Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Contact Measurements of Randomly Rough Surfaces

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tribology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This manuscript presents an experimental effort to directly measure contact areas and the details behind these scaled experiments on a randomly rough model surface used in the “Contact Mechanics Challenge” (2017). For these experiments, the randomly rough surface model was scaled up by a factor of 1000× to give a 100 mm square sample that was 3D printed from opaque polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). This sample was loaded against various optically smooth and transparent samples of PDMS that were approximately 15 mm thick and had a range in elastic modulus from 14 kPa to 2.1 MPa. During loading, a digital camera recorded contact locations by imaging the scattering of light that occurs off of the PMMA rough surface when it was in contact with the PDMS substrate. This method of illuminating contact areas is called frustrated total internal reflection and is performed by creating a condition of total internal reflection within the unperturbed PDMS samples. Contact or deformation of the surface results in light being diffusely transmitted from the PDMS and detected by the camera. For these experiments, a range of reduced pressure (nominal pressure/elastic modulus) from below 0.001 to over 1.0 was examined, and the resulting relative contact area (real area of contact/apparent area of contact) was found to increase from below 0.1% to over 60% at the highest pressures. The experimental uncertainties associated with experiments are discussed, and the results are compared to the numerical results from the simulation solution to the “Contact Mechanics Challenge.” The simulation results and experimental results of the relative contact areas as a function of reduced pressure are in agreement (within experimental uncertainties).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tysoe, W.T., Spencer, N.D.: Contact-mechanics challenge. http://digitaleditions.walsworthprintgroup.com/publication/?m=5716&l=1#%7B%22issue_id%22:%22280703%22,%22page%22:%2298%22%7D (2015)

  2. Greenwood, J.A., Williamson, J.B.P.: Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 295, 300–319 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McCutchen, C.W.: Optical systems for observing surface topography by frustrated total internal reflection and by interference. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 35, 1340–1345 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Axelrod, D., Burghardt, T.P., Thompson, N.L.: Total internal reflection fluorescence. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 13, 247–268 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Needham, J.A., Sharp, J.S.: Watch your step! A frustrated total internal reflection approach to forensic footwear imaging. Sci. Rep. 6, 21290 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Han, J.Y.: Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium User interface Software and Technology-UIST’05, pp. 115–118 (2005)

  7. Harrick, N.J.: Study of physics and chemistry of surfaces from frustrated total internal reflections. Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 224–226 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dieterich, J.H., Kilgore, B.D.: Direct observation of frictional contacts: new insights for state-dependent properties. Pure Appl. Geophys. PAGEOPH 143, 283–302 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubenstein, S.M., Cohen, G., Fineberg, J.: Contact area measurements reveal loading-history dependence of static friction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(25), 256103 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Begej, Stefan: Planar and finger-shaped optical tactile sensors for robotic applications. IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 4(5), 472–484 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Visscher, M., Struik, K.G.: Optical profilometry and its application to mechanically inaccessible surfaces part I: principles of focus error detection. Precis. Eng. 16(3), 192–198 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Childs, T.H.C., Cowburn, D.: Contact observations on and friction of rubber drive belting. Wear 100(1-3), 59–76 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lanni, F., Waggoner, A.S.: Taylor DL Structural organization of interphase 3T3 fibroblasts studied by total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 100(4), 1091–1102 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Müser, M.H., Dapp, W.B.: The Contact Mechanics Challenge: problem definition. http://www.lms.uni-saarland.de/contact-mechanics-challenge/

  15. Schulze, K.D., Bennett, A.I., Marshall, S., Rowe, K.G., Dunn, A.C.: Real area of contact in a soft transparent interface by particle exclusion microscopy. J. Tribol. 138(4), 041404 (2016). doi:10.1115/1.4032822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krick, B.A., Vail, J.R., Persson, B.N.J., Sawyer, W.G.: Optical in situ micro tribometer for analysis of real contact area for contact mechanics, adhesion, and sliding experiments. Tribol. Lett. 45, 185–194 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson, K.L., Kendall, K., Roberts, A.D.: Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 324, 301–313 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ebenstein, D.M., Wahl, K.J.: A comparison of JKR-based methods to analyze quasi-static and dynamic indentation force curves. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 298, 652–662 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Polynkin, P., Polynkin, A., Peyghambarian, N., Mansuripur, M.: Evanescent field-based optical fiber sensing device for measuring the refractive index of liquids in microfluidic channels. Opt. Lett. 30, 1273–1275 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dapp, W.B., Lücke, A., Persson, B.N.J., Müser, M.H.: Self-affine elastic contacts: percolation and leakage. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 1–4 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fregly, B.J., Sawyer, W.G.: Estimation of discretization errors in contact pressure measurements. J. Biomech. 36, 609–613 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Müser, M.H., Dapp, W.B., Bugnicourt, R., Sainsot, P., Lesaffre, N., Lubrect, T.A., Persson, B.N.J., Harris, K., Bennett, A., Schulze, K., Rhode, S., Ifju, P., Sawyer, W.G., Angelini, T., Esfahani, H.A., Kadkhodaei, M., Akbarzadeh, S., Wu, J.-J., Vorlaufer, G., Vernes, A., Solhjoo, S., Vakis, A.I., Jackson, R.L., Xu, Y., Streator, J., Rostami, A., Dini, D., Medina, S., Carbone, G., Bottiglione, F., Afferante, L., Monti, J., Pastewka, L., Robbins, M.O., Greenwood, J.A.: Meeting the contact-mechanics challenge. Tribol. Lett. 65, 118 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Alexander I. Bennett, Kyle. D. Schulze, Juan Manuel Urueña, Alexander J. McGhee, Angela A. Pitenis, Thomas E. Angelini & W. Gregory Sawyer

  2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Kathryn L. Harris & W. Gregory Sawyer

  3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Thomas E. Angelini & W. Gregory Sawyer

  4. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Saarland University, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Martin H. Müser

Authors
  1. Alexander I. Bennett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathryn L. Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kyle. D. Schulze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juan Manuel Urueña
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexander J. McGhee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Angela A. Pitenis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Martin H. Müser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Thomas E. Angelini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. W. Gregory Sawyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Gregory Sawyer.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Special Issue: The Contact Mechanics Challenge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bennett, A.I., Harris, K.L., Schulze, K.D. et al. Contact Measurements of Randomly Rough Surfaces. Tribol Lett 65, 134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-017-0918-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-017-0918-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation