Perhaps as remarkable as the general upsurge in public interest in wildlife over the last 30 years is the trend toward greater community-based wildlife management since the late 1980s. This paper discusses the challenges and opportunities at the local, community scale of collaboration for wildlife management. We explain how collaborative activity between the professional wildlife manager and community stakeholders can lead to improved identification of human-wildlife interactions and better understanding of wildlife-related impacts that are of primary management concern in the community. Community-based collaborative decision making can also effectively result in the specification of management actions that are acceptable to a community. Furthermore, agency-community collaboration can lead to co-management that goes beyond stakeholder input or involvement in decision making about management objectives and actions, and includes appropriate sharing of responsibility for implementation and evaluation. A growing role for the wildlife agency in such situations is facilitating the development of local capacity by filling information and process needs so that individuals and groups in a community can participate effectively in collaborative efforts appropriate to the necessary level of agency-community engagement. This opportunity for the wildlife profession promises to be rewarding and have lasting positive influence on communities for the benefit of wildlife management. However, most agencies cannot address every issue at a community level. Public wildlife managers need guidelines for judgment about when to engage in community-based wildlife management. They need to assess various risks associated with not engaging in a particular issue and to prioritize the potential situations where various degrees of community engagement may be desirable. This paper highlights these intriguing challenges and opportunities associated with community-based wildlife management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bright, A.D., Manfredo, M.J. and Fulton, D.C. (2000) Segmenting the public: An application of value orientations to wildlife planning in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28, 218–226.
Chase, L.C., Schusler, T.M. and Decker, D.J. (2000) Innovations in stakeholder involvement: What's the next step? Wildlife Society Bulletin 28, 208–217.
Curtis, P.D., Decker, D.J. and Schusler, T.M. (2000) Beyond citizen task forces: The future of community-based deer management. In Proceedings 19th Vertebrate Pest Conference (T.P. Salmon and A.C. Crabb, eds.), University of California, Davis.
Decker, D.J. and Chase, L.C. (1997) Human dimensions of living with wildlife—A management challenge for the 21st century. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25, 788–795.
Decker, D.J., Raik, D.B. and Siemer, W.F. (2004) Community-Based Deer Management: A Practitioners' Guide. Northeast Wildlife Damage Management Research and Outreach Cooperative, Ithaca, pp. 52.
Decker, D.J., Schusler, T.M., Brown, T.L. and Mattfeld, G.F. (2000) Co-management: An evolving process for the future of wildlife management? Transactions of the 65th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 3.
Fishbein, M. and Manfredo, M.J. (1992) A theory of behavior change. In Influencing Human Behavior: Theory and Applications in Recreation, Tourism, and Natural Resources Management (M.J. Manfredo, ed.), pp. 29–50. Sagamore Publishing, Champaign.
Korten, D.C. (1981) The management of social transformation. Public Administration Review 41, 609–618.
Lund, R.C. (1997) A cooperative, community-based approach for the management of suburban deer populations. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25, 488–490.
Matthews, F.D. (1999) Politics for People: Finding a Responsible Public Voice. University of Illinois Press, Chicago.
NRC (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Pearse, P.H. and Wilson, J.R. (1999) Local co-management of fish and wildlife: The Quebec experience. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27, 676–691.
Raik, D.B., Decker, D.J. and Siemer, W.F. (2003) Dimensions of capacity in community-based suburban deer management: The managers' perspective. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31, 854–864.
Reich, R.B. (1985) Public administration and public deliberation: An interpretive essay. Yale Law Journal 94, 1617–1641.
Riley, S.J., Decker, D.J., Carpenter, L.H., Organ, J.F., Siemer, W.F., Mattfeld, G.F. and Parsons, G. (2002) The essence of wildlife management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30, 585–593.
Schusler, T.M., Chase, L.C. and Decker, D.J. (2000) Community-based co-management: Sharing responsibility when tolerance for wildlife is exceeded. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5, 34–49.
Schusler, T.M., Decker, D.J. and Pfeffer, M.J. (2003) Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 15, 309–326.
Wondolleck, J.M. and Yaffee, S.L. (2000) Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management.Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Yankelovich, D. (1991) Coming to Public Judgment: Making Democracy Work in a Complex World.Syracuse University Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-006-9988-0.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Decker, D.J., Raik, D.A., Carpenter, L.H. et al. Collaboration for community-based wildlife management. Urban Ecosyst 8, 227–236 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-005-3264-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-005-3264-6