Abstract
MADS-box genes comprise a large gene family, which codes for transcription factors, and play important functions in various aspects of flowering plant growth and development. However, little is known about the MADS-box genes in maize (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Here, we performed a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of the MADS-box gene family in the maize and sorghum genomes and identified 75 maize and 65 sorghum MADS-box genes. We subsequently carried out a comparative analysis of these genes, including the gene structure, phylogenetic relationship, conserved protein motifs, gene duplications, chromosomal locations and expression pattern between the two plants. According to these analyses, the MADS-box genes in both maize and sorghum were categorized into five (MIKCC, MIKC*, Mα, Mβ and Mγ) groups, and the MIKCC groups were further divided into 11 subfamilies. In addition, gene duplications of MADS-box genes were also investigated in the maize, sorghum, rice and Arabidopsis genomes. We found a higher percentage of MADS-box gene duplications in the maize and sorghum genomes, which contributed to the expansion of the MADS-box gene family. Furthermore, both tandem and segmental duplications played a major role in the MADS-box gene expansion in maize and sorghum. A survey of maize and sorghum EST sequences indicated that MADS-box genes exhibit a various expression pattern, suggesting diverse and novel functions of MADS-box gene families in the two plants. These results provided a useful reference for selection of candidate MADS-box genes for cloning and further functional analysis in both maize and sorghum.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarez-Buylla ER, Liljegren SJ, Pelaz S, Gold SE, Burgeff C, Ditta GS, Vergara-Silva F, Yanofsky MF (2000) MADS-box gene evolution beyond flowers: expression in pollen, endosperm, guard cells, roots and trichomes. Plant J 24:457–466
Alwee SS, Van der Linden CG, Van der Schoot J, de Folter S, Angenent GC, Cheah SC, Smulders MJM (2006) Characterization of oil palm MADS box genes in relation to the mantled flower abnormality. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 85:331–344
Arora R, Agarwal P, Ray S, Singh AK, Singh VP, Tyagi AK, Kapoor S (2007) MADS-box gene family in rice: genome-wide identification, organization and expression profiling during reproductive development and stress. BMC Genomics 8:242–263
Bailey TL, Elkan C (1995) The value of prior knowledge in discovering motifs with MEME. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 3:21–29
Becker A, Theißen G (2003) The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the development and evolution of flowering plants. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29:464–489
Becker A, Winter KU, Meyer B, Saedler H, Theißen G (2000) MADS-box gene diversity in seed plants 300 million years ago. Mol Biol Evol 17:1425–1434
Caetano-Anollés G (2001) Novel strategies to study the role of mutation and nucleic acid structure in evolution. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 67:115–132
Cho S, Jang S, Chae S, Chung KM, Moon YH, An G, Jang SK (1999) Analysis of the C-terminal region of Arabidopsis thaliana APETALA1 as a transcription activation domain. Plant Mol Biol 40:419–429
Davies B, Egea-Cortines M, Silva ED, Saedler H, Sommer H (1996) Multiple interactions amongst floral homeotic MADS box proteins. EMBO J 15:4330–4343
De Bodt S, Raes J, Van de Peer Y, Theißen G (2003) And then there were many: MADS goes genomic. Trends Plant Sci 8:475–483
Díaz-Riquelme J, Lijavetzky D, Martínez-Zapater JM, Carmona MJ (2009) Genome-wide analysis of MIKCC-type MADS-box genes in grapevine. Plant Physiol 149:354–369
Finn RD, Mistry J, Schuster-Bockler B, Griffiths-Jones S, Hollich V, Lassmann T, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Durbin R, Eddy SR, Sonnhammer EL, Bateman A (2006) Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res 34:247–251
Gojobori T, Li WH, Graur D (1982) Patterns of nucleotide substitution in pseudogenes and functional genes. J Mol Evol 18:360–369
