Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The application of a single-use fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope for the management of upper urinary calculi

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the clinical outcomes with a Chinese single-use fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope (YouCare Tech) from a prospective database.

Materials and methods

A prospective study was conducted in a single center in China between January 2016 and October 2017. All consecutive patients who underwent flexible ureteroscopy performed by YouCare flexible ureteroscope were analyzed. Patients’ demographics, clinical characteristics, intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, and stone-free rate were evaluated and recorded. Stone-free status was defined as no visible stones or clinically insignificant residual stones < 2 mm on a postoperative image study.

Results

A total of 684 procedures were performed for 653 patients (31 patients had bilateral stones). A double J stent had been previously placed in 431 patients. The location of the calculi was upper calyx, middle calyx, lower calyx, and renal pelvis and proximal ureter in 74, 101, 211, 115, and 183 patients, respectively. The median operative time was 52 min. The postoperative stone-free rate for the first 2 weeks after surgery was 78.5%, which increased to 91.1% at the first month. The overall stone-free rate was 95.2%. The complication rate was minor and short-term, such as gross hematuria or flank pain.

Conclusion

YouCare flexible ureteroscope can be considered effective and safe in the treatment of both upper ureteral and renal stones in selected patients. Further evaluation of comparison with other FURS’s surgical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis will help to present the best utility of this single-use FURS in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marshall VF (1964) Fiber optics in urology. J Urol 91:110–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Straub M, Seitz C. Guidelines on urolithiasis, 2012 update. Arnhem: European Association of Urology. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/20_Urolithiasis_LR%20March %2013%202012.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2013

  3. Wen J, Xu G, Du C, Wang B (2016) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Surg 28:22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu X, Yang H, Cui L, Li C, Peng E, Wu B, Guo X, Chen Z, Liu J, Ye Z, Wang S (2017) Clinical applications of domestic modular flexible ureteroscope for the treatment of kidney stones. J Minim Invasive Urol 6(2):89–92

    Google Scholar 

  5. Landman J, Lee DI, Lee C, Monga M (2003) Evaluation of over-all costs of currently available small flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 62(2):218–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kramolowsky E, McDowell Z, Moore B, Booth B, Wood N (2016) Cost analysis of flexible ureteroscope repairs: evaluation of 655 procedures in a community-based practice. J Endourol 30(3):254–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bryniarski P, Paradysz A, Zyczkowski M, Kupilas A, Nowakowski K, Bogacki R (2012) A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter. J Endourol/Endourol Soc 26(1):52–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin CJ, McAdams SB, Abdul-Muhsin H, Lim VM, Nunez-Nateras R, Tyson MD, Humphreys MR (2017) The economic implications of a reusable flexible digital ureteroscope: a cost-benefit analysis. J Urol 197(3 Pt 1):730–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Semins MJ, George S, Allaf ME et al (2009) Ureteroscope cleaning and sterilization by the urology operating room team: the effect on repair costs. J Endourol 23:903–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bagley DH (1987) Flexible ureteropyeloscopy with modular, “disposable” endoscope. Urology 29(3):296–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Boylu U, Oommen M, Thomas R, Lee BR (2009) In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. J Urol 182(5):2347–2351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, Schlenker B, Tilki D, Hocaoglu Y, Sroka R, Stief CG, Reich O (2010) The polyscope: a modular design, semidisposable flexible ureterorenoscope system. J Endourol 24(7):1061–1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bansal H, Swain S, Sharma GK, Mathanya M, Trivedi S, Dwivedi US, Singh PB (2011) Polyscope: a new era in flexible ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol 25(2):317–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu H, Lu Y, He D, Cui L, Zhang J, Zhao Z, Qin B, Wang Y, Lin F, Wang S (2016) Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly. Urolithiasis 44(5):427–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0854-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tom WR, Wollin DA, Jiang R, Radvak D, Simmons WN, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME (2017) Next-generation single-use ureteroscopes: an in vitro comparison. J Endourol 31(12):1301–1306. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lusch A, Abdelshehid C, Hidas G et al (2013) In vitro and in vivo comparison of optics and performance of a distal sensor ureteroscope versus a standard fiberoptic ureteroscope. J Endourol 27:896–902

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Somani BK, Al-Qahtani SM, de Medina SD et al (2013) Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope. Urology 82:1017–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Defidio L, De Dominicis M, Di Gianfrancesco L et al (2012) Improving flexible ureterorenoscope durability up to 100 procedures. J Endourol 26:1329–1334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Traxer O, Dubosq F, Jamali K et al (2006) New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones. Urology 68:276–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miernik A, Wilhelm K, Ardelt PU, Adams F, Kuehhas FE, Schoenthaler M (2012) Standardized flexible ureteroscopic technique to improve stone-free rates. Urology 80(6):1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ding J, Xu D, Cao Q, Huang T, Zhu Y, Huang K, Chen Y, Liang C, Qi J, Huang Y (2015) Comparing the efficacy of a multimodular flexible ureteroscope with its conventional counterpart in the management of renal stones. Urology 86(2):224–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu DY, He HC, Wang J, Tang Q, Zhou YF, Wang MW, Chu CL, Zhang CY, Zhu Y, Zhou WL, Shen ZJ (2012) Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using holmium laser for 187 patients with proximal ureteral stones. Chin Med J 125(9):1542–1546

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Berardinelli F, De Francesco P, Marchioni M, Cera N, Proietti S, Hennessey D, Dalpiaz O, Cracco C, Scoffone C, Schips L, Giusti G, Cindolo L (2016) Infective complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery: a new standardized classification system. Int Urol Nephrol 48(11):1757–1762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Traxer O, Thomas A (2013) Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol 189:580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Delvecchio F, Auge B, Brizuela R et al (2003) Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath. Urology 61(3):518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Seklehner S, Sievert KD, Lee R, Engelhardt PF, Riedl C, Kunit T (2017) A cost analysis of stenting in uncomplicated semirigid ureteroscopic stone removal. Int Urol Nephrol 49(5):753–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1538-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Geavlete P, Seyed Aghamiri SA, Multescu R (2006) Retrograde flexible ureteroscopic approach for pyelocaliceal calculi. Urol J 3(1):15–19; discussion 19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pan J, Xue W, Xia L, Zhong H, Zhu Y, Du Z, Chen Q, Huang Y (2014) Ureteroscopic lithotripsy in Trendelenburg position for proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized, comparative study. Int Urol Nephrol 46(10):1895–1901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0732-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Doizi S, Kamphuis G, Giusti G, Andreassen KH, Knoll T, Osther PJ, Scoffone C, Perez-Fentes D, Proietti S, Wiseman O, de la Rosette J (2017) First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study. World J Urol 35(5):809–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1936-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Engineer Pengming Li for his generous help in technological guidance and introduction. This work has not been published in any other journal or publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhiliang Weng or Hui Xie.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors state that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, F., Yang, Y., Chen, H. et al. The application of a single-use fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope for the management of upper urinary calculi. Int Urol Nephrol 50, 1235–1241 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1895-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1895-9

Keywords

Navigation