Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical factors associated with shock in bacteremic UTI

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Urinary tract infection (UTI) often causes bacteremia, resulting in shock. The purpose of this study is to investigate urological bacteremia and bacteremia shock cases and seek for the clinical factors associated with urological bacteremic shock.

Methods

Seventy consecutive cases with bacteremia caused by UTI from the Department of Urology, Kobe University Hospital were studied. These cases were diagnosed from 2000 to 2010 and had full data available for analysis. We investigated the potential clinical factors associated with bacteremic shock (systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg with UTI), including: (1) the number of basal general diseases (such as diabetes, malignancy, immune diseases, heart diseases, liver diseases, and kidney diseases), (2) causative bacteria, (3) antibiotics and therapeutic intervention, (4) gram-negative bacteria, (5) resistance to imipenem (which is often used in this infection), and (6) serum white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein (CRP) at the time of diagnosis of bacteremic UTI.

Results

A total of 81 causative bacteria were isolated: 42 cases were gram-negative and 39 were gram-positive bacteria. In detail, Escherichia coli was the most common, followed by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The comparison data revealed that urological bacteremic shock cases had significantly increased CRP (p < 0.001). Our univariate analyses showed indwelling urinary tract catheters (p = 0.02) as a significant clinical factor associated with urological bacteremic shock and multivariate analyses showed that the presence of indwelling urinary tract catheters before UTI was a significant clinical factor associated with urological bacteremic shock (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Indwelling urinary catheters before UTI and high CRP were clinical factors associated with urological bacteremic shock. This result should be considered during decision-making for UTI treatments in high risk cases or urological bacteremia cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bader MS, Hawboldt J, Brooks A (2010) Management of complicated urinary tract infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance. Postgrad Med 122:7–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsumoto T (2001) Urinary tract infections in the elderly. Curr Urol Rep 2:330–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ronald A (2003) The etiology of urinary tract infection: traditional and emerging pathogens. Dis Mon 49:71–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heyns CF (2012) Urinary tract infection associated with conditions causing urinary tract obstruction and stasis, excluding urolithiasis and neuropathic bladder. World J Urol 30:77–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown PD (2010) Management of urinary tract infections associated with nephrolithiasis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 12:450–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Geerlings SE (2008) Urinary tract infections in patients with diabetes mellitus: epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment. Int J Antimicrob Agents 31:S54–S57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Geerlings SE, Stolk RP, Camps MJ et al (2000) Asymptomatic bacteriuria may be considered a complication in women with diabetes. Diabetes Mellitus Women Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Utrecht Study Group. Diabetes Care 23:744–749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lever A, Mackenzie I (2007) Sepsis: definition, epidemiology, and diagnosis. BMJ 335:879–883

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shubin H, Weil MH (1976) Bacterial shock. JAMA 235:421–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A et al (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septicshock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 39:165–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008) Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard 8th edition. Document M07-A8 CLSI, Wayne, PA

  12. YokooA Kumamoto Y, Hirose T (1994) Study on intractable factors in urinary tract infections–multiple regression analysis. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 68:905–915

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nicolle LE (2008) Short-term therapy for urinary tract infection: success and failure. Int J Antimicrob Agents 31:S40–S45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shigemura K, Arakawa S, Tanaka K et al (2009) Clinical investigation of isolated bacteria from urinary tracts of hospitalized patients and their susceptibilities to antibiotics. J Infect Chemother 15:18–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wagenlehner FM, Pilatz A, Weidner W (2011) Urosepsis–from the view of the urologist. Int J Antimicrob Agents 38:S51–S57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hori J, Yamaguchi S, Watanabe M et al (2008) Clinical investigation of extracorporeal endotoxin adsorption therapy in septic urinary tract infections. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 99:578–583

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guzmàn CA, Pruzzo C, LiPira G et al (1989) Role of adherence in pathogenesis of Enterococcus faecalis urinary tract infection and endocarditis. Infect Immun 57:1834–1838

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tabibian JH, Gornbein J, Heidari A et al (2008) Uropathogens and host characteristics. J Clin Microbiol 46:3980–3986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Farajnia S, Alikhani MY, Ghotaslou R et al (2009) Causative agents and antimicrobial susceptibilities of urinary tract infections in the northwest of Iran. Int J Infect Dis 13:140–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Campillo B, Dupeyron C, Richardet JP (2001) Epidemiology of hospital-acquired infections in cirrhotic patients: effect of carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and influence of previous antibiotic therapy and norfloxacin prophylaxis. Epidemiol Infect 127:443–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wagenlehner FM, Pilatz A, Naber KG et al (2008) Anti-infective treatment of bacterial urinary tract infections. Curr Med Chem 15:1412–1427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Amano T, Matsui F, Takashima H et al (2003) Analysis of patients with septic shock due to urosepsis brought on by ureteral calculi. Hinyokika Kiyo 49:1–4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Savas L, Guvel S, Onlen Y et al (2006) Nosocomial urinary tract infections: micro-organisms, antibiotic sensitivities and risk factors. West Indian Med J 55:188–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ludwig E (2008) Urinary tract infections in diabetes mellitus. Orv Hertil 149:597–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Houdouin V, Bonacorsi S, Bidet P et al (2006) Phylogenetic background and carriage of pathogenicity island-like domains in relation to antibiotic resistance profiles among Escherichia coli urosepsis isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 58:748–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tambyah PA, Oon J (2012) Catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis 25:365–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Fukashi Yamamichi for drafting the manuscript and Yuzo Nakano for data analysis.

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsumi Shigemura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shigemura, K., Tanaka, K., Osawa, K. et al. Clinical factors associated with shock in bacteremic UTI. Int Urol Nephrol 45, 653–657 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0449-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0449-4

Keywords

Navigation