Abstract
Although there has been considerable interest in the rejuvenation and greening of inner-city schoolyards for several decades, recent studies on the behavioral and environmental impacts of greenspace, particularly tree cover, suggest that greenspace on schools may be more important than previously understood. However, little is known about the conditions and landcover of urban schoolyards. To understand the structure of the landcover on city schoolyards, this study used Geographic Information System software to classify and compare landcover on 258 U.S. public elementary and middle schools in Baltimore, MD, Boston, MA, and Detroit, MI. For all three cities, schoolyard was found to cover, on average, more than 68% of the school property, which was an average of 1.0–2.5 ha in size. Boston’s schoolyards (circa 1995) were notably smaller from those in Baltimore and Detroit, and they had far more impervious surface. On average, schoolyards were dominated by turf grass and impervious surface, while tree canopy occupied the smallest fraction of schoolyard landcover (approximately 10%). In light of these findings, we conclude by discussing how greening might be achieved on these and other yards.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen G (1968) Planning for play. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
American Forests (1999) Regional ecosystem analysis Chesapeake Bay region and the Baltimore–Washington corridor. American Forests, Washington, DC
American Forests (2006) Urban ecosystems analysis SE Michigan and City of Detroit. American Forests, Washington, DC
Arnfield AJ (2003) Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island. Int J Climatol 23(1):1–26
Boston Schoolyard Initiative (2001) Designing schoolyards and building community report. Boston Schoolyard Initiative, Boston, MA
Campbell SD, Frost JL (1985) The effects of playground type on the cognitive and social play behaviors of grade two children. In: Frost JL, Sunderlein S (eds) When children play: proceedings of the international conference on play and play environments. Association for Childhood Education International, Wheaton, MD
Frost JL, Klein BL (1979) Children’s play and playgrounds. Allyn and Bacon, Boston
Graves BE (edited by Clifford Pearson) (1993) School ways: the planning and design of America’s schools. McGraw-Hill, New York
Gregory JH, Dukes MD, Joseph PH, Miller GL (2006) Effect of urban soil compaction on infiltration rates. J Soil Water Conserv 61(3):117–124
Heffeman M (1994) The children’s garden project at river farm. Child Environ Q 11(3):63–78
Hendricks B (2001) Designing for play. Ashgate Publishing, Burlington, VT
Kuo FE, Sullivan WC (2001) Aggression and violence in the inner city: effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environ Behav 33(4):543–571
Louv R (2005) Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin Books, Chapel Hill, NC
McPherson GE, Nowak D, Heisler G, Grimmond S, Souch C, Grant R, Rowntree R (1997) Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago urban forest climate project. Urban Ecosyst 1(1):49–61
McPherson G, Simpson JR, Maco SE, Xiao QF (2005) Municipal forest benefits and costs in five US cities. J For 103(8):411–416
Moore RC (1974) Anarchy zone—kids needs and school yards. School Rev 82(4):621–645
Moore RC (1986) Childhood’s domain: play and place in child development. Croom Helm, London
Moore RC (1989) Before and after asphalt: diversity as an ecological measure of quality in children’s outdoor environments. In: Bloch MN, Pelligrini T (eds) The ecological context of children’s play. Ablex, Norwood, NJ
Paul JM, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–365
Raza SH, Murthy MSR, Bhagya Lakshmi O, Shylaja G (1990/91) Effect of vegetation on urban climate and healthy urban colonies. Energy Build 15–16:487–491
Rivkin M (1995) The great outdoors: restoring children’s right to play. NAEYC, Washington, DC
Rivkn M (1997) The schoolyard habitat movement: what it is and why children need it. Early Child Educ J 25(1):61–66
Schulman A (2004) Providing social and environmental benefits through urban schoolyard greening. Senior Thesis Collection, #18063, Princeton University Archives
Spirn A (2003) Better air quality at street level: strategies for urban design. In Watson D, Plattus A, Shibley R (eds) Time saver standards for urban design. McGraw-Hill, New York
SPSS Inc. (2000) SPSS 10.0.7 for Windows. SPSS, Chicago, Illinois
Taha H (1997) Urban climates and heat islands: albedo, evapotranspiration, and anthropogenic heat. Energy Build 25:99–103
Taha H, Douglas S, Haney J (1997) Mesoscale meteorological and air quality impacts of increased urban albedo and vegetation. Energy Build 25:169–177
Tamhane AC (1979) A comparison of procedures for multiple comparisons of means with unequal variances. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366):471–480
Taylor AF, Wiley A, Kuo FE, Sullivan WC (1998) Growing up in the inner city—green spaces as places to grow. Environ Behav 30(1):3–27
Taylor AF, Kuo FE, Sullivan WC (2001) Coping with ADD: the surprising connection to green play settings. Environ Behav 33(1):54–77
Titman W (1994) Special places; special people: the hidden curriculum of school grounds. WWF UK/Learning through Landscapes Publication, Surrey, Great Britain
Weinstein CS, Pinciotti P (1988) Changing a schoolyard—intentions, design decisions, and behavioral outcomes. Environ Behav 20(3):345–371
Xaio QF (1998) Rainfall interception by Sacramento’s urban forest. J Arboric 24(4):235–244
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Frank Rodgers of Parks and People and Randall Raymond of the Detroit Office of Student Transportation for their generous provision of school data, as well as Dr. Frances Kuo and Dr. William Sullivan at the Landscape and Human Health Laboratory at the University of Illinios at Urbana-Champaign. We would also like to thank Kirk Meyer of the Boston Schoolyard Initiative and Lynn Wolff at Copley Wolff Design Group for their thoughtful input. Finally, we are grateful to Dr. Alan Berkowitz, Dr. Mary Cadenasso, and Mary Ford at the Institute of Ecosystem Studies for planting the seeds of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schulman, A., Peters, C.A. GIS analysis of urban schoolyard landcover in three U.S. cities. Urban Ecosyst 11, 65–80 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-007-0037-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-007-0037-4