Abstract
One of the chief concerns of the young Descartes was with what he, and others, termed “physico-mathematics”. This signalled a questioning of the Scholastic Aristotelian view of the mixed mathematical sciences as subordinate to natural philosophy, non explanatory, and merely instrumental. Somehow, the mixed mathematical disciplines were now to become intimately related to natural philosophical issues of matter and cause. That is, they were to become more ’physicalised’, more closely intertwined with natural philosophising, regardless of which species of natural philosophy one advocated. A curious, short-lived yet portentous epistemological conceit lay at the core of Descartes’ physico-mathematics—the belief that solid geometrical results in the mixed mathematical sciences literally offered windows into the realm of natural philosophical causation—that in such cases one could literally “see the causes”. Optics took pride of place within Descartes’ physico-mathematics project, because he believed it offered unique possibilities for the successful vision of causes. This paper traces Descartes’ early physico-mathematical program in optics, its origins, pitfalls and its successes, which were crucial in providing Descartes resources for his later work in systematic natural philosophy. It explores how Descartes exploited his discovery of the law of refraction of light—an achievement well within the bounds of traditional mixed mathematical optics—in order to derive—in the manner of physico-mathematics—causal knowledge about light, and indeed insight about the principles of a “dynamics” that would provide the laws of corpuscular motion and tendency to motion in his natural philosophical system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam, C., & Tannery, P. (Eds.). (1974–1986). Oeuvres de Descartes, (2nd ed. 11 Vols.). Paris: Vrin.
Beeckman, I. (1939–1953). In C. de Waard (Ed.), Journal tenu par Isaac Beeckman de 1604 à 1634 (4 Vols.). The Hague: Nijhoff.
Bennet J. (1998) Practical geometry and operative knowledge. Configurations 6(2): 195–222
Bossha, J. (1908). Annexe note. Archives Neerlandaises des Sciences Exactes et Naturelles, ser 2 t. 13, xii–xiv.
Buchdahl G. (1972) Methodological aspects of Kepler’s theory of refraction. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 3: 265–298
de Waard C. (1935–1936) Le manuscrit perdu de Snellius sur la refraction. Janus 39(40): 51–73
Dear P. (1995) Discipline and experience: The mathematical way in the scientific revolution. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Gabbey A. (1980) Force and inertia in the seventeenth century: Descartes and Newton. In: Gaukroger S. (eds) Descartes: Philosophy, mathematics and physics. Harvester, Sussex, pp 230–320
Gaukroger S. (1995) Descartes: An intellectual biography. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gaukroger S., Schuster J. A. (2002) The hydrostatic paradox and the origins of Cartesian dynamics. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 33: 535–572
Henry, C., & Tannery, P. (Eds.). (1891–1912). Oeuvres de Fermat. t. II. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
Kepler, J. (1938). In M. Caspar (Ed.), Gesammelte Werke. Munich.
Knudsen O., Pedersen K. M. (1968) The link between “determination” and conservation of motion in Descartes’ dynamics. Centaurus 13: 183–186
Korteweg D.-J. (1896) Descartes et les manuscrits de Snellius d’après quelques documents nouveau. Révue de Métaphysique et de Morale 4: 489–501
Kramer P. (1882) Descartes und das Brechungsgesetz des Lichtes. Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematischer (Natur) Wissenschaften 4: 235–278
Lohne J. (1959) Thomas Harriot (1560–1621). The Tycho Brahe of optics. Centaurus 6: 113–121
Lohne J. (1963) Zur Geschichte des Brechungsgesetzes. Sudhoffs Archiv 47: 152–172
Mahoney M. (1973) The mathematical career of Pierre de Fermat 1601–1665. Princeton University Press, Princeton
McLaughlin P. (2000) Force determination and impact. In: Gaukroger S., Schuster J. A., Sutton J. (eds) Descartes’ natural philosophy. Routledge, London, pp 81–112
Mersenne, M. (1932–1988). In C. de Waard, R. Pintard, B. Rochot, & A. Baelieu (Eds.), Correspondence du P. Marin Mersenne (17 Vols.). Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Milhaud, G. (1921). Descartes savant. Paris: Felix Alcan.
Mouy, P. (1934). Le développement de la physique Cartésienne. Paris: Vrin.
Prendergast T. L. (1975) Motion, action and tendency in Descartes’ physics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 13: 453–462
Sabra A. I. (1967) Theories of light from Descartes to Newton. Oldbourne, London
Schuster J. A. (1980) Descartes’ mathesis universalis: 1618–1628. In: Gaukroger S. W. (eds) Descartes: Philosophy, mathematics and physics. Harvester, Brighton, pp 41–96
Schuster J. A. (1986) Cartesian method as mythic speech: A diachronic and structural analysis. In: Schuster J. A., Yeo R. (eds) The politics and rhetoric of scientific method: Historical studies. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 33–95
Schuster J. A. (1993) Whatever should we do with Cartesian method: Reclaiming Descartes for the history of science. In: Voss S. (eds) Essays on the philosophy and science of René Descartes. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 195–223
Schuster J. A. (2000) Descartes’ Opticien: The construction of the law of refraction and the manufacture of its physical rationales, 1618–29. In: Gaukroger S., Schuster J. A., Sutton J. (eds) Descartes’ natural philosophy. Routledge, London, pp 258–312
Schuster J. A. (2002) L’Aristotelismo e le sue Alternative. In: Garber D. (eds) La Rivoluzione Scientifica. Instituto della Enciclopedia Italiana (in Italian), Rome, pp 337–357
Schuster J. A. (2005) Descartes’ vortical celestial mechanics: A gambit in the natural philosophical contest of the early seventeenth century. In: Anstey P., Schuster J. (eds) The science of nature in the seventeenth century: Changing patterns of early modern natural philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 35–79
Shea W. (1991) The magic of motion and numbers: The scientific career of René Descartes. Science History Publications, Canton MA
Stevin, S. (1586). De Beghinselen des Waterwichts. In The principal works of Simon Stevin (Vol. 1, pp. 415–417). Leiden.
Vollgraff J. A. (1913) Pierre de la Ramée (1515–1572) et Willebrord Snel van Royen (1580–1626). Janus 18: 595–625
Vollgraff J. A. (1936) Snellius notes on the reflection and refraction of rays. Osiris 1: 718–725
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schuster, J.A. Physico-mathematics and the search for causes in Descartes’ optics—1619–1637. Synthese 185, 467–499 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9979-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9979-4