Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mainstreaming urban ecosystem services: A national survey of municipal foresters

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Researchers and advocates are calling for ecosystem services management to advance from theory to implementation. To do so, they argue, requires two things: information on the science and practice ecosystem services management to be more widely developed and distributed, and support for ecosystem services management be incorporated into decision-making. These changes require adding to urban ecology an understanding of the political and information relationships supporting work in this field. To gain insight into these relationships I surveyed the national membership of the Society for Municipal Arborists about their efforts in managing municipal green space to produce ecosystem services. A significant percentage of respondents reported their organizations currently engaged in managing green space assets to produce ecosystem services and predicted such activities would increase over time. Foresters noted they relied on public and informal peer relationships as primary information sources in these efforts and reported little interface with private sector entities, viewing the latter, rather as most likely to constrain their efforts to enhance the production of ecosystem services. While foresters noted that they sought information from public and academic sources, the foresters themselves were less frequently sought out for their expertise. Respondents, however, foresaw becoming engaged in more reciprocal relationships around information exchange. The private sector’s absence in these relationships suggests insufficient legal and regulatory structures necessary to support private engagement in the growing demand for urban ecosystem services. The broad base of local grassroots and public support, however, suggest the emergence of constituencies that could lay the basis for new coalitions to advance green infrastructure and its related ecosystem services into the mainstream of municipal resource management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amati M, Taylor L (2010) From green belts to green infrastructure. Plan Pract Res 25(2):143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Planning Association (2009) Planning the urban forest: ecology, economy and community development. American Planning Association, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • American Public Works Association (2006) APWA Washington report: urban forestry–APWA joins Sustainable Urban Forests Coalition. http://www2.apwa.net/documents/Advocacy/WashingtonReport/wash-report_062006.pdf . Accessed October 15, 2010.

  • Barthel, S. 2006. Sustaining urban ecosystem services with local stewards participation in Stockholm (Sweden). Volume 12 From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning: Aspects of Integration, Education and Application Tress, B.; Tres, G.; Fry, G.; Opdam, P. (Eds.) 2006, XIII, 434 p. pp. 305-320.

  • Baskin Y (2008) The work of nature: how the diversity of nature sustains us. Island Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict M, McMahon E (2006) Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ 29(2):293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botkin D, Beveridge C (1997) Cities as environments. Urban Ecosystems 1(1):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley D (1997) Rethinking markets. Am J Agric Econ 79(5):1383–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown T, Bergstrom J, Loomis J (2007) Defining, valuing and providing ecosystem goods and services. Nat Resour J 47(2):329–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro R (1974) The power broker: Robert Moses and the fall of New York. Alfred A. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Mooney H, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries R, Díaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah A, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira H, Perrings C, Reid W, Sarukhan J, Scholes R, Whyte A (1312) Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 106(5):1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey F, Vickerman S, Hummon C, Taylor B (2006) Incentives for Biodiversity Conservation: an Ecological and Economic Assessment. Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M, Cardoso G (eds) (2005) The network society: from knowledge to policy. Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen N, Bartuska A, Brown J, Carpenter S, D’Antonio C, Francis R, Franklin J, MacMahon J, Noss R, Parsons D, Peterson C, Turner M, Woodmansee R (1996) The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecol Appl 6:665–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cork S, Shelton D, Binning C, Parry R (2001) A framework for applying the concept of ecosystem services to natural resource management in Australia. In: Rutherford I, Sheldon F, Brierley G, Kenyon C (eds) Third Australian Stream Management Conference August 27–29, 2001. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Brisbane, pp 157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neil R, Paruelo J, Raskin R, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(15):253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling R, Egoh B, Knight A, O’Farrell P, Reyers B, Rouget M, Roux D, Welz A, Wilhelm-Rechman A (2008) An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 105(28):9483–9488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Croteau D, Hoynes W (1997) Industries and Audience. Media/Society. Pine Forge Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily G (ed) (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily G, Matson P (2008) Ecosystems services: From theory to practice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(28):9455–9456

