Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the clinical outcomes with a Chinese single-use fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope (YouCare Tech) from a prospective database.
Materials and methods
A prospective study was conducted in a single center in China between January 2016 and October 2017. All consecutive patients who underwent flexible ureteroscopy performed by YouCare flexible ureteroscope were analyzed. Patients’ demographics, clinical characteristics, intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, and stone-free rate were evaluated and recorded. Stone-free status was defined as no visible stones or clinically insignificant residual stones < 2 mm on a postoperative image study.
Results
A total of 684 procedures were performed for 653 patients (31 patients had bilateral stones). A double J stent had been previously placed in 431 patients. The location of the calculi was upper calyx, middle calyx, lower calyx, and renal pelvis and proximal ureter in 74, 101, 211, 115, and 183 patients, respectively. The median operative time was 52 min. The postoperative stone-free rate for the first 2 weeks after surgery was 78.5%, which increased to 91.1% at the first month. The overall stone-free rate was 95.2%. The complication rate was minor and short-term, such as gross hematuria or flank pain.
Conclusion
YouCare flexible ureteroscope can be considered effective and safe in the treatment of both upper ureteral and renal stones in selected patients. Further evaluation of comparison with other FURS’s surgical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis will help to present the best utility of this single-use FURS in clinical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Marshall VF (1964) Fiber optics in urology. J Urol 91:110–114
Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Straub M, Seitz C. Guidelines on urolithiasis, 2012 update. Arnhem: European Association of Urology. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/20_Urolithiasis_LR%20March %2013%202012.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2013
Wen J, Xu G, Du C, Wang B (2016) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Surg 28:22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.056
Yu X, Yang H, Cui L, Li C, Peng E, Wu B, Guo X, Chen Z, Liu J, Ye Z, Wang S (2017) Clinical applications of domestic modular flexible ureteroscope for the treatment of kidney stones. J Minim Invasive Urol 6(2):89–92
Landman J, Lee DI, Lee C, Monga M (2003) Evaluation of over-all costs of currently available small flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 62(2):218–222
Kramolowsky E, McDowell Z, Moore B, Booth B, Wood N (2016) Cost analysis of flexible ureteroscope repairs: evaluation of 655 procedures in a community-based practice. J Endourol 30(3):254–256
Bryniarski P, Paradysz A, Zyczkowski M, Kupilas A, Nowakowski K, Bogacki R (2012) A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter. J Endourol/Endourol Soc 26(1):52–57
Martin CJ, McAdams SB, Abdul-Muhsin H, Lim VM, Nunez-Nateras R, Tyson MD, Humphreys MR (2017) The economic implications of a reusable flexible digital ureteroscope: a cost-benefit analysis. J Urol 197(3 Pt 1):730–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.085
Semins MJ, George S, Allaf ME et al (2009) Ureteroscope cleaning and sterilization by the urology operating room team: the effect on repair costs. J Endourol 23:903–905
Bagley DH (1987) Flexible ureteropyeloscopy with modular, “disposable” endoscope. Urology 29(3):296–300
Boylu U, Oommen M, Thomas R, Lee BR (2009) In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. J Urol 182(5):2347–2351
Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, Schlenker B, Tilki D, Hocaoglu Y, Sroka R, Stief CG, Reich O (2010) The polyscope: a modular design, semidisposable flexible ureterorenoscope system. J Endourol 24(7):1061–1066
Bansal H, Swain S, Sharma GK, Mathanya M, Trivedi S, Dwivedi US, Singh PB (2011) Polyscope: a new era in flexible ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol 25(2):317–321
Hu H, Lu Y, He D, Cui L, Zhang J, Zhao Z, Qin B, Wang Y, Lin F, Wang S (2016) Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly. Urolithiasis 44(5):427–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0854-5
Tom WR, Wollin DA, Jiang R, Radvak D, Simmons WN, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME (2017) Next-generation single-use ureteroscopes: an in vitro comparison. J Endourol 31(12):1301–1306. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0447
Lusch A, Abdelshehid C, Hidas G et al (2013) In vitro and in vivo comparison of optics and performance of a distal sensor ureteroscope versus a standard fiberoptic ureteroscope. J Endourol 27:896–902
Somani BK, Al-Qahtani SM, de Medina SD et al (2013) Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope. Urology 82:1017–1019
Defidio L, De Dominicis M, Di Gianfrancesco L et al (2012) Improving flexible ureterorenoscope durability up to 100 procedures. J Endourol 26:1329–1334
Traxer O, Dubosq F, Jamali K et al (2006) New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones. Urology 68:276–281
Miernik A, Wilhelm K, Ardelt PU, Adams F, Kuehhas FE, Schoenthaler M (2012) Standardized flexible ureteroscopic technique to improve stone-free rates. Urology 80(6):1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.042
Ding J, Xu D, Cao Q, Huang T, Zhu Y, Huang K, Chen Y, Liang C, Qi J, Huang Y (2015) Comparing the efficacy of a multimodular flexible ureteroscope with its conventional counterpart in the management of renal stones. Urology 86(2):224–229
Liu DY, He HC, Wang J, Tang Q, Zhou YF, Wang MW, Chu CL, Zhang CY, Zhu Y, Zhou WL, Shen ZJ (2012) Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using holmium laser for 187 patients with proximal ureteral stones. Chin Med J 125(9):1542–1546
Berardinelli F, De Francesco P, Marchioni M, Cera N, Proietti S, Hennessey D, Dalpiaz O, Cracco C, Scoffone C, Schips L, Giusti G, Cindolo L (2016) Infective complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery: a new standardized classification system. Int Urol Nephrol 48(11):1757–1762
Traxer O, Thomas A (2013) Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol 189:580
Delvecchio F, Auge B, Brizuela R et al (2003) Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath. Urology 61(3):518
Seklehner S, Sievert KD, Lee R, Engelhardt PF, Riedl C, Kunit T (2017) A cost analysis of stenting in uncomplicated semirigid ureteroscopic stone removal. Int Urol Nephrol 49(5):753–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1538-6
Geavlete P, Seyed Aghamiri SA, Multescu R (2006) Retrograde flexible ureteroscopic approach for pyelocaliceal calculi. Urol J 3(1):15–19; discussion 19
Pan J, Xue W, Xia L, Zhong H, Zhu Y, Du Z, Chen Q, Huang Y (2014) Ureteroscopic lithotripsy in Trendelenburg position for proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized, comparative study. Int Urol Nephrol 46(10):1895–1901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0732-z
Doizi S, Kamphuis G, Giusti G, Andreassen KH, Knoll T, Osther PJ, Scoffone C, Perez-Fentes D, Proietti S, Wiseman O, de la Rosette J (2017) First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study. World J Urol 35(5):809–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1936-x
Acknowledgements
We thank Engineer Pengming Li for his generous help in technological guidance and introduction. This work has not been published in any other journal or publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors state that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, F., Yang, Y., Chen, H. et al. The application of a single-use fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope for the management of upper urinary calculi. Int Urol Nephrol 50, 1235–1241 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1895-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1895-9