Nephrol 19(3):521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shen Q, Jiang X, Shen X, Fangyan Y, Tu Q, Chen W, Ye Q, Behera TR, He Q (2017) Modified laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter with intra-abdominal fixation. Int Urol Nephrol 49(8):1481–1488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lei L, Jielong J, Peng W, Wei R, Zhao H (2015) Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in the right lower quadrant is associated with a lower risk of catheter tip migration: a retrospective single-center study. Int Urol Nephrol 47(3):557–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scanziani R, Pozzi M, Pisano L, Santagostin GB, Dozio B, Rovere G, Gabella P (2006) Imaging work-up for peritoneal access care and peritoneal dialysis complications. Int J Artif Organs 29(1):142–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Joffe P, Christensen AL, Jensen C (1991) Intra-abdominal location of peritoneal catheters during CAPD. Adv Perit Dial 7:214–217

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diaz-Buxo J (1991) Mechanical complications of chronic peritoneal dialysis catheters. Semin Dial 4:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reddy YS, Manjusha Y, Kishore CK, Sridhar N, Sriramnaveen P, Sivakumar V (2012) Spontaneous cure of migrated peritoneal catheter. Perit Dial Int 32(1):107–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Twardowski ZI (1990) Malposition and poor drainage of peritoneal catheters. Semin Dial 3:57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Qayyum A, Yang L, Fan SL (2015) Optimizing peritoneal dialysis catheter placement by lateral abdomen X-ray. Perit Dial Int 35(7):760–762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bammens B, Peeters D, Jaekers J, Claes KJ, Evenepoel P, Kuypers D, Meijers B, Naesens M, Vanrenterghem Y, Monbaliu D (2014) Abdominal X-ray predicts functional PD catheter problems. Kidney Int 86(5):1001–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Janeiro D, Portolés J, Tato AM, López-Sánchez P, Del Peso G, Rivera M, Castellano I, Fernández-Reyes MJ, Pérez-Gómez V, Ortega M, Martínez-Miguel P, Felipe C, Caparrós G, Ortiz A, Selgas R, Grupo Centro de Diálisis Peritoneal (GCDP) (2015) Peritoneal dialysis can be an option for dominant polycystic kidney disease: an observational study. Perit Dial Int 35(5):530–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang JY, Chen L, Chao CT, Peng YS, Chiang CK, Kao TW, KL, Wu HY, Huang JW, Hung KY (2015) Outcome comparisons between patients on peritoneal dialysis with and without polycystic kidney disease: a nationwide matched cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(48):e2166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li L, Szeto CC, Kwan BC, Chow KM, Leung CB, Kam-Tao Li P (2011) Peritoneal dialysis as the first-line renal replacement therapy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 57(6):903–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lobbedez T, Touam M, Evans D, Ryckelynck JP, Knebelman B, Verger C (2011) Peritoneal dialysis in polycystic kidney disease patients. Report from the French peritoneal dialysis registry (RDPLF).Nephrol Dial Transplant 26(7):2332–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krezalek MA, Bonamici N, Kuchta K, Lapin B, Carbray J, Denham W, Linn J, Ujiki M, Haggerty SP (2018) Peritoneal dialysis catheter function and survival are not adversely affected by obesity regardless of the operative technique used. Surg Endosc 32(4):1714–1723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sakaci T, Ahbap E, Basturk T, Koc Y, Kara E, Sevinc M, Ucar Z, Caglayan F, Kayalar A, Sahutoglu T, Akgul C, Sinangil Y, Unsal A (2016) Does body mass index affect survival and technique failure in patients undergoing peritonealdialysis? Minerva Urol Nefrol 68(3):302–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chuengsaman P, Panomrerngsak A, Sriudom K (2011) Does previous abdominal operation affect peritoneal dialysis complications and outcomes? J Med Assoc Thai 94 Suppl4:S64–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Keshvari A, Fazeli MS, Meysamie A, Seifi S, Taromloo MK (2010) The effects of previous abdominal operations and intraperitoneal adhesions on the outcome of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Perit Dial Int 30(1):41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiana Tanasiychuk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was done in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanasiychuk, T., Selgas, R., Kushnir, D. et al. The ideal position of the peritoneal dialysis catheter is not always ideal. Int Urol Nephrol 51, 1867–1872 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02177-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02177-3

Keywords

Navigation