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daily G, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Peter M, Kareiva HA, Mooney LP, Taylor H, Ricketts JS, Shallenberger R (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale A, Sparkes J (2008) Protecting ecosystems: network structure and social capital mobilization. Community Development Journal 43(2):143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels T (2010) Integrating forest carbon sequestration into a cap and- trade program to reduce net CO2 emissions. J Am Plan Assoc 76(4):463–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot R, Wilson M, Boumans R (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFilippis J (2004) Unmaking Goliath: Community control in the face of global capital. Routledge Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeritt D, Lees L (2005) Research relevance ‘knowledge transfer’ and the geographies of CASE studentship collaboration. Area 37(2):127–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman D (2007) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaghy K (2013) Managing change in urban infrastructure systems. In: Brooks N, Donaghy K, Knapp G (eds) Oxford handbook on urban economics and planning. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, A. (2010). Siting green infrastructure: legal and policy solutions to alleviate urban poverty and promote healthy communities. Pace Law Faculty Publications, Paper 559.

  • Dwyer, J., Nowak, D., Noble, M., and Sisinni, S. (2000) Connecting people with ecosystems in the 21st century: an assessment of our nation’s urban forests (General Technical Report No. PNW-GTR-490). Portland, OR, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Consultation on EPA’s implementation of the Ecosystem Services Research Program. Washington D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. Accessed June 17, 2012 from:

  • EnvironmentLA (2012) Green infrastructure. Retrieved 6/27/12 from: http://www.lastormwater.org/green-la/green-infrastructure/

  • Erikson D (2006) Metro green: connecting open space in North American cities. Island Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernstson H, Sörlin S, Elmqvist T (2008) Social movements and ecosystem services–the role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecol Soc 13(2):39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin D, Brown D, Chang H, Dujon V, Granek E, Shandas V, Yeakley A (2012) Growing Cities Depend on Ecosystem Services. Solutions 2(6):74–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley J, Costanza R (2010) Payments for Ecosystem Services: from Local to Gobal. Ecol Econ 69:11

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner R (2003) Private environmental governance and international relations: exploring the links. Global Environ Polit 3(2):72–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman R, Tallis H (2008) A critical analysis of ecosystem services as a tool in conservation projects: The possible perils, the promises, and the partnerships. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1162:63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman RL, Tallis H, Kareiva P, Daily GC (2008) Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 105:9445–9448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory R, Ohlson D, Arvai J (2006) Deconstructing adaptive management: criteria for applications to environmental management. Ecol Appl 16(6):2411–2425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson B (1998) Scope and limits of the market mechanism in environmental management. Ecol Econ 24(2–3):259–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman P (2007) Ecosystem services: Foundations for a new rural–urban compact. Ecol Econ 62(3–4):383–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackworth J (2007) The neoliberal city: governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn T (2011) Self-organized governance networks for ecosystem management: who is accountable? Ecol Soc 16(2):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn T, Schultz L, Folke C, Olsson P (2008) Social networks as sources of resilience in socio-ecological systems. In: Norberg J, Cumming G (eds) Complexity theory for a sustainable future. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmes A (2006) Neoliberalism and multilevel governance. Rev Int Polit Econ 3(5):725–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris R, Clark J, Matheny N (2004) Arboriculture: integrated management of landscape trees, shrubs and vines. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken P (2007) Blessed unrest: how the largest movement in the world came into being and why no one saw it coming. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal G, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Salzman J, Boggs C, Hellman J, Hughs J, Kremen C, Ricketts T (2001) Protecting natural capital through ecosystem service districts. Stanford Envirnmental Law Journal 20:333

