Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the bacterial distribution within the biofilm by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis in the rat model of urinary catheters

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Most nosocomial urinary tract infections are related to urinary catheters and their biofilm. For the research in this province, animal models are needed to explain the host–pathogen interactions and have an advantage in controlling external interference. This study investigated the validity of the denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) technique for identification of bacteria in a rat model of urinary catheter biofilm.

Methods

After cutting with aseptic technique, the 24-gauge polyurethane IV catheter was placed in the female rat bladder through the urethra. The catheters were kept in the bladder for 2, 4, or 6 weeks for each group. The genomic DNA was isolated from harvested biofilm of the extracted catheter, and DGGE was performed. The band patterns of DGGE results were analysed, and the sequences were compared using the BLAST from the NCBI.

Results

The results show that Pseudomonas aerusinosa, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus spp., and Corynebacterium sp. were the dominant bacterial species, regardless of the indwelling periods, and other species of bacteria, including Burkholderia and Achromobacter, were identified. The changes in bacterial distribution for the different indwelling periods were non-specific.

Conclusions

This study using rat model of urinary catheter suggests that DGGE is a useful method in the analysis of the bacterial community in biofilms. Molecular techniques, including DGGE, are valuable to identify fastidious bacteria in the urinary catheter biofilm. This study may be used as fundamental data for studies involving human materials hereafter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rebmann T, Greene LR (2010) Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: an executive summary of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Elimination guide. Am J Infect Control 38:644–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trautner BW, Hull RA, Darouiche RO (2005) Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis 18:37–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morris NS, Stickler DJ, McLean RJ (1999) The development of bacterial biofilms on indwelling urethral catheters. World J Urol 17:345–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Trevors JT (2011) Viable but non-culturable (VBNC) bacteria: gene expression in planktonic and biofilm cells. J Microbiol Methods 86:266–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI (2006) Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 444:1022–1023

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Paster BJ, Boches SK, Galvin JL, Ericson RE, Lau CN, Levanos VA et al (2001) Bacterial diversity in human subgingival plaque. J Bacteriol 183:3770–3783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McCartney AL (2002) Application of molecular biological methods for studying probiotics and the gut flora. Br J Nutr 88(Suppl 1):S29–S37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson DE, Lockatell CV, Hall-Craggs M, Warren JW (1991) Mouse models of short- and long-term foreign body in the urinary bladder: analogies to the bladder segment of urinary catheters. Lab Anim Sci 41:451–455

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Krane LS, Gorbachinsky I, Sirintrapun J, Yoo JJ, Atala A, Hodges SJ (2011) Halofuginone-coated urethral catheters prevent periurethral spongiofibrosis in a rat model of urethral injury. J Endourol 25:107–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishii K, Fukui M, Takii S (2000) Microbial succession during a composting process as evaluated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis. J Appl Microbiol 89:768–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH (1995) Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev 59:143–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Edwards C (2000) Problems posed by natural environments for monitoring microorganisms. Mol Biotechnol 15:211–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rovery C, Greub G, Lepidi H, Casalta JP, Habib G, Collart F et al (2005) PCR detection of bacteria on cardiac valves of patients with treated bacterial endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 43:163–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cherkaoui A, Emonet S, Ceroni D, Candolfi B, Hibbs J, Francois P et al (2009) Development and validation of a modified broad-range 16S rDNA PCR for diagnostic purposes in clinical microbiology. J Microbiol Methods 79:227–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kassem II, Esseili MA, Sigler V (2011) Detection and differentiation of staphylococcal contamination of clinical surfaces using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. J Hosp Infect 78:187–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Farnleitner AH, Zibuschka F, Burtscher MM, Lindner G, Reischer G, Mach RL (2004) Eubacterial 16S-rDNA amplicon profiling: a rapid technique for comparison and differentiation of heterotrophic plate count communities from drinking water. Int J Food Microbiol 92:333–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Linder LE, Curelaru I, Gustavsson B, Hansson HA, Stenqvist O, Wojciechowski J (1984) Material thrombogenicity in central venous catheterization: a comparison between soft, antebrachial catheters of silicone elastomer and polyurethane. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 8:399–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sherertz RJ, Carruth WA, Marosok RD, Espeland MA, Johnson RA, Solomon DD (1995) Contribution of vascular catheter material to the pathogenesis of infection: the enhanced risk of silicone in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 29:635–645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marosok R, Washburn R, Indorf A, Solomon D, Sherertz R (1996) Contribution of vascular catheter material to the pathogenesis of infection: depletion of complement by silicone elastomer in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 30:245–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Martinez–Martinez L, Pascual A, Perea EJ (1990) Effect of three plastic catheters on survival and growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Hosp Infect 16:311–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Doyle B, Mawji Z, Horgan M, Stillman P, Rinehart A, Bailey J et al (2001) Decreasing nosocomial urinary tract infection in a large academic community hospital. Lippincotts Case Manag 6:127–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Puri J, Mishra B, Mal A, Murthy NS, Thakur A, Dogra V et al (2002) Catheter associated urinary tract infections in neurology and neurosurgical units. J Infect 44:171–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bouza E, San Juan R, Munoz P, Voss A, Kluytmans J (2001) A European perspective on nosocomial urinary tract infections II. Report on incidence, clinical characteristics and outcome (ESGNI-004 study). European Study Group on Nosocomial Infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 7:532–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wade WG (2011) Has the use of molecular methods for the characterization of the human oral microbiome changed our understanding of the role of bacteria in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease? J Clin Periodontol 38(Suppl 11):7–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cairns S, Thomas JG, Hooper SJ, Wise MP, Frost PJ, Wilson MJ et al (2011) Molecular analysis of microbial communities in endotracheal tube biofilms. PLoS ONE 6:e14759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Riggio MP, Dempsey KE, Lennon A, Allan D, Ramage G, Bagg J (2010) Molecular detection of transcriptionally active bacteria from failed prosthetic hip joints removed during revision arthroplasty. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29:823–834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of Yuhan Corp. and the St. Vincent’s Hospital Research Institute of Medical Science. This study was made possible through the contributions of the research coordinator, Seung June Noh.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Hyun Cho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choe, HS., Kim, HJ., Lee, SJ. et al. Evaluation of the bacterial distribution within the biofilm by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis in the rat model of urinary catheters. Int Urol Nephrol 45, 743–748 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0430-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0430-2

Keywords

Navigation