Gu Q, Ferrándiz C, Yanofsky MF, Martienssen R (1998) The FRUITFULL MADS-box gene mediates cell differentiation during Arabidopsis fruit development. Development 125:1509–1517
Gu ZL, Cavalcanti A, Chen FC, Bouman P, Li WH (2002) Extent of gene duplication in the genomes of drosophila, nematode, and yeast. Mol Biol Evol 19:256–262
Hartmann U, Höhmann S, Nettesheim K, Wisman E, Seadler H, Huijser P (2000) Molecular cloning of SVP: a negative regulator of the floral transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J 21:351–360
Henschel K, Kofuji R, Hasebe M, Saedler H, Münster T, Theißen G (2002) Two ancient classes of MIKC-type MADS-box genes are present in the moss physcomitrella patens. Mol Biol Evol 19:801–814
Holub E (2001) Arms race is ancient history in Arabidopsis, the wildflower. Nat Rev Genet 2:516–527
Honma T, Goto K (2001) Complexes of MADS-box proteins are sufficient to convert leaves into floral organs. Nature 409:525–529
Irish VF (2003) The evolution of floral homeotic gene function. Bioessays 25:637–646
Jain M, Khurana JP (2009) Transcript profiling reveals diverse roles of auxin-responsive genes during reproductive development and abiotic stress in rice. FEBS J 276:3148–3162
Kaufmann K, Melzer R, Theißen G (2005) MIKC-type MADS-domain proteins: structural modularity, protein interactions and network evolution in land plants. Gene 347:183–198
Kofuji R, Sumikawa N, Yamasaki M, Kondo K, Ueda K, Ito M, Hasebe M (2003) Evolution and divergence of the MADS-box gene family based on genome-wide expression analyses. Mol Biol Evol 20:1963–1977
Kramer EM, Irish VF (1999) Evolution of genetic mechanisms controlling petal development. Nature 399:144–148
Leseberg CH, Li A, Kang H, Duvall M, Mao L (2006) Genome-wide analysis of the MADS-box gene family in Populus trichocarpa. Gene 378:84–94
Liljegren SJ, Ditta GS, Eshed Y, Savidge B, Bowman JL, Yanofsky MF (2000) SHATTERPROOF MADS-box genes control seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Nature 404:766–770
Ma H, Yanofsky MF, Meyerowitz EM (1991) AGL1-AGL6, an Arabidopsis gene family with similarity to floral homeotic and transcription factor genes. Gene 5:484–495
Mandel MA, Gustafson-Brown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF (1992) Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature 360:273–277
Mena M, Mandel MA, Lerner DR, Yanofsky MF, Schmidt RJ (1995) A characterization of the MADS-box gene family in maize. Plant J 8:845–854
Messenguy F, Dubois E (2003) Role of MADS box proteins and their cofactors in combinatorial control of gene expression and cell development. Gene 316:1–21
Michaels SD, Amasino RM (1999) FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell 11:949–956
Nam J, Kim J, Lee S, An G, Ma H, Nei M (2004) Type I MADS-box genes have experienced faster birth-and-death evolution than typeII MADS-box genes in angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:1910–1915
Nesi N, Debeaujon I, Jond C, Stewart AJ, Jenkins GI, Caboche M, Lepiniec L (2002) The TRANSPARENT TESTA16 locus encodes the Arabidopsis BSISTER MADS domain protein and is required for proper development and pigmentation of the seed coat. Plant Cell 14:2463–2479
Norman C, Runswick M, Pollock R, Treisman R (1988) Isolation and properties of cDNA clones encoding SRF, a transcription factor that binds to the c-fos serum response element. Cell 55:989–1003
Parenicova L, de Folter S, Kieffer M, Horner DS, Favalli C, Busscher J, Cook HE, Ingram RM, Kater MM, Davies B, Angenent GC, Colombo L (2003) Molecular phylogenetic analyses of the complete MADS-box transcription factor family in Arabidopsis: new openings to the MADS world. Plant Cell 15:1538–1551
Passmore S, Maine GT, Elble R, Christ C, Tye BK (1988) Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein involved in plasmid maintenance is necessary for mating of MAT alpha cells. J Mol Biol 204:593–606
Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, Gundlach H, Hellsten U, Mitros T, Poliakov P, Schmutz J, Spannag M, Tang HB, Wang XY, Wicker T, Bharti AK, Chapman J, Feltus FA, Gowik U, Grigoriev IV, Lyons E, Maher CA, Martis M, Narechania A, Otillar RP, Penning BW, Salamov AA, Wang Y, Zhang LF, Carpita NC, Freeling M, Gingle AR, Peterson DG, Mehboob-ur-Rahman WareD, Westhoff P, Mayer KFX, Messing J, Rokhsar DS (2009) The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457:551–556
Pellegrini L, Tan S, Richmond TJ (1995) Structure of serum response factor core bound to DNA. Nature 376:490–498
Purugganan MD (1997) The MADS-box floral homeotic gene lineages predate the origin of seed plants: phylogenetic and molecular clock estimates. J Mol Evol 45:392–396
Riechmann JL, Meyerowitz EM (1997) MADS-domain protein in plant deveiopment. Biol Chem 378:1079–1101
Riechmann JL, Krizek BA, Meyerowitz EM (1996) Dimerization specificity of Arabidopsis MADS domain homeotic proteins APETALA1, APETALA3, PISTILLATA, and AGAMOUS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:4793–4798
Samach A, Onouchi H, Gold SE, Ditta GS, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Yanofsky MF, Coupland G (2000) Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science 288:1613–1616
Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Wei FS, Pasternak S, Liang CZ, Zhang JW, Clifton SW, Wing RA, Wilson RK et al (2009) The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326:1112–1115
Scortecci KC, Michaels SD, Amasino RM (2001) Identification of a MADS-box gene, FLOWERING LOCUS M, that represses flowering. Plant J 26:229–236
Shore P, Sharrocks AD (1995) The MADS-box family of transcription factors. Eur J Biochem 229:1–13
Sommer H, Beltran JP, Huijser P, Pape H, Lönnig WE, Saedler H, Schwarz-Sommer Z (1990) Deficiens, a homeotic gene involved in the control of flower morphogenesis in Antirrhinum majus: the protein shows homology to transcription factors. EMBO J 9:605–613
Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA 4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599
Theißen G, Kim JT, Saedler H (1996) Classification and phylogeny of the MADS-box multigene family suggest defined roles of MADS-box gene subfamilies in the morphological evolution of eukaryotes. J Mol Evol 43:484–516
Theissen G, Becker A, Di Rosa A, Kanno A, Kim JT, Munster T, Winter KU, Saedler H (2000) A short history of MADS-box genes in plants. Plant Mol Biol 42:115–149
Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680
Xiong YQ, Liu TY, Tian CG, Sun SH, Li JY, Chen MS (2005) Transcription factors in rice: a genome-wide comparative analysis between monocots and eudicots. Plant Mol Biol 59:191–203
Yang Y, Fanning L, Jack T (2003) The K domain mediates heterodimerization of the Arabidopsis floral organ identity proteins, APETALA3 and PISTILLATA. Plant J 33:47–59
Yang SH, Zhang XH, Yue JX, Tian DC, Chen JQ (2008) Recent duplications dominate NBS-encoding gene expansion in two woody species. Mol Genet Genomics 280:187–198
Yanofsky MF, Ma H, Bowman JL, Drews GN, Feldmann KA, Meyerowitz EM (1990) The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factors. Nature 346:35–39
Zhang H, Forde BG (1998) An Arabidopsis MADS-box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture. Science 279:407–409
Zhou T, Wang Y, Chen JQ, Araki H, Jing Z, Jiang K, Shen J, Tian DC (2004) Genome-wide identification of NBS genes in rice reveals significant expansion of divergent non-TIR NBS genes. Mol Genet Genomics 271:402–415
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the National High-Tech Research and Development Program (863 Program) (No. 2008AA10Z408) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 10675002). We thank members of the Key Laboratory of Crop biology of Anhui province for their assistance in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Yang Zhao and Xiaoyu Li contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, Y., Li, X., Chen, W. et al. Whole-genome survey and characterization of MADS-box gene family in maize and sorghum. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 105, 159–173 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9848-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9848-8