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch D (2008) Ecosystems services and the green city. In: Birch E, Wachter S (eds) Growing greener cities. University of Pennsylvania Press pp, Philadelphia, pp 281–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack B, Kousky C, Sims K (2008) Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 105(28):9465–9470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S (1990) The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Jenerette G, Marussich W, Newell J (2006) Linking ecological footprints with ecosystem valuation in the provisioning of freshwater. Ecol Econ 59(1):38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannes RE (1998) The case for data-less marine resource management: examples from tropical nearshore finfisheries. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13(6):243–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson B (1999) Introduction to the special feature: adaptive management - scientifically sound, socially challenged? Conserv Ecol 3(1):10

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen E (1986) Urban forestry in the rearview mirror. Arboriculture Journal 10:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Just D, Wolf S, Zilberman D (2006) Effect of information formats on information services: analysis of four selected agricultural commodities. Agr Econ 35:289–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz E, Lazarsfeld P (1955) Personal Influence: the Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinney J (1972) The development of forest law in the United States including legislation in America prior to March 4th, 1789. Arno Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Koellner T (2010) Why and how much are firms willing to invest in ecosystem services from tropical forests? A comparison of international and Costa Rican firms. Ecol Econ 69:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konijnendijk C (2010) The role of forestry in the development and reform of green belts. Plan Pract Res 25(2):241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konijnendijk C, Nilsson K, Randrup T, Schipperijn J (eds) (2005) Urban forests and trees. Springer, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Konijnendijk C, Ricard R, Kenney A, Randrup T (2006) Defining urban forestry– a comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 4:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konijnendijk C, Nielsen A, Schipperijn J, Rosenblad Y, Sander H, Sarv M, Makinen K, Tyrvainen L, Donis J, Gundersen V, Akerlund U, Gustavsson R (2007) Assessment of urban forestry research and research needs in Nordic and Baltic countries. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 6:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft S, Lant C, Ruhl J (2008) The tragedy of ecosystem services. Bioscience 58(10):969–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C (2005) Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology. Ecol Lett 8:468–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger T, Casey F (2007) An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands. Ecol Econ 64(2):321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layke C, Henninger N, Landsberg F, DeGroot D, Oudenhoven A, Reyers B, Walpole M, Kanwar P, Mapandembe A (2010) Organizing information to support the ecosystem services approach: An ecosystem services indicators framework. UNEP-WCMC Department of economic and social affairs. Statistics division United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberknecht K (2009) Public access to U.S. conservation land trust properties: results from a national survey. Journal of the American Planning Asociation 75(4):479–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis J, Kent P, Strange L, Fausch K, Covich A (2000) Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecol Econ 33:103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J (1998) Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science. Science 279:491–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCain R, Lee R (1996) Adaptive management: promises and pitfalls. Environ Manag 20(4):437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley D (2006) Selling out on nature. Nature 443:27–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson E (1997) Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Urban Ecosystems 1(1):49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson E, Simpson J, Xiao Q, Wu C (2011) Million trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning 99:40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Assessment (2005) Summary: response options and strategies. Island Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller R (1997) Urban forestry: planning and managing urban greenspaces. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol A (2006) Environment and modernity in transitional China: frontiers of ecological modernization. Dev Change 37(1):29–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney HA, Ehrlich PR (1997) Ecosystem services: A fragmentary history. In: Daily GE (ed) Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press pp, Washington, D.C., pp 11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Muldavin, S. (2010) Value beyond cost savings: how to underwrite sustainable properties. Green Building Finance Consortium. http://www.greenbuildingfc.com/ Accessed November 3, 2010.

  • New York City Office of the Mayor (2011) NYC green infrastructure plan: A sustainable strategy for clean waterways. The City of New York, New York City

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman P, Jennings I (2008) Cities as sustainable ecosystems: principles and practices. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton B (2005) Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak D, Crane D (2002) Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ Pollut 116:381–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C (2001) Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: a study of Lake Racken watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems 4(2):85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens S, Petts J, Bulkeley H (2006) Boundary work: knowledge, policy, and the urban environment. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24:633–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resource Management 21:49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrot-Maitre D (2006) The ViIttel Payments for ecosystem services: a perfect PES case? International Institute for Environment and Development. UK, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Philadelphia Water Department (2012) Green City Clean Waters. Accessed 6/27/12 from: http://www.phillywatersheds.org/what_were_doing/documents_and_data/cso_long_term_control_plan/

  • Polanyi K (1957) The great transformation. Rinehart, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J, Ward H (2001) Social capital and the environment. World Dev 29(2):209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primmer E, Wolf SA (2009) Empirical accounting of adaptation to environmental change: organizational competencies and biodiversity conservation in Finnish forest management. Ecol Soc 14(2):27

    Google Scholar 

  • Randrup T, Konijnendijk C, Kaennel Dobbertin M, Pruller R (2005) The concept of urban forestry in Europe. In: Konijnendijk C, Nilsson K, Randrup T, Schipperijn J (eds) Urban forests and trees. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond C, Bryan B, MacDonald D, Cast A, Strathearn S, Grandgirard A, Kalivas T (2009) Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Ecoomics 68(5):1301–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricard R (2005) Shade trees and tree wardens: revising the history of urban forestry. J For 103(5):230–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter T, Gemünden HG (2003) Network competence: its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. J Bus Res 56(9):745–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson M (2004) The neoliberalisation of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35:361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhl J, Salzman J, Goodman I (2009) Implementing the new ecosystem services mandate: A catalyst for advancing science and policy. National Wetlands Newsletter. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandercock L (2005) The democratization of planning: elusive or illusory? Planning Theory and Practice 6(4):437–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling J, Logan J (2008) Greening the rust belt: a green infrastructure model for right sizing America’s shrinking cities. J Am Plan Assoc 74(4):451–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F.; Small Is Beautiful: Economics As If People Mattered : 25 Years Later…With Commentaries (1999). Hartley & Marks Publishers.

  • Smith C (2006) The Plan of Chicago. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Society of Municipal Arborists (2010) http://www.urban-forestry.com/mc/page.do?sitePageId=2806. Accessed January 5, 2010.

  • Stankey, G., Clark R. and Boreman, B. (2005) Adaptive management of natural resources: theory, concepts, and management institutions. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-654, Portland, OR, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

  • Sustainable Urban Forests Coalition (2010). How does the SUFC define urban forests? http://www.urbanforestcoalition.com/. Retrieved December 23, 2010.

  • Swanwick C, Dunnett N, Woolley H (2003) Nature, role and value of green spaces in towns and cities: an overview. Built Environment 29(2):94–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Resilience Alliance (2010) Adaptive management. http://www.resalliance.org/600.php. Accessed 8 September 2010.

  • Thomas K, Littlewood S (2010) From green belts to green infrastructure? The evolution of a new concept in the emerging soft governance of spatial strategies. Planning Practice and Research 25:203–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Troldahl V (2001) A field test of a modified ‘two-step flow of communication’ model. Public Opin Quart 30(4):609–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kazmietczak A, Niemela J, James P (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning 81:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Washington, D.C., et al. (2007) green infrastructure statement of intent. 2007-04-19 Accessed January 17, 2012.

  • Voloscuk I (2002) Adaptive ecosystem management. Acta Facultatis Ecologiae 8:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute (2012) Mainstreaming Ecosystem Services Initiative (MESI) Accessed 6/27/12 from: http://www.wri.org/project/mainstreaming-ecosystem-services

  • Young R (2009) Interdisciplinary foundations of urban ecology. Urban ecosystems 12(3):311–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young R (2010) Managing municipal green space for ecosystem services. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 9(4):313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young R (2011) Planting the living city: best practices in planning green infrastructure – results from major U.S. cities. J Am Plan Assoc 77(4):368–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young R, McPherson G (2013) Governing metropolitan green infrastructure in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 109:67–75

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Community and Regional Planning Program, University of Texas, 78712, Austin, TX, USA

    Robert F. Young

Authors
  1. Robert F. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert F. Young.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, R.F. Mainstreaming urban ecosystem services: A national survey of municipal foresters. Urban Ecosyst 16, 703–722 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0287-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0287-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation